Clinical Implications of Non-A-Type NPM1 and FLT3 Mutations in Patients with Normal Karyotype Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPark B.G.a · Chi H.-S.a · Park S.-J.c · Min S.K.a · Jang S.a · Park C.-J.a · Kim D.-Y.b · Lee J.-H.b · Lee J.-H.b · Lee K.-H.b
Departments of aLaboratory Medicine and bInternal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, and cDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea Corresponding Author
Mutations in the nucleophosmin (NPM1) and fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) genes are the most commonly observed mutations in patients with normal-karyotype acute myeloid leukemia (AML-NK). We analyzed the prognostic effects and interactions of these mutations in 201 AML-NK patients. NPM1 and FLT3 mutations were found in 38.3 and 24.9% of AML-NK patients, respectively. NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut), especially in patients without FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut), were associated with a favorable outcome. However, NPM1mut did not affect survival. FLT3mut tended to be associated with a poor survival outcome. FLT3mut showed no prognostic effects in patients with A-type NPM1mut. However, FLT3mut were associated with a significantly worse prognosis in patients with non-A-type NPM1mut. The prognostic interaction between the NPM1 and FLT3 mutations was significant in patients with non-A-type NPM1mut.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
New molecular markers have been used to determine the prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially patients with normal-karyotype AML (AML-NK). These patients constitute approximately 40% of patients with AML and are regarded as an intermediate-risk group [1,2]. In addition, these patients harbor specific mutations in genes that serve as prognostic markers for survival outcomes after adequate therapy [1,2]. Prognostically important mutations in patients with AML-NK include mutations in the nucleophosmin (NPM1), fms- related tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (CEBPA) genes . For example, NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut) are observed in 50–60% of patients with AML-NK and are included in the 2008 World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms as provisional entities . In contrast, FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut) are not included as defining criteria for distinct entities because they often accompany other genetic abnormalities. However, FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITD) are the second most common mutation in patients with AML-NK [3,4,5]. NPM1mut are associated with a better patient prognosis, whereas FLT3-ITD mutations (FLT3-ITDmut) are associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) [4,5]. Approximately 80% of NPM1mut are A-type (tandem duplication of TCTG) , whereas the remaining 20% are non-A-type (exon 12 mutations), which have been associated with poor prognosis . Mutations in the FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) have been observed in approximately 4–7% of patients with AML; however, little is known about the clinical impact of these FLT3-TKD mutations [8,9,10].
It has not been determined whether or not these mutations exert positive or negative effects on prognosis after treatment . Several Japanese and Korean studies have described the prognostic significance of NPM1mut and FLT3mut in various clinical settings. However, these studies did not focus on AML-NK [7,10,12,13]. The prognostic effects of these mutations in AML-NK have been emphasized. Therefore, to further investigate the effects of these mutations on survival in AML-NK patients, we assessed the frequencies and prognostic effects of NPM1mut and FLT3mut, including non-A-type NPM1 and FLT3-TKD mutations, and their interactions in AML-NK patients.
Patients and Methods
Our patient population comprised 201 adults (102 men, 99 women) who were aged 15 years or older (median age 53 years, range 15–81 years, mean ± SD 51.4 ± 14.9 years) and had been newly diagnosed with AML-NK at the Asan Medical Center between January 2002 and March 2010 (table 1). Of these 201 patients, 153 (76.1%; 77 men and 76 women; median age 48 years, range 15–79 years, mean ± SD 48.2 ± 14.1 years) received standard induction chemotherapy consisting of 7 days of cytarabine at 200 mg/m2/day (100 mg/m2/day for patients aged >60 years) and 3 days of daunorubicin at 45 mg/m2/day. Patients who failed to achieve complete remission (CR) but attained partial remission received a second, identical cycle of induction chemotherapy. Consolidation chemotherapy was followed by anthracycline and cytarabine (or cytarabine and daunorubicin for patients aged >60 years) according to the standard regimen of our institution . CR was defined as the presence of <5% blast cells with more than 20% cellularity in a standardized bone marrow (BM) aspirate sample after the first or second course of induction chemotherapy according to our institution’s criteria . The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board, and all patients provided written informed consent for additional genetic analyses at diagnosis.
|Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with AML-NK|
BM samples that were obtained at diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed for NPM1mut and FLT3mut. Genomic DNA was extracted from BM smears or cell pellets using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
The analysis of NPM1mut was performed using fragment analysis as previously described . Genomic DNA was amplified using PCR analysis. The products were subjected to capillary electrophoresis for exact size analysis using an ABI 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA) and GeneScan Analysis software (Applied Biosystems). In samples showing an additional peak, which indicated the presence of the 4-bp insertion, the NPM1 exon 12 was amplified and the products were directly sequenced.
