For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
The MEF2C-Related and 5q14.3q15 Microdeletion SyndromeZweier M.a · Rauch A.b
aInstitute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; bInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland Corresponding Author
Institute of Medical Genetics
University of Zurich, Schorenstrasse 16
CH–8603 Schwerzenbach (Switzerland)
Tel. +41 44 655 7051, E-Mail email@example.com
Disorders related to the autosomal transcription factor MEF2C located in 5q14.3 were first described in 2009 and have since evolved to one of the more common microdeletion syndromes. Mutational screening in a larger cohort revealed heterozygous de novo mutations of MEF2C in about 1% of patients with moderate to severe intellectual disability, and the phenotype is similar in patients with intragenic deletions and multigenic microdeletions. Clinically, MEF2C-related disorders are characterized by severe intellectual disability with absent speech and limited walking abilities, hypotonia, seizures, and a variety of minor brain anomalies. The majority of patients show a similar facial gestalt with broad forehead, flat nasal bridge, hypotonic mouth, and small chin, as well as strabismus, but this phenotype is clinically not well recognized. The course of the disease is generally quite uniform, but patients with point mutations and smaller deletions seem to have a higher chance of walking skills and a lower risk of refractory seizures. Patients in whom the microdeletion also includes the RASA1 gene show features of the respective capillary and arterio-venous malformations and fistula syndrome. The phenotypic overlap with Rett syndrome is explained by a shared pathway and, accordingly, diminished MECP2 and CDKL5 expression is measureable in patients with MEF2C defects. Further research of this pathway may therefore eventually lead to a common therapeutic target.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
As a result of joint efforts of the German Mental Retardation Network (MRNET) and the Decipher database, Engels, Firth and Rauch initiated a study on 5q14.3q15 microdeletions and delineated a novel syndrome characterized by severe psychomotor retardation, epilepsy or febrile seizures, muscular hypotonia and variable brain and minor anomalies [Engels et al., 2009]. These deletions partially overlapped with the distally more extended deletions in 3 patients with severe mental retardation, seizures and periventricular heterotopia described by Cardoso et al. . The 1.6-Mb smallest region of overlap contained the neurodevelopmental LYSMD3 gene as a potential underlying cause of intellectual disability and the GPR98/MASS1 gene was considered potentially related to seizures [Engels et al., 2009]. However, the observation of 2 very similar patients with more proximal deletions not overlapping the 1.6-Mb smallest region of overlap led Zweier et al.  to further investigate the nearby MEF2C gene as a potential monogenic cause of the 5q14.3q15 microdeletion syndrome (fig. 1). They showed that MEF2C expression levels were indeed significantly decreased in blood probes of their novel patients as well as in all patients described by Engels et al. , indicating MEF2C as the underlying gene and a positional effect in the patient with a deletion breakpoint distal to MEF2C. Accordingly, subsequent mutational screening in patients with moderate to severe intellectual disability of unknown cause revealed 4 MEF2C de novo mutations in patients with similar phenotype as seen in patients with larger deletions [Zweier et al., 2010]. At the same time Le Meur et al.  independently identified MEF2C as the gene underlying the 5q14.3q15 microdeletion syndrome by detection of a microdeletion limited to MEF2C only and subsequent identification of a MEF2C stop mutation in a similar patient. Both Zweier et al.  and Le Meur et al.  pointed out the phenotypic overlap to Rett syndrome, and Zweier et al.  demonstrated molecular interaction of the respective genes. Attributable to the wide use of molecular karyotyping or array comparative genomic hybridization, by now a total of 23 patients with 5q14.3q15 microdeletions have been reported [Cardoso et al., 2009; Engels et al., 2009; Berland and Houge, 2010; Le Meur et al., 2010; Novara et al., 2010; Nowakowska et al., 2010; Zweier et al., 2010; Carr et al., 2011; Mikhail et al., 2011; Tonk et al., 2011], but no further patients with point mutations, indicating that the phenotype is not well recognized. Sixteen microdeletions involved MEF2C and additional genes, 3 multi-gene microdeletions had a proximal breakpoint close to, but distally to MEF2C [Cardoso et al., 2009; Engels et al., 2009], and 4 microdeletions involved MEF2C only [Le Meur et al., 2010; Novara et al., 2010; Nowakowska et al., 2010; Mikhail et al., 2011]. Of note, one of the balanced translocation breakpoints in a patient with severe intellectual disability, early-onset epileptic encephalopathy, and hypoplastic corpus callosum was mapped 121.5 kb upstream of MEF2C [Saitsu et al., 2011].
