Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 71, No. 1, 2002
Issue release date: January–February 2002

The Validation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Nonclinical Subjects

Ventureyra V.A.G. · Yao S.-N. · Cottraux J. · Note I. · De Mey-Guillard C.
Psychother Psychosom 2002;71:47–53 (DOI:10.1159/000049343)
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale (PCLS) is a short self-report inventory for assessing the 3 main syndromes of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The aim of this study was the validation of the French version of the PCLS in PTSD subjects and nonclinical subjects. Methods: One-hundred and thirteen outpatients suffering from PTSD according to DSM-IV were administered the PCLS. The patients’ scores on the PCLS were then compared to those of 31 nonclinical control subjects. Thirty-five of the patients were administered the PCLS twice over an interval of 1–2 weeks and also completed questionnaires measuring depression, phobia and anxiety. Results: The patients’ total score and subscores on the PCLS were found to be significantly higher than those of control subjects. The cutoff score of 44 on the French version PCLS distinguishes well between the PTSD group and control group with a high diagnostic efficacy (0.94). Factor analysis revealed 3 main factors corresponding to the reexperiencing, numbing and hyperarousal syndromes. The PCLS showed satisfactory test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Conclusions: The PCLS is therefore a valid and effective measurement of PTSD. It may be a useful tool for screening and assessing PTSD in psychiatric as well as in primary-care settings.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Madianos MG, Pagaghelis M, Ioannovich J, Dafni R: Psychiatric disorders in burn patients: A follow-up study. Psychother Psychosom 2001;70:30–37.
  2. Cottler LB, Compton WM, Mager D, Spitznagel EL, Aleksander J: Post-traumatic stress disorder among substance abusers for the general population. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:664–670.
  3. Hidalgo RB, Davidson JRT: Posttraumatic stress disorder: Epidemiology and health-related considerations. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(suppl 7):5–13.
  4. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Nelson CB: Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:1048–1060.
  5. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM: The PTSD checklist: Reliability, validity and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, October 1993.
  6. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  7. Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, Forneris CA: Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist. Behav Res Ther 1996;34:669–673.
  8. Cottraux J: French version of the PTSD Checklist Scale, 1996; in Cottraux J (ed): Les thérapies comportementales et cognitives. Paris, Masson, 1998.
  9. Beck AT, Real WY, Rickels K: Short form of the depression inventory: Cross-validation. Psychol Rep 1974;34:1184–1186.
  10. Cottraux J: Inventaire abrégé de dépression de Beck (13 items); in Guelfi J (ed): L’évaluation clinique standardisée en psychiatrie. Paris, Editions Médicales Pierre-Fabre, 1993, vol 1, pp 291–295.
  11. Marks IM, Matthews AM: Brief standard rating for phobic patients: Behav Res Ther 1979;17:263–267.
  12. Cottraux J, Bouvard M, Messy P: Validation et analyse factorielle d’une échelle de phobies: La version française du questionnaire des peurs de Marks et Matthews. Encéphale 1987;13:23–29.

    External Resources

  13. Hamilton M: Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry Spec Publ 1969;3:76–79.
  14. Pichot P, Pull CB, von Frecknell R, Pull MC: Une analyse factorielle de l’échelle d’appréciation de l’anxiété de Hamilton. Helsinki, Psychiatrica Fennica International Edition, 1981, pp 183–189.
  15. Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox L, Perry K: The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychol Assess 1997;9:445–451.

    External Resources

  16. Hovens JE, van der Ploeg HM, Bramsen I, Klaarenbeek MTA, Schreuder JN, Rivero VV: The development of the self-rating inventory for posttraumatic stress disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994;90:172–183.
  17. Norris FH: Epidemiology of trauma: Frequency and impact of different potentially traumatic events on different demographic groups. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992;60:409–418.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50