Open Access Gateway
Med Princ Pract 2012;21:24–29
(DOI:10.1159/000331596)

Comparison of the Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities of Phyllanthus virgatus and Phyllanthus amarus Extracts

Poompachee K. · Chudapongse N.
School of Biology, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
email Corresponding Author


 Outline


 goto top of outline Key Words

  • Phyllanthus virgatus
  • Phyllanthus amarus
  • Antioxidant
  • HepG2
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Oxygen consumption

 goto top of outline Abstract

Objective: To determine the antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of Phyllanthus virgatus crude extract compared to Phyllanthus amarus.Methods: Phenolic contents of the hydromethanolic extracts were measured using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Antioxidant activity was evaluated by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl hydrate free radical scavenging and antilipid peroxidation assays. Cytotoxicity on human hepatoma HepG2 cells was assessed by trypan blue and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide viability assays. A stereomicroscope was used to observe and photograph the morphology of the cells. Oxygen consumption of the HepG2 cells was measured using a Clark oxygen electrode. Results: The extract of P. virgatus, which contained more phenolic compounds than P. amarus extract, had higher cytotoxicity and showed higher free radical scavenging activity and more inhibition of peroxidation in a linoleic acid system. P. virgatus extract conspicuously increased the oxygen consumption of HepG2 cells, while P. amarus extract had little stimulatory effect. Conclusion: The hydromethanolic extract of P. virgatus had stronger antioxidant and cytotoxic action than P. amarus extract. The stimulation of HepG2 cell respiration by P. virgatus extract suggests the extract alters mitochondrial function; this action could play a role in the cytotoxicity of this plant.

Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel


goto top of outline Introduction

Oxidative stress induced by oxygen radicals, causing damage to lipids, proteins and nucleic acid, has been shown to be involved in the initiation and progression of various diseases such as inflammation, liver injury, renal failure, cardiovascular diseases and cancer [1]. Several studies have revealed the potential of medicinal plants for serving as antioxidants against various diseases induced by oxidative radicals [2,3,4]. It is widely known that almost all chemotherapeutic agents currently used produce serious toxicities to several organs. Naturally occurring phenolic compounds of plants have been shown to have antioxidant properties [5,6,7] and to exhibit cytotoxic activity on a variety of cancer cell types, such as Jurkat and human hepatoma HepG2 cells, without toxicity to noncancer cells [8]. Moreover, there is increasing evidence showing the chemopreventive potential of many plant compounds such as green and black tea polyphenols, lycopene, soy isoflavones, curcumin, phenethyl isothiocyanate, indole-3-carbinol and perillyl alcohol [9,10,11].

The genus Phyllanthus consists of several species in the family Euphorbiaceae. Phyllanthus virgatus and another two species, P. amarus and P. urinaria, are closely related in appearance and phytochemical structure [12]. In Thailand, they have the same local name (Look Tai Bai). All of them traditionally have been used for the treatment of many ailments such as gonorrhea, jaundice, diabetes and liver diseases [13]. The anticancer activity of Phyllanthus species has also been documented [14,15,16,17,18,19]. For example, P. amarus inhibits the growth of human adenocarcinoma cell line Caco-2 [14], hepatoma induced by N-nitrosodiethylamine in rats [15] and sarcoma induced by 20-methylcholanthrene in mice [16]. Similarly, P. urinaria has also been shown to possess cytotoxic activity against several cancer cell lines including human promyelocytic leukemia [17], Lewis lung carcinoma cells [18] and HepG2 cells [19]. However, the pharmacological studies on P. virgatus mostly involved its antimicrobial [20,21] and antihyperglycemic effects [22]. Cytotoxicity of P. virgatus to cancer cells, particularly HepG2 cells, has never been reported. In this survey, we studied and compared the antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of the hydromethanolic extracts of P. virgatus and P. amarus. In addition, the effects of both extracts on HepG2 cell oxygen consumption were also investigated.

