Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 46, No. 4, 2012
Issue release date: July 2012
Caries Res 2012;46:346–352
(DOI:10.1159/000338851)

Summary of the IADR Cariology Research Group Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, July 2010: New Directions in Cariology Research

Vieira A.R. · Modesto A. · Ismail A. · Watt R.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Caries remains the most prevalent noncontagious biofilm-mediated disease in humans. It is clear that the current approaches to decrease the prevalence of caries in human populations, including water fluoridation and school-based programs, are not enough to protect everyone. The scientific community has suggested the need for innovative work in a number of areas in cariology, encompassing disease etiology, epidemiology, definition, prevention, and treatment. In this symposium, two of these areas, dealing specifically with etiological aspects of caries were discussed: (1) systematic research on caries risk assessment using population-based cohort techniques, and (2) genetic studies to identify genes and genetic markers of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value. This paper summarizes these presentations.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Aleksejūniene J, Holst D, Brukiene V: Dental caries risk studies revisited: causal approaches needed for future inquiries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:2992–3009.
  2. American Dental Association: ADA Policy on Evicence-Based Dentistry. 2008. http://www.ada.org/1754.aspx.
  3. Batchelor P, Sheiham A: The limitations of a ‘high-risk’ approach for the prevention of dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30:302–312.
  4. Batchelor P, Sheiham A: The distribution of burden of dental caries in schoolchildren: a critique of the high-risk caries prevention strategy for populations. BMC Oral Health 2006;6:3.

    External Resources

  5. Beaglehole R, Bonita R: Public health at the crossroads: which way forward? Lancet 1998;351:590–592.
  6. Beck JD: Risk revisited. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:220–225.
  7. Böök JA, Grahnén H: Clinical and genetical studies of dental caries. II. Parents and sibs of adult highly resistant (caries-free) propositi. Odontol Revy 1953;4:1–53.
  8. Boraas JC, Messer LB, Till MJ: A genetic contribution to dental caries, occlusion, and morphology as demonstrated by twins reared apart. J Dent Res 1988;67:1150–1155.
  9. Brown WJ, Hockey R, Dobson A: Rose revisited: a ‘middle road’ prevention strategy to reduce noncommunicable chronic disease risk. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:886–887.

    External Resources

  10. Burt BA: Concepts of risk in dental public health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:240–247.
  11. Cooney MT, Dudina A, Whincup P, Capewell S, Menotti A, Jousilahti P, Njølstad I, Oganov R, Thomsen T, Tverdal A, Wedel H, Wilhelmsen L, Graham I; SCORE Investigators: Re-evaluating the Rose approach: comparative benefits of the population and high-risk preventive strategies. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009;16:541–549.

    External Resources

  12. Deeley K, Letra A, Rose EK, Brandon CA, Resick JM, Marazita ML, Vieira AR: Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Guatemalan-Mayan population. Caries Res 2008;42:8–13.
  13. de Savigny D, Adam T: Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. Geneva, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, 2009.
  14. De Stoppelaar JD, Van Houte J, Backer Dirks O: The effect of carbohydrate restriction on the presence of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and iodophilic polysaccharide-producing bacteria in human dental plaque. Caries Res 1970;4:114–123.
  15. Fisher-Owens SA, Gansky SA, Platt LJ, Weintraub JA, Soobader MJ, Bramlett MD, Newacheck PW: Influences on children’s oral health: a conceptual model. Pediatrics 2007;120:e510–e520.

    External Resources

  16. Gustafsson BE, Quensel CE, Lanke LS, Lundqvist C, Grahnén H, Bonow BE, Krasse B: The Vipeholm Dental Caries Study. The effects of different levels of carbohydrate intake in 436 individuals observed for five years. Acta Odontol Scand 1954;11:232–364.
  17. Hausen H: Caries prediction – state of the art. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:87–96.
  18. Hausen H, Seppa L, Poutanen R, Niinimaa A, Lahti S, Kärkkäinen S, Pietilä I: Noninvasive control of dental caries in children with active initial lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 2007;41:384–391.
  19. Ismail AI, Bader JD; ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and Division of Science; Journal of the American Dental Association: Evidence-based dentistry in clinical practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:78–83.
  20. Kao RT: The challenges of transferring evidence-based dentistry into practice. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2006;6:125–128.

    External Resources

  21. Kay E, Locker D: A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion aimed at improving oral health. Community Dent Health 1998;15:132–144.
  22. McKinlay JB, Marceau LD: To boldly go. Am J Public Health 2000;90:25–33.
  23. Nariyama M, Shimizu K, Uematsu T, Maeda T: Identification of chromosomes associated with dental caries susceptibility using quantitative trait locus analysis in mice. Caries Res 2004;38:79–84.
  24. Ozturk A, Famili P, Vieira AR: The antimicrobial peptide DEFB1 is associated with caries. J Dent Res 2010;89:631–636.
  25. Patir A, Seymen F, Yildirim M, Deeley K, Cooper ME, Marazita ML, Vieira AR: Enamel formation genes are associated with high caries experience in Turkish children. Caries Res 2008;42:394–400.
  26. Pitts NB: Modern concepts of caries measurement. J Dent Res 2004;83:C43–C47.

    External Resources

  27. Rockhill B, Kawachi I, Colditz GA: Individual risk prediction and population-wide disease prevention. Epidemiol Rev 2000;22:176–180.
  28. Rose EK, Vieira AR: Caries and periodontal disease: insights from two US populations living a century apart. Oral Health Prev Dent 2008;6:23–28.
  29. Rose G: The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. New York, Oxford University Press, 1992.
  30. Schwaninger M: The role of system dynamics within the systems movement; in Barlas Y (ed): Theme System Dynamics, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), UNESCO, chap 6.63.2.4. Oxford, EOLSS Publishers, 2003/4.
  31. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB: Dental caries. Lancet 2007;369:51–59.
  32. Suzuki N, Kurihara Y, Kurihara Y: Dental caries susceptibility in mice is closely linked to the H-2 region on chromosome 17. Caries Res 1998;32:262–265.
  33. Takahashi N, Nyvad B: Caries ecology revisited: microbial dynamics and the caries process. Caries Res 2008;42:409–418.
  34. Uematsu T, Nariyama M, Shimizu K, Maeda T: Mapping of affected gene(s) to dental caries susceptibility on mouse chromosome 2. Pediatr Dent J 2003;13:75–81.

    External Resources

  35. Vieira AR, Marazita ML, McHenry TG: Genome-wide scan finds suggestive caries loci. J Dent Res 2008;87:435–439.
  36. Von Bertalanffy L: General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York, Brazilier, 1968.
  37. Watt RG: Strategies and approaches in oral disease prevention and health promotion. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:711–718.

    External Resources

  38. Watt RG: From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:1–11.
  39. Wendt LK, Carlsson E, Hallonsten AL, Birkhed D: Early dental caries risk assessment and prevention in pre-school children: evaluation of a new strategy for dental care in a field study. Acta Odontol Scand 2001;59:261–266.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50