Nitric Oxide Activates IL-6 Production and Expression in Human Renal Epithelial CellsDemirel I.a · Vumma R.a · Mohlin C.b · Svensson L.b, c · Säve S.b · Persson K.a, b
aSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, bSchool of Natural Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, and cDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Corresponding Author
Katarina Persson, PhD
Clinical Research Center (KFC)
Örebro University Hospital
SE–701 85 Örebro (Sweden)
Background/Aims: Increased nitric oxide (NO) production or inducible form of NO synthase activity have been documented in patients suffering from urinary tract infection (UTI), but the role of NO in this infection is unclear. We investigated whether NO can affect the host response in human renal epithelial cells by modulating IL-6 production and mRNA expression. Methods: The human renal epithelial cell line A498 was infected with a uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strain and/or the NO donor DETA/NO. The IL-6 production and mRNA expression were evaluated by ELISA and real-time RT-PCR. IL-6 mRNA stability was evaluated by analyzing mRNA degradation by real-time RT-PCR. Results: DETA/NO caused a significant (p < 0.05) increase in IL-6 production. Inhibitors of p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling, but not JNK, were shown to significantly suppress DETA/NO-induced IL-6 production. UPEC-induced IL-6 production was further increased (by 73 ± 23%, p < 0.05) in the presence of DETA/NO. The IL-6 mRNA expression increased 2.1 ± 0.17-fold in response to DETA/NO, while the UPEC-evoked increase was pronounced (20 ± 4.5-fold). A synergistic effect of DETA/NO on UPEC-induced IL-6 expression was found (33 ± 7.2-fold increase). The IL-6 mRNA stability studies showed that DETA/NO partially attenuated UPEC-induced degradation of IL-6 mRNA. Conclusions: NO was found to stimulate IL-6 in renal epithelial cells through p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling pathways and also to increase IL-6 mRNA stability in UPEC-infected cells. This study proposes a new role for NO in the host response during UTI by modulating the transcription and production of the cytokine IL-6.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
The free radical nitric oxide (NO) is formed from a reaction between molecular oxygen and the substrate l-arginine by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS). In the kidney, NO plays an important role in various physiological processes, including salt and fluid reabsorption, renal hemodynamics, renin secretion and tubuloglomerular feedback . The inducible form of NOS (iNOS) is absent under physiological conditions, but is expressed in many cells in response to microbes and inflammatory cytokines . Increased NO levels or iNOS activity have been reported in patients suffering from urinary tract infection (UTI) [3,4,5], with a cellular localization of iNOS described in neutrophils and renal and bladder epithelial cells [5,6,7,8]. Thus, NO is produced by host cells in UTI, but the functional role of NO in this infection remains unclear.
UTIs, including cystitis and pyelonephritis, are mainly caused by different strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). Attachment of the bacteria to the urinary tract epithelium is the first step in the pathogenesis of UTI. When bacteria adhere to the epithelial cells, these are triggered to release proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (e.g. IL-6 and IL-8) followed by recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells . Release of proinflammatory mediators from renal epithelial cells in response to different UPEC strains and toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) signaling has been extensively studied . In some tissues, NO appears to be able to regulate the host production of chemokines and cytokines. Both stimulatory and suppressive effects of NO on cytokine expression and production have been reported, which suggests that NO may have a role during both induction and resolution of inflammation . However, it is not known if NO regulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 from renal epithelial cells. IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine with proinflammatory and immunoregulatory functions, and is important for bacterial clearance. Elevated levels of IL-6 are found in patients with UTI, and several cell types within the urinary tract can produce IL-6 including fibroblasts, macrophages and epithelial cells .
This study was performed to determine whether NO could affect the host IL-6 responses in human renal epithelial cells by modulating IL-6 release and mRNA expression.
The UPEC strain IA2 was originally isolated from a patient with acute pyelonephritis. Bacteria were grown and maintained on tryptic soy agar (Becton Dickinson co, Le Pont Claix, France). The human renal epithelial cell line A498 (ATCC HTB-44) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Va., USA). Cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mml-glutamine, 1 mm sodium pyruvate, 1 mm non-essential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Gentamicin (50 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to cells 24 h before infection, but was excluded during the experiments. The viability of the cells was >90% during the experiments as determined by trypan blue exclusion test.
