Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 72, No. 4, 2011
Issue release date: December 2011
Section title: Paper
Free Access
Hum Hered 2011;72:228–236

Linkage Analysis in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era

Bailey-Wilson J.E. · Wilson A.F.
Inherited Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Md., USA
email Corresponding Author

Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, PhD


333 Cassell Drive, Suite 1200

Baltimore, MD 21224 (USA)

Tel. +1 443 740 2921, E-Mail


  1. Tsui LC, et al: Cystic fibrosis locus defined by a genetically linked polymorphic DNA marker. Science 1985;230:1054–1057.
  2. Riordan JR, et al: Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science 1989;245:1066–1073.
  3. Gusella JF, et al: A polymorphic DNA marker genetically linked to Huntington’s disease. Nature 1983;306:234–238.
  4. The Huntington Disease Collaborative Research Group: A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 1993;72:971–983.
  5. Brant SR, et al: American families with Crohn’s disease have strong evidence for linkage to chromosome 16 but not chromosome 12. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1056–1061.
  6. Ogura Y, et al: A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature 2001;411:603–606.
  7. Hugot JP, et al: Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature 2001;411:599–603.
  8. Hampe J, et al: Association between insertion mutation in NOD2 gene and Crohn’s disease in German and British populations. Lancet 2001;357:1925–1928.
  9. Goldin LR, et al: Segregation and linkage studies of plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH), erythrocyte catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), and platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO): possible linkage between the ABO locus and a gene controlling DBH activity. Am J Hum Genet 1982;34:250–262.
  10. Asamoah A, et al: Segregation and linkage analyses of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity in a six-generation pedigree. Am J Med Genet 1987;27:613–621.
  11. Wilson AF, et al: Linkage of a gene regulating dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity and the ABO blood group locus. Am J Hum Genet 1988;42:160–166.
  12. Craig SP, et al: Localization of the human dopamine beta hydroxylase (DBH) gene to chromosome 9q34. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1988;48:48–50.
  13. Zabetian CP, et al: A quantitative-trait analysis of human plasma-dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity: evidence for a major functional polymorphism at the DBH locus. Am J Hum Genet 2001;68:515–522.
  14. Cubells JF, et al: Linkage analysis of plasma dopamine-Β-hydroxylase in families of patients with schizophrenia. Hum Genet 2011;130:635–643.
  15. Ioannidis JP: Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005;2:e124.
  16. Moonesinghe R, Khoury MJ, Janssens AC: Most published research findings are false – but a little replication goes a long way. PLoS Med 2007;4:e28.
  17. Sobreira NL, et al: Whole-genome sequencing of a single proband together with linkage analysis identifies a Mendelian disease gene. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1000991.
  18. Bowden DW, et al: Molecular basis of a linkage peak: exome sequencing and family-based analysis identify a rare genetic variant in the ADIPOQ gene in the IRAS Family Study. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:4112–4120.
  19. Guo X, et al: Genome-wide linkage of plasma adiponectin reveals a major locus on chromosome 3q distinct from the adiponectin structural gene: the IRAS family study. Diabetes 2006;55:1723–1730.
  20. Sutton WS: On the morphology of the chromosome group in Brachystola magna. Biol Bull 1902;4:24–39.
  21. Sutton WS: The chromosomes in heredity. Biol Bull 1903;4:231–251.
  22. Correns C: Uber Vererbungsgesetze. Berlin, G. Borntrager, 1905.
  23. Bateson W, Punnett RC: Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Reports of the Evolution Committee. Roy Soc 1906;3:1–53.
  24. Muller HJ: The mechanism of crossing over. Am Nat 1916;50:193–221.
  25. Morgan TH: Random segregation versus coupling in Mendelian inheritance. Science 1911;34:384.
  26. Sturtevant AH: The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila as shown by their mode of association. J Exp Zool 1913;14:43–59.
  27. Wilson AF, et al: Stepwise oligogenic segregation and linkage analysis illustrated with dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity. Am J Med Genet 1990;35:425–432.
  28. Fisher RA: The detection of linkage. Ann Eugen 1935;6:187–201.
  29. Penrose LS: The detection of autosomal linkage in data which consists of pairs of brothers and sisters of unpecified parentage. Ann Eugen 1935;6:133–138.
  30. Finney DJ: The detection of linkage. Ann Eugen 1940;10:171–214.
  31. Finney DJ: The detection of linkage. II. Further mating types, scoring of Boyd’s data. Ann Eugen 1941;11:10–30.
  32. Finney DJ: The detection of linkage. III. Incomplete parental testing. Ann Eugen 1941;11:115–135.
  33. Finney DJ: The detection of linkage. IV. Lack of parental records and the use of empirical information. J Hered 1942;33:157–160.