 

goto top of outline Materials and Methods

goto top of outline Plant Materials and Extraction

Plants were collected from June to September 2005 in the Pak Tong Chai and Mueang districts of Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand, and were identified by a botanist, Dr. Paul J. Grote, School of Biology, Suranaree University of Technology. Specimens of the plants are archived at the same School of Biology. Whole plants were thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove dirt and contaminants, and then oven-dried at 40°C. Each dried plant (10 g) was extracted twice with 100 ml of 50% methanol in distilled water. The pooled extracts were filtered and concentrated at 40°C using a rotary evaporator under low pressure. The residue was freeze-dried in a lyophilizer and stored at –20°C until used.

goto top of outline Measurement of Total Phenolic Compounds

The concentration of phenolic compounds in an extract was measured according to the method described previously [23], using gallic acid as a standard. The reaction mixture consisted of 250 µl of the extract (1 mg/ml) or standard (0.025–0.5 mg/ml gallic acid), and 2.5 ml of 2% Na2CO3 was added with 100 µl of 50% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. After 30 min of incubation, the absorbance was measured at 750 nm using a spectrophotometer. Results were expressed as milligrams per gram of gallic acid equivalents.

goto top of outline Determination of Antioxidant Activity: DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity

To measure antioxidant activity, the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) radical scavenging assay was carried out according to the procedure previously described [8]. Briefly, each sample (500 µl; final concentration range: 0–300 µg/ml) was added to 4.0 ml of 50 µM DPPH in methanolic solution, and the final volume was adjusted to 5.0 ml with distilled water. After vortexing, the mixture was incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The decrease in absorbance at 517 nm was then measured using a spectrophotometer. Antioxidant activity was expressed as half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), which was defined as the concentrations of the extracts required to inhibit the formation of DPPH radicals by 50%.

goto top of outline Determination of Antioxidant Activity: Inhibition of Linoleic Acid Oxidation

The antilipid peroxidation activity of the extracts was determined using the ferric thiocyanate method, as previously described [24]. Each sample (500 µl; final concentration range: 0–2,000 µg/ml) was mixed with 2.5 ml of linoleic acid emulsion (0.2 M, pH 7.0) and 2.0 ml of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.0). The linoleic acid emulsion was prepared by mixing 0.2804 g of linoleic acid with 0.2804 g of Tween 20 and 50 ml of phosphate buffer. The reaction mixture was incubated in the dark at 60°C for 8 h. An aliquot (0.1 ml) of the mixture was diluted with 4.5 ml of 75% ethanol, followed by the addition of 0.2 ml of 30% ammonium thiocyanate and 0.2 ml of 20 mM ferrous chloride in 3.5% HCl. Absorbance of the solution was measured at 500 nm using a spectrophotometer. The percentage of inhibition of lipid peroxidation in linoleic acid emulsion was calculated as follows:

inhibition of lipid peroxidation (%) = (1 – A1/A0) × 100%,

where A0 is the absorbance of the control, while A1 is the absorbance in the presence of the extracts.

goto top of outline Cytotoxicity Studies

HepG2 cells (ATCC HB-8065; Manassas, Va., USA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco, Langley, Okla., USA). The cells were grown at 37°C in a fully humidified atmosphere of air with 5% CO2. The cells were used to determine the cytotoxicity of the extracts by trypan blue exclusion and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays [8].

goto top of outline Trypan Blue Exclusion Assay

Cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were plated in triplicate in a 96-well culture plate overnight. They were treated with various concentrations (ranging from 0 to 1,000 µg/ml) of the extracts for 24 h. Cells were harvested after digestion with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution at 37°C for 5 min. The cell suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue. The numbers of viable (unstained) and dead (stained) cells were counted by hemacytometer under a light microscope and the results calculated and expressed as the percentage of live cells compared to control.

goto top of outline MTT Assay

HepG2 cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were prepared as described above for the trypan blue exclusion assay and treated with each extract for 24 h. MTT solution (0.5 mg/ml) was added to each well and incubated for a further 4 h. The medium was removed and 100 µl of DMSO (99.9%) added to each well to dissolve purple crystals of formazan. Absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 540 nm using a microplate reader (Biorad, USA). Data are expressed as percent cell viability compared to control.

goto top of outline Measurement of HepG2 Cell Oxygen Consumption

Rates of oxygen consumption by HepG2 cells were determined with a Clark oxygen electrode (Hansatech Oxygraph, King’s Lynn, UK). HepG2 cells (2 × 107 cells/ml) were incubated in an oxygraph chamber. Glucose (2 mg/ml) was used as a substrate. After a stable rate of oxygen consumption, carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), which is a well-known and potent mitochondrial uncoupler (as a positive control), or the extracts were added to the chamber. Respiratory rates were expressed as nanomoles of oxygen per milliliter per minute.

goto top of outline Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± SD, and the unpaired t test was used to compare phenolic content and antioxidant activity between P. virgatus and P. amarus groups. However, the data from cytotoxicity and oxygen consumption studies were not normally distributed. The data were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare cytotoxicity (IC50) between P. virgatus and P. amarus groups. Statistical differences between treated and control groups in the oxygen consumption study were determined using the Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by ranks followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls method for multiple comparisons. Differences between groups were considered significant when p < 0.05 (n = 5 in each group for all experiments).

