Increased Spironolactone in Advanced Heart Failure: Effect of Doses Greater than 25 mg/Day on Plasma Potassium ConcentrationShchekochikhin D.a · Lindenfeld J.b · Schrier R.a
Divisions of aRenal Diseases and Hypertension and bCardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo., USA
Background: Daily doses of spironolactone higher than 25 mg are rarely used in heart failure (HF) patients, presumably due to the concern for hyperkalemia. However, in advanced HF, doses ≥50 mg have been found to be necessary to produce natriuresis. The aim of the present study was to examine the safety of natriuretic doses of spironolactone (50–200 mg) on serum potassium concentration in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV HF patients over several weeks. Methods: 18 patients with advanced HF received 50–200 mg of spironolactone in addition to standard treatment. Serum electrolytes, BUN and serum creatinine were assessed at baseline, during increased doses of spironolactone and at the 1-month follow-up. Results: During a total of 738 patient-weeks, there was no significant increase in mean serum potassium (4.0 vs. 4.2 mEq/l) or serum creatinine (1.3 vs. 1.4 mg/dl). However, in 3 patients, spironolactone treatment was stopped due to a mean increase in serum creatinine (1.9 vs. 2.6 mg/dl) and in one of them, an increase in serum potassium (4.4 vs. 5.2 mEq/l) was noted. Conclusion: Increased doses of spironolactone are generally safe during outpatient follow-up in selected patients with advanced HF, who are receiving treatment with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and loop diuretics.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), namely spironolactone and eplerenone, have been shown to improve mortality in a wide variety of patients with heart failure (HF) [1,2,3]. Relatively low doses of MRA were used in these trials. In a dose ranging study prior to the randomized trial, the randomized aldactone evaluation study (RALES) investigators demonstrated that 25 mg/day of spironolactone did not decrease sodium retention in these HF patients, but doses of 50–75 mg/day were natriuretic . They therefore concluded that the beneficial effect of 25 mg of spironolactone on HF survival in the RALES trial was due to blocking the non-genomic effects of aldosterone including cardiac inflammation, fibrosis and apoptosis . Since the major cause of symptoms and readmission in HF patients is congestion, improving natriuresis in these patients is likely to add additional symptomatic, and possibly survival, benefits . However, natriuretic doses of MRA, i.e. ≥25 mg/day of spironolactone or 50 mg of eplerenone, are generally not used in HF patients, presumably because of the fear of hyperkalemia. After the RALES publication, a retrospective observational study from Canada reported an increased number of prescriptions for spironolactone and an increased risk of hospitalizations associated with hyperkalemia . In that Canadian study, however, there were no measurements of kidney function, the level of plasma potassium concentration defined as hyperkalemia was not stated, and there were numerous other factors than hyperkalemia associated with reasons for hospitalization. Moreover, a more recent large study from Scotland with analysis over the same period of time also demonstrated an increased number of prescriptions for spironolactone after the RALES publication, but did not find any increase in hospitalizations associated with hyperkalemia .
The aim of the present study was to examine the safety of natriuretic doses of spironolactone (50–200 mg/day) on serum potassium concentration in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV HF patients over a prolonged outpatient follow-up.
A retrospective chart review study of medical records was undertaken of 18 patients with advanced HF on the heart transplant list of a single center who had received 50–200 mg/day of spironolactone over several weeks (see table 2). The study period included the time of listing for cardiac transplantation to the time of cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device placement. Increased doses of spironolactone were prescribed by attending cardiology physicians due to severe volume overload in spite of generous doses of loop diuretics. All patients from the pre-transplant database who were receiving increased doses of spironolactone (50–200 mg/day) for at least 1 week (see table 2) were included in the study; this numbered 18 patients with advanced HF. Spironolactone was the only MRA used in these patients. Serum sodium, potassium, chloride (Cl), CO2, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine were measured at baseline and 1 week after each increase in the spironolactone dose. Concomitant medications including potassium supplements were recorded. Loop diuretic doses were converted into furosemide equivalent doses (1 mg of bumetanide = 20 mg of torsemide = 40 mg of furosemide). Due to the small number of patients, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare serum electrolytes levels.