  34. Finney DJ: The detection of linkage. V. Supplementary tables. Ann Eugen 1942;11:224–232.
  35. Finney DJ: The detection of linkage. VII. Combination of data from matings of known and unknown phase. Ann Eugen 1943;12:31–43.
  36. Haldane JB, Smith CA: A new estimate of the linkage between the genes for colourblindness and haemophilia in man. Ann Eugen 1947;14:10–31.
  37. Smith CAB: The detection of linkage in human genetics. J Roy Stat Soc B 1953;15:153–184.
  38. Wald A: Sequential Analysis. New York, Wiley, 1947.
  39. Morton NE: Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 1955;7:277–318.
  40. Bernard GA: Statistical inference. J R Stat Soc B 1949;11:115–140.
  41. Morton NE: Significance levels in complex inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:690–697.
  42. Morton NE: Erratum, significance levels in complex inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:1252.
  43. Rao DC, et al: Variability of human linkage data. Am J Hum Genet 1978;30:516–529.
  44. Morton NE: The detection and estimation of linkage between the genes for elliptocytosis and the Rh blood type. Am J Hum Genet 1956;8:80–96.
  45. Morton NE, Steinberg AG: Sequential test for linkage between cystic fibrosis of the pancreas and the MNS locus. Am J Hum Genet 1956;8:177–189.
  46. Morton NE: Further scoring types in sequential linkage tests, with a critical review of autosomal and partial sex linkage in man. Am J Hum Genet 1957;9:55–75.
  47. Elston RC, Stewart J: A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 1971;21:523–542.
  48. Mather K, Jinks JL: Biometrical Genetics; the Study of Continuous Variation, ed 2, revised. Ithaca, Cornell Univ Press, 1971, p 382.
  49. Lange K, Elston RC: Extensions to pedigree analysis I. Likehood calculations for simple and complex pedigrees. Hum Hered 1975;25:95–105.
  50. Mather K, Jinks JL: Introduction to Biometrical Genetics. Ithaca, Cornell Univ Press, 1977, p 231.
  51. Elston RC: Segregation analysis. Adv Hum Genet 1981;11:63–120, 372–373.
  52. Mather K, Jinks JL: Biometrical Genetics: The Study of Continuous Variation, ed 3. London, New York, Chapman and Hall, 1982, p 396.
  53. Lalouel JM, et al: A unified model for complex segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1983;35:816–826.
  54. Elston RC: Segregation and linkage analysis. Anim Genet 1992;23:59–62.
  55. Bonney GE: Regressive logistic models for familial disease and other binary traits. Biometrics 1986;42:611–625.
  56. Bonney GE: A note on the basis of regressive models for genetic analysis. Genet Epidemiol Suppl 1986;1:37–42.
  57. Bonney GE, Lathrop GM, Lalouel JM: Combined linkage and segregation analysis using regressive models. Am J Hum Genet 1988;43:29–37.
  58. Bonney GE, Dunston GM, Wilson J: Regressive logistic models for ordered and unordered polychotomous traits: application to affective disorders. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:211–215.
  59. Demenais FM, Bonney GE: Equivalence of the mixed and regressive models for genetic analysis. I. Continuous traits. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:597–617.
  60. Bonney GE: Compound regressive models for family data. Hum Hered 1992;42:28–41.
  61. Stricker C, Fernando RL, Elston RC: Segregation analysis under an alternative formulation for the mixed model. Genet Epidemiol 1993;10:653–658.
  62. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, ed 4. Essex, Longman, 1996, p 464.
  63. Elston RC, Olson JM, Palmer L: Biostatistical Genetics and Genetic Epidemiology. Wiley reference series in biostatistics. Chichester, New York, Wiley, 2002, p 831.
  64. Wilson AF, Elston RC: Linkage analysis in the study of the genetics of alcoholism; in Begleiter H, Kissin B (eds): The Genetics of Alcoholism. Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 353–376.
  65. Ott J: Estimation of the recombination fraction in human pedigrees: efficient computation of the likelihood for human linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 1974;26:588–597.
  66. Lander E, Botstein D: Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989;121:185–199.
  67. Lander ES, Green P: Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:2363–2367.
  68. Ott J: Linkage analysis and family classification under heterogeneity. Ann Hum Genet 1983;47:311–320.
  69. Smith CAB: Homogeneity test for linkage data. 2nd International Congress on Human Genetics, 1961.
  70. Cannings C, Thompson EA, Skolnick MH: Probability functions on complex pedigrees. Adv Appl Prob 1978;10:26–61.
  71. Meyers DA, et al: Linkage group I: the simultaneous estimation of recombination and interference. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1976;16:335–339.
  72. Lathrop GM, et al: Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:3443–3446.
  73. Lathrop GM, et al: Multilocus linkage analysis in humans: detection of linkage and estimation of recombination. Am J Hum Genet 1985;37:482–498.
  74. Cottingham RW Jr, Idury RM, Schaffer AA: Faster sequential genetic linkage computations. Am J Hum Genet 1993;53:252–263.
  75. Hodge SE, et al: Age-of-onset correction available for linkage analysis (LIPED). Am J Hum Genet 1979;31:761–762.
