Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the epidemiology, natural history, treatment pattern and predictors of long-term survival of patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the urinary bladder based on the analysis of the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods and Results: In total, 230 patients with pathologically confirmed SRCC of the urinary bladder were identified between 1973 and 2004. The mean age was 65 ± 13 years. Overall, 75.7% of the patients had a poorly differentiated or undifferentiated histology grade, 26.5% presented with metastatic disease, 59 (25.7%) underwent transurethral resection for bladder tumor only and 107 (46.5%) had partial or radical cystectomy. The 1-, 3- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates were 66.8, 40.6 and 25.8%, respectively. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, age (HR 1.024; p = 0.004), stage (distant vs. local, HR 6.2; p < 0.001) and cystectomy (HR 0.53; p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors for cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Receipt of cystectomy was strongly associated with improved survival in the patients with SRCC of urinary bladder. However, many patients with localized tumors did not receive potentially curative cystectomy. Further studies to address the barriers to the delivery of appropriate care to these patients are warranted.

Keywords:
Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results, Signet-ring cell carcinoma, Cancer-specific survival
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.