All 18 patients eventually underwent cardiac transplantation and 4 had left ventricular assist device implantations as a bridge to transplant.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the 18 patients who were treated with increased doses of spironolactone (50–200 mg/day) are presented in table 1. All patients had NYHA class III/IV symptoms with severe volume overload and were receiving high-dose loop diuretics (the average daily furosemide equivalent dose at baseline was 142.2 ± 76.4 mg).
|Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the HF patients at time of listing for cardiac transplantation|
Spironolactone was titrated to 50 mg in 6 patients, to 75 mg in 4 patients, to 100 mg in 6 patients and to more than 100 mg in 2 patients. The duration of treatment is presented in table 2. Fourteen of the 18 patients (77.8%) received treatment until cardiac transplantation and the remaining 4 patients until left ventricular assist device implantation was performed as a bridge to transplantation. In 3 patients treatment was withheld due to a rise in serum creatinine (from 1.8 to 2.1 mg/dl in the first patient, from 2.0 to 3.1 mg/dl in the second patient and from 1.8 to 2.2 mg/dl in the third patient). The latter patient was the only one in whom the plasma potassium concentration increased to 5.2 from 4.4 mEq/l. Two of these 3 patients had diabetes mellitus. The mean duration of daily therapy of 50 mg or more of spironolactone was 41 weeks.
|Table 2. Number of weeks on different doses of spironolactone|
Serum electrolytes, BUN and serum creatinine were measured at baseline and after every increase in the spironolactone dose (table 3). Serum potassium did not increase significantly from baseline to the last follow-up measurement (4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.5, p > 0.05). However, a modest decrease in serum sodium was observed (135.5 ± 3.3 vs. 133.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.016). Other serum electrolytes, BUN and serum creatinine were not significantly different from baseline (26.1 ± 3.6 vs. 26.1 ± 3.2 mEq/l for total CO2, 98.7 ± 4.2 vs. 95.6 ± 8.4 mEq/l for Cl, 28.2 ± 14.7 vs. 31.0 ± 13.2 mg/dl for BUN, and 1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5 mg/dl for creatinine, p > 0.05 for all). Potassium supplements and diuretic doses are presented in table 4.
|Table 3. Serum electrolytes, BUN and serum creatinine at various doses of spironolactone|
|Table 4. Potassium supplements and furosemide equivalent doses|
Our retrospective study demonstrates that fluid-overloaded patients with advanced HF can safely receive increased doses of MRA. In our 18 patients followed for a mean duration of 41 weeks after listing for cardiac transplantation, only 3 required withdrawal of MRA and in only 1 did that include modest hyperkalemia. These patients were relatively young and had only modest increments in serum creatinine. Thus, 17 of 18 HF patients tolerated natriuretic doses of spironolactone without an increase in serum potassium concentration. Overall, there were 738 total patient-weeks for all patients on ≥50 mg/day of spironolactone with a mean change in serum potassium concentration from 4.0 to 4.2 mEq/l. In the current study, 83% of the patients were receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and 72% were receiving beta-blockers, both of which can increase plasma potassium. In addition to improving the urinary potassium-losing effect of loop diuretics, perhaps aldosterone breakthrough was involved in the absence of any effect on plasma potassium .
