Vol. 82, No. 3, 2013
Issue release date: April 2013
Free Access
Psychother Psychosom 2013;82:132-141
(DOI:10.1159/000345316)
Special Article
Add to my selection

Excessive Mood Elevation and Behavioral Activation with Antidepressant Treatment of Juvenile Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review

Offidani E.a · Fava G.A.a, b · Tomba E.a · Baldessarini R.J.c
aLaboratory of Psychosomatics and Clinimetrics, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; bDepartment of Psychiatry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y., and cDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Psychopharmacology Program and International Consortium for Bipolar Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Boston, Mass., USA
email Corresponding Author


 Outline


 goto top of outline Key Words


  • Adolescents
  • Children
  • Antidepressants
  • Anxiety
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Depression
  • Mania
  • Adverse events


 goto top of outline Abstract

Background: The prevalence, characteristics and implications of excessive arousal-activation in children and adolescents treated with antidepressants for specific illnesses have not been systematically examined. Methods: We compared reports of antidepressant trials (n = 6,767 subjects) in juvenile depressive (n = 17) and anxiety disorders (n = 25) for consensus-based indications of psychopathological mood elevation or behavioral activation. Results: Rates of excessive arousal-activation during treatment with antidepressants were at least as high in juvenile anxiety (13.8%) as depressive (9.79%) disorders, and much lower with placebos (5.22 vs. 1.10%, respectively; both p < 0.0001). The antidepressant/placebo risk ratio for such reactions in paired comparisons was 3.50 (12.9/3.69%), and the meta-analytically pooled rate ratio was 1.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.2; both p ≤ 0.001). Overall rates for ‘mania or hypomania', specifically, were 8.19% with and 0.17% without antidepressant treatment, with large drug/placebo risk ratios among depressive (10.4/0.45%) and anxiety (1.98/0.00%) disorder patients. Conclusions: Risks of excessive mood elevation during antidepressant treatment, including mania-hypomania, were much greater than with placebo, and similar in juvenile anxiety and depressive disorders. Excessive arousal-activation in children or adolescents treated with antidepressants for anxiety as well as depressive disorders calls for particular caution and monitoring for potential risk of future bipolar disorder.

Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel


goto top of outline Introduction

Treatment with antidepressants (ADs) has been associated with a range of excessive emotional arousal or behavioral activation in adult [1,2,3] as well as juvenile [4,5] mood disorder patients, particularly among those diagnosed with unipolar depression. Such responses may reflect unrecognized bipolar disorder (BPD), especially among young persons who have not previously become manic or hypomanic spontaneously. Alternative possibilities include adverse drug effects or perhaps even de novo induction of BPD by mood-elevating treatments [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Risks of pathological mood elevation may be greater in association with treatment with older tricyclic ADs than with modern, second-generation agents in adults [3,9,12], but serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been implicated at ages below mid-adolescence [4,13,14]. These risks need to be balanced against evidence that the responsiveness of depression to AD treatment may be less in juveniles (and rarely studied separately in children) compared to adults [3,15,16,17]. In addition, the use of ADs to treat a broad range of disorders has increased several-fold in both adults and children following the introduction of modern ADs since the late 1980s, even for patients with known or suspected BPD [18,19].

International cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of the relationship between rates of AD prescriptions and incidence of BPD have found more apparent BPD in AD-treated samples of all ages [7,20]. Clinical studies also indicate major secular increases in the apparent prevalence of patients diagnosed with BPD between the 1990s and 2000s, ranging from 2-fold in adults to approximately 40-fold in juveniles [21]. In contrast, community-based epidemiological estimates indicate little change in the prevalence of BPD in recent decades [22]. The marked increase of diagnoses of BPD among juveniles may reflect greater clinical interest and more effective, or possibly exaggerated, case identification [23]. Broad acceptance and wider use of modern ADs throughout clinical medicine itself may also be a contributing factor [20,24].

Several case series have reported on associations of AD treatment with new-onset episodes of mania or hypomania in children and adolescents [4,25,26,27]. However, risks of more broadly defined excessive arousal-activation have not been systematically evaluated in findings from prospective, controlled clinical trials, particularly to compare risks with specific drugs versus a placebo or other control conditions. There are even fewer comparisons of risks by indications for AD treatment, particularly juvenile depressive versus anxiety disorders, for which ADs are commonly used in clinical settings [3]. Symptoms of excessive arousal and even mania have been associated with AD treatment of juvenile anxiety disorder patients, though rarely in adults [6]. For both depressive and anxiety disorder patients, questions remain as to whether such effects represent adverse drug reactions or if anxiety syndromes as well as depression may sometimes precede spontaneous BPD, especially in juveniles [28,29,30,31]. Much of the available information about risks involved has -relied on passively and incidentally identified adverse events in treatment trials rather than on direct investigation of defined responses as a specified research outcome measure, as noted in recent reviews [8,11].

Given the remaining uncertainties concerning excessive activation-arousal in young patients treated with ADs, and the potential clinical, public health, and conceptual-scientific significance of such reactions, we carried out a comprehensive review of the available research literature on associations of AD treatment with the emergence of a range of symptoms of apparently excessive emotional arousal or behavioral activation, as well as mania-hypomania, among children and adolescents with mood or anxiety disorders, based on findings from clinical trials of AD treatment.

