The present is a review of the gustatory system of lampreys, which are representative of the earliest vertebrates. They are the oldest extant vertebrates that possess taste buds. Because of the phylogenetic position of lampreys, the study of their gustatory system will provide important information to help understand the early evolution of this system in vertebrates. The taste buds of larval lampreys, which are papillae located on the first six pairs of gill arches facing the water current, respond to classical taste substances. They consist of two types of tall differentiated cells, serotonergic biciliated taste receptors (‘light’ cells) and microvillous sustentacular cells (‘dark cells’). The taste buds also contain basal proliferative cells. Afferent gustatory fibers of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves innervate the taste buds of lampreys and contact the basal surface of the biciliated cells without entering the bud. Central processes of the glossopharyngeal and vagal cranial nerves terminate in a caudal rhombencephalic region that may correspond to the nucleus of the solitary tract of gnathostomes. To date, most studies in lampreys have focused on characterizing taste buds; future research should focus on the central processing of the gustatory information. Here we will review the current knowledge about the gustatory system of lampreys to provide a basis for establishing the direction of further studies of this chemosensory system.

Aquatic organisms such as lampreys evolved in a world of dissolved chemicals, and detection of such surrounding chemicals was important for their survival. One of the major chemosensory systems is the gustatory system, which is dedicated to the evaluation of food contents. A sense of taste is important for the detection of both nutritive molecules and harmful substances, which is vital to enable animals to adapt to specific habitats.

The gustatory system in gnathostome vertebrates comprises peripheral receptors (taste buds) that are innervated by fibers of three branchiomeric nerves (facial, glossopharyngeal and vagus), and a series of central nuclei and pathways. Lampreys, which are representatives of the jawless vertebrates (agnathans), are the oldest vertebrates that posses taste buds [Northcutt, 2004]. Lampreys occupy a key phylogenetic position, as the sister group to gnathostomes, between protochordates (amphioxus and tunicates) and gnathostome vertebrates. It is therefore generally accepted that lampreys represent the closest living forms to early vertebrates and that they may be good models for studying the evolution of the chemosensory systems. Since the first studies by Baatrup in the 1980s on the ultrastructure and physiology of the taste buds of lampreys [Baatrup, 1983a, b, 1985a, b], the gustatory system of lampreys has not received much attention. However, recent neurochemical data on the taste buds of sea lampreys have revealed some interesting new aspects of the early evolution of taste buds in vertebrates [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. In the present review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge of the organization and physiology of the gustatory system of lampreys. This will provide a basis for further studies of the gustatory system of lampreys, which in turn will provide valuable information to help understand how these animals have adapted to their habitat as well as to help understand the early evolution of the gustatory system in vertebrates.

Hagfishes are chordates, and perhaps also vertebrates [Ota et al., 2007], which have a system of sensory organs resembling taste buds, the Schreiner organs [Braun, 1998]. Schreiner organs are located extensively – on the skin, the prenasal sinus, the nasopharyngeal duct, the pharynx and, at lower densities, in the oral and velar cavities of hagfishes [Braun, 1998]. These structures were initially described on the tentacles and the skin of the head and body of hagfishes [Retzius, 1892; Schreiner, 1919; Georgieva et al., 1979]. In these early studies, Schreiner organs were initially identified as end buds. End buds are found in large numbers on the skin of many fishes and they are, in most cases, external taste buds similar in structure and innervation to taste buds within the oropharyngeal cavities [Lane and Whitear, 1982]. Out-group analysis has indicated that taste buds were primitively restricted to the oropharynx, and that external taste buds (end buds), distributed over the head and, in some cases, even the trunk, evolved independently a number of times [Northcutt, 2004].

Recent studies have revealed important systematic differences between the organization of the Schreiner organs system of hagfishes and the end bud/taste bud system of vertebrates: (1) Schreiner organs are innervated by sensory trigeminal branches, the glossopharyngeal/vagal nerve and by the cutaneous branches of spinal nerves [Braun, 1998], while gnathostome taste buds are innervated by the facial/glossopharyngeal/vagal nerves [Northcutt, 2004]. (2) The central projections of the nerves innervating Schreiner organs of hagfishes form a continuous tract in the trigeminal sensory zone and the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord, but only some Schreiner organs may be represented in the nucleus of the solitary tract [Braun, 1998], whose rostral part (the gustatory nucleus) is the primary recipient of the gustatory afferents in gnathostomes [see Smith and Davis, 2000]. (3) Supporting cells of Schreiner organs are not associated with high levels of ecto-ATPase [Finger, 2006], which is a key feature of the structurally similar type I cells of vertebrate taste buds in which ATP serves as a neurotransmitter [Finger et al., 2005]. For these reasons, it appears that Schreiner organs are not homologous to end buds/taste buds [Braun, 1998; Finger, 2006]. This sensory modality of hagfishes has no direct homologue in vertebrates, and appears to be a specialization of hagfishes [Braun, 1998]. It is therefore generally accepted that lampreys are the oldest extant vertebrates that possess true taste buds [Finger and Simon, 2000; Northcutt, 2004] and, therefore, that taste buds evolved in the common ancestor of lampreys and gnathostome vertebrates.

