For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
Inhibition of Histamine H1 Receptor Activity Modulates Proinflammatory Cytokine Production of Dendritic Cells through c-Rel ActivityLee C.-L.a · Hsu S.-H.a · Jong Y.-J.a,b,d · Hung C.-H.a,b,d,e · Suen J.-L.a, c
aGraduate Institute of Medicine, bDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Pediatrics, and cDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, dDepartment of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and eDepartment of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC Corresponding Author
Correspondence to: Dr. Jau-Ling Suen or Dr. Chih-Hsing Hung
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University
100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road
Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan (ROC)
Tel. +886 7 312 1101, E-Mail firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Background: Histamine exerts diverse effects on immune regulation through four types of histamine receptors (HRs). Among them, type 1 receptor (H1R) plays an important role in allergic inflammation. Dendritic cells (DCs), which express at least three types of HRs, are professional antigen-presenting cells controlling the development of allergic inflammation. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in H1R-mediated NF-ĸB signaling of DCs remain poorly defined. Methods: Bone-marrow (BM)-derived DCs (BM-DCs) were treated with H1R inverse agonists to interrupt basal H1R-mediated signaling. The crosstalk of H1R-mediated signaling and the NF-ĸB pathway was examined by NF-ĸB cellular activity using a luciferase reporter assay, NF-ĸB subunit analysis using Western blotting and TNF-α promoter activity using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Results: Blockage of H1R signaling by inverse agonists significantly inhibited TNF-α and IL-6 production of BM-DCs. H1R-specific agonists were able to enhance TNF-α production, but this overexpression was significantly inhibited by NF-ĸB inhibitor. The H1R inverse agonist ketotifen also suppressed cellular NF-ĸB activity, suggesting crosstalk between H1R and NF-ĸB signaling in DCs. After comprehensive analysis of NF-ĸB subunits, c-Rel protein expression was significantly down-regulated in ketotifen-treated BM-DCs, which led to inhibition of the promoter activity of TNF-α. Finally, adoptive transfer of the ketotifen-treated BM-DCs did not induce significant allergic airway inflammation compared to that of control cells in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that c-Rel controls H1R-mediated proinflammatory cytokine production in DCs. This study provides a potential mechanism of H1R-mediated signaling and NF-ĸB pathway crosstalk in allergic inflammation.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
Histamine exerts diverse effects on many physiological and pathological conditions through four different types of histamine receptors (HRs) – H1R, H2R, H3R and H4R . Each HR is characterized by a specific expression pattern and function. H1R and H2R are ubiquitously expressed on lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells, while H3R  and H4R [3,4] are expressed by a majority of cells in the nervous system and on hematopoietic cells, respectively. Histamine primarily mediates acute and chronic allergic inflammation through H1R . H1R, as well as other HRs, belongs to the G-protein-coupled receptor family. The H1R-mediated signaling pathway has been well studied in model cell line systems. H1R activates phospholipase C through pertussis toxin-resistant Gq/11 proteins . Phospholipase C then catalyzes phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate from the membrane into IP3 (inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate) and diacylglycerol. IP3 releases Ca2+ from intracellular calcium stores and initiates the Ca2+-dependent pathway, whereas diacylglycerol activates protein kinase C. A previous study suggested that histamine-activated protein kinase C isoforms are associated with the activation of Raf/MEK/ERK and IKK/IĸB/NF-ĸB cascades in the up-regulation of cytokine expression of keratinocytes . Crosstalk between H1R-mediated signaling and the NF-ĸB pathway may regulate cytokine production of immune cells. However, the mechanisms underlying this crosstalk in immune cells, especially dendritic cells (DCs), have not been fully elucidated.