 

goto top of outline Methods

We followed PRISMA guidelines for systematic searching for reports pertaining to a range of symptoms of clinically excessive arousal or activation arising during treatment of juvenile patients with ADs up to March 2012 [32]. Key words were: ‘child,' ‘adolescent,' ‘antidepressant,' ‘hypomania,' ‘mania,' ‘manic,' ‘bipolar,' ‘adverse,' and ‘switching.' To increase identification of studies involving anxiety disorders, we expanded the search terms to include: ‘anxiety,' ‘obsessive-compulsive,' ‘OCD,' ‘generalized anxiety,' ‘GAD,' ‘phobia,' and ‘social phobia.' Searching and ratings of target responses were carried out independently by two investigators (E.O. and E.T.); disagreements were resolved by consensus among these primary raters and a senior investigator (G.A.F.). Electronic research-literature databases searched included -CINAHL, the Cochrane Library MedLine, PsychInfo, PubMed and Web-of-Science. In addition, bibliographies of initially identified reports were searched manually. Owing to the infrequency of required investigations, we included studies of varied designs (randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, reviews and meta-analyses, but not single case reports) in addition to randomized, placebo-controlled trials. We sought studies involving juveniles with an average age <18 years, diagnosis of broadly defined depressive or anxiety disorders, and treatment with ADs. Studies were screened to identify reports of new onset of behavioral events involving arousal or activation considered psychopathological or adverse events [33].

Statistical analyses included comparisons of continuous measures by ANOVA methods (t tests) or paired t tests, as well as random-effects meta-analytic and metaregression modeling. Pooled proportions (affected/all exposed subjects) were also compared by contingency tables (c2). Data are reported as means with standard deviations (SD) or with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Computations used standard commercial computer programs (Statview.5; SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., USA and STATA.8; StataCorp, College Station, Tex., USA).

 

goto top of outline Results

Searching initially identified 354 reports of studies involving children and adolescents treated with an AD or a psychostimulant; we excluded 312 reports not meeting study criteria, leaving 42 studies involving a total of 6,767 subjects to analyze (fig. 1). They included 17 studies regarding AD trials in juvenile depressive disorders, with or without other psychiatric disorders (n = 2,637 subjects, 2,083 given an AD and 554 controls), 16 of which provided quantitative estimates of behavior outcomes considered as adverse events (see online supplementary table 1; for all online supplementary material, see www.karger.com?doi=10.1159/000345316) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]; 25 studies involved AD trials in juvenile anxiety disorders, with or without other psychiatric disorders (n = 4,130 subjects, 3,211 given an AD and 919 controls; online suppl. table 2) [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]. It is important to emphasize that interpretation of the findings is limited by the variety of types of patients and ages represented, and the range of behavioral outcomes considered to represent excessive arousal. A total of 19 studies involved a placebo or another no-treatment control-comparison condition, and were suitable for meta-analysis. As studies referred to a primary diagnosis, we considered separately trials involving depressive (online suppl. table 1) and anxiety-related disorders (online -suppl. table 2) and compared their findings.

FIG01
Fig. 1. Summary of report selection. Excluded from n = 354 initial potential reports were 146 of inappropriate type (73 letters, editorials or treatment guidelines, 62 case reports and 11 reviews), and 165 lacking information on rates of adverse behavioral changes. The final 42 reports included were from trials in depressed patients (n = 17 with 2,637 cases) or for anxiety disorders (n = 25 with 4,130 cases), or a total of 6,767 juvenile patients-subjects (5,294 given ADs, 1,473 controls).

goto top of outline Depression

We identified 17 reports of trials involving ADs or stimulants alone or with other psychotropic agents (most often mood stabilizers or antipsychotics) in various types of juvenile depressive disorders, with or without other comorbidities (online suppl. table 1). Subject ages varied from 3 to 22 (mean 12.5) years in trials involving 13-439 subjects. A majority of the 2,637 depressed subjects (54.3%) were boys. Exposure times varied from 6 to 40 weeks, and latency to identified excessive mood elevation averaged 4.8 ± 4.3 weeks among reports including such information (online suppl. table 1). Study designs included prospective randomization and blinding (usually with a placebo control) in 6/17 trials. Methods of assessing adverse behavioral manifestations involved more or less systematic assessments in 11/17 trials; in 4 others, noteworthy behavioral responses were identified in spontaneous reporting of apparent adverse events (online suppl. table 1).

The depression studies analyzed reported various types and levels of behavioral activation considered in each report to be psychopathological. These responses ranged from insomnia, various manifestations of behavioral activation and overarousal, restlessness, agitation, irritability or sustained anger, as well as hypomania, ‘manic symptoms,' and mania that may or may not have met formal contemporary diagnostic criteria, especially pertaining to duration; such events were sometimes associated with discontinuing from trials (online suppl. table 1). Three studies included currently depressed juveniles who were suspected of having BPD but did not include a control condition to indicate risk of spontaneous behavioral changes [40,44,46]. The range of responses considered precludes confident estimates of occurrence rates, which ranged from 0.3% for reactions considered to represent hypomania in a recent, large, prospective treatment trial involving treatment-resistant depressed, mainly adolescent, patients [50] to 50% for ‘manic symptoms' in a small retrospective study [46]. Nevertheless, 5 of the studies involved comparisons of AD-treated versus placebo-control cases of juvenile depression [36,38,39,42,47]; in all of these, the rates were much lower with placebo treatment (online suppl. table 1).

