Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 80, No. 6, 2011
Issue release date: October 2011
Psychother Psychosom 2011;80:353–358
(DOI:10.1159/000327582)

Does the Heterogeneity of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Moderate the Response to Cognitive Behaviour Therapy? An Exploratory Study

Cella M. · Chalder T. · White P.D.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a heterogeneous condition. A few studies have shown that some independent factors predict outcomes after cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). Two recent systematic reviews suggest that heterogeneity may moderate treatment outcomes. However, no study has explored whether subgroups of CFS predict response to treatment. Methods: We used both latent class analysis (LCA) and latent class regression (LCR) to clarify the relationship between subgroups of CFS patients (n = 236), diagnosed using the Oxford diagnostic criteria, and the response to CBT. We measured symptoms, demographics, mood, and cognitive and behavioural responses to illness to define subgroups. Results: We found 5 latent classes by LCA, which did not differ in the direction of their response to CBT, with all classes showing improvement. In contrast, an exploratory LCR identified 4 latent classes, 1 of which predicted a poor response to CBT, whereas the other 3 predicted a good outcome, accounting for more than 70% of the patients. The negative outcome class was defined by weight fluctuations and physical shakiness, anxiety, pain and being focused on symptoms. Conclusions: CBT should be offered to all classes of patients with CFS, when defined by these measures. It may be possible to predict a minority group with a negative outcome, but this exploratory work needs replication.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. White PD, Thomas JM, Sullivan PF, Buchwald D: The nosology of sub-acute and chronic fatigue syndromes that follow infectious mononucleosis. Psychol Med 2004;34:499–507.
  2. Sullivan PF, Kovalenko P, York TP, Prescott CA, Kendler KS: Fatigue in a community sample of twins. Psychol Med 2003;33:263–281.
  3. Jason LA, Corradi K, Torres-Harding S, Taylor RR, King C: Chronic fatigue syndrome: the need for subtypes. Neuropsychol Rev 2005;15:29–58.
  4. Aslakson E, Vollmer-Conna U, Reeves WC, White PD: Replication of an empirical approach to delineate the heterogeneity of chronic unexplained fatigue. Popul Health Metr 2009;7:17–27.

    External Resources

  5. Vollmer-Conna U, Aslakson E, White PD: An empirical delineation of the heterogeneity of chronic unexplained fatigue in women. Pharmacogenomics 2006;7:355–364.

    External Resources

  6. Sullivan PF, Pedersen NL, Jacks A, Evengard B: Chronic fatigue in a population sample: definitions and heterogeneity. Psychol Med 2005;35:1337–1348.

    External Resources

  7. Rindskopf D, Rindskopf W: The value of latent class analysis in medical diagnosis. Stat Med 1986;5:21–27.
  8. Vermunt JK: Latent class and finite mixture models for multilevel data sets. Stat Methods Med Res 2008;17:33–51.

    External Resources

  9. Sullivan PF, Smith W, Buchwald D: Latent class analysis of symptoms associated with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Psychol Med 2002;32:881–888.
  10. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Rooke SE, Bhullar N, Schuttle NS: Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2008;28:736–745.
  11. Price JR, Mitchell E, Tidy E, Hunot V: Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;3:CD001027.
  12. Heins MJ, Knoop H, Prins JB, Stulemeijer M, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G: Possible detrimental effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychother Psychosom 2010;79:249–256.
  13. Balon R: Cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in the medically ill. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:261–264.
  14. Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, Gielissen MF, van der Meer JW, White PD: Is a full recovery possible after cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome? Psychother Psychosom 2007;76:171–176.
  15. Butler S, Chalder T, Ron M, Wessely S: Cognitive behaviour therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54;153–158.
  16. Deale A, Wessley S: Diagnosis of psychiatric disorder in clinical evaluation of chronic fatigue syndrome. J R Soc Med 2000;93:310–312.
  17. Prins JB, Bleijenberg G, Bazelmans E, Elving LD, De Boo TM, Severens JL, Van Der Wilt GJ, Spinhoven P, Van Der Meer JW: Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;357:841–847.
  18. Jason, LA, Torres-Harding S, Brown M, Sorenson M, Donalek J, Corradi K, Maher K, Fletcher MA: Predictors of change following participation in non-pharmacologic interventions for CFS. Trop Med Int Health 2008;36:9.
  19. Jason LA, Torres-Harding S, Maher K, Reynolds N, Brown M, Sorenson M, Donalek J, Corradi K, Fletcher MA, Lu T: Baseline cortisol levels predict treatment outcomes in chronic fatigue syndrome nonpharmacologic clinical trial. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 2008;14:20.
  20. Roberts AD, Chalrer ML, Papadopoulos A, Wessely S, Chalder T, Cleare AJ: Does hypocortisolism predict a poor response to cognitive behavioural therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome? Psychol Med 2010;40:515–522.
  21. Sharpe MC, Archard LC, Banatvala JE, Borysiewicz LK, Clare AW, David A, Edwards RH, Hawton KE, Lambert, HP, Lane RJ, et al: A report – Chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research. J R Soc Med 199;84:118–121.
  22. Turnbull N, Shaw EJ, Baker R, Dunsdon S, Costin N, Britton G, Kuntze S, Norman R: Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy): diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) in adults and children. 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG53FullGuidance.pdf (accessed November 9, 2010).
  23. Cella M, Stahl D, Reme SE, Chalder T: Therapist effects in routine psychotherapy practice: an account from chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychother Res 2011;24:1–11.
  24. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP: Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 1993;37:147–153.
  25. Deale A, Chalder T, Marks I, Wessely S: Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:408–414.
  26. White PD, Sharpe MC, Chalder T, Decesare JC, Walwyn R: Protocol for the PACE trial: a randomised controlled trial of adaptive pacing, cognitive behaviour therapy, and graded exercise, as supplements to standardised specialist medical care versus standardised specialist medical care alone for patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis or encephalopathy. BMC Neurol 2007;7:6.