Lampreys have clearly differentiated larval and adult stages. Larval lampreys spend most of their time buried within the sand of freshwater streams. They are filter feeders and feed exclusively on microorganisms in suspension, which become embedded in mucus in the pharynx [Moore and Mallat, 1980]. The mouth of larval lampreys is divided into buccal and oral cavities (fig. 2a). The anterior opening of the mouth leads into a large buccal cavity through a narrow oral aperture (fig. 2a). Posterior oral cirri form a ring of branched projections around and across the oral aperture, and prevent the passage of large objects into the oral cavity [Mallat, 1979, 1981]. The muscles used for feeding are innervated by the trigeminal nerve [Homma, 1975]. In larvae, a muscular velum that is also innervated by the trigeminal nerve pumps water through the pharynx and gills [Johnston, 1905] (fig. 2a). The water current used for respiration and feeding flows into the pharynx by the coordinated action of the velum movements and by the sequential contraction and expansion of the branchial region. The water comes out through the seven pairs of branchiopores. The pharyngeal region is also the site where food particles are trapped before passing into the esophagus. Tracts of ciliated cells present in the pharynx help to move the food cord, which is formed by mucus secretion and trapped particles, toward the esophagus. These ciliated tracts are prominent in the bilateral pseudobranchial grooves, in the hypobranchial groove, and in the anterolateral surfaces of the gill seams [Mallat, 1979]. The first six pairs of gill arches bear volcano-like papillae that face the water current (fig. 1, 2a). These gill structures were identified in larval lampreys in early light [Schreiner, 1879; Retzius, 1893; Schaffer, 1895; Alcock, 1899] and electron microscopic studies [Mallat, 1979] as taste buds. According to Alcock [1899] and Pietschmann [1929], these organs of larval lampreys are innervated by branches of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves.

Fig. 1

Schematic drawing showing the location of taste buds in relation to the gill support elements, the afferent innervation (at the left) and the location of the nucleus of the solitary tract in relation to other rhombencephalic nuclei (at the right) in larval lampreys. Top schematic drawing: transverse section at the level of the caudal rhombencephalon where the nucleus of the solitary tract is located (at the right). Bottom schematic drawing: oblique, more caudal section of the branchial region in which rostral is at the top. Modified from Barreiro-Iglesias et al. [2008c].

Fig. 1

Schematic drawing showing the location of taste buds in relation to the gill support elements, the afferent innervation (at the left) and the location of the nucleus of the solitary tract in relation to other rhombencephalic nuclei (at the right) in larval lampreys. Top schematic drawing: transverse section at the level of the caudal rhombencephalon where the nucleus of the solitary tract is located (at the right). Bottom schematic drawing: oblique, more caudal section of the branchial region in which rostral is at the top. Modified from Barreiro-Iglesias et al. [2008c].

Close modal
Fig. 2

Schematic drawings of sagittal head sections comparing the organization of the oral/pharyngeal regions between larval (a) and adult (b) lampreys. Note that in larvae the taste buds (white circles) are located in a common respiratory and digestive canal, while in adults the taste buds are located in the respiratory canal because of development of the secondary esophagus. Modified from Kawasaki and Rovainen [1988].

Fig. 2

Schematic drawings of sagittal head sections comparing the organization of the oral/pharyngeal regions between larval (a) and adult (b) lampreys. Note that in larvae the taste buds (white circles) are located in a common respiratory and digestive canal, while in adults the taste buds are located in the respiratory canal because of development of the secondary esophagus. Modified from Kawasaki and Rovainen [1988].

Close modal

The anatomy of adult lampreys differs considerably from that of the larvae because of the changes that take place during metamorphosis. In the adult, a secondarily formed esophagus begins as a dorsal orifice of the oral cavity at the level of the velum and communicates directly with the oral cavity (fig. 2b), also called ‘pharynx’ by early authors. During transformation, the larval pharynx becomes a respiratory region, formed by the water tube with the associated branchial chambers. The secondarily formed esophagus is separated from the more ventrally located water tube by cartilaginous processes [Weissenberg, 1926] (fig. 2b). After metamorphosis, lampreys are carnivorous and feed on a variety of bottom fauna, including worms and crustacea, in addition to fish tissues. Half of all living species of lampreys [38] are parasitic and feed on fishes by sucking their blood and tissues [Hardisty, 2006]. In adult lampreys, taste buds have also been described in the inner branchiopores joining the water tube and branchial chambers of the pharynx (fig. 2b) [Retzius, 1893; Fahrenholz, 1936]. Like larval taste buds, the buds of adult lampreys are innervated by branches of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves [Alcock, 1899; Johnston, 1905; Pietschmann, 1929].