Observed, crude mean rates of apparent mood shifting were 20.5 times higher with ADs (16.8 ± 14.6%) than placebo (0.82 ± 0.86%) when all available trials and data pertaining to juvenile depressed patients were included (t = 2.40, p = 0.027). Rates adjusted for approximate or nominal exposure times (not precisely associated with outcomes) were 1.16 ± 1.25% per week with ADs and 0.084 ± 0.091% per week with placebo (a 13.8-fold difference). However, a probably more secure comparison found drug-associated rates to be 3.66 times greater with ADs than placebo in controlled studies with paired comparisons [3.95% (34/861) vs. 1.08% (6/554); c2 = 9.76, p = 0.0018].

goto top of outline Anxiety Disorders

We also identified 25 other, similarly heterogeneous studies of juvenile cases of anxiety-related disorders with or without other psychiatric comorbidities, involving varied study designs and methods of defining behavioral outcomes (online suppl. table 2). Notably, however, cotreatment with mood stabilizers and antipsychotics was rare compared to the studies involving depression (see online supp. materials). The anxiety disorder studies involved a total of 4,130 young patients, of whom 57.5% were boys with an average age of 12 (range 3-18) years. AD exposure times varied from 8 to 104 (mean 17.6) weeks. Of these studies, 16/25 involved prospective, randomized comparisons of outcomes during treatment with ADs versus a placebo. Methods of assessing observed behavioral responses appeared to be systematic in only 12/25 studies; 2 did not define this aspect of methods, and the other 11 seemed to involve spontaneous reporting of adverse effects, so as to limit confidence in the validity of reported outcomes. As in trials involving depression, outcomes ranged through insomnia, agitation or either subjective or objective physical restlessness, excitement or disinhibition, hypomania, or mania. Rates of such behavioral outcomes with AD treatment ranged from 0.7 to 2.4% for mania in 4 reports [56,65,66,68] to as high as 45-55% for insomnia, restlessness, agitation or irritability [52,57,59], and even 83% in 1 study reporting on unspecified behavioral reactions [73]. Reported latency to such reactions averaged 5.0 ± 3.0 weeks (online suppl. table 2), which was similar to that with depressive disorders.

Observed mean rates of apparent arousal-activation responses among juveniles with anxiety-related illnesses (online suppl. table 2) were 3.13-fold higher with ADs (22.6 ± 20.3%) than placebo (7.23 ± 7.45%; t = 2.89, p = 0.006). Rates of mood change adjusted for nominal exposure times differed by 2.94-fold between AD and placebo treatment (2.10 ± 2.22% vs. 0.714 ± 0.820% per week). Moreover, in controlled trials, paired AD-associated versus placebo-associated rates differed by 2.24-fold [11.7% (154/1,317) vs. 5.22% (48/919); c2 = 27.6, p < 0.0001].

goto top of outline Comparisons of Outcomes and Diagnostic Groups

We further summarized proportions of patients showing excessive arousal or activation with AD versus placebo treatment in several ways, based on overall proportions, comparing risks of excessive activation with AD versus placebo and comparing all available data (data limited to controlled trials for direct comparisons), as well as risks specifically for outcomes reported as mania-hypomania. These comparisons were for both diagnoses as well as for depressive and anxiety disorder subjects (table 1).

TAB01
Table 1. Rates of excessive arousal-activation with antidepressant versus placebo treatment for depressive or anxiety disorders in juvenile patients

Overall risk with AD treatment, regardless of primary diagnosis or outcome type, was 12.9% (687/5,327), and with placebo, 3.69% (54/1,463) - a highly significant 3.49-fold difference (table 1). For drug-placebo paired obser-vations, the overall risks were 8.63% (188/2,178) versus 3.69% (54/1,463), another highly significant 2.34-fold -difference. For mania-hypomania specifically, the drug-associated versus placebo-associated risks were 8.19% (130/1,587) versus 0.17% (1/599) overall, and for such outcomes in paired comparisons, 7.98% (123/1,541) versus 0.17% (1/599). These risks for both mania and hypomania were more than 45 times greater with than without AD treatment (both c2 ≥46, both p < 0.0001; table 1).

We also compared outcomes by diagnosis (table 1). With paired data, risk of excessive arousal was 2.96 times greater (11.7 vs. 3.95%) during AD treatment with anxiety than with depressive disorders (c2 = 39.6, p < 0.0001). Similarly, with placebo, risk of spontaneous increases in mood or behavior was 4.74 times greater in anxiety disorders (5.22 vs. 1.10%; c2 = 16.3, p < 0.0001). These observations suggest that risk of excessive arousal-activation was at least as large in anxiety as depressive disorders in children and adolescents.

For manias and hypomanias specifically, the risk (weighted by subject counts) with AD versus controls in depressive disorders was 10.4% (122/1,173) versus 0.45% (1/222; c2 = 23.0, p < 0.0001); for anxiety disorders, the respective rates were 1.98% (8/414) versus 0.00% (0/377; c2 = 7.35, p = 0.0067; table 1). These pooled risks of mania or hypomania during AD treatment, therefore, were 5.25 times greater in depressive (10.4%) than anxiety disorders (1.98%; c2 = 29.2, p < 0.0001). However, risk of spontaneous mania-hypomania during placebo treatment was low in depression (0.45%) and did not occur with anxiety disorders (0.00%).

goto top of outline Meta-Analytic Modeling

Finally, we carried out a meta-analysis of pairs of mood-elevating responses with ADs versus placebo available in reports of 19 controlled trials (fig. 2). This analysis resulted in an overall drug/placebo risk ratio (RR) of 1.66-fold (95% CI: 1.23-2.25; p = 0.001). Meta-analysis for studies of depression (3.61; 1.60-8.10) and for anxiety disorders (1.49; 1.08-2.06) yielded somewhat greater drug/control RR values for depression, but with overlapping CIs. Estimates of the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to obtain an excess of 1 case of excessive arousal with an AD versus placebo, based on the reciprocal of meta-analytic mean differences in rates (1/RD) yielded an overall NNT of 36 (95% CI: 22-110), with estimated NNT values of 37 for depression and 32 for anxiety - all consistent with the relative infrequency of such reactions. Metaregression modeling found diagnosis, year of reporting, total subject number, mean age, percentage males, and duration of treatment exposure all to be unrelated to outcomes (not shown).

