Background/Aims: Premature infants lack the vernix caseosa, have an incompetent stratum corneum (SC) barrier and are predisposed to infection. Use of topical agents to improve barrier function has had mixed outcomes. The aim was to determine the effect of vernix versus common barrier creams on the rate and quality of the epidermal barrier repair following controlled wounding. Methods: Minor wounds were created with (1) laser ablation in the minipig and (2) tape stripping of mother’s volar skin as a model for premature skin. Native vernix was applied to the mother’s tape-stripped skin. Treatments were no occlusion (NO), vernix and a petrolatum-based cream (PBC) in the pig, and NO, vernix, PBC, an oil-in-water cream (OWC), a semipermeable film (SP) and full occlusion (FO) in adults. Results: Outcomes for both trials were barrier recovery and skin hydration (moisture accumulation rate, MAT), initial hydration, erythema and dryness in adults. Vernix and PBC produced greater barrier repair than NO in the pig. SP produced greater recovery than NO and FO in adults. Vernix yielded greater recovery than FO and was similar to PBC, OWC and NO. Vernix had a directionally higher MAT than OWC and directionally higher initial hydration than NO. Conclusions: The findings suggest that vernix-based topical creams would be effective for the treatment of epidermal wounds and show promise to augment SC repair and maturation in infants.

Keywords:
Vernix caseosa, Stratum corneum, Premature infant, Barrier repair, Wound healing, Transepidermal water loss
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.