  76. Lander ES, et al: MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1987;1:174–181.
  77. Kruglyak L, et al: Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:1347–1363.
  78. Sobel E, Lange K: Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:1323–1337.
  79. Forabosco P, Falchi M, Devoto M: Statistical tools for linkage analysis and genetic association studies. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2005;5:781–796.
  80. Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, ed 3. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
  81. Dudbridge F: A survey of current software for linkage analysis. Hum Genomics 2003;1:63–65.
  82. Elston RC, Anne Spence M: Advances in statistical human genetics over the last 25 years. Stat Med 2006;25:3049–3080.
  83. Terwilliger JD, Goring HH: Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design. Hum Biol 2000;72:63–132.
  84. Strug LJ, Hodge SE: An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. I. Decoupling ‘error probabilities’ from ‘measures of evidence’. Hum Hered 2006;61:166–188.
  85. Strug LJ, Hodge SE: An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. II. Implications for multiple test adjustments. Hum Hered 2006;61:200–209.
  86. Freimer N, Sabatti C: The use of pedigree, sib-pair and association studies of common diseases for genetic mapping and epidemiology. Nat Genet 2004;36:1045–1051.
  87. Conneally PM, Rivas ML: Linkage analysis in man. Adv Hum Genet 1980;10:209–266.
  88. Lander E, Kruglyak L: Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 1995;11:241–247.
  89. Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM: Using alpha wisely: improving power to detect multiple QTL. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004;3:1.
  90. Cheverud JM: A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans. Heredity 2001;87:52–58.
  91. Curtis D: Genetic dissection of complex traits. Nat Genet 1996;12:356–357.
  92. Risch N, Botstein D: A manic depressive history. Nat Genet 1996;12:351–353.
  93. Witte JS, Elston RC, Schork NJ: Genetic dissection of complex traits. Nat Genet 1996;12:355–356.
  94. Rao DC: CAT scans, PET scans, and genomic scans. Genet Epidemiol 1998;15:1–18.
  95. Fernando RL, et al: Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Genetics 2004;166:611–619.
  96. Risch N: A note on multiple testing procedures in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1991;48:1058–1064.
  97. Hodge SE, Abreu PC, Greenberg DA: Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:217–227.
  98. Greenberg DA, et al: Power, mode of inheritance, and type I error in LOD scores and affecteds-only methods: reply to Kruglyak. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:202–204.
  99. Greenberg DA, Abreu PC: Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics. Genet Epidemiol 2001;21:299–314.
  100. Hodge SE, et al: Multipoint lods provide reliable linkage evidence despite unknown limiting distribution: type I error probabilities decrease with sample size for multipoint lods and mods. Genet Epidemiol 2008;32:800–815.
  101. Camp NJ, Farnham JM: Correcting for multiple analyses in genomewide linkage studies. Ann Hum Genet 2001;65:577–582.
  102. Vieland VJ, Logue M: HLODs, trait models, and ascertainment: implications of admixture for parameter estimation and linkage detection. Hum Hered 2002;53:23–35.
  103. Abreu PC, Hodge SE, Greenberg DA: Quantification of type I error probabilities for heterogeneity LOD scores. Genet Epidemiol 2002;22:156–169.
  104. Hodge SE, Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA: HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:556–559.
  105. Xing C, Morris N, Xing G: Distribution of model-based multipoint heterogeneity lod scores. Genet Epidemiol 2010;34:912–916.
  106. Huang Q, et al: Examining the effect of linkage disequilibrium on multipoint linkage analysis. BMC Genet 2005;6(suppl 1):S83.
  107. Boyles AL, et al: Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. Hum Hered 2005;59:220–227.
  108. Kim Y, et al: Examining the effect of linkage disequilibrium between markers on the Type I error rate and power of nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis of two-generation and multigenerational pedigrees in the presence of missing genotype data. Genet Epidemiol 2008;32:41–51.
  109. Penrose LS: Genetic linkage in graded human characters. Ann Eugen 1938;8:233–237.
  110. Haseman JK, Elston RC: The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet 1972;2:3–19.
  111. Suarez BK, Rice J, Reich T: The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage. Ann Hum Genet 1978;42:87–94.
  112. Amos CI, Dawson DV, Elston RC: The probabilistic determination of identity-by-descent sharing for pairs of relatives from pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 1990;47:842–853.
  113. Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Lander ES: Rapid multipoint linkage analysis of recessive traits in nuclear families, including homozygosity mapping. Am J Hum Genet 1995;56:519–527.
  114. Kruglyak L, Lander ES: Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:439–454.
