Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot Password? Reset your password

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 27, No. 2, 2010
Issue release date: March 2010
Section title: Mini-Review
Free Access
Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:61–67

Ultrasound in Labor and Delivery

Molina F.S.a · Nicolaides K.H.b
aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospital ‘Virgen de las Nieves’, Granada, Spain; bHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
email Corresponding Author

Dr. Francisca S. Molina

Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

University Hospital ‘Virgen de las Nieves’

Avda. Fuerzas Armadas s/n, ES–18012 Granada (Spain)

Tel. +34 958 02 00 85, Fax +34 958 02 06 53, E-Mail fsoniamolina@gmail.com


  1. RCOG: Induction of labor; in Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Number 9. London, RCOG Clinical Support Unit, 2001.
  2. Crowley P: Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD000170.
  3. Crane JM: Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573–584.
  4. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C: Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1027–1031.
  5. Sizer AR, Nirmal DM: Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:749–752.
  6. Gardberg M, Laakkonen E, Salevaara M: Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:746–749.
  7. Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH: Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:45–48.
  8. Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH: Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:315–322.
  9. Darmstadt GL, Yakoob MY, Haws RA, Menezes EV, Soomro T, Bhutta ZA: Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9(suppl 1):S6.
  10. Rao A, Celik E, Poggi S, Poon L, Nicolaides K: Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:646–651.
  11. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:258–263.
  12. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:264–268.
  13. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH: Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;12:172–177.
  14. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A: Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:59–63.
  15. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, Rudigoz RC: Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:868–874.
  16. Yeo L, Romero R: Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:253–258.
  17. Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B: Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:753–760.
  18. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G: Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:331–336.
  19. Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SAM, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW: Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:326–330.
  20. Barbera A, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte D, Hobbins J: A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:313–319.
  21. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V: Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:165–168.
  22. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH: Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:437–440.
  23. Vacca A, Keirse MJNC: Instrumental vaginal delivery; in Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds): Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989, pp 1216–1233.
  24. Mola GD, Amoa AB, Edilyong J: Factors associated with success or failure in trials of vacuum extraction. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42:35–39.
  25. Wong GY, Mok YM, Wong SF: Transabdominal ultrasound assessment of the fetal head and the accuracy of vacuum cup application. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007;98:120–123.