Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 69, No. 2, 2013
Issue release date: February 2013
Eur Neurol 2013;69:95–101
(DOI:10.1159/000343811)

Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination with Irinotecan in Recurrent WHO Grade II and Grade III Gliomas

Seystahl K. · Wiestler B. · Hundsberger T. · Happold C. · Wick W. · Weller M. · Wick A.
aDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; bDepartment of Neurooncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; cDepartment of Neurology and Haematology/Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: The repertoire of salvage regimens for patients with WHO grade II and III gliomas recurring or progressing after surgery, radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy is limited. Based on promising response and progression-free survival (PFS) data in recurrent glioblastoma, the use of bevacizumab (BEV) has been extended to recurrent grade II/III gliomas. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of BEV alone or combined with irinotecan in 39 patients with recurrent grade II/III gliomas. Results: Both BEV monotherapy and its combination with irinotecan were well tolerated. Response rates were 26% as monotherapy and 33% in combination using Macdonald and RANO criteria. The median PFS was 4.2 months and the PFS rate at 6 months 29% for BEV alone, and 4.7 months and 42% for the combination. The median overall survival was 14.8 months for BEV monotherapy and 8.1 months for the combination. Outcome after failure of BEV was better when patients continued BEV beyond progression. Conclusion: BEV has limited activity in recurrent grade II/III gliomas. The additional value of irinotecan remains questionable. Prospective studies with BEV-free control groups are required to better define the role of BEV among the limited options in patients with recurrent grade II/III gliomas.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Bourne TD, Schiff D: Update on molecular findings, management and outcome in low-grade gliomas. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:695–701.

    External Resources

  2. Wick W, Weller M: Classification and management of anaplastic gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:650–656.

    External Resources

  3. Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Prados MD, Levin VA, Yung WK: Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2572.
  4. Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey LE, Yung WK, Paleologos N, Nicholas MK, Jensen R, Vredenburgh J, Huang J, Zheng M, Cloughesy T: Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4733–4740.
  5. Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I, Garren N, Mackey M, Butman JA, Camphausen K, Park J, Albert PS, Fine HA: Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:740–745.
  6. Vredenburgh JJ, Cloughesy T, Samant M, Prados M, Wen PY, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey LE, Yung WK, Paleologos N, Nicholas MK, Jensen R, Das A, Friedman HS: Corticosteroid use in patients with glioblastoma at first or second relapse treated with bevacizumab in the BRAIN study. Oncologist 2010;15:1329–1334.
  7. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG: Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1277–1280.
  8. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM: Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1963–1972.
  9. Wick A, Schäfer N, Dörner N, Schemmer D, Platten M, Bendszus M, Wick W: Arterial hypertension and bevacizumab treatment in glioblastoma: no correlation with clinical outcome. J Neurooncol 2010;97:157–158.
  10. Chamberlain MC, Johnston S: Salvage chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent alkylator-refractory anaplastic astrocytoma. J Neurooncol 2009;91:359–367.
  11. Chamberlain MC, Johnston S: Bevacizumab for recurrent alkylator-refractory anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Cancer 2009;115:1734–1743.
  12. Kreisl TN, Zhang W, Odia Y, Shih JH, Butman JA, Hammoud D, Iwamoto FM, Sul J, Fine HA: A phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab in patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:1143–1150.
  13. Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Herndon JE 2nd, Marcello J, Quinn JA, Rich JN, Sathornsumetee S, Gururangan S, Sampson J, Bailey L, Bigner DD, Friedman AH, Friedman HS, Vredenburgh JJ: Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent WHO grade 3 malignant gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:7068–7073.
  14. Norden AD, Young GS, Setayesh K, Muzikansky A, Klufas R, Ross GL, Ciampa AS, Ebbeling LG, Levy B, Drappatz J, Kesari S, Wen PY: Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. Neurology 2008;70:779–787.
  15. Taillibert S, Vincent LA, Granger B, Marie Y, Carpentier C, Guillevin R, Bellanger A, Mokhtari K, Rousseau A, Psimaras D, Dehais C, Sierra del Rio M, Meng Y, Laigle-Donadey F, Hoang-Xuan K, Sanson M, Delattre JY: Bevacizumab and irinotecan for recurrent oligodendroglial tumors. Neurology 2009;72:1601–1606.
  16. Quant EC, Norden AD, Drappatz J, Muzikansky A, Doherty L, Lafrankie D, Ciampa A, Kesari S, Wen PY: Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab. Neuro Oncol 2009;11:550–555.
  17. Reardon DA, Herndon JE 2nd, Peters K, Desjardins A, Coan A, Lou E, Sumrall A, Turner S, Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Boulton S, Lipp ES, Friedman HS, Vredenburgh JJ: Outcome after bevacizumab clinical trial therapy among recurrent grade III malignant glioma patients. J Neurooncol 2012;107:213–221.
  18. Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh JJ, Gururangan S, Sampson JH, Sathornsumetee S, McLendon RE, Herndon JE 2nd, Marcello JE, Norfleet J, Friedman AH, Bigner DD, Friedman HS: Metronomic chemotherapy with daily, oral etoposide plus bevacizumab for recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study. Br J Cancer 2009;101:1986–1994.
  19. Sathornsumetee S, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh JJ, McLendon RE, Marcello J, Herndon JE, Mathe A, Hamilton M, Rich JN, Norfleet JA, Gururangan S, Friedman HS, Reardon DA: Phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol 2010;12:1300–1310.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50