The presence of FLT3-ITD and TKD mutations was determined using multiplex PCR analysis with Seeplex FLT3 Genotyping Kits (Seegene, Korea).
Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables between two groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare variables among three groups. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the time of CR until relapse, death or the end of the study. OS was measured from the date of the first diagnosis to death from any cause during the course of this study. Nonparametric survival curves for RFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for RFS and OS. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, Ill., USA).
The clinical characteristics of our 201 adult patients with AML-NK are shown in table 1. Of these 201 patients, 77 (38.3%) exhibited NPM1mut. When grouped according to patient age, the incidence of NPM1mut was 28.6% (14/49) in patients aged <40 years, 42.1% (37/88) in patients aged 41–60 years and 40.6% (26/64) in patients aged >60 years. NPM1, especially the A-type NPM1mut, was more common in female patients (p = 0.142). The incidence of NPM1mut was higher in patients with AML-M1, -M4 and -M5 than in patients with other types of leukemia (p = 0.068). The complete blood cell counts at diagnosis were not significantly different between patients with and without NPM1mut. However, BM blasts were significantly increased in patients with NPM1mut (p = 0.000; table 1). The most common NPM1mut was the type A mutation (n = 61, 79.2%), which is a duplication of TCTG at position c.860_863 (NCBI accession number NM_002520.5) [16,17]. In addition, 5 patients (6.5%) had type B mutations, 3 (3.9%) had type D, 2 (2.6%) had type Qm and 6 (7.8%) had other types of NPM1mut (table 2).
|Table 2. List of NPM1 exon 12 mutations that were observed in our patients with AML-NK|
We also detected FLT3mut in 50 patients (24.9%) and showed that 45 patients (22.4%) exhibited FLT3-ITDmut, whereas 5 patients (2.5%) displayed FLT3-TKD mutations. The incidence of FLT3mut, regardless of the type of mutation, was significantly higher in patients with NPM1mut than in patients without NPM1mut (p = 0.009; table 1).
Of the 153 patients who received standard induction chemotherapy, 121 patients (79.1%) achieved CR. The CR rate was significantly higher in patients with NPM1mut than in patients with wild-type NPM1 (NPM1wt; 86.2 vs. 74.7%, p = 0.007; table 3). Of the patients who achieved CR, patients with NPM1mut had a lower relapse rate and a higher survival rate than patients without NPM1mut (relapse rate: 32.8 vs. 41.1%, p = 0.081; survival rate: 56.9 vs. 44.2%, p = 0.129). However, these differences were not statistically significant (table 3). NPM1mut were not independently associated with RFS or OS. Of the 153 patients who received standard induction chemotherapy, 75 (49.0%) underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), regardless of whether or not they had NPM1mut. Most patients who received allogeneic HSCT, regardless of donor type, underwent reduced-intensity conditioning therapy consisting of busulfan, fludarabine and antithymocyte globulin according to the standard regimen of our institution .
|Table 3. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes based on NPM1mut status|
Based on their NPM1 and FLT3-ITDmut status, patients were divided into 4 groups. Patients with NPM1mut but without FLT3-ITDmut (NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt) had the highest CR rate (92.5%; table 4) and significantly longer RFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.055; fig. 1) than the other groups. Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model showed that HSCT was the only factor that was independently associated with longer RFS (p = 0.000) and OS (p = 0.000). No significant differences among the 4 groups were detected after adjustment for HSCT (table 5). In each group, the OS rate was higher in patients who underwent HSCT than in those who did not (63.4 vs. 26.5%, p = 0.000, in NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDwt patients; 88.9 vs. 40.9%, p = 0.007, in NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt patients; 62.5 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.105, in NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDmut patients; 75.0 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.000, in NPM1mut/FLT3- ITDmut patients).
