Background: The role of the non-injured hemisphere in stroke recovery is poorly understood. In this pilot study, we sought to explore the presence of structural changes detectable by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the contralesional hemispheres of patients who recovered well from ischemic stroke. Methods: We analyzed serial DTI data from 16 stroke patients who had moderate initial neurological deficits (NIHSS scores 3–12) and good functional outcome at 3–6 months (NIHSS score 0 or modified Rankin Score ≤1). We segmented the brain tissue in gray and white matter (GM and WM) and measured the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy in the infarct, in the contralesional infarct mirror region as well as in concentrically expanding regions around them. Results: We found that GM and WM ADC significantly increased in the infarct region (p < 0.01) from acute to chronic time points, whereas in the infarct mirror region, GM and WM ADC increased (p < 0.01) and WM fractional anisotropy decreased (p < 0.05). No significant changes were detected in other regions. Conclusion: DTI-based metrics are sensitive to regional structural changes in the contralesional hemisphere during stroke recovery. Prospective studies in larger cohorts with varying levels of recovery are needed to confirm our findings.

Keywords:
Stroke recovery, Diffusion tensor imaging, Plasticity, Contralesional hemisphere
1.
Ziemann U: Improving disability in stroke with RTMS. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:454–455.
2.
Catano A, et al: Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:349–354.
3.
Werhahn KJ, et al: Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2003;54:464–472.
4.
Fridman EA, et al: Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. Brain 2004;127:747–758.
5.
Calautti C, et al: Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 2001;32:2534–2542.
6.
Ward NS, et al: Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 2003;126:2476–2496.
7.
Carmichael ST: Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. Neuroscientist 2003;9:64–75.
8.
Granziera C, et al: Long-term monitoring of post-stroke plasticity after transient cerebral ischemia in mice using in vivo and ex vivo diffusion tensor MRI. Open Neuroimag J 2007;1:10–17.
9.
Takatsuru Y, Koibuchi N, Nabekura J: Unilateral infarction of the visual cortex (VC) induced an increase in dendritic spine turnover in contralateral VC. Neurosci Lett 2011;488:97–100.
10.
Gerloff C, et al: Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain 2006;129:791–808.
11.
Rehme AK, Fink GR, von Cramon DY, Grefkes C: The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal fMRI. Cereb Cortex 2011;21:756–768.
12.
Buffon F, et al: Longitudinal diffusion changes in cerebral hemispheres after MCA infarcts. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:641–650.
13.
Herve D, et al: Longitudinal thalamic diffusion changes after middle cerebral artery infarcts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:200–205.
14.
Schaechter JD, Fricker ZP, Perdue KL, Helmer KG, Vangel MG, Greve DN, Makris N: Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:3461–3474.
15.
Crofts JJ, et al: Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage 2011;54:161–169.
16.
Conturo TE, et al: Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:10422–10427.
17.
Basser PJ, et al: In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:625–632.
18.
Mori S, Zhang J: Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 2006;51:527–539.
19.
Pierpaoli C, et al: Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637–648.
20.
Beaulieu C: The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:435–455.
21.
Ay H, et al: A computerized algorithm for etiologic classification of ischemic stroke: the Causative Classification of Stroke System. Stroke 2007;38:2979–2984.
22.
Sorensen AG, et al: Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212:785–792.
23.
Liu T, Li H, Wong K, Tarokh A, Guo L, Wong ST: Brain tissue segmentation based on DTI data. Neuroimage 2007;38:114–123.
24.
Schlaug G, et al: Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke. Neurology 1997;49:113–119.
25.
Mukherjee P, et al: Differences between gray matter and white matter water diffusion in stroke: diffusion-tensor MR imaging in 12 patients. Radiology 2000;215:211–220.
26.
Ritzl A, et al: Development of brain infarct volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): follow-up of diffusion-weighted MRI lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:201–207.
27.
Murase N, et al: Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004;55:400–409.
28.
Tuch DS, et al: Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:12212–12217.
29.
Carmichael ST, et al: New patterns of intracortical projections after focal cortical stroke. Neurobiol Dis 2001;8:910–922.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.