  115. Amos CI, Elston RC: Robust methods for the detection of genetic linkage for quantitative data from pedigrees. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:349–360.
  116. Elston RC: The genetic dissection of multifactorial traits. Clin Exp Allergy 1995;25(suppl 2):103–106.
  117. Tiwari HK, Elston RC: Linkage of multilocus components of variance to polymorphic markers. Ann Hum Genet 1997;61:253–261.
  118. Tiwari HK, Elston RC: Restrictions on components of variance for epistatic models. Theor Popul Biol 1998;54:161–174.
  119. Goldgar DE: Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. Am J Hum Genet 1990;47:957–967.
  120. Schork NJ: Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. Am J Hum Genet 1993;53:1306–1319.
  121. Amos CI: Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 1994;54:535–543.
  122. Blangero J, Almasy L: SOLAR: Sequential Oligogenic Linkage Analysis Routines. Technical notes. 1996, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research. Population Genetics Laboratory: San Antonio, TX.
  123. Elston RC, et al: Haseman and Elston revisited. Genet Epidemiol 2000;19:1–17.
  124. Elston RC, Cordell HJ: Overview of model-free methods for linkage analysis. Adv Genet 2001;42:135–150.
  125. Almasy L, Blangero J: Contemporary model-free methods for linkage analysis. Adv Genet 2008;60:175–193.
  126. Almasy L, Blangero J: Human QTL linkage mapping. Genetica 2009;136:333–340.
  127. Almasy L, Blangero J: Variance component methods for analysis of complex phenotypes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010;2010:pdb.top77.
  128. Penrose LS: The general purpose sib pair linkage test. Ann Eugen London 1953;18:120–124.
  129. Day NE, Simons MJ: Disease susceptibility genes – their identification by multiple case family studies. Tissue Antigens 1976;8:109–119.
  130. Fishman PM, et al: A robust method for the detection of linkage in familial disease. Am J Hum Genet 1978;30:308–321.
  131. Blackwelder WC, Elston RC: A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol 1985;2:85–97.
  132. Knapp M, Seuchter SA, Baur MP: Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1. Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests. Hum Hered 1994;44:37–43.
  133. Schaid DJ, Nick TG: Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test. Genet Epidemiol 1990;7:359–370.
  134. Feingold E, Siegmund DO: Strategies for mapping heterogeneous recessive traits by allele-sharing methods. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:965–978.
  135. Whittemore AS, Halpern J: A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. Biometrics 1994;50:118–127.
  136. Whittemore AS, Halpern J: Probability of gene identity by descent: computation and applications. Biometrics 1994;50:109–117.
  137. Whittemore AS, Tu IP: Simple, robust linkage tests for affected sibs. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:1228–1242.
  138. Holmans P: Asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:362–374.
  139. Faraway JJ: Improved sib-pair linkage test for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol 1993;10:225–233.
  140. Knapp M, Seuchter SA, Baur MP: Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests. Am J Hum Genet 1994;55:1030–1041.
  141. Dupuis J, Brown PO, Siegmund D: Statistical methods for linkage analysis of complex traits from high-resolution maps of identity by descent. Genetics 1995;140:843–856.
  142. Farrall M: Affected sibpair linkage tests for multiple linked susceptibility genes. Genet Epidemiol 1997;14:103–115.
  143. Olson JM: Likelihood-based models for genetic linkage analysis using affected sib pairs. Hum Hered 1997;47:110–120.
  144. Cordell HJ, et al: Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1273–1286.
  145. Davis S, et al: Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:867–880.
  146. Kong A, Cox NJ: Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61:1179–1188.
  147. McPeek MS: Optimal allele-sharing statistics for genetic mapping using affected relatives. Genet Epidemiol 1999;16:225–249.
  148. Olson JM: A general conditional-logistic model for affected-relative-pair linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:1760–1769.
  149. Bailey-Wilson JE: Parametric versus nonparametric and two-point versus multipoint: controversies in gene mapping; in Dunn M, et al. (eds): Encyclopedia of Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  150. Miki Y, et al: A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994;266:66–71.
  151. Hall JM, et al: Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. Science 1990;250:1684–1689.
  152. Walsh T, et al: Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:12629–12633.
  153. Suarez BK, Hampe CL, Van Eerdewegh P: Problems of replicating linkage claims in psychiatry; in Gershon ES, Cloninger CR (eds): Genetic Approaches to Mental Disorders. Washington, American Psychiatric Press, 1994, pp 23–46.
  154. Wilson AF, Ziegler A: Lessons learned from genetic analysis workshop 17: transitioning from genome-wide association studies to whole-genome statistical genetic analysis. Genet Epidemiol 2011, in press.