FIG02
Fig. 2. Meta-analysis of rates of excessive mood elevation with ADs vs. placebo in controlled trials (n = 19) involving depressive (black boxes; n = 5) or anxiety-related disorders (gray boxes; n = 14; box size is proportional to study size). There was a highly significant overall drug/placebo difference (z = 3.33, p = 0.001) as indicated by the pooled RR of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.23-2.25; black diamond and vertical dotted line) compared to the null value of 1.0 (vertical solid line). The meta-analytically computed NNT is 36 (22-110). The pooled RR for juvenile depression was 3.61 (1.60-8.10; z = 3.10, p = 0.002), and for anxiety, 1.49 (1.08-2.06; z = 2.42, p = 0.016), a 2.4-fold but nonsignificant difference (t = 0.616, p = 0.546), with similar NNT estimates for depression and anxiety (37 vs. 32).

 

goto top of outline Discussion

This review provides information concerning apparently excessive emotional arousal and behavioral activation in children and adolescents in association with AD treatments for depressive and anxiety disorders, and considered by the investigators of the trials as reportable adverse events. Overall rates of excessive arousal-activation during AD treatment were substantial in both depressive (11.2%) and anxiety (13.8%) disorders, and 3-10 times higher than with placebo (table 1). Moreover, in paired comparisons, overall risks (weighted by subject count) of outcomes considered ‘mania or hypomania,' with versus without AD treatment, was 7.98 versus 0.17%. Also, a 1.7-fold overall difference with/without ADs was sustained by meta-analytic modeling of studies that compared risks with and without AD treatment (fig. 2). Such rates are only moderately lower than rates of new mania or hypomania among depressed adults with BPD treated with an AD (15.3%; with or without a mood-stabilizing drug) [3], but involve a range of levels of overarousal. More specifically, the overall risk of mania or hypomania during treatment with an AD was similar to, or somewhat higher than, the rate in AD-treated adults diagnosed with unipolar major depressive disorder (5.97%; 95% CI: 5.88-6.04) [5]. Owing to the limited incidence of excessive arousal-activation in the present juvenile studies, the estimated NNT to encounter more risk with an AD than with placebo was quite high, at 36 (95% CI: 32-110).

These findings support the conclusion that the broadly defined excessive arousal responses considered were strongly associated with AD treatment, and sustained even when reactions were limited to those considered as mania or hypomania. Moreover, the risks were similar or even greater among young patients considered to have an anxiety disorder versus depression (table 1). These findings require consideration of possible mechanisms involved.

An important possibility is that the excessive arousal-activation observed represented responses to AD treatment in cases of previously undiagnosed BPD. Such activation responses have often been reported in association with AD treatment, and may be particularly likely among juvenile depressed patients who have not yet experienced a spontaneous episode of mania or hypomania, and are a clinically important basis of initially recognizing BPD in previously depressed patients [3,4,8,11,13,14,77,78]. The relatively high rates of excessive arousal-activation encountered seem inconsistent with typical exclusion of patients with known BPD from most AD trials [79], but are consistent with the view that BPD is not easily diagnosed in juveniles [59,60,80,81,82,83].

Even though such responses do not necessarily prove the presence of previously undiagnosed BPD, it is important to note that continued use of ADs in cases of unrecognized BPD can lead to sustained mood instability [2,79,82,84]. This consideration underscores the potential significance of even moderately excessive arousal-activation in guiding to future clinical management to monitor for similar future responses and for possible BPD, while considering the use of mood-stabilizing treatments judiciously.

An alternative potential basis for the observed high risk of excessive mood-elevating effects are directly AD-associated reactions that may be particularly likely among children and adolescents, as a pharmacological effect. Putatively drug-induced states of excessive arousal may or may not be followed by spontaneous mood elevations that would support a diagnosis of BPD. The similar or greater risks of excessive arousal-activation in AD-treated juvenile anxiety disorders, rather than selectively in depression (table 1), might be taken as evidence in support of this possibility. Alternatively, anxiety disorders may increase the risk of excessive behavioral activation such as through increased reactivity to the social environment [85]. A further possibility is that anxiety disorders in juveniles, in addition to depression, may represent a significant pathway to developing BPD. Less relevant to the current short-term treatment exposures, physiological adaptations to long-term AD treatment might also increase risks of developing BPD [7,8,11,83,86].

In order to clarify the mechanistic and prognostic significance of excessive arousal-activation or even of hypomania-mania associated with AD treatment in children, it would be helpful to have information based on long-term follow-up of persons experiencing such reactions. Factors to be considered in such studies would include the course and subsequent consequences of drug-associated hyperarousal responses, their relationship to risks of spontaneous mania-hypomania, and effects of drug type, dose, duration of exposure, and the latency from arousal reactions to the diagnosis of BPD. Some information of this kind has been reported. Strober and Carlson [87] followed 60 adolescents diagnosed with major depression for up to 4 years that included treatment with various ADs and antipsychotics: 20% were rediagnosed with BPD, as predicted by having experienced hypomania-mania during AD treatment, as well as having psychotic features or a family history of mood disorders. Similarly, Akiskal et al. [88] followed 206 adolescents and adults diagnosed with unipolar depression for approximately 3 years; 8.7% experienced hypomania during treatment with an AD, all of whom were later rediagnosed with BPD. More recently, Martin et al. [4] found evidence of mania-hypomania in 5.4% of over 87,000 mostly depressed young patients aged 5-29 years during treatment with an AD, and 3 times lower risks without such treatment. Risks were highest at ages 15-19 years and with tricyclic ADs after age 15, but with serotonin reuptake inhibitors among younger children [4,13].

