Sex chromosome evolution in mammals has been extensively investigated through chromosome-painting analyses. In some rodent species from the subfamily Arvicolinae the sex chromosomes contain remarkable features such as giant size, a consequence of heterochromatic enlargement, or asynaptic behaviour during male meiosis. Here, we have made a comparative study of the sex chromosomes in 6 arvicolid species using different probes from the X and Y chromosomes of 3 species, in order to gain knowledge about intra- or interspecific preservation of euchromatic regions. Our results clearly reveal poor conservation of the euchromatic region of the Y chromosome within these species, while the euchromatin on the X chromosome is extremely well preserved. Furthermore, we detected no clear correlation between the synaptic/asynaptic behaviour of the sex chromosomes, and the presence or absence of sequence homology within their euchromatic regions. Notably, our study has shown a new relationship between the giant sex chromosomes of 2 species, Microtus agrestis and Microtus cabrerae, that is, both X and Y share a novel region of common sequences in the euchromatin that is not present in the other species analysed. This interspecific euchromatic conservation, limited to the giant sex chromosomes, could point towards a common evolutionary origin for the heterochromatic enlargement process that has characterized the evolution of the sex chromosomes in some arvicolid species.

Keywords:
Microtus, Sex chromosome evolution, Chromosome painting, Heterochromatin
1.
Acosta MJ, Marchal JA, Fernandez-Espartero CH, Bullejos M, Sanchez A: Retroelements (LINEs and SINEs) in vole genomes: differential distribution in the constitutive heterochromatin. Chromosome Res 16:949–959 (2008).
2.
Acosta MJ, Marchal JA, Mitsainas GP, Rovatsos MT, Fernandez-Espartero CH, et al: A new pericentromeric repeated DNA sequence in Microtus thomasi. Cytogenet Genome Res 124:27–36 (2009).
3.
Borodin PM, Sablina OV, Rodionova MI: Pattern of X-Y chromosome pairing in microtine rodents. Hereditas 123:17–23 (1995).
4.
Castiglia R, Annesi F, Aloise G, Amori G: Systematics of the Microtus savii complex (Rodentia, Cricetidae) via mitochondrial DNA analyses: paraphyly and pattern of sex chromosome evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 46:1157–1164 (2008).
5.
Chaline J, Graf JD: Phylogeny of the Arvicolidae (Rodentia): biochemical and paleontological evidence. J Mammal 69:22–33 (1988).
6.
Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T: Chromosome painting in farm, pet and wild animal species. Methods Cell Sci 23:37–55 (2001).
7.
Das PJ, Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T: Characterization of the bovine pseudoautosomal region and comparison with sheep, goat, and other mammalian pseudoautosomal regions. Cytogenet Genome Res 126:139–147 (2009).
8.
De la Fuente R, Parra MT, Viera A, Calvente A, Gomez R, et al: Meiotic pairing and segregation of achiasmate sex chromosomes in eutherian mammals: the role of SYCP3 protein. PLoS Genet 3:e198 (2007).
9.
Ellis N, Goodfellow PN: The mammalian pseudoautosomal region. Trends Genet 5:406–410 (1989).
10.
Ellison JW, Li X, Francke U, Shapiro LJ: Rapid evolution of human pseudoautosomal genes and their mouse homologs. Mamm Genome 7:25–30 (1996).
11.
Gianfrancesco F, Sanges R, Esposito T, Tempesta S, Rao E, et al: Differential divergence of three human pseudoautosomal genes and their mouse homologs: implications for sex chromosome evolution. Genome Res 11:2095–2100 (2001).
12.
Gifalli-Iughetti C, Koiffmann CP: The Y chromosome of the Atelidae family (Platyrrhini): study by chromosome microdissection. Cytogenet Genome Res 125:46–53 (2009).
13.
Glas R, Marshall Graves JA, Toder R, Ferguson-Smith M, O’Brien PC: Cross-species chromosome painting between human and marsupial directly demonstrates the ancient region of the mammalian X. Mamm Genome 10:1115–1116 (1999).
14.
Iannuzzi L, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Incarnato D, Schibler L, Cribiu EP: Comparative FISH mapping of bovid X chromosomes reveals homologies and divergences between the subfamilies bovinae and caprinae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 89:171–176 (2000).
15.
Kirsch S, Munch C, Jiang Z, Cheng Z, Chen L, et al: Evolutionary dynamics of segmental duplications from human Y-chromosomal euchromatin/heterochromatin transition regions. Genome Res 18:1030–1042 (2008).
16.
Lee C, Griffin DK, O’Brien PC, Yang F, Lin CC, Ferguson-Smith MA: Defining the anatomy of the Rangifer tarandus sex chromosomes. Chromosoma 107:61–69 (1998).
17.
Marais G, Galtier N: Sex chromosomes: how X-Y recombination stops. Curr Biol 13:R641–643 (2003).
18.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Diaz de la Guardia R, Sanchez A: Sex chromosomes, sex determination, and sex-linked sequences in Microtidae. Cytogenet Genome Res 101:266–273 (2003).
19.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Nietzel H, Sperling K, Bullejos M, et al: X chromosome painting in Microtus: origin and evolution of the giant sex chromosomes. Chromosome Res 12:767–776 (2004a).