Experimental studies in gnathostomes have shown that taste buds are innervated by branches of the facial, glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves [see Northcutt, 2004]. If the taste buds of lampreys lack facial nerve innervation, this would indicate that this is an evolutionary novelty of gnathostome vertebrates. However, it is now known that in lampreys the rostral part of the first gill, which bears taste buds [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c], is innervated by the facial nerve [Guimond et al., 2003]. Therefore, the possible facial nerve innervation of the taste buds located on the first gill of lampreys should be determined by use of modern tract-tracing techniques.

Transmission electron microscopic studies have revealed that the structure of the taste buds of larval and adult lampreys is very similar [Baatrup, 1983a, b]. Taste buds are located close to the origin of the gill filaments on the surface, which turns towards the inside of the pharyngeal cavity. Each papilla appears as a volcano-like elevation (100–150 µm in diameter) extending between 50 and 100 µm beyond the surrounding general surface [Baatrup, 1983a].

The taste buds consist of tall elongated cells that extend through the entire length of the epithelium. With light microscopy, it is possible to distinguish between ‘light’ and ‘dark’ elongated cells in the taste buds of lampreys. These cell types can also be distinguished on the basis of their apical processes by electron microscopy: those with electron-dense cytoplasm end apically in a tuft of microvilli, while the more electron-lucent cells are ciliated. The ciliated cells are separated by the microvillar cells that surround them [Baatrup, 1983a].

Each ciliated cell bears two 2- to 5-µm-long cilia (biciliated cells) with a 9 + 2 microtubular arrangement; they originate from basal bodies with 2–5 basal feet in larvae [Baatrup, 1983a] and 2–4 basal feet in adults [Baatrup, 1983b]. Neither accessory centrioles nor rootlets are associated with the basal bodies [Baatrup, 1983a]. The basal region of these cells is filled with vesicles with electron-lucent contents and also with a small number of dense-cored vesicles (100–120 nm). The microvillar cells extend 1.5 µm beyond the surface of the neighboring ciliated cells. The microvilli are circular in cross section and have a central core of microfilaments, which continues proximally into the apical cytoplasm [Baatrup, 1983a].

Afferent nerve fibers do not enter the taste buds of lampreys [Baatrup, 1983a, b], unlike mammals and other jawed vertebrates [Finger, 2006]. However, nerve fibers are numerous in the connective tissue below the taste buds. They are 1.3–2 µm in diameter. Contacts, which may be interpreted as chemical synapses, are only found between biciliated cells and fiber varicosities. These connections are established through holes in the basal lamina between the ciliated cell and the subjacent afferent fiber. There is some degree of membrane thickening at these sites.

A third cell type has occasionally been observed by electron microscopy in taste buds of lampreys. These are spherical ‘basal cells’ with a thin layer of cytoplasm enveloping a cell nucleus showing deep invaginations [Baatrup, 1983a]. They have been considered as Merkel cells, because they are structurally similar to those on the skin [Whitear and Lane, 1981], since they have microvilli and spur synapses [Baatrup, 1985a]. These basal ‘Merkel cells’ are only observed in some buds and are absent from others. No mitotic activity has been observed in this type of cell [Baatrup, 1983a].

Baatrup [1983b] reported the absence of mitotic activity in cells surrounding the taste buds of adult lampreys, but proliferation has only been evaluated by use of proliferation markers in the taste buds of larval lampreys [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. The taste buds of larval lampreys mainly consist of non-proliferating cells. As indicated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry and bromodeoxyuridine labeling experiments, the tall cells (ciliated and microvillar cells) of taste buds of larval lampreys are non-proliferating. In contrast, a few spherical cells surrounding the taste buds are proliferating cells. These cells are located below the basal cell layer of the epithelium. Occasionally, proliferating cells can be observed above or below the basal lamina or intermingled with the elongated cells of the taste bud. The cells above and below the basal lamina may be considered as progenitor cells of the tall taste bud cells, as described in gnathostome vertebrates [Finger, 2006]. Further studies with proliferation markers should confirm the early observations of Baatrup [1983b], i.e. the absence of mitotic activity in cells surrounding the taste buds of adult lampreys.