Contrary to expectation, risk of excessive arousal-activation during AD treatment was at least as high among juveniles with anxiety disorders as with depression (table 1). Although depression commonly precedes manifestations of mania or hypomania in patients diagnosed with BPD [3,79,82], anxiety disorders or anxious depression may also be antecedents of later BPD, as well as being common comorbidities with BPD [6,28,30,89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. As we found (table 1; online suppl. table 2), risks of new-onset mania or hypomania during AD treatment of young anxiety disorder patients have been reported to be several times higher than without anxiety disorders, particularly among boys [28]. In striking contrast, risk of overarousal or mood switching is much less common among adults with anxiety disorders treated with ADs [6]. It is also noteworthy that the risk of spontaneous mood activation among the juvenile anxiety disorder patients in the present study not treated with ADs (9.27%) was nearly 5 times greater than in depressive disorder cases (table 1). This finding is also consistent with an association between anxiety disorders and BPD in juveniles.

This systematic review involves several notable limitations. In most reports considered, the occurrence of symptoms of excessive emotional arousal or behavioral activation was not a systematic and explicit outcome based on consistently defined criteria. Many studies were not randomized, blinded or controlled, and none involved long-term follow-up assessments. Few studies even employed systematic checklists to evaluate the onset of treatment-emergent behavioral or other adverse events, but instead used spontaneously reported adverse events typical of many treatment trials [96]. Furthermore, reported frequencies of excessive arousal-activation (see online supp. materials) varied greatly among children treated with ADs, depending on definitions and severity criteria involved. Nevertheless, there were enough controlled data, with matched pairs of outcomes among patients randomized to treatment with an AD or not, as to indicate major drug-placebo differences in both types of disorders (fig. 2; table 1).

Despite methodological limitations imposed by the available data, a substantial likelihood of excessive arousal or activation, and even hypomania or mania, was clear in children and adolescents during AD treatment. The incidence of such responses, even those considered specifically to represent mania or hypomania, were much higher than in comparable reports involving anxious adults and similar to those reported among depressed adults, all treated with an AD. A notable and unexpected finding was that the risk of excessive arousal-activation, or even of hypomania or mania, was at least as high during AD treatment for anxiety as for depression. Additional follow-up studies are required to clarify the proportion of young patients experiencing such responses to AD treatment who later develop spontaneous mania-hypomania so as to support a diagnosis of BPD. Also of interest is the proportion of subjects who do not experience spontaneous mood elevations and may represent adverse pharmacological effects of ADs.

In spite of uncertainties regarding the interpretation of the excessive mood-elevating effects reported, the findings appear to have clinical implications. Notably, we recommend special caution and close monitoring in the use of ADs to treat depression or anxiety in juvenile patients in whom the risk of excessive mood elevation or the presence of undiagnosed BPD is likely to be underestimated. Those who experience pathological mood elevation or activation during AD treatment need especially close monitoring for similar future responses and for development of BPD. We also encourage avoidance of unnecessary and potentially burdensome or risky, indefinite, long-term use of mood-stabilizing treatments following single mood-elevating responses to AD treatment [95] and consideration of effective and safe nonpharmacological interventions, such as psychotherapy, for anxiety disorders [97].

 

goto top of outline Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a grant from the Bruce J. Anderson Foundation and by the McLean Private Donors Psychopharmacology Research Fund (to R.J.B.).

 

goto top of outline Disclosure Statement

No author or immediate family member has financial arrangements that might represent potential conflicts of interest for the findings presented, nor has any funding source influenced the content of this report.


 goto top of outline References
  1. Ghaemi SN, Wingo AP, Filkowski MA, Baldessarini RJ: Long-term antidepressant treatment in bipolar disorder: meta-analyses of benefits and risks. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2008;118:347-356.
  2. Tondo L, Vázquez G, Baldessarini RJ: Mania associated with antidepressant treatment: comprehensive meta-analytic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010;121:404-414.
  3. Baldessarini RJ: Chemotherapy in Psychiatry, ed 3. New York, Springer, 2013.
  4. Martin A, Young C, Leckman JF, Mukonoweshuro C, Rosenheck R, Leslie D: Age effects on antidepressant-induced manic conversion. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:773-780.
  5. Ernst CL, Goldberg JF: Clinical features related to age at onset in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2004;82:21-27.
  6. Levy D, Kimhi R, Barak Y, Aviv A, Elizur A: Antidepressant-associated mania: a study of anxiety disorder patients. Psychopharmacology 1998;136:243-246.
  7. Reichart CG, Nolen WA: Earlier onset of bipolar disorder in children by antidepressants or stimulants? An hypothesis. J Affect Disord 2004;78:81-84.
  8. Lim CJ, Leckman JF, Young C, Martin A: Antidepressant-induced manic conversion: developmentally informed synthesis of the literature. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005;65:25-52.
  9. Moreno C, Roche AM, Greenhill LL: Pharmacotherapy of child and adolescent depression. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2006;15:977-998.
  10. Pagano MR, Demeter CA, Faber JE, Calebrese JR, Findling RL: Initiation of stimulant and antidepressant medication and clinical presentation in juvenile bipolar I disorder. Bipolar Disord 2008;10:334-341.
  11. Joseph MF, Youngstrom EA, Soares JC: Antidepressant-coincident mania in children and adolescents treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Future Neurol 2009;4:87-102.
  12. Wallace AE, Neily J, Weeks WB, Friedman MJ: Cumulative meta-analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pediatric depression: did unpublished studies influence the efficacy/safety debate? J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2006;16:37-58.
  13. Baldessarini RJ, Faedda GL, Hennen J: Risk of mania with antidepressants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:298-289.
  14. Braun-Scharm H, Bilke O: Differential diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of juvenile mania: a review (in German). Psychiatr Prax 2006;33:S40-S46.
  15. Tsapakis EM, Soldani F, Tondo L, Baldessarini RJ: Efficacy of antidepressants in juvenile depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2008;193:10-17.
  16. Henry A, Kisicki MD, Varley C: Efficacy and safety of antidepressant drug treatment in children and adolescents. Mol Psychiatry 2011, Doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.150.
  17. Undurraga J, Baldessarini RJ: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012;37:851-864.
  18. Leckman JF, King RA: Developmental perspective on the controversy surrounding the use of SSRIs to treat pediatric depression. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:1304-1306.
  19. Baldessarini RJ, Henk HJ, Sklar AR, Chang J, Leahy LF: Psychotropic medications for bipolar disorder patients in the United States: polytherapy and adherence. Psychiatr Serv 2008;59:1175-1183.
  20. Harpaz-Rotem I, Rosenheck RA: Changes in outpatient psychiatric diagnosis in privately insured children and adolescents from 1995 to 2000. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2004;34:329-340.
  21. Moreno C, Laje G, Blanco C, Jiang H, Schmidt AB, Olfson M: National trends in the outpatient diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in youth. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:1032-1039.
  22. Goldstein BI, Birmaher B: Prevalence, clinical presentation and differential diagnosis of pediatric bipolar disorder. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2012;49:3-14.