20.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Diaz de la Guardia R, Sanchez A: A repeat DNA sequence from the Y chromosome in species of the genus Microtus. Chromosome Res 12:757–765 (2004b).
21.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Puerma E, Diaz de la Guardia R, Sanchez A: Distribution of L1-retroposons on the giant sex chromosomes of Microtus cabrerae (Arvicolidae, Rodentia): functional and evolutionary implications. Chromosome Res 14:177–186 (2006).
22.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Diaz de la Guardia R, Sanchez A: Origin and spread of the SRY gene on the X and Y chromosomes of the rodent Microtus cabrerae: role of L1 elements. Genomics 91:142–151 (2008).
23.
Marshall Graves JA, Shetty S: Sex from W to Z: evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes and sex determining genes. J Exp Zool 290:449–462 (2001).
24.
Maruyama T, Imai HT: Molecular phylogeny of European muroid rodents based on complete cytochrome b sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evo 16:37–47 (1981).
25.
Mazurok NA, Rubtsova NV, Isaenko AA, Pavlova ME, Slobodyanyuk SY, et al: Comparative chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses and phylogenetic relationships within common voles (Microtus, Arvicolidae). Chromosome Res 9:107–120 (2001).
26.
Megías-Nogales B, Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Díaz de la Guardia R, Sánchez A: Sex chromosomes pairing in two Arvicolidae species: Microtus nivalis and Arvicola sapidus. Hereditas 138:114–121 (2003).
27.
Mitsainas, GP; Rovatsos, MT; Rizou, EI, Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB: Sex chromosome variability outlines the pathway to the chromosomal evolution in Microtus thomasi (Rodentia, Arvicolinae). Bio J Linn Soc 96:685–695 (2009).
28.
Modi WS: C-Banding analyses and the evolution of heterochromatin among arvicolid rodents. J Mammal 68:704–714 (1987).
29.
Muller S, Stanyon R, O’Brien PC, Ferguson-Smith MA, Plesker R, Wienberg J: Defining the ancestral karyotype of all primates by multidirectional chromosome painting between tree shrews, lemurs and humans. Chromosoma 108:393–400 (1999).
30.
Nash WG, Menninger JC, Wienberg J, Padilla-Nash HM, O’Brien SJ: The pattern of phylogenomic evolution of the Canidae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 95:210–224 (2001).
31.
Neitzel H, Kalscheuer V, Henschel S, Digweed M, Sperling K: Beta-heterochromatin in mammals: evidence from studies in Microtus agrestis based on the extensive accumulation of L1 and non-L1 retroposons in the heterochromatin. Cytogenet Cell Genet 80:165–172 (1998).
32.
Ohno S: Sex Chromosomes and Sex Linked Genes (Springer, Berlin 1967).
33.
Pienkowska-Schelling A, Zawada M, Schelling C: A canine X chromosome painting probe applied to four canid species: close relationship of a heterochromatic-like sequence between the dog and the blue fox. J Anim Breed Genet 122 Suppl 1:54–59 (2005).
34.
Ponce de Leon FA, Ambady S, Hawkins GA, Kappes SM, Bishop MD, et al: Development of a bovine X chromosome linkage group and painting probes to assess cattle, sheep, and goat X chromosome segment homologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3450–3454 (1996).
35.
Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP: The horse pseudoautosomal region (PAR): characterization and comparison with the human, chimp and mouse PARs. Cytogenet Genome Res 121:102–109 (2008).
36.
Raudsepp T, Lear TL, Chowdhary BP: Comparative mapping in equids: the asine X chromosome is rearranged compared to horse and Hartmann’s mountain zebra. Cytogenet Genome Res 96:206–209 (2002).
37.
Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier HU, Lima-de-Faria A, Fronicke L: Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat Genet 6:342–347 (1994).
38.
Sharp P: Sex chromosome pairing during male meiosis in marsupials. Chromosoma 86:27–47 (1982).
39.
Sitnikova NA, Romanenko SA, O’Brien PC, Perelman PL, Fu B, et al: Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 15:447–456 (2007).
40.
Svartman M, Stone G, Stanyon R: The ancestral eutherian karyotype is present in Xenarthra. PLoS Genet 2:e109 (2006).
41.
Toder R, Wienberg J, Voullaire L, O’Brien PC, Maccarone P, Graves JA: Shared DNA sequences between the X and Y chromosomes in the tammar wallaby – evidence for independent additions to eutherian and marsupial sex chromosomes. Chromosoma 106:94–98 (1997).
42.
Triant DA, Dewoody JA: Accelerated molecular evolution in Microtus (Rodentia) as assessed via complete mitochondrial genome sequences. Genetica 128:95–108 (2006).
43.
Volobouev VT, Gallardo MH, Graphodatsky AS: Rodent Cytogenetics, in O’Brien SJ, Nash WG, Menninger JC (eds): Atlas of Mammalian Karyotpyes, pp 173–176 (Wiley-Liss, Hoboken 2006).
44.
Wilson MA, Makova KD: Genomic analyses of sex chromosome evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10:333–354 (2009).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.