Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 58, No. 2, 2012
Issue release date: February 2012
Section title: Regenerative and Technological Section / Original Paper
Gerontology 2012;58:164–170
(DOI:10.1159/000329340)

Health-Related Internet Use in Older Primary Care Patients

Crabb R.M. · Rafie S. · Weingardt K.R.
aGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care System and bPacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, Calif., and cCenter for Health Care Evaluation, Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Menlo Park, Calif., USA

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restriction apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Regenerative and Technological Section / Original Paper

Received: 11/19/2010 8:51:21 AM
Accepted: 5/11/2011
Published online: 7/5/2011

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/GER

Abstract

Background: Adults aged 65 years and older stand to benefit from the accumulating wealth of Internet-based health resources, including online interventions to assist in the self-management of chronic health conditions. However, concerns have been expressed that lesser Internet use and familiarity among older adults may limit the utility of web-based health interventions in older age groups. As these interventions become more prevalent, it is important to understand older adults’ receptivity to using the Internet as a tool in managing healthcare. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to gauge the extent to which older primary care patients are receptive to using web-based health resources, and to explore how health-related Internet use may be related to patient characteristics such as age, income, and health and mental health status. Methods: We surveyed 50 adults aged 65 years and older in a Veterans Administration primary care clinic regarding: (1) Internet use for any purpose, (2) Internet use to obtain health or mental-related information, and (3) interest in using Internet-based interventions to address various health-related needs. A substantial proportion of respondents were in their 70s, 80s, and 90s, and many had multiple medical conditions. Results: Nearly three-quarters of older primary care patients in our sample were regular Internet users and over half had experience in using the Internet to search for health information. The majority of Internet users endorsed an interest in using web-based resources to manage various aspects of their health and mental healthcare. Conclusions: Our results support the conclusion that older primary care patients, including those among the oldest-old and those with multiple medical conditions, are amenable to using the Internet as a means of enhancing healthcare.


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Regenerative and Technological Section / Original Paper

Received: 11/19/2010 8:51:21 AM
Accepted: 5/11/2011
Published online: 7/5/2011

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/GER


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Fox S, Jones S: The social life of health information (online). Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The- Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx (accessed September 17, 2010).
  2. Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J, Brownstein C, Okun S, Vaughan T, Bradley R, Heywood J: Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e19.

    External Resources

  3. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VBB, Case S: Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1275–1281.

    External Resources

  4. Proudfoot J, Ryden C, Everitt B, Shapiro DA, Goldberg D, Mann A, Tylee A, Marks I, Gray JA: Clinical efficacy of computerized cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:46–54.

    External Resources

  5. Kinsella K, Velkoff VA: An Aging World: 2001. Washington, US Bureau of the Census, 2001.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Merck Company Foundation: The state of aging and health in America (online). Available at www.cdc.gov/aging (accessed October 15, 2010).
  7. Conner KO, Copeland VC, Grote NK, Koeske G, Rosen D, Reynolds CF 3rd, Brown C: Mental health treatment seeking among older adults with depression: the impact of stigma and race. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;18:531–543.

    External Resources

  8. Gitlin LN, Chernett NL, Harris LF, Palmer D, Hopkins P, Dennis MP: Harvest Health: translation of the chronic disease self-management program for older African-Americans in a senior setting. Gerontologist 2008;48:698–705.

    External Resources

  9. Elsegood K, Powell D: Computerized cognitive-behavior therapy (cCBT) and older people: a pilot study to determine factors that influence willingness to engage with cCBT. Counsel Psychother Res 2008;8:189–192.

    External Resources

  10. Fox S: Four in ten seniors go online (online). Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2010/January/38-of-adults-age-65-go-online.aspx (accessed November 1, 2010).
  11. Gordon KS, Goulet JL, Brandt CA, Duggal M, Justice AC: Variation in Veterans’ access to Internet and email: potential impact on VHA electronic health communication. VA Information Resource Center (VIReC) Clinical Informatics Seminar 2009 July (online). Available at http://vaww.virec.research.va. gov/EducationResources/Seminars/Cyber seminars.htm (accessed October 15, 2010).
  12. Freese J, Rivas S, Hargittai E: Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults. Poetics. J Empir Res Cult Media Arts 2006;34:236–249.
  13. McInnes DK, Gifford AL, Kasis LE, Wagner TH: Disparities in health-related Internet use by US veterans: results from a national survey. Inform Prim Care 2010;18:59–68.
  14. Veterans Health Affairs Office of Health Information: My HealtheVet registrant distribution by age (pers. commun., June 2009).
  15. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–613.
  16. Williams LS, Brizendine EJ, Plue L, Bakas T, Tu W, Hendrie H, Kroenke K: Performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression after stroke. Stroke 2005;36:635–638.
  17. Li C, Friedman B, Conwell Y, Fiscella K: Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (PHQ-2) in identifying major depression in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:596–602.

    External Resources

  18. Rogers WA, Fisk AD: Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. J Geront B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010;65:645–653.

    External Resources

  19. Cavanagh K, Shapiro DA, Van Den Berg S, et al: The acceptability of computer-aided cognitive behavioural therapy: a pragmatic study. Cogn Behav Ther 2009;38:235–246. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19306147 (accessed November 23, 2010).