Early morphological data on the structure of the taste buds of brook and river lampreys, obtained by light and electron microscopy [Baatrup, 1983a, b, 1985b], have recently been supported by findings obtained by use of anti-acetylated α-tubulin immunofluorescence techniques [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. Antibodies against acetylated α-tubulin can be used as ciliary markers [Piperno and Fuller, 1985] and as general markers of neuronal-like elements in both peripheral and central nervous system [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008a, b]. In taste buds of the sea lampreys, only the biciliated cells are α-tubulin immunoreactive [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c] (fig. 3). These immunofluorescence experiments have confirmed the presence of two cilia in the sensory cells of the taste buds of the sea lampreyand the neuronal-like microtubular cytoskeleton of the cells. In addition, α-tubulin-immunoreactive afferent fibers contact these biciliated tubulin-ir cells without entering the taste bud [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c] (fig. 3), as previously reported in electron microscopic studies (see above). Biciliated cells and most afferent gustatory fibers are also immunoreactive to the neuronal marker calretinin (an EF hand calcium-binding protein) [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. Calretinin was initially discovered as a marker for amphibian taste buds [Barlow and Northcutt, 1997]. Calretinin expression has also been observed in taste cells of teleost fishes [Díaz-Regueira et al., 2005; Northcutt, 2005].

Fig. 3

Photomicrograph of a horizontal section of the pharynx of a larval sea lamprey showing colocalization of serotonin (red channel) and tubulin (green channel) immunoreactivities in the biciliated taste bud cells [for experimental procedures see Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. Note the presence of the apical cilia of the putative taste receptors (arrow). Note also the presence of the afferent gustatory fibers of the glossopharyngeal nerve surrounding and contacting the taste bud cells (arrowhead). The star indicates the pharyngeal cavity. Scale bar = 60 µm.

Fig. 3

Photomicrograph of a horizontal section of the pharynx of a larval sea lamprey showing colocalization of serotonin (red channel) and tubulin (green channel) immunoreactivities in the biciliated taste bud cells [for experimental procedures see Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. Note the presence of the apical cilia of the putative taste receptors (arrow). Note also the presence of the afferent gustatory fibers of the glossopharyngeal nerve surrounding and contacting the taste bud cells (arrowhead). The star indicates the pharyngeal cavity. Scale bar = 60 µm.

Close modal

A schematic drawing comparing the structure of the taste buds in representative vertebrates is shown in figure 4. Immunofluorescence experiments have also shown that the biciliated cells of the taste buds of lampreys are serotonin (fig. 3) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactive [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. As far as we are aware, the existence of CGRP-immunoreactive cells has not been reported in the taste buds of any other vertebrate species, which indicates that this is probably a unique characteristic of lampreys. Serotonin has only been observed in scarce Merkel-like basal cells in the taste buds of other anamniotes [Toyoshima and Shimamura, 1987; Delay and Roper, 1988; Delay et al., 1993; Reutter and Witt, 1993]. Merkel-like basal cells have been observed in the taste buds of lampreys by electron microscopy [Baatrup, 1983a], but have not been observed in immunofluorescence studies with an anti-serotonin antibody [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. In mammals, some type III taste receptors are tall serotonergic cells [Yee et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2009] and/or noradrenergic [Huang et al., 2009], which may resemble lamprey serotonergic taste bud cells morphologically. However, homology between these cell types appears unlikely because of the absence of a similar cell type in jawed fishes or amphibians and the ciliary nature of serotonergic cells of lampreys. In addition, the negative results with TH (the common and rate-limiting enzyme of the catecholamine synthetic pathways) in the taste buds of the sea lampreys strongly suggests that taste cells of lampreys do not use noradrenaline [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2008c]. The morphological/neurochemical resemblance between serotonergic biciliated cells of lampreys and mammalian type III serotonergic taste receptors may be the result of convergent evolution.

Fig. 4

Schematic drawing showing organization of the TBs of lampreys and of representative species of fishes, amphibians and mammals. White cells in the larval sea lamprey bud represent sustentacular microvillar cells. Afferent gustatory fibers are in black. Slightly modified from Barreiro-Iglesias et al. [2008c].

Fig. 4

Schematic drawing showing organization of the TBs of lampreys and of representative species of fishes, amphibians and mammals. White cells in the larval sea lamprey bud represent sustentacular microvillar cells. Afferent gustatory fibers are in black. Slightly modified from Barreiro-Iglesias et al. [2008c].