DCs control T-cell activation and differentiation by cytokines and/or ligands . Originating from bone-marrow (BM)-derived precursors, DCs migrate to the periphery in an immature state with high phagocytic but low T-cell-stimulatory activity. Upon stimulation, DCs migrate to local lymph nodes and differentiate into cells with mature phenotype with high T-cell-stimulatory but low phagocytic activity [9,10]. DCs also secrete several proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, in order to regulate inflammation. These DC functions are primarily mediated by the NF-ĸB pathway. NF-ĸB family members include RelA (p65), NF-ĸB1 (p50; p105), NF-ĸB2 (p52; p100), RelB and c-Rel. Distinct NF-ĸB subunit composition affects DC development and function . The results of the studies using NF-ĸB subunit knockout mice indicate that c-Rel and p50 control the genes important for T-cell responses induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated BM-DCs (CD40, IL-12p40 and IL-18), but not the genes for encoding proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1α and IL-6). In contrast, the RelA subunit regulates genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines but not the genes for T-cell responses . Thus, NF-ĸB is an important regulator of T-cell responses and proinflammatory activity of DCs .
Histamine can influence DCs to determine the types of inflammation produced by its interaction with different HRs, as these cells can express H1R, H2R and H4R [14,15]. It has been demonstrated that histamine inhibits IL-12 production but enhances IL-10 and IL-6 expression of DCs . Histamine-treated DCs drive T-helper 2 (Th2) polarization in both human and mouse DCs, which may be mediated by H1R and H4R [4,15,16]. These studies imply that histamine can regulate immune responses by affecting the maturation of DCs and altering their T-cell-polarizing capacity [16,17]. It also has been demonstrated that DCs can actively synthesize histamine during the differentiation period and that blocking histamine synthesis disturbs DC differentiation . Consequently, the interaction of histamine with different HRs expressed by DCs affects the differentiation and effector functions of these cells.
As each HR has a different pattern of cellular expression, affinity for histamine and specifics of signaling transduction, the effects of histamine on DCs are rather complex. In order to study the molecules involved in the histamine-H1R axis of DCs, we utilized H1R inverse agonists to block H1R-mediated signaling in BM-DCs without exogenous histamine. It has been demonstrated that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-differentiated BM-DCs can produce histamine and secrete it after synthesis . Given that H1R consists of an inactive form and an active form, the inactive state of H1R can be in equilibrium with the active form in an agonist-dependent or independent manner . Also, an inverse agonist preferentially binds the inactive form of H1R and finally causes a shift in the equilibrium toward the inactive state, which is characterized by blocked signaling via H1R .
Here, we demonstrate that inhibition of basal H1R activity of BM-DCs by H1R inverse agonists significantly decreases proinflammatory cytokine production, especially that of TNF-α and IL-6. Blockage of H1R-mediated signaling of BM-DCs decreased their ability to induce allergic airway responses in vivo. We also provide evidence that c-Rel directly binds to TNF-α promoter and controls its activity in H1R-mediated signaling.
BALB/c were obtained from the National Taiwan University and maintained by the Animal Center of the Kaohsiung Medical University in a pathogen-free environment. Female BALB/c mice, 6–8 weeks of age, were used as the source of BM-DCs. All animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Kaohsiung Medical University.
BM-DCs were prepared as described previously [20,21]. Briefly, BM cells were placed in 24-well plates in 1 ml of medium supplemented with recombinant murine GM-CSF (500 U/ml) and IL-4 (1,000 U/ml; PrePro Tech, Rocky Hill, N.J., USA) for 4 or 6 days. Every other day, fresh medium containing GM-CSF and IL-4 was added. The phenotype and purity of BM-DCs were analyzed by flow cytometry (LSR II; BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif., USA), examining the expression of CD11c (HL3), IAd (AMS-32.1), CD40 (1C10), CD80 (16-10A1) and CD86 (GL1). Day-4 or -6 cells were further purified with anti-mouse CD11c magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Sunnyvale, Calif., USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The purified BM-DCs (purity >95%) were treated with different concentrations of H1R inverse agonists (ketotifen or cyproheptadine), selective HR agonists [2-pyridylethylamine dihydrochloride (2-PEA) for H1R, dimaprit for H2R, (R)-α-methylhistamine for H3R, 4-methylhistamine for H4R; all from Tocris Bioscience, Missouri, Mo., USA] or BAY7085 with or without LPS (10 ng/ml, Escherichia coli O127:B8; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA) or polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C; 10 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h. The viability of 80 µm inverse-agonist- or selective-agonist-treated BM-DCs was similar to that of control cells using 7-AAD staining. The supernatant was collected for cytokine or histamine (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Minneapolis, Minn., USA) determination and cells were harvested for phenotypic analysis.