Apart from 1 exceptional patient, all patients with mutations or microdeletions uniformly showed severe mental retardation with absent speech, limited walking abilities and lack of gross malformations (table 1). The exceptional patient described by Tonk et al.  with the largest deletion of 21 Mb only had mild intellectual disability with a global IQ of 69 and a seizure disorder. It was hypothesized that the large extent of the deletion could have a compensatory effect explaining the mild phenotype. However, hidden mosaicism may be a more likely explanation since overlapping cytogenetically visible deletions were associated with significant dysmorphism and mental disability. Seven of 9 patients with MEF2C limited mutations or deletions, 17 of 19 with larger deletions, and overall all patients older than 3 years had seizures. However, the age of onset was usually in infancy or early childhood and commonly associated with fever. The majority of patients had tonic-clonic seizures, but myoclonic or complex partial seizures as well as infantile spasms were also described. Seizures were well controlled in the majority of patients, but were refractory in 3 patients with deletions exceeding the MEF2C gene [Le Meur et al., 2010; Novara et al., 2010]. Mild to severe hypotonia was reported in 17 of 19 patients with larger deletions and in 6 of 9 patients with MEF2C defects. The ability to walk independently was reported only in the following few patients: at the age of 2 years 8 months in a boy with p.E34X mutation [Zweier et al., 2010], at the age of 3 years in a girl with p.S228X mutation [Le Meur et al., 2010], at the ages of 5 and 3 years, respectively, in 2 patients with larger deletions distally to MEF2C [Cardoso et al., 2009], and at the age of 11 years in a girl with a 1.15-Mb deletion including MEF2C and TMEM161B [Berland and Houge, 2010]. Developmental milestones of the exceptionally mildly affected patient with the 21-Mb deletion were within the normal range [Tonk et al., 2011]. Stereotypic movements including bruxism, head rocking, hand washing or clapping, hand-mouth movements, and others, as well as autistic features or poor eye contact were reported in nearly half of the patients (13 of 28 each). Episodic hyperventilation and apnea was reported in 2 patients with MEF2C limited defects only [Le Meur et al., 2010; Zweier et al., 2010].
MRI was reported to show minor anomalies in 24 patients without any consistent pattern. Observed anomalies included delayed myelinization, enlarged ventricles, hypoplastic or thickened corpus callosum, periventricular heterotopia, simplified gyral pattern, polymicrogyria, colpocephaly, and periventricular leucomalacia.
Height, weight and head circumference are commonly within the normal range, but are abnormal in both directions in some patients. While some patients showed relative or absolute macrocephaly, others had relative or absolute microcephaly. Although most patients show a variety of minor anomalies, no easily recognizable facial phenotype evolved. However, broad and/or high, bulging forehead, upslanting palpebral fissures, flat nasal root and bridge, small, upturned nose, hypotonic small mouth, large ears with prominent lobes, and small chin, as well as strabismus are the most consistent facial features reported. Unique, special anomalies were substernal fistula, jugular pit, bilateral club feet, and postaxial polydactyly of toes, all observed in deletions involving more than the MEF2C gene. While few patients had hypermetropia or myopia, hearing loss was not reported.
As pointed out by Carr et al.  in patients with deletions including the RASA1 gene located proximally to MEF2C, capillary or arterio-venous malformations or fistulae (CMs, AVMs, AVFs) should be expected. The RASA1 associated autosomal dominant CM-AVM-syndrome is characterized by multiple pink-red, round, or oval CMs mostly localized on the face and limbs increasing in number with age (fig. 2) [Carr et al., 2011]. About 30% of affected individuals have associated AVMs and/or AVFs which are typically located in the head and neck region [Bayrak-Toydemir and Stevenson, 1993–2011; Boon et al., 2005]. These fast-flow vascular anomalies typically arise in the skin, muscle, bone, spine, and brain, and life-threatening complications may include bleeding, congestive heart failure, or neurologic symptoms which seem to occur early in life [Bayrak-Toydemir and Stevenson, 1993–2011]. Some patients have the clinical diagnosis of Parkes Weber syndrome (multiple micro-AVFs associated with a cutaneous capillary stain and excessive soft tissue and skeletal growth of an affected limb) [Bayrak-Toydemir and Stevenson, 1993–2011].