The NO-donor DETA/NO (Alexis Biochemical, Lausen, Switzerland) was prepared immediately before the start of the experiment. To exclude effects of the parent compound (a polyamine) on IL-6 secretion, some experiments were performed with deactivated DETA/NO (incubation at 37°C for >96 h followed by ventilation in open air for 48 h). The effect of DETA/NO (0.1 mm and 1 mm) and UPEC (108 CFU/ml) on IL-6 production was assessed after 6 and 24 h. To study the effect of DETA/NO on an ongoing UPEC infection, UPEC was added 2 h prior to DETA/NO stimulation. In some experiments, the NOS inhibitor l-NAME (1 mm) was added 2 h prior to UPEC infection to study the involvement of endogenously produced NO in UPEC-evoked IL-6 production. To study the involvement of MAPK, the cells were preincubated with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (20 or 40 µm; InSolution™ JNK Inhibitor II, Calbiochem, USA), the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (10 or 20 µm) or the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (10 or 20 µm) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) for 1 h prior to DETA/NO (1 mm) stimulation for 24 h. IL-6 production was analyzed by ELISA using the BD OptEIATM human IL-6 ELISA kit II (BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif., USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA extraction was performed using Qiagen RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The cDNA synthesis (1 µg of total RNA) was performed by using the Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase for first-strand cDNA syntesis (Qiagen) and oligo-dT16 primers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). RNA was controlled for genomic DNA contamination. The cDNA was amplified using puReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR beads (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK), together with PCR-specific primers (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif., USA). The primers were IL-6 (forward) 5′-ATGAACTCCTTCTCCACAAGCGC-3′, IL-6 (reverse) 5′-GAAGAGCCCTCAGGCTGGACT G-3′ (628 bp) and GAPDH (forward) 5′-ATTCCATGGCACCGTCAAGGC T-3′, GAPDH (reverse) 5′-TCAGGTCCA CCACTGACACGT T-3′ (571 bp).
The real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was carried out in a total volume of 20 µl with 10 µl SsoFast EvaGreen supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif., USA), 0.8 µl ROX passive reference dye (Bio-Rad Laboratories), 2 µl of each primer IL-6 (Qiagen, Hs IL6 1 SG) and GAPDH (Qiagen, Hs GAPDH SG), 2 µl cDNA and 5.2 µl water. The amplification was performed in an ABI 7900HT thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) with the following protocol: 95°C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s followed by a dissociation curve. All samples were run in duplicates. The Ct values were analyzed by the comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method and normalized to the endogenous control GAPDH. Fold difference was calculated as 2–ΔΔCt.
The IL-6 mRNA degradation was evaluated by comparing the expression in samples treated with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) with control samples without actinomycin D treatment.
Data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and n indicates the number of independent experiments. Student’s unpaired t test was used to compare two treatments. For multiple comparisons, ANOVA followed by Bonferroni-Dunn test was used. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
Production of IL-6 was measured after exposing the cells to the NO donor DETA/NO (0.1 and 1 mm) in the absence or presence of the UPEC strain IA2. DETA/NO did not affect the basal IL-6 production after 6 h compared to non-stimulated cells (fig. 1a). However, after 24 h of stimulation, a 2-fold and 6-fold increase (p < 0.05) in basal IL-6 production was noted in response to DETA/NO 0.1 and 1 mm, respectively (fig. 1b). We next studied if DETA/NO could modify an ongoing UPEC-induced IL-6 secretion. UPEC-stimulated IL-6 production was not significantly affected by DETA/NO after 6 h of stimulation (fig. 1a). However, after 24 h of stimulation, DETA/NO (1 mm) increased UPEC-evoked IL-6 production by 73 ± 23% (p < 0.05; fig. 1b).
No significant increase in IL-6 production was found in experiments using DETA/NO (1 mm) that had been inactivated prior to application (fig. 2a). These experiments verified that the stimulatory effect of DETA/NO on IL-6 production was specific and caused by NO (fig. 2a). The NOS inhibitor l-NAME did not affect IL-6 production in UPEC-infected cells, verifying that UPEC-evoked IL-6 release does not involve endogenously produced NO (fig. 2b). Measurement of nitrite in cell supernatants after stimulation with UPEC for 24 h confirmed that UPEC are unable to activate NO production in A498 cells (data not shown).