    External Resources

  23. Yutzy SH, Woofter CR, Abbott CC, Melhem IM, Parish BS: The increasing frequency of mania and bipolar disorder: causes and potential negative impacts. J Nerv Ment Dis 2012;200:380-387.
  24. Goldstein BI: Recent progress in understanding pediatric bipolar disorder. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012;166:362-371.
  25. Achamallah NS, Decker DH: Mania induced by fluoxetine in an adolescent patient. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:1404.
  26. Go FS, Malley EE, Birmaher B, Rosenberg DR: Manic behaviors associated with fluoxetine in three 12- to 18-year-olds with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 1998;8:73-80.
  27. Ameen S, Jagadheesan K, Sinha VK: Citalopram induced manic switch in an adolescent with epilepsy. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2003;37:776-777.
  28. Lewinsohn PM, Zinbarg R, Seeley JR, Lewinsohn M, Sack WH: Lifetime comorbiditiy among anxiety disorders and between anxiety disorders and other mental disorders in adolescents. J Anxiety Disord 1997;11:377-394.
  29. Cheer SM, Figgitt DP: Fluvoxamine: review of its therapeutic potential in the management of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Paediatr Drugs 2001;3:763-781.
  30. Goodwin RD, Hamilton SP: Early-onset fearful panic attack: a possible prodrome of early-onset severe psychopathology. Compr Psychiatry 2002;43:22-27.
  31. Seidel L, Walkup JT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in the treatment of the pediatric non-obsessive-compulsive disorder anxiety disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2006;16:171-179.
  32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006-1012.
  33. Cassano GB, Rucci P, Benvenuti A, Miniati M, Calugi S, Maggi L, Pini S, Kupfer DJ, Maj M, Fagiolini A, Frank E: Role of psychomotor activation in discriminating unipolar from bipolar disorders: a classification-tree analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73:22-28.
  34. Tierney E, Joshi PT, Llinas JF, Rosenberg LA, Riddle MA: Sertraline for major depression in children and adolescents: preliminary clinical experience. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 1995;5:13-27.

    External Resources

  35. McConville BJ, Minnery KL, Sorter MT, West SA, Friedman LM, Christian K: Open study of the effects of sertraline on adolescent major depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 1996;6:41-51.
  36. Emslie GJ, Rush AJ, Weinberg WA, Kowatch RA, Hughes CW, Carmody T, Rintelmann J: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:1031-1037.
  37. Alderman J, Wolkow R, Chung M, Johnston HF: Sertraline treatment of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder or depression: pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and efficacy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998;37:386-394.
  38. Keller MB, Ryan ND, Strober M, Klein RG, Kutcher SP, Birmaher B, Hagino OR, Koplewicz H, Carlson GA, Clarke GN, Emslie GJ, Feinberg D, Geller B, Kusumakar V, Papatheodorou G, Sack WH, Sweeney M, Wagner KD, Weller EB, Winters NC, Oakes R, McCafferty JP: Efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of adolescent major depression: randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:762-772.
  39. Emslie GJ, Heiligenstein JH, Wagner KD, Hoog SL, Ernest DE, Brown E, Nilsson M, Jacobson JG: Fluoxetine for acute treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41:1205-1215.
  40. Bhangoo RK, Lowe CH, Myers FS, Treland J, Curran J, Towbin KE, Leibenluft E: Medication use in children and adolescents treated in the community for bipolar disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13:515-522.
  41. Carlson GA, Mick E: Drug-induced disinhibition in psychiatrically hospitalized children. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13:153-163.
  42. Wagner KD, Ambrosini P, Rynn M, Wohlberg C, Yang R, Greenbaum MS, Childress A, Donnelly C, Deas D: Efficacy of sertraline in the treatment of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2003;290:1033-1041.
  43. Wilens TE, Biederman J, Kwon A, Chase R, Greenberg L, Mick E, Spencer TJ: Systematic chart review of the nature of psychiatric adverse events in children and adolescents treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13:143-152.
  44. Faedda GL, Baldessarini RJ, Glovinsky IP, Austin NB: Treatment-emergent mania in pediatric bipolar disorder: retrospective case review. J Affect Disord 2004;82:149-158.
  45. Shirazi E, Alaghband-Rad J: Open trial of citalopram in children and adolescents with depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2005;15:233-239.
  46. Baumer FM, Howe M, Gallelli K, Simeonova DI, Hallmayer J, Chang KD: Pilot study of antidepressant-induced mania in pediatric bipolar disorder: characteristics, risk factors, and the serotonin transporter gene. Biol -Psychiatry 2006;60:1005-1012.
  47. Emslie G, Kratochvil C, Vitiello B, Silva S, Mayes T, McNulty S, Weller E, Waslick B, Casat C, Walkup J, Pathak S, Rohde P, Posner K, March J: Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): safety results. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45:1440-1455.
  48. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG: Antidepressant side effects in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2006;16:147-157.
  49. Zuckerman ML, Vaughan BL, Whitney J, Dodds A, Yakhkind A, MacMillan C, Raches D, Pravdova I, DeMaso DR, Beardslee WR, Gonzalez-Heydrich J: Tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in 39 children under age seven: retrospective chart -review. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2007;17:165-174.
  50. Brent D, Emslie G, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Asarnow JR, Keller M, Vitiello B, Ritz L, Iyengar S, Abebe K, Birmaher B, Ryan N, Kennard B, Hughes C, DeBar L, McCracken J, Strober M, Suddath R, Spirito A, Leonard H, Melhem N, Porta G, Onorato M, Zelazny J: Switching to another SSRI or to venlafaxine with or without cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with SSRI-resistant depression: the TORDIA randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299:901-913.
  51. Riddle MA, King RA, Hardin MT, Scahill L, Ort SI, Chappell P, Rasmusson A, Leckman JF: Behavioral side effects of fluoxetine in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 1991;1:193-198.