Close modal

In mammals, the main taste receptors are the type II taste cells (the light cells of mammalian taste buds). Different subtypes of type II cells have been reported, and are distinguishable by the expression of different proteins such as gustducin, phospholipase Cβ2 [Matsumura et al., 2009] and TRPM5 [Oike et al., 2006]. As regards the transmitters used by mammalian type II cells, recent studies reveal that they are purinergic (release ATP) [see Huang et al., 2009]. Further neurochemical studies should investigate whether serotonergic biciliated cells of lampreys express these protein markers specific to different subsets of mammalian type II taste receptor cells, and also whether some cells in the taste buds of lampreys use purinergic mechanisms of neurotransmission. In addition, cloning of serotonergic and purinergic receptors of lampreys and the study of their possible expression in taste bud cells and/or afferent gustatory fibers may also provide important information about the neurochemical transmission of the gustatory inputs in lampreys and about the evolution of the gustatory system in vertebrates.

The physiology of the taste buds of lampreys has only been studied in larvae of Lampetra planeri [Baatrup, 1985a]. In this study, evaluation of the functional properties of the taste buds of L. planeri was performed by means of recording from nerve fibers obtained from the gill arch during mechanical and chemical stimulation. No mechanical responses were detected, but the buds were sensitive to chemical stimulants. Of the classical taste substances in gnathostomes, sodium chloride and quinine proved to be the most effective (threshold concentrations of 10–6M). The threshold concentration of sucrose and acetic acid was 10–3M. The most potent stimulants were the amino acids L-arginine and L-alanine (threshold concentrations of 10–7M). For L-serine and L-glutamic acid, the threshold concentrations were 10–5 and 10–4M, respectively. The physiological study by Baatrup [1985a] confirmed the role of the larval taste buds of lampreys in the reception and transmission of gustatory inputs and the homology between lampreys and gnathostome taste buds. However, the location of the taste buds of adult lampreys in the water (respiratory) tube and not in a common respiratory and digestive tract as in larvae suggests that pharyngeal buds of lampreys may serve other purposes, e.g. possible evaluation of oxygen levels in respiratory water [Baatrup, 1983b], as recently suggested for other serotonergic peripheral cell types in gills of lampreys [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2009]. In any case, the location of the taste buds in the respiratory water tube does not exclude the possibility that they play a role in the detection of taste substances that are dissolved in the surrounding water. Further studies analyzing the physiology of adult taste buds and the cloning of the possible taste receptors of lampreys should clarify this point.

As far as we are aware, the organization of the central gustatory system has not been specifically studied in lampreys. In mammals, the gustatory afferents of the facial nerve enter into the gustatory nucleus directly (rostral part of the nucleus of the solitary tract) and the afferents of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves enter more caudally and ascend with solitary tract until they reach their targets in the gustatory nucleus [see Smith and Davis, 2000]. Koyama [2005] observed central targets of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves in the brain of Lampetra japonica by means of tract-tracing experiments. It should be taken into account that this study reported the overall central projections of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves and was not specific to the gustatory central afferents.

Thick ascending afferent fibers labeled from both the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves of lampreys mainly terminate in the ipsilateral cerebellar area, medial octavolateral nucleus, and between the ventral octavolateral nucleus and descending tract and nucleus of the trigeminal nerve [Koyama, 2005]. In the area between the descending tract and the ventral octavolateral nucleus (fig. 1), central fibers of both nerves course near the dorsal margin of the rostral part of the descending tract, and shift dorsally in the caudal part. Koyama [2005] did not determine whether the ascending fibers pertain to the vagal and glossopharyngeal nerves or are actually lateral line fibers coursing in peripheral branches of these nerves. Thinner varicose fibers are observed in the marginal region at the level of the vagal nerve entry [Koyama, 2005].

In lampreys, a nucleus equivalent to the nucleus of the solitary tract has been neurochemically identified by use of antibodies against different neuropeptides [Auclair et al., 2004 (tachykinins); Pombal et al., 2006 (neuropeptide FF); Pombal et al., 2008 (adrenomedullin)] in a region dorsal to the descending trigeminal tract in the caudal rhombencephalon. This cell population forms a well-delineated nucleus ventrally to the ventral octavolateral nucleus at the level of the vagal motor nucleus (fig. 1). These neuropeptides are also expressed by neurons of the nucleus of the solitary tract of different gnathostome species [Zhang and Ashwell, 2001 (tachykinins); Kivipelto et al., 1989, 1992; Crespo et al., 2003 (neuropeptide FF); Muñoz et al., 2001 (adrenomedullin)], which suggests that the neurochemical features of this nucleus were mainly established before separation of agnathans and gnathostomes. However, differences can be observed between lampreys and gnathostomes with regard to the expression of neuronal markers within this nucleus. In gnathostomes, some neurons of the nucleus of the solitary tract are catecholaminergic [Kivipelto et al., 1992; Cheng et al., 2006], whereas tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity [Pierre-Simons et al., 2002; Pombal et al., 2006; Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2010a] and tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA expression [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2010b] have not been observed in the nucleus of the solitary tract of lampreys.