So far there is no evidence for specific internal or life-threatening complications associated with MEF2C defects. However, the oldest age of investigation in reported patients was 18 years only. Seizures seem to be benign or well controllable by standard treatment such as valproate in the majority of patients. For AVMs or AVFs, the individual risks and benefits of intervention have to be considered.
The MEF2C gene, first identified by Leifer et al. , is located within the microdeletion syndrome region on chromosome 5q14.3. Three transcriptional start sites with variable 5′-untranslated regions are annotated and MEF2C contains up to 11 coding exons spanning approximately 100 kb of genomic DNA (fig. 3). Up to now, 6 transcript variants in humans are annotated (Ref Seq: NM_002397, NM_001131005, NM_001193347, NM_001193348, NM_001193349, NM_001193350). The longest of these variants encodes for a 483-amino-acid protein, the shortest one for 393 amino acids.
Like all members of the MADS family (MCM1-agamous-deficiens-serum response factor) MEF2C, which belongs to the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) subfamily, is characterized by a highly conserved N-terminal MADS box. Together with the directly adjacent subfamily-specific MEF2 domain motif it mediates dimerization, DNA binding, and cofactor interaction [Potthoff and Olson, 2007]. It is also known that MEF2 family members possess strong nuclear localization signals, for MEF2C it is reported in the N-terminal region [Janson et al., 2001]. The C-terminal region of MEF2 proteins contains the transcriptional activation domains, differs between family members, and is subject to complex patterns of alternative splicing (fig. 3). Whereas vertebrates have 4 MEF2 genes, MEF2A–D, yeast, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans possess only a single Mef2 gene. MEF2 factors bind to the A/T rich consensus DNA sequence YTA(A/T)4TAR as homo- and heterodimers. Their transcriptional activity relies on the recruitment of and cooperation with many other transcription factors, as well as on translational and posttranslational modifications [Potthoff and Olson, 2007]. For instance, phosphorylation of a highly conserved site enhances the DNA binding activity of MEF2C [Molkentin et al., 1996]. MEF2 proteins are known to act as central regulators of diverse developmental programs [Potthoff and Olson, 2007]. The 4 vertebrate MEF2 genes display overlapping, but distinct temporal and spatial expression patterns during embryonic development and in adult tissues with highest expression in striated muscles and brain [Edmondson et al., 1994].
Regarding MEF2C in particular, high expression levels were detected in skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle and brain in both humans and mice [Edmondson et al., 1994; Zweier et al., 2010]. It is reported to be highly expressed in the embryonic cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, midbrain, olfactory bulb, and cerebellum, as well as in the adult frontal cortex, dentate gyrus, hippocampus, thalamus, and cerebellum in the development of mouse CNS [Lyons et al., 1995]. Alternatively spliced MEF2C transcripts differ significantly in both expression pattern and transactivation functions, some of them shown to be brain-specific [Leifer et al., 1993; Janson et al., 2001; Zweier et al., 2010].
Previous studies revealed an important role of Mef2c in several differentiation and developmental processes like myogenesis, the development of the anterior heart field, neural crest and craniofacial development, chondrocyte hypertrophy and vascularization, endothelial cell proliferation and survival, lymphoid development, neurogenesis, and synaptic formation [Potthoff and Olson, 2007; Li et al., 2008a, b; Stehling-Sun et al., 2009]. Mef2c homozygous knockout in mice results in embryonic lethality due to cardiovascular defects even before brain development [Lin et al., 1997], resembling the indicated crucial role of MEF2C in developmental processes. However, in vivo analysis of the neuronal function of MEF2C using a conditional homozygous deletion of murine Mef2c in radial glial cells during late embryogenesis and expression of a superactive form of Mef2c in neurons indicated an essential role in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory by suppressing the number of excitatory synapses and thus regulating basal and evoked synaptic transmission [Barbosa et al., 2008]. Interestingly, Li et al. [2008a] reported that mice with conditional Mef2c knockout in neural progenitors have abnormal aggregation and compaction of neurons migrating into the lower layers of the neocortex during development. This manifested in smaller brain size with smaller, less mature neurons in adulthood, with resultant aberrant electrophysiology and severe behavioral anomalies resembling those seen in mouse models of Rett syndrome-like altered anxiety and paw-clasping [Li et al., 2008a]. Supported by a study showing that activated MEF2C drives the formation of neurons from murine stem cells [Li et al., 2008b], this work indicates the pivotal role of MEF2C in early neuronal differentiation and offers a phenotypic link to Rett syndrome.