    External Resources

  52. Fairbanks JM, Pine DS, Tancer NK, Dummit ES III, Kentgen LM, Martin J, Asche BK, Klein RG: Open fluoxetine treatment of mixed anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 1997;7:17-29.
  53. March JS, Biederman J, Wolkow R, Safferman A, Mardekian J, Cook EH, Cutler NR, Dominguez R, Ferguson J, Muller B, Riesenberg R, Rosenthal M, Sallee FR, Wagner KD, Steiner H: Sertraline in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: multicenter randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:1752-1756.
  54. Cook EH, Wagner KD, March JS, Biederman J, Landau P, Wolkow R, Messig M: Long-term sertraline treatment of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:1175-1181.
  55. Geller DA, Hoog SL, Heiligenstein JH, Ricardi RK, Tamura R, Kluszynski S, Jacobson JG: Fluoxetine treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents: placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:773-779.
  56. Riddle MA, Reeve EA, Yaryura-Tobias JA, Yang HM, Claghorn JL, Gaffney G, Greist JH, Holland D, McConville BJ, Pigott T, Walkup JT: Fluvoxamine for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:222-229.
  57. Rynn MA, Siqueland L, Rickels K: Placebo-controlled trial of sertraline in the treatment of children with generalized anxiety disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:2008-2014.
  58. Thomsen PH, Ebbesen C, Persson C: Long-term experience with citalopram in the treatment of adolescent OCD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:895-902.
  59. Liebowitz MR, Turner SM, Piacentini J, Beidel DC, Clarvit SR, Davies SO, Graae F, Jaffer M, Lin SH, Sallee FR, Schmidt AB, Simpson HB: Fluoxetine in children and adolescents with OCD: placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41:1431-1438.
  60. Walkup J, Labellarte M, Riddle MA, Pine DS, Greenhill L, Fairbanks J, Klein R, Davies M, Sweeney M, Abikoff H, Hack S, Klee B, Bergman RL, Lynn D, McCracken J, March J, Gammon P, Vitiello B, Ritz L, Roper M: Treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders: an open-label extension of the research units on pediatric psychopharmacology anxiety study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2002;12:175-188.
  61. Pediatric OCD Treatment Study (POTS) Team: Cognitive behavior therapy, sertraline, and their combination for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292:1969-1976.
  62. Birmaher B, Axelson DA, Monk K, Kalas C, Clark DB, Ehmann M, Bridge J, Heo J, Brent DA: Fluoxetine for the treatment of childhood anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003;42:415-423.
  63. Geller DA, Biederman J, Stewart SE, Mullin B, Farrell C, Wagner KD, Emslie G, Carpenter D: Impact of comorbidity on treatment response to paroxetine in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: is the use of exclusion criteria empirically supported in randomized clinical trials? J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13:S19-S29.
  64. March J, Silva S, Petrycki S, Curry J, Wells K, Fairbank J, Burns B, Domino M, McNulty S, Vitiello B, Severe J: Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292:807-820.
  65. Wagner KD, Berard R, Stein MB, Wetherhold E, Carpenter DJ, Perera P, Gee M, Davy K, Machin A: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine in children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:1153-1162.
  66. Clark DB, Birmaher B, Axelson D, Monk K, Kalas C, Ehmann M, Bridge J, Wood DS, Muthen B, Brent D: Fluoxetine for the treatment of childhood anxiety disorders: open-label, long-term extension to a controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005;44:1263-1270.
  67. Isolan L, Pheula G, Salum GA Jr, Oswald S, Rohde LA, Manfro GG: Open-label trial of escitalopram in children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2007;17:751-760.
  68. March JS, Entusah AR, Rynn M, Albano AM, Tourian KA: Randomized controlled trial of venlafaxine ER versus placebo in pediatric social anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:1149-1154.
  69. Rynn MN, Riddle MA, Yeung PP, Kunz NR: Efficacy and safety of venlafaxine-ER in the treatment of children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: two placebo-controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:290-300.
  70. Mrakotsky C, Masek B, Biederman J, Raches D, Hsin O, Forbes P, de Moor C, DeMaso DR, Gonzalez-Heydrich J: Prospective open-label pilot trial of mirtazapine in children and adolescents with social phobia. J Anxiety Disord 2008;22:88-97.
  71. Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, Ginsburg GS, Rynn MA, McCracken J, Waslick B, Iyengar S, March JS, Kendall PC: Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2753-2766.
  72. Alaghband-Rad J, Hakimshooshtary M: Randomized controlled clinical trial of citalopram versus fluoxetine in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009;18:131-135.
  73. Coskun M, Zoroglu S: Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in preschool children with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2009;19:297-300.
  74. Reinblatt SP, Riddle MA: Pharmacological management of childhood anxiety disorders: a review. Psychopharmacol 2007;191:67-86.
  75. Harris E, Eng HY, Kowatch R, Delgado SV, Saldaña SN: Disinhibition as a side effect of treatment with fluvoxamine in pediatric patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2010;20:347-353.
  76. Schirman S, Kronenberg S, Apter A, Brent D, Melhem N, Pick N, Carmel M, Frisch A, Weizman A, Gothelf D: Effectiveness and tolerability of citalopram for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: an open-label study. J Neural Transm 2010;117:139-145.
  77. Faedda GL, Baldessarini RJ, Suppers T, Tondo L, Becker I, Lipschitz DS: Pediatric-onset bipolar disorder: a neglected clinical and public health problem. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1995;3:171-195.
  78. Cohen D: Should the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in child and adolescent depression be banned? Psychother Psychosom 2007;76:5-14.
  79. Merikangas KR, Cui L, Kattan G, Carlson GA, Youngstrom EA, Angst J: Mania with and without depression in a community sample of US adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012;69:943-951.
  80. Birmaher B, Axelson DA: Course and outcome of bipolar spectrum disorder in children and adolescents: review of the existing literature. Devel Psychopathol 2006;18:1023-1035.
  81. Ghaemi SN, Ostacher MM, El-Mallakh RS, Borrelli D, Baldassano CF, Kelley ME, Filkowski MM, Hennen J, Sachs GS, Goodwin FK, Baldessarini RJ: Antidepressant discontinuation in bipolar depression: a Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) randomized clinical trial of long-term effectiveness and safety. J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71:372-380.
  82. Gilman SE, Dupuy JM, Perlis RH: Risks for the transition from major depressive disorder to bipolar disorder in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73:829-836.
  83. Hamrin V, Scahill L: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for children and adolescents with major depression: current controversies and recommendations. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2005;26:433-450.
  84. Undurraga K. Baldessarini RJ, Valenti M, Pacchiarotti I, Tondo L, Vázquez G, Vieta E: Bipolar depression: clinical correlates of receiving antidepressants. J Affect Disord 2012;139:89-93
  85. Fava GA, Rafanelli C, Tomba E, Guidi J, Grandi S: The sequential combination of cognitive behavioral treatment and well-being therapy in cyclothymic disorder. Psychother Psychosom 2011;80:136-143.
  86. Fava GA, Offidani E: The mechanisms of tolerance in antidepressant action. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2011;35:1593-1602.
  87. Strober M, Carlson G: Bipolar illness in adolescents with major depression: clinical, genetic, and psychopharmacologic predictors in a three- to four-year prospective follow-up investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:549-555.
  88. Akiskal HS, Walker P, Puzantian VR, King D, Rosenthal TL, Dranon M: Bipolar outcome in the course of depressive illness. Phenomenologic, familial, and pharmacologic predictors. J Affect Disord 1983;5:115-128
  89. Das AK, Olfson M, Gameroff MJ, Pilowsky DJ, Blanco C, Feder A, Gross R, Neria Y, Lantigua R, Shea S, Weissman MM: Screening for bipolar disorder in a primary care practice. JAMA 2005;193:956-963.