In gnathostomes, the gustatory nucleus (rostral part of the nucleus of the solitary tract) projects to the parabrachial complex, thalamus and the reticular formation [see Smith and Davis, 2000]. Tract-tracing experiments in lampreys have only demonstrated the existence of afferent projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the middle and posterior reticular formation of the rhombencephalon [González et al., 1997], and the presence of a parabrachial complex homologue (or a secondary gustatory nucleus, as reported in teleosts) is uncertain. Projections to the lateral hypothalamus from the gustatory neurons of the parabrachial complex [Smith and Davis, 2000; Lei et al., 2008] appear to be related to the role of hypothalamic nuclei in feeding control [Lei et al., 2008]. Recent neurochemical data in lampreys also suggest that the lateral hypothalamic nucleus plays a role in the control of feeding in lampreys [Barreiro-Iglesias et al., 2010a]. Further studies should be performed to decipher the ascending gustatory pathways of lampreys and the central circuits of lampreys that participate in processing the gustatory information.

Physiological studies have shown that the taste buds of lampreys, at least in larval lampreys, respond to common taste stimulants. Studies performed to date suggest that the biciliated cells of the taste buds in lampreys are probably the taste receptors and that microvillar cells are sustentacular cells. Serotonin is probably the main neurotransmitter for the transmission of the gustatory input from the biciliated taste receptors to the afferent gustatory fibers that contact the base of these cells, while CGRP may act as a neuromodulator during the transmission of the gustatory input to the afferent fibers. The presence of calretinin (a cytoplasmic calcium buffer) in the biciliated cells may be associated with modulation of serotonin and CGRP release by calcium influx following activation of cells [Evans et al., 2000]. The results of anatomical and neurochemical studies suggest that the central target of the gustatory fibers of the cranial nerves may be homologous to the nucleus of the solitary tract of gnathostomes. The ascending secondary pathways of the gustatory system of lampreys must be investigated to provide new insights into the early evolution of this system in vertebrates.

Grant sponsors: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (BFU2004-01080), the Xunta de Galicia (PGIDIT05PXIC20004PN and INCITE09ENA 200036ES) and a María Barbeito contract from the Xunta de Galicia to A. Barreiro-Iglesias.