 

goto top of outline Results

goto top of outline Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity

The amounts of phenolic compounds in extracts as well as antioxidant activity are shown in table 1. P. virgatus extract contained more phenolic compounds than P. amarus extract. The former also showed significantly greater antioxidant capacity both in DPPH scavenging (p < 0.05) and inhibition of linoleic acid oxidation (p < 0.01). Significant differences in the inhibition of linoleic acid oxidation were found at concentrations of ≧250 µg/ml of the extracts, and the maximal inhibition rates of the P. virgatus and P. amarus extracts were about 84.0 and 65.5% (p < 0.001), respectively.

TAB01
Table 1. Comparison of total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of Phyllanthus extracts

goto top of outline Cytotoxic Effect

The cytotoxic activity of the extracts of P. virgatus and P. amarus, expressed as IC50 values, from the two assays was similar (fig. 1). The results showed that P. virgatus extract was more toxic to HepG2 cells than P. amarus extract. The IC50 of P. amarus and P. virgatus extracts calculated from trypan blue exclusion were 500 (424–604) and 380 (305–401) µg/ml, respectively (fig. 1a), whereas those calculated from MTT assays were 372 (336–593) and 258 (208–296) µg/ml, respectively (fig. 1b).

FIG01
Fig. 1. Cytotoxic effects of Phyllanthus extracts. Cell viability was measured by two different methods. Values are expressed as medians with interquartile ranges in parentheses. The IC50 of P. amarus and P. virgatus measured by the trypan blue method (a) were 500 (424–604) and 380 (305–401) µg/ml, respectively (p < 0.05; n = 5). The IC50 of P. amarus and P. virgatus measured by MTT viability assays (b) were 372 (336–593) and 258 (208–296) µg/ml, respectively (p < 0.05; n = 5).

goto top of outline Effects of Phyllanthus Extracts on Morphological Changes of HepG2 Cells

Morphological features of cells treated with the extracts at 500 µg/ml were studied after 24 h of incubation (fig. 2). Normal cell morphology characterized by epithelial-like features forming a monolayer on the surface of the culture flask was seen in controls and cells treated with 1% DMSO. In the presence of the plant extracts, morphological changes were observed, such as rounding up, loss of contact with cells and detachment from the plate. P. virgatus extract caused more extensive morphological changes in HepG2 cells than P. amarus.

FIG02
Fig. 2. Effects of Phyllanthus extracts on HepG2 morphology. Morphological features of cells treated with the extracts (500 µg/ml each) were observed under a microscope after 24 h of incubation. a Control. b 0.5% DMSO. cP. amarus.dP. virgatus.

goto top of outline Effects of Phyllanthus Extracts on Oxygen Consumption of HepG2 Cells

The rate of oxygen consumption by HepG2 cells was measured in the presence of the extracts (fig. 3). It was found that P. amarus extract caused a small and statistically insignificant respiratory stimulation (p > 0.05), while P. virgatus extract clearly enhanced the respiration of HepG2 cells. This effect of P. virgatus extract was comparable to that produced by CCCP.

FIG03
Fig. 3. Effects of Phyllanthus extracts on oxygen consumption of HepG2 cells. Tracings a and b show the effects of vehicle (0.5% DMSO) and CCCP (1 µM) as negative and positive controls, respectively. Tracings c and d show the effects of P. amarus and P. virgatus (500 µg/ml each), respectively. Arrows: time at which the vehicle, CCCP and the extracts were added. Numbers in parentheses: rates of oxygen consumption in nanomoles of oxygen per milliliter per minute. The tracings are representative of 5 experiments (n = 5). The respiration rates of HepG2 cells in the presence of P. virgatus extract [16.9 (13.3–20.7) nmol O2/ml/min] and CCCP [9.8 (8.1–14.2) nmol O2/ml/min], but not of P. amarus extract [7.5 (5.7–11.0) nmol O2/ml/min], were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the negative control [5.5 (4.2–8.2) nmol O2/ml/min]. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges.