The phenotype of murine models of Mef2c inactivation and the biological function in neuronal pathways supports the causal role of defects in MEF2C for the severe mental retardation phenotype observed in human patients with MEF2C haploinsufficiency. Of note, in the human phenotype the impairment seems to be restricted to its central nervous functions [Le Meur et al., 2010; Zweier et al., 2010]. Trying to explain the observed phenotypic overlap of patients with MEF2C mutations and atypical Rett syndrome and Pitt-Hopkins syndrome due to the involvement of a common pathway, Zweier et al.  found diminished MECP2 and CDKL5 expression in vivo in blood of MEF2C-deficient patients. Supporting evidence was given by transcriptional reporter assays indicating that MEF2C truncating and missense mutations diminish synergistic transactivation of E-box promoters including that of MECP2 and CDKL5. These results are in line with other molecular findings indicating involvement of MECP2 and CDKL5 in a common pathway [Mari et al., 2005]. Of note, MECP2 binding to the murine Mef2c promoter as a repressor was shown by [Chahrour et al., 2008]. In contrast, consistently altered expression levels of TCF4, mutations which cause Pitt-Hopkins syndrome [Zweier et al., 2007], were not found in MEF2C-deficient patients. Therefore, a molecular link between MEF2C and TCF4 at this level was not obvious [Zweier et al., 2010].
MEF2 proteins like MEF2C are reported to cooperate with many different cofactors and promote gene expression of many different genes, some of which are responsible for intellectual disability themselves. There is evidence that fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is required to enable MEF2 proteins to eliminate excitatory synapses in hippocampal neurons of mice [Pfeiffer et al., 2010].
Expression profiling in hippocampal neurons of rats indicated that MEF2 proteins also regulate several transcripts like Dia1, Pcdh10, and Ube3a in which defects are known to cause neurodevelopmental features such as intellectual disability, epilepsy and autism [Flavell et al., 2008; Morrow et al., 2008].
All reported MEF2C mutations and microdeletions occurred de novo and have been heterozygous. Although no recurrence within siblings was observed so far, an approximately 1% recurrence risk is likely due to the possibility of parental germ line mosaicism. Similarity of the phenotype in microdeletions and point mutations indicates haploinsufficiency as the underlying genetic mechanism. Moreover, Zweier et al.  demonstrated significantly diminished MEF2C expression levels in patients with microdeletions and truncating mutations. In contrast, MEF2C expression levels in patients with missense mutations were unaltered or significantly increased, but downstream effects on the expression levels of MECP2 and CDKL5 was equally in patients with missense or truncating mutations and deletions. Both reported missense mutations are located in the MADS domain and like truncating mutations abolish the transcriptional activity of MEF2C in vitro [Zweier et al., 2010].
Despite the contiguous gene deletion phenotype associated with the RASA1 gene deletion, no striking genotype-phenotype correlation evolved so far. However, patients with point mutations and smaller deletions seem to have a higher chance of walking skills and a lower risk of refractory seizures.
The only large scale mutational screening study identified MEF2C mutations in 1.1% of patients with moderate to severe intellectual disability of unknown cause and in about 2% of patients fitting into the spectrum of Rett syndrome-like disorders [Zweier et al., 2010]. Thus, MEF2C-related disorders represent one of the more common causes of intellectual disability.
So far no disease-specific therapeutic targets are known. However, due to the at least partially shared pathway with typical and atypical Rett syndromes, further elucidation of this pathway may eventually lead to a common therapeutic approach in this group of disorders.
Institute of Medical Genetics
University of Zurich, Schorenstrasse 16
CH–8603 Schwerzenbach (Switzerland)
Tel. +41 44 655 7051, E-Mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.