RT-PCR analysis was performed to examine whether the DETA/NO-induced increase in IL-6 production involves increased gene expression. No expression of IL-6 mRNA was detected in non-stimulated cells, but an increased expression of IL-6 mRNA was noted 6–24 h after DETA/NO stimulation (fig. 3a). As expected, RT-PCR analysis demonstrated a strong expression of IL-6 mRNA in A498 cells stimulated with UPEC (fig. 3b). Real-time RT-PCR was used for quantitative studies of IL-6 expression in A498 cells. The IL-6 mRNA expression increased 2.1 ± 0.17-fold in the presence of DETA/NO, while the UPEC-induced increase was pronounced (20 ± 4.5-fold). DETA/NO and UPEC in combination caused a 33 ± 7.2-fold increase in IL-6 mRNA expression (fig. 4). Thus, a synergistic trend in IL-6 mRNA expression was observed for the combined treatment of DETA/NO and UPEC.
Different inhibitors were used to evaluate if the DETA/NO-induced IL-6 production involves MAPK signaling pathways. The p38 MAPK (SB203580) and the ERK1/2 (PD98059) inhibitors markedly suppressed DETA/NO-induced IL-6 production in a dose-dependent manner (fig. 5). The DETA/NO-induced increase in IL-6 was reduced, at the highest concentration used, by 99 ± 1.2% (p < 0.001) and 95 ± 3.5% (p < 0.001)in response to SB203580 and PD98059, respectively. The JNK inhibitor (SP600125) did not inhibit the IL-6 production induced by DETA/NO (fig. 5). None of the inhibitors significantly suppressed the basal IL-6 production (data not shown).
Actinomycin D, an inhibitor of transcription, was used to evaluate the effect of DETA/NO on IL-6 mRNA stability in A498 cells. Degradation of IL-6 mRNA was evaluated by comparing actinomycin D-treated samples stimulated with IA2 (108 CFU/ml), DETA/NO (1 mm), the combination of IA2 and DETA/NO or with cell medium alone to a control sample without actinomycin D treatment and expressing the differences as fold change. The mRNA levels were relatively stable for up to 6 h in un-stimulated control cells (fig. 6). UPEC-stimulated cells showed a time-dependent IL-6 mRNA degradation after actinomycin D treatment (fig. 6). In cells treated with DETA/NO, the IL-6 mRNA levels were stable for up to 6 h and not different from control cells (fig. 6). Treatment of UPEC-infected cells with DETA/NO caused a decreased IL-6 mRNA degradation compared to cells treated with only UPEC. The effect of DETA/NO on mRNA stability in UPEC-infected cells was most pronounced 1–4 h after actinomycin D treatment (fig. 6).
The results in this study showed that addition of the NO donor DETA/NO to human renal epithelial cells caused an augmentation of basal IL-6 production. The DETA/NO-induced increase in IL-6 production was associated with an increase in IL-6 mRNA verifying an effect of DETA/NO at the transcriptional level. Both IL-6 and NO are known to be produced during the host response in UTI [7,13], supporting that an interaction between these mediators may take place in vivo. In a rat model of ascending pyelonephrites, tubular immunoreactivity for IL-6 as well as iNOS was seen in cortical and medullary areas, which also corresponded to sites of bacterial colonization . Production of IL-6 from urinary tract epithelial cells after in vitro infection with UPEC strains increases within hours by a TLR4-dependent mechanism [10,14]. This was also confirmed in our study where UPEC strain IA2 increased IL-6 secretion approximately 7-fold after 6 h of infection, i.e. a much faster response than noted for DETA/NO. Infection of A498 cells with UPEC strain IA2 did not evoke any endogenous NO production. This is in agreement with a previous study  demonstrating that activation of iNOS expression in A498 cells depends on cytokines such as IL-1β and IFN-γ while UPEC per se are weak inducers of iNOS in vitro.