Multiple cytokines (table 1) in the culture supernatant were simultaneously determined with a cytometric bead array kit (BD Biosciences), which contains microparticles that are dyed to different fluorescence intensities of approximately 650 nm. The experimental procedure was modified as described previously . The samples were then run on a FACSarray flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using cytometric bead array software (BD Biosciences). Cytokine levels in some experiments were assayed by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn., USA).
The treated BM-DCs were lysed in the sample buffer [3% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), 1.67 m urea and 2.7% β-mercaptoethanol), resolved in a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and electrotransferred onto Hybond-C extra membranes (Amersham, Piscataway, N.J., USA). The blots were blocked with TBST (50 mm Tris-HCl, 0.15 m NaCl and 0.05% Tween 20) containing 2.5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Bound antibodies were detected with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h, and blots were developed by Western Lightning chemiluminescence reagent (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Mass., USA). Blots were washed with TBST four times in between steps. The primary antibodies used in this experiment included anti-c-Rel, anti-RelB, anti-p65 (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif., USA), anti-pp65 (Abcam, Cambridge, Mass., USA), anti-β-actin, anti-p52 and anti-p100 (all from Millipore, Billerica, Mass., USA), anti-p50 and anti-p105 (all from eBioscience, Hatfield, UK).
The treated BM-DCs were fixed with 1% formaldehyde at 37°C for 10 min, washed with phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed in a lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mm EDTA and 50 mm Tris-HCl with protease inhibitors). The lysed cells were sonicated and incubated with an anti-c-Rel antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 4°C overnight, followed by addition of protein-G agarose beads (Millipore) for further 1 h. The beads were then sequentially washed with low- and high-salt buffer, LiCl washing buffer and TE buffer. The immunoprecipitated complexes were eluted with elution buffer, treated with 5 m NaCl at 65°C for 4 h and digested with proteinase K. The released DNA fragments were purified using a DNA purification kit (Favorgen, Ping-Tung, Taiwan, ROC) according to manufacturer’s instructions and then subjected to real-time PCR detection of the TNF-α promoter. Genomic DNA was used as a positive control. The following primer sets for the detection of the NF-ĸB binding site in TNF-α promoter were used: forward, AAGGAGAAGGCTTGTGAGGTC, and reverse, TCTGAAAGCTGGGTGCATAAG.
The two reporter constructs, pRL-SV40 (Renilla luciferase; Promega, Madison, Wisc., USA) and pNF-ĸBLuc or control vector (firefly luciferase; Promega), were co-transfected into 1 × 106 THP-1 cells. After a 16-hour treatment, the washed cells were then treated with various concentrations of ketotifen for another 8 h. Luciferase activity was then measured with the dual luciferase kit (Promega). Relative luciferase activity was defined as firefly/Renilla ratio normalized to control vector transfection.
Purified day-4 BM-DCs treated with or without ketotifen (80 µm) were cultured with ovalbumin (OVA; 200 µg/ml; grade V; Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h and instilled intravenously (2 × 105 cells/recipient) into syngeneic naïve mice. After 1 week, mice were subjected to 15-min daily exposure with OVA (3% w/v in phosphate-buffered saline) on 4 consecutive days. Twenty-four hours after the last OVA challenge, mice were sacrificed and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was obtained as described previously . Cells in BALF were stained with PE-Cy7-anti-CD11c (N418; eBioscience) and FITC-anti-I-Ad/I-Ed (M5/114.15.2; eBioscience; DCs/macrophages), PE-anti-CCR3 (83101; R&D Systems; eosinophils), APC-anti-CD3 (145-2C11; BD Biosciences) and anti-B220 (RA3-6B2; eBioscience; lymphocytes). The cellular composition of BALF cells was determined by flow cytometry (LSR II; BD Biosciences).
Statistical comparisons of data among groups of control and treated BM-DCs were performed with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical tests were performed by SPSS for Windows, version 13.0. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA).
