Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 57, No. 3-4, 2010
Issue release date: January 2011
Ann Nutr Metab 2010;57:221–227

Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Resting Metabolic Rate during Pregnancy

Melzer K. · Schutz Y. · Soehnchen N. · Othenin Girard V. · Martinez de Tejada B. · Pichard C. · Irion O. · Boulvain M. · Kayser B.
aInstitute of Movement Sciences and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, and bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and cNutrition Unit, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, and dDepartment of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Aim: The resting metabolic rate (RMR) varies among pregnant women. The factors responsible for this variability are unknown. This study aimed to assess the influence of the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) on the RMR during late pregnancy. Methods: RMR, height, weight, and total (TEE) and activity (AEE) energy expenditures were measured in 46 healthy women aged 31 ± 5 years (mean ± SD) with low (<19.8), normal (19.8–26.0), and high (>26.0) prepregnancy BMI at 38.2 ± 1.5 weeks of gestation (tgest) and 40 ± 7 weeks postpartum (tpost) (n = 27). Results: The mean tgest RMR for the low-, normal-, and high-BMI groups was 1,373, 1,807, and 2,191 kcal/day, respectively (p = 0.001). The overall mean tgest RMR was 316 ± 183 kcal/day (21%), higher than the overall mean tpost value and this difference was correlated with gestational weight gain (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). The scaled metabolic rate by allometry (RMR/kilograms0.73) was similar in the low-, normal-, and high-BMI groups, respectively (p = 0.45). Changes in tgest TEE closely paralleled changes in tgest RMR (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). AEE was similar among the BMI groups. Conclusion: The RMR is significantly increased in the third trimester of pregnancy. The absolute gestational RMR is higher in women with high prepregnancy BMI due to increased body weight. The scaled metabolic rate (RMR/kilograms0.73) is similar among the BMI groups of pregnant women.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Butte NF, Wong WW, Treuth MS, Ellis KJ, O’Brian SE: Energy requirements during pregnancy based on total energy expenditure and energy deposition. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:1078–1087.
  2. FAO: Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series. Human Energy Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation, Rome, October 2001, pp 17–24.
  3. Bronstein MN, Mak RP, King JC: The thermic effect of food in normal-weight and overweight pregnant women. Br J Nutr 1995;74:261–275.
  4. Nagy LE, King JC: Postprandial energy expenditure and respiratory quotient during early and late pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;40:1258–1263.
  5. Piers LS, Diggavi SN, Thangam S, van Raaij JM, Shetty PS, Hautvast JG: Changes in energy expenditure, anthropometry, and energy intake during the course of pregnancy and lactation in well-nourished Indian women. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:501–513.
  6. Poppitt SD, Prentice AM, Jequier E, Schutz Y, Whitehead RG: Evidence of energy sparing in Gambian women during pregnancy: a longitudinal study using whole-body calorimetry. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:353–364.
  7. Prentice AM, Spaaij CJ, Goldberg GR, Poppitt SD, van Raaij JM, Totton M, Swann D, Black AE: Energy requirements of pregnant and lactating women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996;50(suppl 1):S82–S110.

