Sudden Death in Incident Dialysis PatientsVázquez E.a · Sánchez-Perales C.b · García-García F.b · García-Cortés M.J.b · Torres J.a · Borrego F.b · Salas D.a · Liébana A.b · Fernandez-Guerrero J.C.a
Departments of aCardiology and bNephrology, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain Corresponding Author
Eduardo Vázquez, MD
Department of Cardiology, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén
C/Navas de Tolosa 4 y 6, P-1, 6º D
ES-23003 Jaén (Spain)
Background: Sudden death (SD) constitutes one of the principal causes of death and is an important problem in healthcare provision. Cardiovascular diseases have a high prevalence in dialysis patients and constitute the principal cause of death. We sought to analyze retrospectively the incidence of SD in patients commencing dialysis and the factors related to its presence. Methods: We evaluated all the patients who began dialysis in our center between 1/11/2003 and 15/9/2007, and who were followed up until death, transplant, or study completion on 31/12/2012. We determined the presence of SD according to the following criteria: SD at 24 h (SD 24H): unexpected death occurring in the 24 h following the start of symptoms, or when the patient was found dead and had been seen alive 24 h earlier; SD at 1 h (SD 1H): death witnessed as occurring in the first hour following the start of symptoms. Results: We evaluated 285 patients, mean age 65.67 ± 15.7 years. In a follow-up of 39.9 ± 34.2 months (947.6 patient-years of follow-up) 168 died (59%), 28 (10%) patients presented SD 24H (2.9/100 patient-years), and 16 (6%) patients presented SD 1H (1.7/100 patient-years). In the multivariate analysis, having had a myocardial infarction or having had electrocardiographic abnormalities (Q wave, negative T wave, subendocardial lesion or QRS >120 ms) were the principal independent predictors of SD 24H (OR 7.83; 95% CI 2.20-27.86; p = 0.001) and of SD 1H (OR 13.43; 95% CI 1.56-115.42; p = 0.018). Conclusions: SD on dialysis is very frequent. Two groups can be identified easily, with risk profiles clearly differentiated.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
Sudden death (SD) is defined as occurring naturally and unexpectedly following a short period of time varying between 1 and 24 h from the start of symptoms. It constitutes the principal cause of death in the USA  and represents between 6 and 18% of all deaths. This variability can be attributable to studies having been conducted in different regions and populations, lack of uniformity in defining SD and sudden cardiac arrest, differences in ages of the populations analyzed and, above all, differences in the time lapse between the onset of symptoms and the occurrence of death [2,3,4].
Cardiovascular diseases have a high prevalence in patients with chronic renal insufficiency and constitute the principal cause of death in this patient population. Despite the information on SD in patients with end-stage renal disease on treatment with dialysis not being extensive, the available data indicate that the frequency is much higher than that in the general population. With an annual incidence of 6-7%, it is responsible for approximately a quarter of all the deaths of patients on dialysis . This high incidence of SD in the population on dialysis relative to the general population is attributed, essentially, to two circumstances. The first is the presence in the dialysis population of the traditional risk factors associated with SD in the general population such as coronary disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left ventricular dysfunction. The second circumstance is the effect of the stress, such as electrolyte and plasma volume changes resulting specifically from the hemodialysis treatment, on a heart that is already in a non-healthy state . The time patterns of SD in patients on dialysis show a high incidence during the long interdialysis interval (which is why it is sometimes referred to as ‘death which occurs at weekends'), during the dialysis, and the hours following dialysis supports the role of treatment as the main cause of SD [7,8]. However, the observation that the incidence of SD in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis is not very different from that of the patients on hemodialysis suggests the determinant cause is the anatomical substrate .
The objective of the present study was to analyze retrospectively the incidence of SD in patients who commence dialysis in our hospital and the factors related with the presence of SD.
We evaluated all patients who began dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) in our hospital and its dependent dialysis centers between November 1, 2003 and September 15, 2007. Excluded were those who had undergone renal transplant, had commenced substitutive treatment at other centers, or who had recovered renal function and had left the dialysis program. The patients were evaluated for cardiac function within the first month of starting dialysis. The evaluation included clinical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. The patients were followed up until death, kidney transplant, or study completion on December 31, 2012.
The occurrence of SD was retrospectively determined, but not all the relevant data were available from the clinical history, i.e. some had died or had changed the place of residence before the performance of the cardiological evaluation, or their data had deteriorated beyond recovery. Hence, although the total number of patients included was 285, we were able to apply full statistical analyses to a lower number of patients (see tables 1, 2, 3, 4). There were 256 patients in whom an echocardiogram had been performed.