1.
Alcock R (1899): The peripheral distribution of the craneal nerves of ammocetes. J Anat Physiol 33:133–135.
2.
Auclair F, Lund JP, Dubuc R (2004): Immunohistochemical distribution of tachykinins in the CNS of the lamprey Petromyzon marinus. J Comp Neurol 479:328–346.
3.
Baatrup E (1983a): Ciliated receptors in the pharyngeal terminal buds of larval Lampetra planeri (Bloch) (Cyclostomata). Acta Zool 64:67–75.
4.
Baatrup E (1983b): Terminal buds in the branchial tube of the brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) (Bloch) – putative respiratory monitors. Acta Zool 64:139–147.
5.
Baatrup E (1985a): Physiological studies on the pharyngeal terminal buds in the larval brook lamprey, Lampetra planeri (Bloch). Chem Senses 10:549–558.
6.
Baatrup E (1985b): Sensory terminal buds of larval and adult lampreys. Fortschr Zool 30:723–725.
7.
Barlow LA, Northcutt RG (1997): Taste buds develop autonomously from endoderm without induction by cephalic neural crest or paraxial mesoderm. Development 124:949–957.
8.
Barreiro-Iglesias A, Aldegunde M, Anadón R, Rodicio MC (2009): Extensive presence of serotonergic cells and fibers in the peripheral nervous system of lampreys. J Comp Neurol 512:478–499.
9.
Barreiro-Iglesias A, Anadón R, Rodicio MC (2010a): New insights on the neuropeptide Y system in the larval lamprey brain: Neuropeptide Y immunoreactive neurons, descending spinal projections and comparison with tyrosine hydroxylase and GABA immunoreactivities. Neuroscience 167:396–413.
10.
Barreiro-Iglesias A, Laramore C, Shifman MI, Anadón R, Selzer ME, Rodicio MC (2010b): The sea lamprey tyrosine hydroxylase: cDNA cloning and in situ hybridization study in the brain. Neuroscience 168:659–669.
11.
Barreiro-Iglesias A, Villar-Cheda B, Abalo XM, Anadón R, Rodicio MC (2008a): The early scaffold of axon tracts in the brain of a primitive vertebrate, the sea lamprey. Brain Res Bull 75:42–52.
12.
Barreiro-Iglesias A, Gómez-López MP, Anadón R, Rodicio MC (2008b): Early development of the cranial nerves in a primitive vertebrate, the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus L. Open Zool J 1:37–43.
13.
Barreiro-Iglesias A, Villar-Cerviño V, Villar-Cheda B, Anadón R, Rodicio MC (2008c): Neurochemical characterization of sea lamprey taste buds and afferent gustatory fibers: presence of serotonin, calretinin, and CGRP immunoreactivity in taste bud biciliated cells of the earliest vertebrates. J Comp Neurol 511:438–453.
14.
Braun CB (1998): Schreiner organs: a new craniate chemosensory modality in hagfishes. J Comp Neurol 392:135–163.
15.
Cheng G, Zhu H, Zhou X, Qu J, Ashwell KW, Paxinos G (2006): Development of the human nucleus of the solitary tract: a cyto- and chemoarchitectural study. Auton Neurosci 128:76–95.
16.
Crespo M, Moreno N, López JM, González A (2003): Comparative analysis of neuropeptide FF-like immunoreactivity in the brain of anuran (Rana perezi, Xenopus laevis) and urodele (Pleurodeles waltl) amphibians. J Chem Neuroanat 25:53–71.
17.
Delay RJ, Roper SD (1988): Ultrastructure of taste cells and synapses in the mudpuppy Necturus maculosus. J Comp Neurol 277:268–280.
18.
Delay RJ, Taylor R, Roper SD (1993): Merkel-like basal cells in Necturus taste buds contain serotonin. J Comp Neurol 335:606–613.
19.
Díaz-Regueira SM, Lamas J, Anadón R (2005): Calretinin immunoreactivity in taste buds and afferent fibers of the grey mullet Chelon labrosus. Brain Res 1031:297–301.
20.
Evans BN, Rosenblatt MI, Mnayer LO, Oliver KR, Dickerson IM (2000): CGRP-RCP, a novel protein required for signal transduction at calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin receptors. J Biol Chem 275:31438–31443.
21.
Fahrenholz C (1936): Die sensiblen Einrichtungen der Neunaugenhaut. Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch 40:323–380.
22.
Finger TE (2006): Evolution of taste; in Kaas J, Bullock TH (eds): The Evolution of Nervous Systems. Academic Press, Oxford, vol 2, pp 424–438.
23.
Finger TE, Danilova V, Barrows J, Bartel DL, Vigers AJ, Stone L, Hellekant G, Kinnamon SC (2005): ATP signaling is crucial for communication from taste buds to gustatory nerves. Science 310:1495–1499.
24.
Finger TE, Simon SA (2000): Cell biology of taste epithelium; in Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds): The Neurobiology of Taste and Smell. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, pp 353–392.
25.
Georgieva V, Patzner RA, Adam H (1979): Transmissions- und rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchung an den Sinnesknospen der Tentakeln von Myxine glutinosa L. (Cyclostomata). Zool Scripta 8:61–67.
26.
González MJ, Manso MJ, Anadón R (1997): Octavolateral neurons projecting to the middle and posterior rhombencephalic reticular nuclei of larval lamprey: a retrograde horseradish peroxidase labeling study. J Comp Neurol 384:396–408.
27.
Guimond JC, Auclair F, Lund JP, Dubuc R (2003): Anatomical and physiological study of respiratory motor innervation in lampreys. Neuroscience 122:259–266.
28.
Hardisty MW (2006): Lampreys: Life without jaws. Forrest text, Ceredigion.
29.
Homma S (1975): Velar motoneurons of lamprey larvae. J Comp Physiol A 104:175–183.
30.
Huang YA, Dando R, Roper SD (2009): Autocrine and paracrine roles for ATP and serotonin in mouse taste buds. J Neurosci 29:13909–13918.
31.
Johnston JB (1905): The cranial nerve components of Petromyzon. J Morph 34:149–203.
32.