    External Resources

  8. Spaaij CJ, van Raaij JM, van der Heijden LJ, Schouten FJ, Drijvers JJ, De Groot LC, Boekholt HA, Hautvast JG: No substantial reduction of the thermic effect of a meal during pregnancy in well-nourished Dutch women. Br J Nutr 1994;71:335–344.
  9. Contaldo F, Scalfi L, Coltorti A, Di Palo MR, Martinelli P, Guerritore T: Reduced regulatory thermogenesis in pregnant and ovariectomized women. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1987;57:299–304.
  10. Illingworth PJ, Jung RT, Howie PW: Reduction in postprandial energy expenditure during pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295:554.
  11. Kopp-Hoolihan LE, van Loan MD, Wong WW, King JC: Longitudinal assessment of energy balance in well-nourished, pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:697–704.
  12. Clarke PE, Rousham EK, Gross H, Halligan AW, Bosio P: Activity patterns and time allocation during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of British women. Ann Hum Biol 2005;32:247–258.
  13. Lawrence M, Whitehead RG: Physical activity and total energy expenditure of child-bearing Gambian village women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1988;42:145–160.
  14. Lof M, Forsum E: Activity pattern and energy expenditure due to physical activity before and during pregnancy in healthy Swedish women. Br J Nutr 2006;95:296–302.
  15. Rousham EK, Clarke PE, Gross H: Significant changes in physical activity among pregnant women in the UK as assessed by accelerometry and self-reported activity. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:393–400.
  16. Forsum E, Kabir N, Sadurskis A, Westerterp K: Total energy expenditure of healthy Swedish women during pregnancy and lactation. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56:334–342.
  17. Heini A, Schutz Y, Diaz E, Prentice AM, Whitehead RG, Jequier E: Free-living energy expenditure measured by two independent techniques in pregnant and nonpregnant Gambian women. Am J Physiol 1991;261:E9–E17.
  18. Lawrence M, Singh J, Lawrence F, Whitehead RG: The energy cost of common daily activities in African women: increased expenditure in pregnancy? Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:753–763.
  19. Singh J, Prentice AM, Diaz E,Coward WA, Ashford J, Sawyer M, Whitehead RG: Energy expenditure of Gambian women during peak agricultural activity measured by the doubly-labelled water method. Br J Nutr 1989;62:315–329.
  20. Melzer K, Schutz Y, Boulvain M, Kayser B: Pregnancy related changes in activity energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate in Switzerland. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009;63:1185–1191.
  21. Goldberg GR, Prentice AM, Coward WA, Davies HL, Murgatroyd PR, Wensing C, Black AE, Harding M, Sawyer M: Longitudinal assessment of energy expenditure in pregnancy by the doubly labeled water method. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:494–505.
  22. James WPT, Schofield EC: Human Energy Requirements: A Manual for Planners and Nutritionists. Oxford, Oxford University Press/FAO, 1990.
  23. Lof M, Olausson H, Bostrom K, Janerot-Sjoberg B, Sohlstrom A, Forsum E: Changes in basal metabolic rate during pregnancy in relation to changes in body weight and composition, cardiac output, insulin-like growth factor I, and thyroid hormones and in relation to fetal growth. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:678–685.
  24. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board: Nutrition During Pregnancy, Weight Gain and Nutrient Supplements. Washington, National Academy Press, 1990.
  25. Hopkinson JM, Butte NF, Ellis KJ, Wong WW, Puyau MR, Smith EO: Body fat estimation in late pregnancy and early postpartum: comparison of two-, three-, and four-component models. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:432–438.
  26. Power ML, Cogswell ME, Schulkin J: Obesity prevention and treatment practices of U.S. obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:961–968.
  27. Weir JB: New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism – 1949. Nutrition 1990;6:213–221.
  28. Brage S, Brage N, Ekelund U, Luan J, Franks PW, Froberg K, Wareham NJ: Effect of combined movement and heart rate monitor placement on physical activity estimates during treadmill locomotion and free-living. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006;96:517–524.
  29. Lotgering FK, van Doorn MB, Struijk PC, Pool J, Wallenburg HC: Maximal aerobic exercise in pregnant women: heart rate, O2 consumption, CO2 production, and ventilation. J Appl Physiol 1991;70:1016–1023.
  30. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wong MY, Andersen LB, Froberg K, Wareham NJ: Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:343–351.
  31. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ: Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:561–570.
  32. Brage S, Ekelund U, Brage N, Hennings MA, Froberg K, Franks PW, Wareham NJ: Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity. J Appl Physiol 2007;103:682–692.
  33. Thompson D, Batterham AM, Bock S, Robson C, Stokes K: Assessment of low-to-moderate intensity physical activity thermogenesis in young adults using synchronized heart rate and accelerometry with branched-equation modeling. J Nutr 2006;136:1037–1042.
  34. Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett DR Jr: Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:704–711.
  35. Kleiber M: Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol Rev 1947;27:511–541.
  36. Hytten FE, Leitch I: The Physiology of Human Pregnancy. Oxford, Blackwell, 1971.
  37. Blackburn MW, Calloway DH: Energy expenditure and consumption of mature, pregnant and lactating women. J Am Diet Assoc 1976;69:29–37.
  38. Davies GA, Wolfe LA, Mottola MF, MacKinnon C, Arsenault MY, Bartellas E, et al: Exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:516–529.

    External Resources

  39. Nagy LE, King JC: Energy expenditure of pregnant women at rest or walking self-paced. Am J Clin Nutr 1983;38:369–376.
  40. Thongprasert K, Tanphaichitre V, Valyasevi A, Kittigool J, Durnin JV: Energy requirements of pregnancy in rural Thailand. Lancet 1987;2:1010–1012.
  41. van Raaij JM, Schonk CM, Vermaat-Miedema SH, Peek ME, Hautvast JG: Body fat mass and basal metabolic rate in Dutch women before, during, and after pregnancy: a reappraisal of energy cost of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;49:765–772.
  42. Tanner JM: Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlation. J Appl Physiol 1949;2:1–15.
  43. Gilliat-Wimberly M, Manore MM, Woolf K, Swan PD, Carroll SS: Effects of habitual physical activity on the resting metabolic rates and body compositions of women aged 35 to 50 years. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;101:1181–1188.
  44. Ballor DL, Poehlman ET: Resting metabolic rate and coronary-heart-disease risk factors in aerobically and resistance-trained women. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56:968–974.
  45. Tremblay A, Fontaine E, Poehlman ET, Mitchell D, Perron L, Bouchard C: The effect of exercise-training on resting metabolic rate in lean and moderately obese individuals. Int J Obes 1986;10:511–517.
  46. Kalkhoff RK: Impact of maternal fuels and nutritional state on fetal growth. Diabetes 1991;40(suppl 2):61–65.

    External Resources

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50