Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 30, No. 3, 2012
Issue release date: June 2012
Dig Dis 2012;30:304–309
(DOI:10.1159/000337003)

Microsatellite Instability and Therapeutic Consequences in Colorectal Cancer

Laghi L. · Malesci A.
aMolecular Gastroenterology Unit and bDepartment of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, and cDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI), the molecular phenotype of colorectal cancers with mismatch repair defects was discovered in the last decade of the previous century. As a field of investigation which successfully joins basic and clinical science, MSI is an example of real translational science, starting from the molecular basis of a disease and extending to the clinical arena. In clinical settings, MSI is a diagnostic biomarker leading to the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. However, the clinical implication of MSI testing extends to the role of prognostic marker, due to the better outcome of patients with MSI colorectal cancer. Additionally, MSI identified a general lack of response to neo-adjuvant therapy employing 5-fluorouracil. Like predictive markers of response to chemotherapy, the role of MSI is likely not exhausted, as chemotherapy regimens need to take into account the peculiar biological and clinical behavior of MSI cancers.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Markowitz SD, Bertagnolli MM: Molecular origins of cancer: molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2449–2460.
  2. NCBI: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). 2007. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=OMIM.
  3. Laghi L, Bianchi P, Malesci A: Differences and evolution of the methods for the assessment of microsatellite instability. Oncogene 2008;27:6313–6321.
  4. Laghi L, Ranzani GN, Bianchi P, et al: Frameshift mutations of human gastrin receptor gene (hGARE) in gastrointestinal cancers with microsatellite instability. Lab Invest 2002;82:265–271.
  5. Thibodeau SN, French AJ, Roche PC, et al: Altered expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 in tumors with microsatellite instability and genetic alterations in mismatch repair genes. Cancer Res 1996;56:4836–4840.
  6. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al: A National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:5248–5257.
  7. Aaltonen LA, Salovaara R, Kristo P, et al: Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1481–1487.
  8. Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE: The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 2010;12:93–104.
  9. Laghi L, Bianchi P, Miranda E, et al: CD3+ cells at the invasive margin of deeply invading (pT3-T4) colorectal cancer and risk of post-surgical metastasis: a longitudinal study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:877–884.
  10. Lindor NM, Rabe K, Petersen GM, et al: Lower cancer incidence in Amsterdam-I criteria families without mismatch repair deficiency: familial colorectal cancer type X. JAMA 2005;293:1979–1985.
  11. Malesci A, Laghi L, Bianchi P, et al: Reduced likelihood of metastases in patients with microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:3831–3839.
  12. Guastadisegni C, Colafranceschi M, Ottini L, Dogliotti E: Microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and response to therapy: a meta-analysis of colorectal cancer survival data. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2788–2798.
  13. Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh ET, et al: Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;342:69–77.
  14. Ribic CM, Sargent DJ, Moore MJ, et al: Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:247–257.
  15. Sargent DJ, Marsoni S, Monges G, et al: Defective mismatch repair as a predictive marker for lack of efficacy of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3219–3226.
  16. Des Guetz G, Schischmanoff O, Nicolas P, Perret GY, Morere JF, Uzzan B: Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:1890–1896.
  17. Sinicrope FA, Foster NR, Thibodeau SN, et al: DNA mismatch repair status and colon cancer recurrence and survival in clinical trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:863–875.
  18. Zaanan A, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Guilloux A, et al: Impact of p53 expression and microsatellite instability on stage III colon cancer disease-free survival in patients treated by 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin. Ann Oncol 2010;21:772–780.
  19. Bertagnolli MM, Niedzwiecki D, Compton CC, et al: Microsatellite instability predicts improved response to adjuvant therapy with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in stage III colon cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 89803. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1814–1821.
  20. Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT: New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1453–1456.
  21. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, et al: Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:261–268.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50