SD was established according to the following criteria: (i) SD at 24 h (SD 24H): unexpected death that occurred within 24 h following the start of the symptoms, or when the patient was found dead but had been observed to be alive 24 h earlier; (ii) SD at 1 h (SD 1H): death witnessed as having occurred in the first hour following the start of symptoms; (iii) SD in dialysis: unexpected death during a session of hemodialysis, and (iv) SD at weekend: death occurring after 48 h from the last dialysis session.
The category SD 24H includes the patients who presented SD 1H and the patients who presented SD at the weekend. The patients who presented SD during dialysis are included in those who presented SD 1H.
The variables measured in relation to SD were: age, gender, type of dialysis, smoking habit, body mass index, pulse pressure, diabetes, arterial hypertension, presence of previously documented coronary disease (myocardial infarction or coronary lesions >70% in the coronary angiography), presence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart rate, QRS interval, QTc interval, presence in the electrocardiogram of Q wave, subendocardial lesion (decrease of ST ≥1 mm with horizontal morphology, or descendent) or subepicardial ischemia (negative T wave in any derivation except in aVR, V1 or D III).
Hematological parameters measured included: hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelets. Biochemical parameters measured included: urea, creatinine, albumin, cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, intact parathormone, calcium, phosphorus, ferritin, transferrin, and homocysteine. Color Doppler echocardiography was used to measure the following parameters: left atrial size, left ventricular dimensions, left ventricular mass, left ventricular ejection fraction, ascending aorta dimension, presence of annular and/or valve calcifications, and mitral E/A ratio.
Student's t test or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used in the descriptive analysis of the data. Comparison of qualitative variables was carried out with Pearson's χ2 test. Univariate analyses were performed on all measured variables. The objective prognostic variable of this study was the occurrence of SD 24H or SD 1H. The study was based on an analysis of the predictors at the start of treatment using Cox's regression of proportional risk. The variables included were those that, in the overall patient group, were statistically significant in univariate analysis, or were borderline significant. The odds ratio and 95% CI were calculated. In all tests, a probability of p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
During the study period, 333 patients had commenced dialysis in our center. Of these, 25 had undergone transplant earlier, 14 had arrived from a different center, and 9 recovered renal function. The remaining 285 were included in the current analysis, and represent 85% in the hemodialysis program. The mean age was 65.67 ± 15.7 years and 55% were male. During a mean follow-up of 39.9 ± 34.2 months (947.6 patient-years of follow-up) 168 patients died (59%), 28 from SD 24H which represents 2.9/100 patient-years, 16 patients were witnessed deaths SD 1H (1.7/100 patient-years), 9 patients died during the weekend and 6 during the dialysis sessions. Table 1 summarizes the percentage deaths noted. No autopsies were performed.
Of the 16 patients with SD 1H (witnessed as having occurred in the first hour of the start of symptoms), 13 were cardiorespiratory arrest with resuscitation failure and without determined cause and, in the 3 remaining patients, the cause of death was established as acute myocardial infarction. In the 12 patients in whom death had occurred in the previous 24 h, 8 were found dead at home. The cause of death was not established although they had been observed alive 24 h earlier. The other 4 patients died after 1 h of the start of symptoms, and within a 24 h time lapse. The cause of death was established as cerebral hemorrhage in 2 patients and mesenteric thrombosis in the other 2.
The mean ejection fraction was much lower in the patients who presented SD even though both groups were within the normal ranges. Only 2 patients had ejection fraction <40% and both presented SD; 1 was SD 1H and the other was SD 24H during the weekend. Eight patients had ejection fraction ≥40 and <45%, and 1 of them presented with SD during dialysis.
Of the 255 patients in whom information and electrocardiographic data were available, 103 (40%) had presented with previous myocardial infarction or had electrocardiographic abnormalities in the baseline electrocardiogram; these included Q wave, subendocardial lesion, negative T wave or QRS >120 ms. Over a mean follow-up of 39.5 ± 31.7 months (median 33.4), 18 of the 103 patients (18%) who fulfilled some of the criteria presented with SD 24H and 10/103 (10%) SD 1H. The rate of SD 24H was 5.4/100 patient-years in the group with a clinical history of myocardial infarction or electrocardiographic abnormalities versus 0.8/100 patient-years in those patients without these findings. The rate of SD 1H in the two groups of patients was 2.9/100 and 0.4/100 patient-years, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves of the differences in rates of SD 24H and SD 1H in the two groups of patients are shown in figure 1. In multivariate analysis, although none of the electrocardiographic alterations individually were shown to be independently predictive of SD, a higher heart rate or a combined variable that included having had a previous myocardial infarction or having electrocardiographic abnormalities were shown to be independent predictors of SD 24H. This latter parameter, together with greater age and elevated cardiac frequency, were the predictors of SD 1H (table 4).