We used a well-defined culture system for GM-CSF-mediated generation of DCs from BM cells. BM precursors from BALB/c mice were incubated with GM-CSF and IL-4 for 4 or 6 days, which represented different stages of maturation of BM-DCs . Cytokine assessment showed that either day-4 or -6 BM-DCs constitutively secreted TNF-α and IL-6, but not IL-10 and IL-12 (table 1), whereas both LPS and poly I:C significantly enhanced the expression of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 from day-6 BM-DCs. In contrast to day-6 BM-DCs, day-4 BM-DCs seemed more ‘insensitive’ to stimuli, because LPS and poly I:C did not enhance their TNF-α production and poly I:C did not affect the level of IL-6 from day-4 BM-DCs either. The possible reason may be the strength of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 signaling. At the dose of 0.5 µg/ml of LPS (instead of 10 ng/ml), both day-4 and -6 BM-DCs secreted significantly more TNF-α and IL-12 than corresponding unstimulated controls (data not shown).
Due to endogenous histamine synthesis of BM-DCs , BM-DCs have constitutive H1R-mediated activity. Thus, in order to examine the role of H1R-mediated signaling in DC activity, inverse agonists of H1R were used to treat BM-DCs in the absence of histamine to inhibit the constitutive H1R-mediated downstream signaling. Ketotifen and cyproheptadine are inverse agonists for H1R and are clinically used as prophylactic agents in the treatment of allergic reactions [24,25,26]. As shown in figure 1, ketotifen significantly inhibited TNF-α and IL-6 production from day-4 and -6 BM-DCs in a dose-dependent manner. Notably, 100 µm of ketotifen almost suppressed all TNF-α production from day-4 BM-DCs and around 50% from day-6 BM-DCs. Regarding IL-6, ketotifen had a similar effect on day-4 and -6 BM-DCs, although the degree of inhibition of IL-6 (fig. 1c, d) was not as dramatic as that seen for TNF-α (fig. 1a, b). Treatment with another H1R inverse agonist, cyproheptadine, resulted in day-4 BM-DCs in a similar inhibition. Consequently, blocking H1R-mediated signaling may mediate the inhibition of TNF-α and IL-6 expression of BM-DCs.
To re-confirm the suppressive effect of ketotifen on DCs, we also used GM-CSF-derived BM-DCs (without IL-4 in the culture), another well-defined culture system for DC differentiation . Ketotifen also significantly inhibited TNF-α and IL-6 production from BM-DCs (data not shown). These data indicate that the constitutive H1R-mediated activity of BM-DCs is associated with their basal expression of proinflammatory cytokines, especially TNF-α.
Given that BM-DCs differentiated with GM-CSF can produce and release histamine [18,28], we determined histamine release by ketotifen-treated BM-DCs. As shown in figure 2a, under resting conditions BM-DCs secreted histamine in a time-dependent manner. After 24-hour treatment, ketotifen significantly inhibited histamine release by BM-DCs. In order to rule out the possibility that an autocrine loop of histamine release can act on other HRs to stimulate proinflammatory cytokine production, selective agonists for H2R (dimaprit), H3R (R-α-methylhistamine) and H4R (4-methylhistamine) were used to treated BM-DCs for 24 h. As shown in figure 2b, none of these agonists affected TNF-α and IL-6 (data not shown) expression by BM-DCs, suggesting that H1R-mediated signaling is specifically involved in proinflammatory cytokine production of BM-DCs.
As the expression of TNF-α/IL-6 genes is regulated by the NF-ĸB pathway, the NF-ĸB pathway may be involved in the downstream signaling of H1R on BM-DCs. As shown in figure 3, 2-PEA, a highly selective H1R agonist , was able to increase the expression of TNF-α; however, BAY7085, an NF-ĸB inhibitor, significantly inhibited basal and 2-PEA-induced TNF-α expression. Then LPS or poly I:C was used to activate the NF-ĸB pathway  to examine whether TLR-mediated signaling interrupts or alleviates the effect of ketotifen on BM-DCs. As expected, ketotifen did not effectively inhibit TNF-α (fig. 4) and IL-6 (data not shown) expression when BM-DCs were simultaneously treated with TLR agonist, LPS or poly I:C. These data suggest that NF-ĸB molecules are involved in the downstream signaling of H1R on BM-DCs.