 

goto top of outline Discussion

The findings of a higher total phenolic content of P. virgatus extract from five separate plant collections and the stronger antioxidant activity of P. virgatus extract are comparable to those presented by Kumaran and Karunakaran [13], who have previously reported that the total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of five Phyllanthus species from India can be placed in the following order: P. debilis > P. urinaria > P. virgatus > P. maderaspatensis > P. amarus.P. virgatus extract also showed a stronger cytotoxic effect than P. amarus.

Experiments on the effect of Phyllanthus extracts on HepG2 cell respiration showed that at a concentration of 500 µg/ml, P. virgatus extract clearly stimulated oxygen consumption, whereas P. amarus extract produced but a small and insignificant increase in respiration. Since oxygen consumption by cells is mostly due to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, changes in cellular respiration rate as a result of experimental treatment may indicate alterations in mitochondrial activity. This finding therefore suggests that P. virgatus extract affects mitochondrial function. The greater cytotoxic activity of P. virgatus extract compared to that of P. amarus may be related to a higher phenolic content since it has been reported that phenolic compounds could be cytotoxic [25].

The ability of the extracts to stimulate HepG2 cell oxygen consumption may be involved in cell death. Apoptosis signaling transduction can be induced through the death receptor pathway, such as the Fas ligand and Bcl-2 family, as well as through a mitochondrial pathway [26]. Mitochondrial dysfunction can cause a necrosis-type cell death via ATP depletion and Ca2+ dysregulation [27]. Further experiments are needed to determine whether dysregulation of mitochondrial respiration and function is caused by phenolic compounds and is thereby involved in the cytotoxicity of Phyllanthus extracts; these might include, for example, measurement of oxygen consumption and oxidative phosphorylation by isolated mitochondria treated with known phenolic compounds of these extracts.

 

goto top of outline Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrate that the hydromethanolic extract of P. virgatus exerted greater antioxidant and cytotoxic effects on human hepatoma HepG2 cells than P. amarus extract. It also produced stronger stimulation of HepG2 cell respiration, which indicates the possibility of mitochondrial involvement in the cytotoxic action.

 

goto top of outline Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Research Council of Thailand. We thank Dr. Paul J. Grote for plant verification, and Ms. Matcha Kamkhunthod for her technical assistance.


 goto top of outline References
  1. Aruoma OI, Kaur H, Halliwell B: Oxygen free radicals and human diseases. J R Soc Health 1991;111:172–177.
  2. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G: Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med 1996;21:933–956.

    External Resources

  3. Sabu MC, Kuttan R: Anti-diabetic activity of medicinal plants and its relationship with their antioxidant property. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;81:155–160.
  4. Vuillaume M: Reduced oxygen species, mutation, induction and cancer initiation. Mutat Res 1987;186:43–72.
  5. Sithisarn P, Supabphol R, Gritsanapan W: Comparison of free radical scavenging activity of Siamese neem tree (Azadirachta indica A Juss var siamensis Valeton) leaf extracts prepared by different methods of extraction. Med Princ Pract 2006;15:219–222.
  6. Rao VS, Paiva LA, Souza MF, Campos AR, Ribeiro RA, Brito GA, Teixeira MJ, Silveira ER: A correlation between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic content has been observed. Planta Med 2003;69:851–853.
  7. Sithisarn P, Jarikasem S: Antioxidant activity of Acanthopanax trifoliatus. Med Princ Pract 2009;18:393–398.
  8. Rao YK, Geethangili M, Fang SH, Tzeng YM: Antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of naturally occurring phenolic and related compounds: a comparative study. Food Chem Toxicol 2007;45:1770–1776.
  9. Gann PH, Ma J, Giovannucci E, Willett W, Sacks FM, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ: Lower prostate cancer risk in men with elevated plasma lycopene levels: results of a prospective analysis. Cancer Res 1999;59:1225–1230.
  10. Miller EC, Giovannucci E, Erdman JW Jr, Bahnson R, Schwartz SJ, Clinton SK: Tomato products, lycopene, and prostate cancer risk. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:83–93.
  11. Kelloff GJ, Crowell JA, Steele VE, Lubet RA, Malone WA, Boone CW, Kopelovich L, Hawk ET, Lieberman R, Lawrence JA, Ali I, Viner JL, Sigman CC: Progress in cancer chemoprevention: development of diet-derived chemopreventive agents. J Nutr 2000;130:467S–471S.
  12. Chantaranothai P: Phyllanthus; in van Welzen PC, Chayamarit K (eds): Euphorbiaceae. Flora of Thailand. Bangkok, Royal Forest Department, 2005, vol 6, pp 473–507.
  13. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ: In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India. LWT 2007;40:344–352.
  14. Lawson-Evi P, Eklu-Gadegbeku K, Agbonon A, Aklikokou K, Moukha S, Creppy EE, Gbeassor M: Toxicological assessment on extracts of Phyllanthus amarus Schum and Thonn. Sci Res Essay 2008;3:410–415.