Our study shows that the frequency of SD in our dialysis population is very high. The rate of SD 1H and SD 24H were 9.5 and 16.6% of overall mortality, respectively, and with an annual incidence of 1.7 and 2.9%, respectively.
The annual incidence of SD in the general population in the USA is around 0.1-0.2%  and is around 0.2-0.3% in the older group of 65-84 years of age . This represents between 13 and 18% of all natural deaths in the USA [2,3]. In southern European countries the incidence of SD is lower and varies between 0.08 and 0.36/100 patient-years in the population between 45 and 74 years of age . A perspective on SD mortality in our study needs to take several aspects into account. Firstly, the mortality in the dialysis population is very much higher than that in the general population. Secondly, SD in the general population is observed to have significant regional differences. Thirdly, our study was conducted in a country with the lowest SD rate in the general population .
Comparing our data with other studies of SD in dialysis, it is of note that, in American population registries, the annual incidence of SD is also higher than that encountered in the present study. With an annual incidence of 6-7%, this represents 25% of all deaths irrespective of the circumstances of the death not being specified nor the time lapse since the start of the symptoms . In clinical trials, SD mortality is lower, and not very different to that of the present study. In the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study (4D Study), 160 of the 1,255 patients (13%) had SD defined as ‘patients who died unexpectedly and did not present with serum potassium >7.5 mmol/l before the start of the three most recent sessions of hemodialysis' during a 4-year follow-up . In a study conducted in a single center that included patients on hemodialysis, 32 of the 476 patients included (7%) died from SD 1H in a 3-year follow-up , a level slightly higher than that of the present study. The incidence of SD during the dialysis sessions encountered in the present study (5.6/100,000 sessions) is similar to that observed in the literature in outpatient clinics (4.5-7/100,000 sessions) [15,16] and lower than that observed in the patients treated in hospitals (12/100,000 dialysis sessions) .
In analyzing the factors usually associated with high probability of presenting with SD, we did not find diabetes, type of dialysis, nor C-reactive protein as being independently predictive of SD, as had been found in the study by Genovesi et al. . Atrial fibrillation, which in previous studies conducted in our institution had presented a high prevalence and was associated with higher mortality and greater thrombotic risk [18,19,20], was not associated with SD in our study, as observed in the study of Genovesi et al. . However, our study identified two groups of risk that were clearly different. The patients who had not had a myocardial infarction and did not have electrocardiographic abnormalities at the start of the dialysis had a rate of SD similar to that observed in the general population. However, those who did have these risk factors were at a sevenfold greater risk of SD.
We believe that identifying a group at high risk of SD in a population with preserved systolic function was the principal finding of our study. The rate of SD 1H in the patients in the high-risk group in our study (10/103; 10%) had, over a mean follow-up period of 39.5 ± 31.7 months (median 33.4), a rate of SD that is similar to that in placebo groups of large general population studies that have evaluated patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction - groups that constitute a high risk of SD. For example, in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT I) , 13% of the patients included in the placebo group had a death attributed to primary arrhythmia during the mean follow-up of 27 months. In the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), cardiac mortality resulting from SD (presumed to be ventricular tachyarrhythmia) occurred in 11% of the patients randomized to placebo (median follow-up of 45.5 months) .
In conclusion, our study shows that the population on dialysis presents a high incidence of SD and that two groups of patients with very different risk profiles are identifiable. One group with history of myocardial infarction or electrocardiographic abnormalities at the start of the dialysis, albeit with preserved systolic function, constitute a high-risk group for SD similar to that presented in the general population with depressed systolic function. A second group is identifiable without these criteria, and has a risk that is similar to the general population. More studies are warranted to design an appropriate preventive strategy in the patients with high risk and to establish whether prophylactic therapy with an implanted defibrillator in primary prevention is appropriate in this population. In the light of the information currently available, the efficacy of these devices in patients with systolic dysfunction appears to be much lower in the presence of renal impairment [23,24].
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Eduardo Vázquez, MD
Department of Cardiology, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén
C/Navas de Tolosa 4 y 6, P-1, 6º D
ES-23003 Jaén (Spain)
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.