Open Access Gateway
Case Rep Oncol 2013;6:50–54

Diverticular Bleeding of the Colon during Combination Chemotherapy with Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel for Recurrent Breast Cancer

Nakayama Y. · Ito Y. · Tanabe M. · Takahashi S.
Medical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
email Corresponding Author


 goto top of outline Key Words

  • Breast cancer
  • Bevacizumab
  • Paclitaxel
  • Adverse effects
  • Diverticular bleeding
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Opioid analgesics

 goto top of outline Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab has been increasingly used in combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. The aim of this report is to underline possible risks associated with the new combination chemotherapy. Case Presentation: A 39-year-old woman with recurrent breast cancer was treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel. Positron emission tomography revealed breast cancer metastasis to the left supraclavicular lymph nodes and right axillary lymph nodes, with no distant metastasis. Results: After the third cycle of bevacizumab and paclitaxel, the patient developed a bloody bowel discharge. Emergent colonoscopy demonstrated diverticular bleeding on one of the multiple diverticula in the ascending colon. The bleeding point was successfully clipped colonoscopically. Conclusion: The factors for diverticular bleeding are believed to be non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, constipation, and bevacizumab. We recommend reviewing anamneses for diverticulitis, multiple prior abdominal surgeries, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and regular use of certain drugs.

Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

goto top of outline Introduction

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis and is overexpressed in a wide range of malignant tumors. Bevacizumab inhibits tumor angiogenesis, targeting both tumor growth and metastasis. Inhibition of VEGF reduces growth of new tumors supplied by vessels, and leads to ‘normalization’ of existing tumor vessels. Therefore, reducing the interstitial fluid pressure should result in an enhanced efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Bevacizumab is widely used to treat a variety of advanced solid tumors, including colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and renal cell cancer (RCC). It has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with RCC and has been demonstrated to have clinically significant benefits as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer in combination with cytotoxic agents. In E2100, a significant increase in PFS was observed in patients receiving bevacizumab plus paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; p < 0.0001]. Median PFS was 11.4 versus 5.8 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 26.5 months with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus 24.8 months with paclitaxel alone; the HR for OS was 0.869 (p = 0.1374). The objective response rate more than doubled with the addition of bevacizumab, from 22 to 50%. In E2100, AVADO, and both cohorts of RIBBON-1, PFS was significantly superior in the bevacizumab-containing arm compared with chemotherapy alone, thus meeting the primary objective of each trial. Median PFS was approximately 9–11 months in all four bevacizumab-containing arms [1]. The response rate with bevacizumab in combination with taxane was 50–64%. The response rate was 35% in the bevacizumab-capecitabine cohort of RIBBON-1 [1]. Median OS was 26.7 months in the bevacizumab arm compared with 26.4 months in the non-bevacizumab arm. There was no significant difference in OS between the two arms (HR 0.97). The 1-year OS rate was 82% in the bevacizumab-containing arm versus 77% in the non-bevacizumab arm (p = 0.003) [2]. Bevacizumab has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and RCC. Many trials are currently underway evaluating its efficacy in various kinds of solid tumors [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The adverse effects of bevacizumab are hemorrhage/79.2% (grade 3, 1.7%; grade 4, 0.8%); gastrointestinal tract perforation/0.6% (grade 4, 0.6%), wound dehiscence/5.0%, arterial and venous thromboembolism/0.8%, hypertension/51.7% (grade 3, 16.7%), reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy/0.5%, neutropenia/75.8% (grade 3, 31.7%; grade 4, 10.8%), proteinuria/59.2%, and congestive heart failure/1.7% [2,8,9,10,11]. Serous hemorrhage and thrombosis could be lethal. In Japan, this drug was approved in November 2011; since then, an increasing number of patients have been treated with it.

We report an apparently rare case with diverticular bleeding of the colon during chemotherapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel for recurrent breast cancer.


goto top of outline Case Presentation

A 39-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed with cancer of the left breast. The characteristics of the cancer included invasive ductal carcinoma, with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor being negative (0% positive cells). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 was negative by immunohistochemistry, and Ki-67 was 50%. Her clinical stage was T1N1M0, according to the TNM classification of malignant tumors. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of FEC (fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2; epirubicin, 100 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days), partial resection of the left breast and sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed. The pathological findings were invasive ductal carcinoma, nuclear grade 3; absence of lymph node metastasis; negative triple receptor, and high Ki-67 (≥30%). Radiation for breast conservation was performed. One year and 8 months after surgery, redness and swelling developed in the conserved breast skin. The skin lesion was pathologically diagnosed as recurrence of inflammatory breast cancer with triple receptor negative. Positron emission tomography revealed multiple metastases in the left supraclavicular lymph nodes and right axillary lymph nodes, with no distant metastasis. The patient suffered from pain in her left breast. Oxycodone hydrochloride hydrate 40 mg/day with 5 mg rescue; diclofenac sodium 75 mg/day for pain control, and magnesium oxide 1,500 mg/day for constipation were associated with chemotherapy and narcotics. Two cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days) were given, but a new skin lesion developed. The treatment was changed to capecitabine (2,400 mg/day) for 3 weeks at 1-week intervals. After two cycles of capecitabine, a CT scan revealed the development of skin lesions, enlargement of the left breast mass, and lung metastasis. We changed the treatment to bevacizumab (10 mg/kg on day 1 every 14 days) with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2; bevacizumab and paclitaxel). After three cycles of bevacizumab and paclitaxel, the size of the skin lesion and the volume of the left breast mass were reduced. Seven days after the three cycles of bevacizumab and paclitaxel, the patient noticed evident bloody bowel discharge from the rectum. She was found lying on the floor at home and was brought to our hospital by ambulance. When she was admitted, her blood pressure was 88/39 mm Hg, and her heart rate was 71 beats/min. Initial laboratory findings revealed hemoglobin 8.8 g/dl, and her coagulation tests were normal. The patient was transfused with packed red blood cells. Her blood pressure then improved to 103/62 mm Hg, and her hemoglobin was raised to 9.6 g/dl. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed normal findings. Colonoscopy demonstrated multiple diverticula in the ascending colon and detected the diverticular bleeding point, which was then clipped colonoscopically (fig. 1, fig. 2). After clipping, the bleeding subsided completely. She was prohibited from eating, and was given high-calorie intravenous hyperalimentation for 3 weeks, which is estimated to be long enough for elimination of bevacizumab.

