Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 64, No. 1, 2001
Issue release date: 2001
Digestion 2001;64:1–8

Dilated Intercellular Spaces as Markers of Reflux Disease: Histology, Semiquantitative Score and Morphometry upon Light Microscopy

Villanacci V. · Grigolato P.G. · Cestari R. · Missale G. · Cengia G. · Klersy C. · Rindi G.
aPathology Service 2, bDepartment of Surgery (Digestive Endoscopy), University of Brescia and Spedali Civili, Brescia, and cBiometric and Clinical Epidemiology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background and Aims: A recent electron microscopy study suggested that dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) are specific for acid reflux-damaged esophageal epithelium. Electron microscopy is, however, expensive and difficult to apply to routine biopsies. The aims of this study are to establish a method for assessing DIS on light microscopy of esophageal biopsies and to estimate its association with current clinicopathological parameters of esophagitis. Materials and Methods: 21 patients with reflux symptoms were investigated. Light microscopy biopsies were assessed for DIS size by a semiquantitative method and computer-assisted, static morphometry. A DIS score accounting for DIS size and distribution was assigned to each patient and its association with 30 clinicopathological variables investigated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Both the semiquantitative method and static morphometry identified 4 different classes of DIS size. The DIS score was significantly and independently associated with the esophageal symptoms score, the histological score of esophagitis and the relevant morphometry data. Conclusions: DIS may be efficiently assessed during light microscopy of routine esophageal biopsies. Since correlation with both the histology and the symptoms of esophagitis, the DIS score may be considered a novel parameter of esophagitis and is suggested for the routine evaluation of esophageal biopsies in patients with reflux disease.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Nebel OT, Fornes MF, Castell DO: Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors. Dig Dis Sci 1976;21:953–956.
  2. Pope CE II: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (reflux esophagitis); in: Schleisenger MH, Fordtran JS (eds): Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, ed 2. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1978, pp 541–568.
  3. DeVault KR: Reflux symptoms with normal endoscopy and pH testing: Hypersensitive esophagus? AGA Postgraduate Course ‘GI in the Next Century’, Orlando, May 15–16, 1999, pp 35–39.
  4. Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE: Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology 1970;58:163–174.
  5. Riddell RH: The biopsy diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Surg Pathol 1996 20(suppl 1):S31–S50.
  6. Hamilton SR: Esophagitis; in Ming SC, Goldman H (eds): Pathology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, ed 2. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1988, pp 433–474.
  7. Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, Orlando RC: Dilated intercellular spaces: A morphological feature of acid reflux-damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 1996;111:1200–1205.
  8. Savary M, Miller G: L’esophage. Manuel et atlas d’endoscopie. Solothurn, Gassmann, 1977.
  9. Pope CE II: The quality of life following antireflux surgery. World J Surg 1992;16:335–358.
  10. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P: International workshop on the histopathology of gastritis. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney system. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1161–1181.
  11. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB: Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361–387.
  12. Fu VK: Estimating generalized ordered logit models; in Newton HJ (ed): Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints. College Station, Stata Corporation, 1999, vol 8, pp 160–164.
  13. Hopwood D, Milne G, Logan KR: Electron microscopical changes in human esophageal epithelium in esophagitis. J Pathol 1979;129:161–167.

    External Resources

  14. Solcia E, Villani L, Luinetti O, Trespi E, Strada E, Tinelli C, Fiocca R: Altered intercellular glycoconjugates and dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in reflux disease. Virchows Arch 2000;436:207–216.
  15. Orlando R, Lacy ER, Tobey NA, Cowart K: Barriers to paracellular permeability in rabbit esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 1992;102:910–923.
  16. Zerbib F, DeKoster E, Galmiche JP: Helicobacter pylori and the oesophagus. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2000;16(suppl 1):S33–S38.
  17. Schindlbeck NE, Wiebecke B, Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Müller-Lissner SA: Diagnostic value of histology in non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1996;39:151–154.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50