Kawasaki R, Rovainen CM (1988): Feeding behavior by parasitic phase lampreys, Ichthyomyzon unicuspis. Brain Behav Evol 32:317–329.
33.
Kivipelto L, Aarnisalo AA, Panula P (1992): Neuropeptide FF is colocalized with catecholamine synthesizing enzymes in neurons of the nucleus of the solitary tract. Neurosci Lett 143:190–194.
34.
Kivipelto L, Majane EA, Yang HYT, Panula P (1989): Immunohistochemical distribution and partial characterization of FLFQPQRFamide-like peptides in the central nervous system of rats. J Comp Neurol 186:269–287.
35.
Koyama H (2005): Organization of the sensory and motor nuclei of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves in lampreys. Zoolog Sci 22:469–476.
36.
Lane EB, Whitear M (1982) Sensory structures at the surface of fish skin. I. Putative chemoreceptors. Zool J Linn Soc 75:141–151.
37.
Lei Q, Yan J, Huang T, Shi J, Yang X, Lv B, Li Q (2008): Role of the lateral hypothalamus in modulating responses of parabrachial gustatory neurons in the rat. Brain Res Bull 77:165–171.
38.
Mallat J (1979): Surface morphology and functions of pharyngeal structures in the larval lamprey Petromyzon marinus. J Morphol 162:249–274.
39.
Mallat J (1981): The suspension feeding mechanism of the larval lamprey Petromyzon marinus. J Zool Lond 194:103–142.
40.
Matsumura S, Eguchi A, Mizushige T, Kitabayashi N, Tsuzuki S, Inoue K, Fushiki T (2009): Colocalization of GPR120 with phospholipase-Cbeta2 and alpha-gustducin in the taste bud cells in mice. Neurosci Lett 450:186–190.
41.
Moore JW, Mallat JM (1980): Feeding of larval lamprey. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:1658–1664.
42.
Muñoz M, Martínez A, Cuttita F, González A (2001): Distribution of adrenomedullin-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the frog. J Chem Neuroanat 21:105–123.
43.
Northcutt RG (2004): Taste buds: development and evolution. Brain Behav Evol 64:198–206.
44.
Northcutt RG (2005): Taste bud development in the channel catfish. J Comp Neurol 482:1–16.
45.
Oike H, Wakamori M, Mori Y, Nakanishi H, Taguchi R, Misaka T, Matsumoto I, Abe K (2006): Arachidonic acid can function as a signaling modulator by activating the TRPM5 cation channel in taste receptor cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1761:1078–1084.
46.
Ota KG, Kuraku S, Kuratani S (2007): Hagfish embryology with reference to the evolution of the neural crest. Nature 446:672–675.
47.
Pierre-Simons J, Repérant J, Mahouche M, Ward R (2002): Development of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive systems in the brain of the larval lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis. J Comp Neurol 447:163–176.
48.
Pietschmann V (1929): Cyclostomata. In: Handbuch der Zoologie. de Gruyter, Berlin, vol 6/1, pp 127–547.
49.
Piperno G, Fuller MT (1985) Monoclonal antibodies specific for an acetylated form of alpha-tubulin recognize the antigen in cilia and flagella from a variety of organisms. J Cell Biol 10:2085–2094.
50.
Pombal MA, López JM, de Arriba MC, Megías M, González A (2006): Distribution of neuropeptide FF-like immunoreactive structures in the lamprey central nervous system and its relation to catecholaminergic neuronal structures. Peptides 27:1054–1072.
51.
Pombal MA, López JM, Arriba M del C, González A, Megías M (2008): Distribution of adrenomedullin-like immunoreactivity in the brain of the adult sea lamprey. Brain Res Bull 75:261–265.
52.
Retzius G (1892): Ueber die sensiblen Nervenendigungen in den Epithelien bei den Wirbelthieren. Biologische Untersuchungen, Neue Folge 4:37–44.
53.
Retzius G (1893): Über Geschmacksknospen bei Petromyzon. Biol Unters V:69–70.
54.
Reutter K, Witt M (1993): Morphology of vertebrate taste organs and their nerve supply; in Simon SA, Roper SD (eds): Mechanisms of taste transduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 29–82.
55.
Schaffer J (1895): Ueber das Epithel des Kiemendarms von Ammocoetes nebst Bemerkungen über intraepitheliale Drüsen. Arch Mikrosk Anat 45:294–338.
56.
Schreiner A (1879): Beiträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wirbeltiere. G Reimer, Berlin.
57.
Schreiner KE (1919): Zur Kenntnis der Zellgranula. Untersuchungen über den feineren Bau der Haut von Myxine glutinosa. Archiv Mikr Anat 92:1–63.
58.
Smith DV, Davis BJ (2000): Neural representation of taste; in Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds): The Neurobiology of Taste and Smell. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, pp 353–392.
59.
Toyoshima K, Shimamura A (1987): Monoamine-containing basal cells in the taste buds of the newt Triturus pyrrhogaster. Arch Oral Biol 32:619–621.
60.
Weissenberg R (1926):Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Biologie und Morphologie der Neunaugen. I. Vorderdarm und Mundbewaffnung bei Lampetra fluviatilis und planeri. Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch5:153–184.
61.
Whitear M, Lane EB (1981) Fine structure of Merkel cells in lampreys. Cell Tissue Res 220:139–151.
62.
Yee CL, Yang R, Bottger B, Finger TE, Kinnamon JC (2001): ‘Type III’ cells of rat taste buds: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of neuron-specific enolase, protein gene product 9.5, and serotonin. J Comp Neurol 440:97–108.
63.
Zhang LL, Ashwell KW (2001): Development of the cyto- and chemoarchitectural organization of the rat nucleus of the solitary tract. Anat Embryol (Berl) 203:265–282.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.