    External Resources

  90. Rende R, Birmajer B, Alexson D, Strober M, Gill MK, Valeri S, Chiappetta L, Ryan N, Leonard H, Hunt J, Iyengar S, Keller M: Childhood-onset bipolar disorder: evidence for increased familial loading of psychiatric illness. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;46:127-204.

    External Resources

  91. Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Huang B, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Saha TD, Smith SM, Pulay AJ, Pickering RP, Ruan WJ, Compton WM: Sociodemographic and psychopathologic predictors of first incidence of DSM-IV substance use, mood and anxiety disorders: results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Mol Psychiatry 2009;14:1051-1066.
  92. Sala R, Axelson DA, Castro-Fornieles J, Goldstein RR, Ha W, Liao F, Gill MK, Iyengar S, Strober MA, Goldstein BI, Yen S, Hower H, Hunt J, Ryan ND, Dickstein D, Keller MV, Birmaher B: Comorbid anxiety in children and adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorders: prevalence and clinical correlates. J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71:1344-1350.
  93. Kinley DJ, Walker JR, Enns MW, Sareen J: Panic attacks as a risk for later psychopathology: results from a nationally representative survey. Depress Anxiety 2011;28:412-419.
  94. Masi G, Toni C, Perugi G, Mucci M, Millepiedi S, Akistal HS: Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder: a neglected comorbidity. Can J Psychiatry 2001;46:797-802.
  95. Merikangas KR, Jin R, He JP, Kessler RC, Lee S, Sampson NA, Viana MC, Andrade LH, Hu C, Karam EG, Ladea M, Medina-Mora ME, Ono Y, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Wells JE, Zarkov Z: Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the world mental health survey initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:241-251.
  96. Jureidini JN, McHenry LB: Key opinion leaders and pediatric antidepressant overprescribing. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:197-201.
  97. In-Albon T, Schneider S: Psychotherapy of childhood anxiety disorder. Psychother Psychosom 2007;76:15-24.

 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Emanuela Offidani
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna
Viale Berti Pichat 5
IT-40127 Bologna (Italy)
E-Mail emanuela.offidani2@unibo.it


 goto top of outline Article Information

Received: September 18, 2012
Accepted after revision: October 12, 2012
Published online: March 21, 2013
Number of Print Pages : 10
Number of Figures : 2, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 97
Additional supplementary material is available online - Number of Parts : 1


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Vol. 82, No. 3, Year 2013 (Cover Date: April 2013)

Journal Editor: Fava G.A. (Bologna)
ISSN: 0033-3190 (Print), eISSN: 1423-0348 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PPS


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.