Fig. 1. Multiple diverticula.

Fig. 2. Colonoscopically clipped bleeding point.


goto top of outline Discussion

In breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel, the incidence of all-grade hemorrhage is 79.2%. Incidence of grade 3 bleeding is 2.5% and 0.8% for grade 4 bleeding [2,8,9,10,11]. To our knowledge, this is the first report of colonic diverticular bleeding associated with bevacizumab.

Hemorrhage may result from the anti-VEGF action of bevacizumab. As a neutralizing antibody against VEGF, bevacizumab may damage vascular integrity by inhibition of endothelial survival and proliferation, particularly in tissues with a high VEGF dependence, such as injured mucosal membranes of the airway or peptic ulcers. In addition, bevacizumab may inhibit the coagulation cascade regulated by tissue factor, whose expression on endothelial cells is induced by VEGF [12]. Epidemiological data show that in industrialized nations, the prevalence of diverticular disease is 65% in the population older than 65 years. The prevalence has been 40% in the population aged 70–79 years. Diverticula may develop at sites of weakness in the colonic wall, where the vasa recta penetrate the circular muscle layer. Diverticular bleeding occurs when a nutrient artery ruptures into the colon lumen, commonly involving local mucosal ulceration in the absence of inflammation. Regular use of aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioid analgesics is associated with an increased risk of diverticular bleeding [13]. NSAIDs, including aspirin, likely promote blood loss from existing lesions via inhibition of platelet aggregation. In addition, NSAIDs, including aspirin, are thought to damage the colon via direct topical injury and/or impaired prostaglandin synthesis, which compromise mucosal integrity, increase permeability, and enable the influx of bacteria and other toxins. Opioid analgesics increase intracolonic pressure and slow colonic transit [14].


goto top of outline Conclusion

In the present case, chemotherapy or opioids were associated with constipation. Constipation increases colonic pressure and may reduce the integrity of the colonic wall, which may increase the occurrence of multiple diverticula. Moreover, regular use of bevacizumab and NSAIDs could be associated with an increased risk of diverticular bleeding in patients who have multiple diverticula. We need to carefully review anamneses for a history of diverticulitis, prior abdominal surgeries, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and regular use of certain drugs.


goto top of outline Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

 goto top of outline References
  1. Gray R, Bhattacharya S, Bowden C, et al: Independent review of E2100: a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4966–4972.
  2. Robert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J, et al: RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1252–1260.
  3. Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al: XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results. Br J Cancer 2011;105:58–64.
  4. Kabbinavar FF, Ellis LM: Can inhibition of angiogenic pathways increase the efficacy of intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based regimens? Clin Colorectal Cancer 2004;4(suppl 2):S69–S73.
  5. Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al: Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1539–1544.
  6. Nakagawa K, Matsui K, Negoro S, et al: Randomized phase II study of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2012;76:362–367.
  7. Planchard D: Bevacizumab in non-small-cell lung cancer: a review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011;11:1163–1179.
  8. Hardy-Bessard AC, Delva R, Pivot X, et al: Safety and efficacy of bevacizumab combined with taxanes in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: ATHENA study-France. Bull Cancer 2012;99:609–618.
  9. Hamilton EP, Blackwell KL: Safety of bevacizumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Oncology 2011;80:314–325.
  10. Blowers E, Hall K: Adverse events in bevacizumab and chemotherapy: patient management. Br J Nurs 2009;18:424–428.

    External Resources

  11. Blowers E, Hall K: Managing adverse events in the use of bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Br J Nurs 2009;18:351–356.

    External Resources

  12. Weltermann M, Wolzt K, Petersmann C, et al: Large amounts of vascular endothelial growth factor at the site of hemostatic plug formation in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1757–1760.
  13. Morris R, Harvey IM, Stebbings WS, et al: Anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and the risk of perforated colonic diverticular disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:1267–1272.
  14. Piekarek K, Israelsson LA: Perforated colonic diverticular disease: the importance of NSAIDs, opioids, corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:1193–1197.

 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Dr. Yoshie Nakayama
The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku
Tokyo 135-8550 (Japan)

 goto top of outline Article Information

Published online: January 23, 2013
Number of Print Pages : 5
Number of Figures : 2, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 14

 goto top of outline Publication Details

Case Reports in Oncology

Vol. 6, No. 1, Year 2013 (Cover Date: January - April)

Journal Editor: Markman M. (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1662-6575 (Print), eISSN: 1662-6575 (Online)

For additional information:

Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (, applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.