Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 51, No. 1, 2014
Issue release date: December 2013
Ophthalmic Res 2014;51:32-36

Microperimetry of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits

Forte R. · Cennamo G. · de Crecchio G. · Cennamo G.
aEye Department, University Federico II, Naples, and bPediatric Eye Department, University of Salerno, Fisciano Salerno, Italy

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Purpose: To investigate light sensitivity in eyes presenting with subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD). Methods: All consecutive patients with SDD only seen between January 2012 and July 2012 were included. A control group of consecutive age- and sex-matched control subjects presenting at least one eye with early age-related macular degeneration was considered. In all cases best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging and spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography with integrated microperimetry were performed. Results: Twenty-one eyes (21 patients, 9 females, 12 males, mean age 69.2 ± 5.3 years, mean BCVA 0.18 ± 0.14 LogMAR) were included in the SDD group. Twenty eyes of 20 patients (13 females, 7 males, mean age 69.1 ± 3.9 years, mean BCVA 0.16 ± 0.15 LogMAR) were included in the control group. In eyes with SDD the choroid was thinner at the subfoveal location, and at 1,500 μm superior, inferior, temporal and nasal to the fovea (p < 0.05). In eyes with SDD, the overall mean light sensitivity in the central macula (4.21 ± 2.46 dB) was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (6.81 ± 2.12 dB, p = 0.001), while stable fixation was present in both groups. Correlation between BCVA and mean light sensitivity in the central 7 × 7 mm square was low in the SDD group (Pearson's rho = 0.4, p = 0.01), while it was good in the control group (Pearson's rho = 0.7, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Eyes with SDD showed reduced sensitivity despite preserved BCVA. Reduced choroidal thickness could be involved in reduction of light sensitivity. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Mimoun G, Soubrane G, Coscas G: Macular drusen. J Fr Ophtalmol 1990;13:511-530.

    External Resources

  2. Arnold JJ, Sarks SH, Killingsworth MC, Sarks JP: Reticular pseudodrusen: a risk factor in age-related maculopathy. Retina 1995;15:183-191.

    External Resources

  3. Cohen SY, Dubois L, Tadayoni R, et al: Prevalence of reticular pseudodrusen in age-related macular degeneration with newly diagnosed choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:354-359.
  4. Zweifel SA, Spaide RF, Curcio CA, Malek G, Imamura Y: Reticular pseudodrusen are subretinal drusenoid deposits. Ophthalmology 2010;117:303-312.
  5. Rudolf M, Malek G, Messinger JD, et al: Sub-retinal drusenoid deposits in human retina: organization and composition. Exp Eye Res 2008;87:402-408.
  6. Wong IY, Iu LP, Koizumi H, Lai WW: The inner segment/outer segment junction: what have we learnt so far? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012;23:210-218.
  7. Querques G, Querques L, Martinelli D, et al: Pathologic insights from integrated imaging of reticular pseudodrusen in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2011;31:518-526.
  8. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozoni MC: Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:496-500.
  9. Landa G, Rosen RB, Garcia PM, Seiple WH: Combined three-dimensional spectral OCT/SLO topography and microperimetry: steps toward achieving functional spectral OCT/SLO. Ophthalmic Res 2009;43:92-98.
  10. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB: Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:423-429.
  11. Spaide RF, Curcio CA: Drusen characterization with multimodal imaging. Retina 2010;30:1441-1454.
  12. Alten F, Heiduschka P, Clemens CR, Eter N: Multifocal electroretinography in eyes with reticular pseudodrusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:6263-6270.
  13. Gerth C, Hauser D, Delahunt PB, Morse LS, Werner JS: Assessment of multifocal electroretinogram abnormalities and their relation to morphologic characteristics in patients with large drusen. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1404-1414.
  14. Jurklies B, Weismann M, Hüsing J, Sutter EE, Bornfeld N: Monitoring retinal function in neovascular maculopathy using multifocal electroretinography - early and long-term correlation with clinical findings. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:244-264.
  15. Switzer DW Jr, Mendonça LS, Saito M, Zweifel SA, Spaide RF: Segregation of ophthalmoscopic characteristics according to choroidal thickness in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2012;32:1265-1271.
  16. McLeod DS, Grebe R, Bhutto I, Merges C, Baba T, Lutty GA: Relationship between RPE and choriocapillaris in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4982-4991.
  17. Querques G, Querques L, Forte R, Massamba N, Coscas F, Souied EH: Choroidal changes associated with reticular pseudodrusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:1258-1263.
  18. Sohrab MA, Smith RT, Salehi-Had H, Sadda SR, Fawzi AA: Image registration and multimodal imaging of reticular pseudodrusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:5743-5748.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50