    External Resources

  27. Cella M, Chalder T: Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings. J Psychosom Res 2010;69:17–22.

    External Resources

  28. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.
  29. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH: The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:461–464.
  30. Cella M, Sharpe M, Chalder T: Measuring disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. J Psychosom Res, in press.
  31. Moss-Morris RE, Chalder T: Illness representations: where to from here? 16th Conf Eur Health Psychol Soc, Kos, 2003.
  32. Skerrett TN, Moss-Morris R: Fatigue and social impairment in multiple sclerosis: the role of patients’ cognitive and behavioral responses to their symptoms. J Psychosom Res 2006;61:587–593.

    External Resources

  33. Vermunt JK, Magdison J: Latent GOLD 4.0 User’s Guide. Belmont, Statistical Innovations Inc, 2005.
  34. Vermunt JK: Applications of latent class analysis in social science research; in Dyhre Nielsen T, Zhang NL (eds): Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. 7th European Conference, ECSQARU 2003, Aalborg, Denmark, July 2–5, 2003. Proceeding. Berlin, Springer, 2003, pp 22–36.
  35. Rost J, Langeheine R: Application of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences. Munster, Waxmann, 1997.
  36. Wood PK: Applied latent class analysis. J Classif 2008;25:143–145.

    External Resources

  37. Schwartz GE: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978;6:3.
  38. Akaike H: Factor-Analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 1987;52:317–332.

    External Resources

  39. Bozdogan H: Model selection and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) – The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 1987;52:345–370.

    External Resources

  40. Wicherts JM, Dolan CV: A cautionary note on the use of information fit indexes in covariance structure modeling with means. Struct Equ Modeling 2004;11:45–50.

    External Resources

  41. Wasserman L: Bayesian model selection and model averaging. J Math Psychol 2000;44:92–107.

    External Resources

  42. Quarmby L, Rimes K, Deale A, Wessely S, Chalder T: Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial. Behav Res 2007;45:1085–1094.

    External Resources

  43. Wiborg JF, Knoop H, Stulemeijer M, Prins JB, Bleijenberg G: How does cognitive behaviour therapy reduce fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome? The role of physical activity. Psychol Med 2010;5:1–7.
  44. Sysko R, Hildebrandt T, Wilson GT, Wilfley DE, Agras WS: Heterogeneity moderates treatment response among patients with binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010;78:681–690.

    External Resources

  45. Horwitz RI, Singer BH, Makuch RW, Viscoli CM: Can treatment that is helpful on average be harmful to some patients? A study of the conflicting information needs of clinical inquiry and drug regulation. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:395–400.
  46. Fava GA: The intellectual crisis of psychiatric research. Psychother Psychosom 2006;75:202–208.
  47. Action for ME. ME 2008: what progress? http://www.afme.org.uk/res/img/resources/Survey%20Summary%20Report%202008.pdf (accessed Feb 28, 2011).
  48. Mohr DC, Spring B, Freedland KE, Beckner V, Arean, P, Hollon, SD, Ockene J, Kaplan R: The selection and design of control conditions for randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:275–284.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50