|Table 4. Complete remission rate based on risk factors|
|Table 5. Cox proportional hazard models for RFS and OS in AML-NK patients based on NPM1mut and FLT3-ITDmut|
|Fig. 1.a RFS in patients with AML-NK according to NPM1 and FLT3-ITDmut. b OS of patients with AML-NK according to NPM1 and FLT3-ITDmut. Patients with NPM1mut but without FLT3-ITDmut had significantly better RFS and OS than other patient groups. NPM1mut/FLT3wt: patients with NPM1mut without FLT3-ITDmut; NPM1mut/FLT3mut: patients with both NPM1 and FLT3-ITDmut; NPM1wt/FLT3wt: patients with neither NPM1 nor FLT3-ITDmut; NPM1wt/FLT3mut: patients with FLT3-ITDmut without NPM1mut.|
We found that the CR rate tended to be higher in patients with non-A-type NPM1mut than in patients with A-type NPM1mut (92.3 vs. 84.4%; p = 0.238), regardless of the FLT3mut status (table 4). Moreover, the CR rate tended to be lower in patients with FLT3-ITDmut than in those with FLT3-TKD mutations (65.8 vs. 75.0%, p = 0.359; table 4). However, these differences were not statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no significant differences in RFS (p = 0.459) or OS (p = 0.847) between patients with A-type NPM1mut and those with non-A-type NPM1mut (fig. 2). In addition, no differences were observed in RFS (p = 0.674) or OS (p = 0.897) between patients with FLT3-ITDmut and those with FLT3-TKD mutations. A multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model showed that FLT3-ITDmut were independently associated with significantly shorter RFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.010) after adjustment for HSCT (table 5). A-type NPM1mut and non-A-type NPM1mut were associated with longer RFS and OS. FLT3-TKD mutations were associated with shorter RFS and OS, although these differences were not statistically significant (table 5).
|Fig. 2.a RFS of patients with NPM1mut according to the type of NPM1mut. b OS of patients with NPM1mut according to the type of NPM1mut. No significant differences in survival outcomes were detected between patients with A-type and non-A-type NPM1mut. c RFS of patients with A-type NPM1mut according to FLT3mut. d OS of patients with A-type NPM1mut according to FLT3mut. No significant differences were detected in survival between patients with FLT3wt and FLT3mut. e RFS of patients with non-A-type NPM1mut according to FLT3mut. The RFS was significantly increased in patients with FLT3wt compared to patients with FLT3mut.f OS of patients with non-A-type NPM1 mut according to FLT3mut.|
Only 56 patients were enrolled in this study, and the prognostic study for the interaction between NPM1mut and FLT3mut showed weaker effects because of the small number of patients. In the 42 patients with A-type NPM1mut, the presence of FLT3mut, including FLT3-TKD mutations, did not significantly affect the RFS (p = 0.081) or OS (p = 0.210; fig. 2). In the 14 patients with non-A-type NPM1mut, the RFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.062) tended to decrease in patients with FLT3mut compared with patients without FLT3mut (fig. 2).
We retrospectively investigated the incidence and clinical impact of NPM1 and FLT3 mutations in 201 Korean patients with AML-NK. We found that among these patients, 38.3% had NPM1mut and 24.9% had FLT3mut, which are similar findings to incidences that have been previously reported in Asian populations [8,19]. Several Japanese studies observed a lower incidence of NPM1mut than in our study [12,13]. However, those studies evaluated AML with or without abnormal karyotype. Although NPM1mut was detected in AML with an abnormal karyotype, its prevalence was more frequent in AML-NK. NPM1mut has a favorable prognosis in AML-NK [5,20,21]. Therefore, a prognostic study for NPM1mut must focus on AML-NK. However, most prognostic studies for NPM1mut in Asians have been performed in AML with or without abnormal karyotypes [12,13]. Our study is therefore advantageous from this point of view.
NPM1mut is more common in older than in younger patients . We showed that the incidence of NPM1mut was lower in adults who were aged <40 years but similar in patients who were aged 40–60 and >60 years. In agreement with previous findings, we found that NPM1mut was significantly associated with an increased percentage of BM blasts . However, the increase in BM blasts was not associated with a difference in patient prognosis (data not shown).
NPM1 and FLT3 mutations have been suggested to be mechanistically linked [16,22]. Patients with FLT3mut are more likely to have NPM1mut [8,9]. We found that FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD mutations were more common in patients with NPM1mut than in those with NPM1wt. Although 5 of 201 patients (2.5%) had the FLT3-TKD mutation, 4 of these 5 patients (80.0%) also carried NPM1mut. The interaction between FLT3mut and NPM1mut may have prognostic impact because patients with NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt had significantly longer RFS and tended to have longer OS than patients with one of the other three genotypes. Moreover, the NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt combination showed a favorable hazard ratio. However, NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt was not a significant prognostic factor in the Cox regression model. Recent studies have demonstrated that patients with NPM1mut but without FLT3-ITD have a better prognosis [23,24]. However, most studies on the interaction between NPM1mutand FLT3mut in AML-NK patients have focused on FLT3-ITD. In contrast, we focused on FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD. We observed that patients with FLT3-TKD mutations tended to have a poorer outcome, although the difference was not statistically significant because of the small sample size. We determined that the presence of FLT3-ITDmut was an independent predictor of poor patient prognosis and that there were no prognostic differences between FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD mutations. These results suggest the possibility that the presence of FLT3-TKD mutations predicts poor patient prognosis.
