Aims: Different patterns of intact and disturbed working memory function can be observed in schizophrenic patients depending on the type of n-back task. We investigated whether these patterns can be induced in healthy subjects by experimentally preventing a motor encoding strategy. Methods: Thirty-two healthy subjects were asked to solve 2 types of n-back task. In the continuous matching task, the subjects had to compare the present stimulus with the one occurring n stimuli back. In the continuous delayed response task (CDRT), the subjects had to select a response depending on the stimulus n stimuli back. Both types of n-back task are assumed to differ with respect to the encoding strategies that can be used to solve the tasks. The use of a motor strategy was prevented by a random arrangement of the target buttons. Results: When the position of the target buttons was predictable, CDRT was solved faster and with higher accuracy than the continuous matching task. However, CDRT was solved more slowly and less accurately when the arrangement of the target buttons varied between the trials. This resulted in a comparable performance in both types of the n-back task. Conclusions: The behavioural alteration in schizophrenic patients in n-back tasks can be induced in healthy subjects by experimentally preventing the use of a motor encoding strategy.

Keywords:
Schizophrenia, Working memory, n-Back task, Motor encoding, Sensory encoding, Simulation, Reaction time
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.