Congestion is a major cause of symptoms and a predictor of mortality in HF patients. Thus, loop diuretics are prescribed as the cornerstone of HF treatment. Nevertheless, on discharge, 50% of these HF patients have continued symptoms of congestion including dyspnea, and approximately 20% of these patients have gained weight in spite of intravenous loop diuretic therapy . It also has been estimated that 20% of these patients are loop diuretic resistant. Natriuretic doses of MRA should be expected to at least improve the symptoms of congestion but might also improve prognosis. While ‘loop diuretic resistance’ has not been well defined, it is clear that loop diuretic therapy alone has not been adequate in treating the congestion of HF. Secondary hyperaldosteronism is not only a pivotal pathogenic factor in HF , but can play an important role in loop diuretic resistance . Moreover, loop diuretics block sodium Cl transport at the macula densa, an effect that further stimulates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. A rapid natriuresis in response to loop diuretics may also exceed the rate of fluid mobilization from the interstitium and worsen renal function even while the deleterious effects of fluid overload and congestion persist. In contrast to loop diuretics, the natriuretic effect of MRA occurs in the more distal collecting duct where approximately 4% of filtered sodium is reabsorbed. Therefore, the natriuresis is slower than with loop diuretics and thus may not exceed the rate of mobilization of interstitial fluid. This is one reason why MRA are considered safe and effective to begin treatment for edema and ascites in cirrhotic patients . Diuretic resistance in cirrhotic patients has been defined by the International Ascites Club as failure to respond to daily spironolactone doses of 400 mg and furosemide of 160 mg . Thus, in spite of the common pathophysiology of HF and cirrhosis , the standard dose of spironolactone is 25 mg/day in HF patients.
There are potential reasons for this situation. First, aldosterone may not be involved in the sodium retention in HF; alternatively, aldosterone production may be adequately blocked by ACE inhibitors or ARB. There is, however, evidence to incriminate the sodium-retaining effect of aldosterone in advanced HF. Several small studies demonstrated reversal of sodium retention in advanced HF with spironolactone doses of 100–400 mg/day. In 1965, Braunwald et al.  demonstrated that patients with HF have a markedly reduced rate of renal sodium excretion in response to an oral sodium load and that cumulative sodium retention was closely correlated with an increase in body weight. Although the study was not designed to determine the mechanism of sodium retention, 3 patients were given 100 mg of spironolactone daily. In these 3 patients, urinary sodium excretion increased substantially, thus supporting the hypothesis that secondary hyperaldosteronism plays an important role in the sodium and water retention in HF. In a subsequent study from the University of Colorado reversal of sodium retention in advanced HF was demonstrated with a spironolactone dose of 200 mg twice daily . This was associated with a rather small increase in serum potassium from 3.86 to 4.10 mEq/l. In another study in HF patients on moderate doses of ACE inhibitors who were considered to be diuretic resistant, a 100-mg/day dose of spironolactone was found to be natriuretic, with an increase in serum potassium from 4.0 to 4.3 mmol/l within 7 days .
A potential limitation of the current study is that these HF patients were selected from the cardiac transplant list. Increased doses of spironolactone were prescribed due to clinical judgment of fluid overload and loop diuretic resistance. Since the patients were selected for heart transplant, they did not have advanced renal impairment. Thus, the results of the study cannot be generalized to the entire HF patients’ population. For example, HF patients who are not healthy enough to be placed on the heart transplant list or have more advanced renal impairment may be more prone to develop hyperkalemia with increased MRA doses.
In conclusion, the present study indicates that increased doses of MRA can be used in selected patients with advanced HF without the development of hyperkalemia. Even so, the cessation of potassium supplements and a low-potassium diet would further decrease any risk of hyperkalemia in these HF patients. This may be particularly true in HF patients with diabetes mellitus. Controlled studies, addressing increased MRA doses in fluid-overloaded HF patients are needed to assess efficacy and safety.
Dr. D. Shchekochikhin’s cardiorenal fellowship has been sponsored by Russian President’s Scholarship for Studying Abroad and Gambro UF Solutions, Inc.
Robert W. Schrier, MD
University of Colorado Denver, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension
Box C-281, 1270 East 19th, RC2 7th floor
Aurora, CO 80045 (USA)
Received: September 14, 2012
Published online: January 29, 2013
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 4, Number of References : 15
Vol. 3, No. 1, Year 2013 (Cover Date: April 2013)
Journal Editor: Sowers J.R. (Columbia, Mo.)
ISSN: 1664-3828 (Print), eISSN: 1664-5502 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CRM