Our findings on the hematologic response of patients following induction chemotherapy correlated with the presence or absence of NPM1 and FLT3 mutations. Similar to previous studies, we found that the CR rate was significantly higher in patients with NPM1mut than in patients without NPM1mut. This difference is primarily derived from the greater sensitivity of NPM1mut-containing blasts to the initial chemotherapy . Indeed, we found that patients with non-A-type NPM1mut had superior hematological responses regardless of their FLT3mut status. We observed a similar response in patients with NPM1mut in the absence of FLT3-ITD (table 4).
The treatment protocol for patients with AML is usually dependent on prognostic factors, including cytogenetic results and age. AML patients with NPM1mut/ FLT3-ITDwt, who have a favorable prognosis, are usually treated with conventional chemotherapy, with or without HSCT . Although FLT3mut are regarded as an indication for HSCT, the role of HSCT in patients with NPM1mut and FLT3mutis unclear [26,27]. We found that HSCT improved survival in AML-NK patients, including patients with NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDmut. However, the OS did not exceed 6 years in patients with NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDmut. Although we did not focus on the detail of HSCT therapy, we found that HSCT improved OS, regardless of the presence of NPM1mut and/or FLT3-ITDmut. In general, patients in favorable risk groups have not been considered candidates for HSCT . We observed that the presence of NPM1mut without FLT3-ITDmut was significantly correlated with a higher CR rate and longer OS and that these patients benefited from HSCT. This study could not provide sufficient evidence to justify the benefit of HSCT because of its small sample size and simple retrospective analysis. Because we observed a favorable impact of HSCT in our study, further studies with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm these findings.
Among patients with NPM1mut, 80% have A-type NPM1mut, which have a favorable impact on patient prognosis [17,26]. The remaining 20% of patients with NPM1mut have non-A-type NPM1mut. The clinical impact of non-A-type NPM1mut remains unclear. Regardless of the mutation type, mutated NPM1 encodes cytoplasmic NPM, which acts as an oncoprotein [16,29]. Therefore, non-A-type NPM1mut are believed to have a clinical impact similar to that of A-type NPM1mut. Our results indicate that non-A-type NPM1mut are associated with favorable outcomes. Patients with A-type and non-A-type NPM1mut tended to have more favorable outcomes with no prognostic differences between these two subgroups. Another previous study of 106 patients found that non-A-type NPM1mut (5 patients) were associated with a significantly shorter CR rate and shorter OS compared with NPM1wt and A-type NPM1mut (13 patients) . However, there was a limitation in that karyotype was not specified for all studied patients. In particular, 1 of the 5 patients with non-A-type NPM1mut were included in the poor-risk group according to karyotype, for 1 of them there was no information about karyotype and 3 of them were included in the standard-risk group without specific karyotypic information.
Interestingly, we found that the interactions between mutations differed according to the type of NPM1mut. Although FLT3mut tended to predict poor prognosis in patients with A-type and non-A-type NPM1mut, their prognostic impact was significant in patients with non-A-type NPM1mut. We included the FLT3-TKD mutation in FLT3mut in our mutational interaction analysis because we observed that the presence of the FLT3-TKD mutation was predictive of poor patient prognosis. Further studies are needed to determine the prognostic interaction between mutations. In addition, our study did not include other molecular markers, such as CEBPA genes, which are known to impact on disease prognosis . Further studies including other prognostic factors are required in the future.
In conclusion, we showed that patients with non- A-type NPM1mut, regardless of FLT3mut status, and patients with NPM1mut in the absence of FLT3-ITD have higher CR rates than patients with NPM1wt and FLT3mut. We found that patients with A-type and non-A-type NPM1mut tended to have better prognoses than patients with NPM1wt and that FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD mutations were associated with a poor prognosis. The favorable prognostic impact of NPM1mut was shown in the univariate analysis, which evaluated the CR rate and RFS. However, in the multivariate analysis, no prognostic impact of NPM1mut and FLT3mut was detected. Although limited by the small sample size, our study findings on the prognostic interaction between non-A-type NPM1mut and FLT3mut indicate the importance of assessing the subtypes of NPM1mut and FLT3mut in patients with AML-NK.
Hyun-Sook Chi, MD, Department of Laboratory Medicine
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center
86, Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu
Seoul 138-736 (South Korea)
Tel. +82 2 3010 4502, E-Mail email@example.com
Received: April 27, 2011
Accepted after revision: August 9, 2011
Published online: November 18, 2011
Number of Print Pages : 9
Number of Figures : 2, Number of Tables : 5, Number of References : 29
Vol. 127, No. 2, Year 2012 (Cover Date: February 2012)
Journal Editor: Ben-Bassat I. (Qiryat-Ono)
ISSN: 0001-5792 (Print), eISSN: 1421-9662 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/AHA