    External Resources

  15. Rajeshkumar NV, Kuttan R: Phyllanthus amarus extract administration increases the life span of rats with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Ethnopharmacol 2000;73:215–219.
  16. Rajeshkumar NV, Joy KL, Kuttan G, Ramsewak RS, Nair MG, Kuttan R: Antitumour and anticarcinogenic activity of Phyllanthus amarus extract. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;81:17–22.
  17. Huang ST, Yang RC, Chena MY, Pang JHS: Phyllanthus urinaria induces the Fas receptor/ligand expression and ceramide-mediated apoptosis in HL-60 cells. Life Sci 2004;75:339–351.
  18. Huang ST, Yang RC, Yang LJ, Lee PN, Pang JHS: Phyllanthus urinaria triggers the apoptosis and Bcl-2 down-regulation in Lewis lung carcinoma cells. Life Sci 2003;72:1705–1716.
  19. Sureban SM, Subramaniam D, Paramasivam R, Ramanujam RP, Dieckgraefe BK, Houchen CW, Anant S: Therapeutic effects of Phyllanthus species: induction of TNF-α-mediated apoptosis in HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Am J Pharmacol Toxicol 2006;1:65–71.
  20. Maruyama M, Yamauchi S, Akiyama K, Sugahara T, Kishida T, Koba Y: Antibacterial activity of a virgatusin-related compound. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2007;71:677–680.
  21. Akiyama K, Yamauchi S, Nakato T, Maruyama M, Sugahara T, Kishida T: Antifungal activity of tetra-substituted tetrahydrofuran lignan, (–)-virgatusin, and its structure-activity relationship. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2007;71:1028–1035.
  22. Shabeer J, Srivastava RS, Singh SK: Antidiabetic and antioxidant effect of various fractions of Phyllanthus simplex in alloxan diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2009;124:34–38.
  23. Kähkönen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M: Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem 1999;47:3954–3962.
  24. Zhan Y, Dong CH, Yao YJ: Antioxidant activities of aqueous extract from cultivated fruit-bodies of Cordyceps militaris (L) link in vitro. J Integr Plant Biol 2006;48:1365–1370.
  25. Metodiewa D, Jaiswal AK, Cenas N, Dickancaité E, Segura-Aguilar J: Quercetin may act as a cytotoxic prooxidant after its metabolic activation to semiquinone and quinoidal product. Free Radic Biol Med 1999;26:107–116.
  26. Nagata S: Apoptosis by death factor. Cell 1997;88:355–365.
  27. Bernardi P, Petronilli V, di Lisa F, Forte M: A mitochondrial perspective on cell death. Trends Biochem Sci 2001;26:112–117.

 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Dr. Nuannoi Chudapongse
School of Biology, Institute of Science
Suranaree University of Technology
Nakhon Ratchasima 30000 (Thailand)
Tel. +66 4422 4620, E-Mail nuannoi@sut.ac.th


 goto top of outline Article Information

Received: November 10, 2010
Accepted: May 9, 2011
Published online: October 20, 2011
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 3, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 27


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Medical Principles and Practice (International Journal of the Kuwait University Health Sciences Centre)

Vol. 21, No. 1, Year 2012 (Cover Date: December 2011)

Journal Editor: Owunwanne A. (Kuwait), Benov L. (Kuwait)
ISSN: 1011-7571 (Print), eISSN: 1423-0151 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/MPP


Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.