Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 18, No. 2, 2012
Issue release date: February 2012
Eur Addict Res 2012;18:91–96
(DOI:10.1159/000334614)

Subculture Affiliation Is Associated with Substance Use of Adolescents

Bobakova D. · Madarasova Geckova A. · Reijneveld S.A. · van Dijk J.P.
aGraduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health and bInstitute of Public Health, Department of Health Psychology, Medical Faculty, P.J. Safarik University, Kosice, Slovak Republic; cDepartment of Social Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Youth subcultures (hip-hop, punk, skinhead, techno scene, metal) are known for specific lifestyles, music preferences, shared values and behaviours of their members. The aim of this study was to assess the association between subculture affiliation and substance use (tobacco, alcohol and cannabis), and whether gender, family affluence and substance use by peers explain this association. Subculture affiliation was significantly associated with substance use (OR/95% CI: smoking 3.13/2.30–4.24; drinking 2.58/1.95–3.41; drunkenness 2.02/1.54–2.66; cannabis use 2.42/1.46–4.00). Only a part of this risk runs via gender, family affluence and peer substance use. Health promotion should be targeted in particular at adolescents with a subculture affiliation as they are at higher risk of substance use.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Nicholas S: Subcultures and Countercultures – Research Starters Sociology. Toledo, Great Neck, 2009, pp 1–6.
  2. Tarrant M, MacKenzie L, Hewitt LA: Friendship group identification, multidimensional self-concept, and experience of developmental tasks in adolescence. J Adolesc 2006;29:627–640.
  3. Nurmi J: Socialization and self-development: channeling, selection, adjustment, and reflection; in Lerner RM, Steinberg LD (eds): Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. Hoboken, Wiley & Sons, 2004, p 85.
  4. Simons-Morton B, Chen RS: Over time relationships between early adolescent and peer substance use. Addict Behav 2006;31:1211–1223.
  5. Hodkinson P, Deicke W: Youth Cultures: Scenes, Subcultures and Tribes. New York, Routledge, 2007.
  6. Bakagiannis S, Tarrant M: Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence. Scand J Psychol 2006;47:129–136.
  7. Selfhout MHW, Branje SJT, ter Bogt TFM, Meeus WHJ: The role of music preferences in early adolescents’ friendship formation and stability. J Adolesc 2009;32:95–107.
  8. Baker F, Bor W: Can music preference indicate mental health status in young people? Australas Psychiatry 2008;16:284–288.
  9. Schwartz K: Music preferences, personality style, and developmental issues of adolescents. J Youth Ministry 2004;3:47–64.
  10. Mulder J, Ter Bogt TFM, Raaijmakers QAW, et al: The soundtrack of substance use: music preference and adolescent smoking and drinking. Subst Use Misuse 2009;44:514–531.
  11. Pedersen W: Cannabis use: subculture opposition or social marginality?: a population-based longitudinal study. Acta Sociol 2009;52:135–148.

    External Resources

  12. Forsyth AJM, Barnard M, Mckeganey NP: Musical preference as an indicator of adolescent drug use. Addiction 1997;92:1317–1325.
  13. Allaste A, Lagerspetz M: Recreational drug use in Estonia: the context of club culture. Contemp Drug Probl 2002;29:183.
  14. Anderson TL, Kavanaugh PR, Rapp L, Daly K: Variations in clubbers’ substance use by individual and scene-level factors. Adicciones 2009;21:289–308.
  15. Rácz JG: Drug use by the members of youth subcultures in Hungary. Int J Addict 1992;27:289–300.
  16. Verkooijen KT, de Vries NK, Nielsen GA: Youth crowds and substance use: the impact of perceived group norm and multiple group identification. Psychol Addict Behav 2007;21:55–61.
  17. Van der Rijt GAJ, d’Haenens LSJ, Van Straten P: Smoking and other substance use as distinct features of teenage subcultures. J Adolesc Health 2002;31:433–435.
  18. Currie C, Molcho M, Boyce W, et al: Researching health inequalities in adolescents: the development of the health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:1429–1436.
  19. Currie C, Gabhainn SN, Godeau E, et al: Inequalities in young people’s health. HBSC international report from the 2005/2006 survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, 2008, report 5.
  20. Bobakova D: Relation between youth subcultures and drugs; thesis, Prešov, 2009.
  21. Shildrick T, MacDonald R: In defence of subculture: young people, leisure and social divisions. J Youth Stud 2006;9:125–140.

    External Resources

  22. Veselska Z, Madarasova Geckova A, Reijneveld SA, van Dijk JP: Self-efficacy, affectivity and smoking behavior in adolescence. Eur Addict Res 2011;17:172–177.
  23. Tomcikova Z, Madarasova Geckova A, Reijneveld SA, van Dijk JP: Parental divorce, adolescents’ feelings toward parents and drunkenness in adolescents. Eur Addict Res 2011;17:113–118.
  24. Mayberry ML, Espelage DL, Koenig B: Multilevel modeling of direct effects and interactions of peers, parents, school, and community influences on adolescent substance use. J Youth Adolesc 2009;38:1038–1049.
  25. Glaser B, Shelton KH, Van den Bree MBM: The moderating role of close friends in the relationship between conduct problems and adolescent substance use. J Adolesc Health 2010;47:35–42.
  26. Mulder J, Ter Bogt TFM, Raaijmakers QAW, et al: Is it the music? Peer substance use as a mediator of the link between music preferences and adolescent substance use. J Adolesc 2010;33:387–394.
  27. Madarasova Geckova A, Stewart R, Van Dijk JP, Orosova O, Groothoff JW, Post D: Influence of socio-economic status, parents and peers on smoking behaviour of adolescents.Eur Addict Res 2005;11:204–209.
  28. Del Boca FK, Noll JA: Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 2000;95:S347–S360.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50