Neutrophils and renal epithelial cells express the iNOS enzyme in different UTI-models, which suggests that these cell types are able to produce NO during UTI [4,5,7,8]. The neutrophils upregulate iNOS early in the infection in response to the bacteria [5,8] while induction of iNOS in human renal epithelial cells is delayed and dependent on secreted cytokines from infiltrating inflammatory cells [8,15]. Additional work is required to define more accurately the relative roles of NO signaling from epithelial cells versus the neutrophils in regulation of the IL-6 response. NO is an antimicrobial molecule that reduces the growth of a wide variety of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria species, including UPEC [2,16]. However, to protect against the damage caused by nitrosative stress, bacteria possess multiple defense mechanisms. Thus, it is possible that host-derived NO may exert an antibacterial effect in UTI, at least until appropriate defense mechanisms have been activated. We have previously shown that iNOS-deficient and wild-type mice were equally successful to clear UPEC-induced bladder and kidney infections , suggesting that iNOS-derived NO production was not important for bacterial clearance in this experimental UTI model. Unfortunately, we did not measure urinary IL-6 levels in the iNOS-deficient mice as this might have provided valuable information for validation of the in vitro findings in the present study. Further studies are needed to explore the importance of NO-mediated regulation of proinflammatory cytokines using in vivo UTI models.
Whether NO regulates cytokines in a positive or negative manner appears to depend on the type of responder cell, the cytokine and the local levels and duration of the NO exposure . In our study, two concentrations of DETA/NO were used, and only the highest concentration showed a stimulatory effect on IL-6 production. High concentrations of NO donors may have an inhibitory effect on IL-6 production [18,19], and it is possible that a higher concentration of DETA/NO (> 1 mm) would have decreased IL-6 also in renal epithelial cells. However, due to the risk of cytotoxicity, experiments using higher concentration of DETA/NO were not performed. In agreement with our data, NO has been reported to stimulate IL-6 production in murine skeletal myocytes  and human blood mononuclear cells  by activating ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK-signaling pathways . We also found that ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling were crucial for the DETA/NO-mediated activation of IL-6 in renal epithelial cells. Mechanisms through which NO inactivates tyrosine phosphatases leading to prolonged activation of MAPK and S-nitrosylation of p21Ras, an upstream signal of the MAPK pathway, have been reported [20,21].
The results in this study also showed that addition of DETA/NO to cells pre-infected with UPEC caused an augmentation of the IL-6 response, suggesting a potentially wide influence of NO as an inducer and modulator of inflammation. Quantitative RT-PCR studies demonstrated that the effect of DETA/NO in combination with UPEC was synergistic rather than additive, at least at the mRNA level. It is well known that TLR4 and associated ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways play a role in IL-6 production in UPEC-stimulated human renal epithelial cells [22,23]. This was also confirmed in our study where the p38 and ERK 1/2 inhibitors markedly suppressed IA2-induced IL-6 secretion from A498 cells [unpubl. observation]. Our study suggests that NO activates IL-6 production in human renal epithelial cells by signaling pathways that, at least partly, overlap with pathways used by UPEC to induce IL-6. Thus, NO signaling seems to represent a non-TLR4 pathway that may function as an additional pathway for activation of IL-6 release during kidney infection.
To further explore the mechanisms for NO in IL-6 regulation, we performed analysis of IL-6 mRNA stability. It was found that DETA/NO per se did not alter the IL-6 mRNA stability compared to the control. UPEC-stimulated cells caused a gradual degradation of IL-6 mRNA, but treatment with DETA/NO was able to partially attenuate this degradation at least during the first 4 h. In other studies, NO has been reported to stabilize IL-8 mRNA by p38 MAPK signaling pathways, and stabilization of IL-6 mRNA in mouse embryonic fibroblasts was also promoted by p38 MAPK signaling [24,25]. Thus, the mechanisms through which DETA/NO mediates increased IL-6 mRNA stability in UPEC-infected renal epithelial cells may involve p38 MAPK signaling as we found this pathway to be activated by DETA/NO. The results from the IL-6 mRNA stability experiments indicate that NO may stabilize UPEC-evoked IL-6 production in renal epithelial cells by posttranscriptional events such as regulation of mRNA degradation.
This study demonstrates that NO activates IL-6 production and expression in renal epithelial cells and also provides insight into mechanisms, including activation of p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling pathways and effects on IL-6 mRNA stability. It is suggested that NO may participate in the host response during UTI by modulating the epithelial cytokine response.
The authors acknowledge support from the Swedish Medical Research Council (12601), the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, and the Natural Sciences Faculty at the University of Kalmar.
No conflicts of interest.
Katarina Persson, PhD
Clinical Research Center (KFC)
Örebro University Hospital
SE–701 85 Örebro (Sweden)
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.