Next, we examined whether H1R-mediated signaling is associated with the maturation and T-cell-stimulatory activity of BM-DCs. We analyzed the expression levels of MHC class II, CD80, CD86 and CD40 after treatment of day-4 BM-DCs with ketotifen in the presence of LPS or poly I:C. As shown in figure 5, LPS and poly I:C markedly increased the percentages of MHC class IIhigh, CD80+, CD86+ and CD40+ in CD11c+ BM-DCs. However, compared with vehicle-treated cells (gray areas in fig. 5), ketotifen did not change the expression levels and percentages of these molecules on CD11c+ BM-DCs (solid lines in fig. 5) either under TLR agonist-stimulated or non-stimulated conditions. Ketotifen did not have a significant effect on the maturation of day-6 BM-DCs either (data not shown). We then further examined the T-cell-stimulatory activity of treated BM-DCs; there was no significant difference in the DO11.10 CD4+ T-cell proliferative response elicited by ketotifen-treated BM-DCs compared with control cells (data not shown). These data demonstrate that H1R-mediated signaling regulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines on BM-DCs, but not their maturation and T-cell stimulatory activity.
In order to examine whether NF-ĸB activity is involved in the downstream signaling of H1R on BM-DCs, an NF-ĸB luciferase reporter gene assay was performed to examine whether blocking H1R-mediated signaling could affect NF-ĸB activity. As shown in figure 6, ketotifen significantly inhibited basal NF-ĸB activity of THP-1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Next, we examined which subunit(s) of NF-ĸB regulated TNF-α expression during H1R-mediated signaling of BM-DCs. We analyzed the expression levels of all subunits of NF-ĸB in ketotifen-treated BM-DCs. As shown in figure 7a, non-treated BM-DCs expressed basal levels of most of the NF-ĸB subunits except p52. We found that ketotifen significantly decreased c-Rel expression of BM-DCs (fig. 7b). Although high-dose ketotifen seemed to inhibit p50 expression of BM-DCs (fig. 7a), this inhibition was not consistently observed in different independent experiments.
To further examine whether c-Rel directly regulated TNF-α expression during H1R-mediated signaling of BM-DCs, we investigated the binding of c-Rel to the promoter region in the TNF-α gene in day-4 BM-DCs treated with or without ketotifen. As shown in figure 7c, chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that ketotifen significantly decreased the binding of c-Rel to the ĸB site of TNF-α promoter. These data revealed that the interaction between c-Rel and the TNF-α promoter was downregulated in ketotifen-treated BM-DCs compared with untreated cells. Therefore, H1R-mediated signaling may activate c-Rel to directly regulate TNF-α expression of BM-DCs.
To test the functional consequences of H1R-mediated signaling interruption in DCs in vivo, we examined the effect of the transfer of ketotifen-treated OVA-pulsed BM-DCs into naïve BALB/c mice before OVA challenge. Wild-type recipients of vehicle-treated OVA/BM-DCs significantly developed airway eosinophilia (fig. 8a) and increased Th2 cytokine expression (fig. 8b). This was in contrast to the response following the transfer of ketotifen-treated OVA/BM-DCs, where neither airway eosinophilia nor allergic cytokine responses developed. Therefore, blockage of H1R-mediated signaling in local DCs may alleviate allergic responses.
Histamine can significantly enhance the inflammatory activity of DCs through H1R. Although previous studies suggested that NF-ĸB family transcription factors are involved in the downstream signaling of H1R, which NF-ĸB family members are required and whether they directly regulate the inflammatory genes remains unclear. This is, to our knowledge, the first report to demonstrate that c-Rel directly controls TNF-α expression in H1R-mediated signaling in DCs. Also, our study demonstrates that the basal proinflammatory activity of DCs is, at least in part, associated with H1R-mediated NF-ĸB expression. In addition, blockage of H1R-mediated signaling may reduce allergic responses in vivo. This study provides a molecular basis in the H1R-c-Rel-TNF-α axis for controlling allergic inflammation.
