To view the fulltext, please log in
To view the pdf, please log in
Many products that claim to have caries-preventive effects are available to the general public. Different and sometimes even contradictory claims of effectiveness are given in advertisements. Dentists would like to give good information and advice to their patients and the public with respect to the efficacy of different products. In medicine and dentistry there are guidelines which consider the ethics, design, conduct as well as the recording and reporting of clinical studies. The effects of clinical trials in subjects with a high risk for caries or in a population with a high caries prevalence are not comparable to the situation in most industrialized countries today. The sample should, therefore, include subjects with a range of prevalences and of risks for a valid assumption of efficacy. Reliable data can be obtained if a strict control of the design and management of the clinical trials is maintained over the duration of the experiment. New diagnostic methods used in the study must be validated and could lead to trials of a shorter duration. For a new fluoride product the bioavailability of the ion should be demonstrated. The results must have the necessary characteristics to be included in a meta-analysis. Thesis: The caries-preventive effect of a fluoride product cannot be accurately measured in populations with a variety of preventive products in use. On the other hand, the measured effect in populations with caries prevalence higher than those of the country where it will be used is not comparable to the real situation.
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
- Alanen P: Are all clinical caries prevention studies biased? J Dent Res 2000;79:796–797.
- Angmar-Månsson B: How to measure the effects of fluoride treatments in clinical trials. Assessment: Modern versus traditional methods. Caries Res 2001;35(suppl 1):30–33.
- Brothwell DJ, Jutai DGK, Hawkins RJ: An update of mechanical oral hygiene practices; evidence-based recommendations for disease prevention. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64:295–306.
- Brunelle JB, Carlos JC: Changes in the prevalence of dental caries in U.S. schoolchildren, 1961–1980. J Dent Res 1982;61(spec. issue):1346–1351.
- Clarkson J, Hardwick K, Barmes D: International collaborative research on fluoride. J Dent Res 2000;79:893–904.
- Driscoll WS, Heifetz SB, Korts DC: Effect of chewable fluoride tablets in schoolchildren: Results after 6 years of use. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:820–824.
- FDI Guidelines for Testing the Efficacy of Toothpastes. Int Dent J 1999;49:311–316.
- Hargreaves JA, Thompson GW, Wagg BJ: Changes in caries prevalence of Isle of Lewis children between 1971 and 1981. Caries Res 1983;17:554–559.
- International Congress and Symposium Series 209: Relative Efficacy of Sodium Fluoride and Sodium Monofluorophosphate as Anti-Caries Agents in Dentifrices. London, Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1995.
- Johnson MF: Comparative efficacy of NaF and SMFP dentifrices in caries prevention: A meta-analytic overview. Caries Res 1993;27:328–336.
- Kingman A: Methods of projecting long-term relative efficacy of products exhibiting small short-term efficacy. Caries Res 1993;27:322–327.
- Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbittom C, Reich E: Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999;33:261–266.
- Lussi A, Megert B, Longbittom C, Reich E, Francescut P: Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:1–6.
- Marthaler TM: Caries-inhibition after seven years of unsupervised use of amine fluoride dentifrice. Br Dent J 1968;124:510–515.
- Marthaler TM: Caries-inhibition by an amine fluoride dentifrice. Results after 6 years in children with low caries activity. Helv Odontol Acta 1974;18(suppl):35–44.
- Marthaler TM, O’Mullane DM, Vribic V: The prevalence of dental caries in Europe 1990–1995. ORCA Symposium 1995. Caries Res 1996;30:237–255.
- O’Mullane DM: Introduction and rationale for the use of fluoride for caries prevention. Int Dent J 1994;44:257–261.
- Oral Health of United States Children, National and Regional Findings. US Departement of Health and Human Services, PHS, NIH Pub No 89-2247, 1989.
- Pitts NB: Diagnostic tools and measurements – Impact on appropriate care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;23:55–59.
- Pitts NB: Inequalities in children’s caries experience: The nature and size of the UK problem. Community Dent Health 1998;15:296–300.
- Reich E: Active agents in dentifrice – Anticaries efficacy; in Lang K, Karring T, Lindhe J (eds): Chemotherapeutic Agents. Berlin, Quintessence, 1995.
- Richards D: Use of best evidence in making decisions: A challenge for the scientist and practitioner; in Micheelis W, Walther W (eds): Evidence Based Dentistry. Cologne, Deutscher Ärzteverlag, 2000.
- Rølla G, Øgaard B: Clinical effect and mechanism of cariostatic action of fluoride-containing toothpastes: A review. Int Dent J 1991;41:171–174.
- Schiffner U, Reich E: Prävalenzen zu ausgewählten klinischen Variablen bei den Kindern/Jugendlichen (12 Jahre); in Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie – DMS III. Cologne, Deutscher Ärzteverlag, 1999, chap 8.
- Scientific Advisory Group Workshop: Caries prevention – All fluoride dentifrices are not equally effective. Caries Res 1993;27:321–360.
- Stamm JW: Clinical Studies of Neutral Sodium Fluoride and Sodium Monofluorophosphate Dentifrices (CSS 209). London, Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1995, pp 43–58.
- Stephen KW: Criteria for efficacy of plaque control agents for caries. J Dent Res 1976;68(spec. issue):1672–1676.
- Stephen KW: Discussion of session V: Rational use of fluorides in prevention and therapy. J Dent Res 1990;69(spec. issue):820–823.
- Stephen K, Stamm JW: Summary of session V: Rational use of fluorides in prevention and therapy of dental caries. J Dent Res 1990;69(spec. issue):722.
- Vehkalati M, Tarkokonen L, Varsio S, Heikkila P: Decrease in and polaritzation of dental caries occurrence among child and youth populations, 1976–1993. Caries Res 1997;31:161–165.
- WHO: Fluorides and Oral Health. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva, WHO, 1994, No 846.
- WHO: Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods, ed 4. Geneva, WHO, 1997.