DCs express almost all NF-ĸB subunits, suggesting the importance of distinct subunit composition in DC differentiation and function. It has been reported that deficiency in p50/c-Rel or c-Rel alone does not affect DC development, but rather perturbs the maturation and survival of DCs . In contrast, RelB-knockout mice exhibit defective myeloid DC differentiation . Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that c-Rel is the specific transcriptional regulator of both IL-12/p35  and IL-23/p19  gene expression in DCs. Using a knockout system, it has been shown that c-Rel also positively regulates TNF-α expression in macrophages . Our study here shows that c-Rel directly binds to the TNF-α promoter and regulates its basal expression under H1R-mediated signaling in DCs. It also implies that c-Rel may form homodimers to regulate TNF-α expression as interruption of H1R signaling specifically impacts only c-Rel expression (fig. 7a). Taken together, these findings suggest that c-Rel is responsible for DC costimulatory function, such as TNF-α and IL-12 production. The detailed regulatory mechanisms in the H1R-c-Rel-TNF-α axis still need to be further elucidated.
It has been shown that H1R–/– BM-DCs display an immature phenotype, secrete a modified cytokine pattern and alter T-cell polarization . However, in our study, blockage of H1R signaling primarily affects the proinflammatory activity but not the maturation or T-cell-stimulatory activity in the well-differentiated BM-DCs. On the other hand, in the context of allergic inflammation, histamine exerts its effect on differentiated DCs not only through H1R and H2R, but also through the recently identified H4R [4,15,16]. Taken together, H1R signaling mediated by histamine affects the regulation of both DC differentiation and function.
The molecular mechanisms involved in the basal proinflammatory activity of DCs are still unknown. This activity is, at least in part, associated with constitutive NF-ĸB expression (fig. 7a). We suggest that the basal proinflammatory activity of DCs may be associated with constitutive H1R-mediated NF-ĸB activation for the following reasons. First, DCs can express at least three types of HR. Just like other G-protein-coupled receptors, HRs demonstrate an equilibrium between their active and inactive states . Constitute HR activity exists and is independent of receptor occupancy by an agonist in cell line context . Second, DCs can actively synthesize endogenous histamine in autocrine and paracrine ways . Third, it has also been demonstrated that H1R activates NF-ĸB in both a constitutive and agonist-dependent manner in cell line experiments . Finally, as shown in our study, H1R-mediated signaling leads to TNF-α expression through c-Rel activity, and then TNF-α may further activate the downstream NF-ĸB pathway. This may be the reason why an H1R-specific agonist (2-PEA) increased basal TNF-α expression about 1.5-fold, but NF-ĸB inhibitor (BAY7085) significantly suppressed the TNF-α level to 30% of control (fig. 3). Understanding the detailed molecular mechanisms involved in H1R-mediated proinflammatory activity may have a great impact on the development of therapeutic targets for the treatment of DC-mediated inflammatory diseases.
In diseases characterized by allergic inflammation, such as asthma, DCs are essential for Th2-mediated airway inflammation . It has been shown that the number of airway DCs increases 80-fold in experimental asthma . Also, increased NF-ĸB activity and TNF-α levels have been demonstrated in the airways in human and animal models of asthma . Combined with our data, this implies that in the context of chronic inflammation, increases in DCs result in increased TNF-α secretion due to the constitutive H1R activity even in the absence of histamine in the microenvironment. As TNF-α has many pleiotropic activities and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases , strategies targeting the H1R-c-Rel-TNF-α axis in DCs may provide a novel alternative for controlling allergic inflammation.
Our results clearly show that H1R-mediated signaling in DCs controls TNF-α expression through c-Rel activity. This study provides a potential basis for clarifying the crosstalk between H1R and NF-ĸB pathways and for designing treatments affecting the H1R-c-Rel-TNF-α axis to control allergic inflammation.
We thank Dr. Shau-Ku Huang for helpful advice and careful review of the study. This work was supported by grants from National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX101-9824SC). We thank the Center for Resources, Research and Development of KMU for providing LSRII.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Correspondence to: Dr. Jau-Ling Suen or Dr. Chih-Hsing Hung
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University
100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road
Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan (ROC)
Tel. +886 7 312 1101, E-Mail firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.