Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 31, No. 4, 1999
Issue release date: July–August 1999

Does Convergence, Not Accommodation, Cause Axial-Length Elongation at Near?

A Biometric Study in Teens

Bayramlar H. · Çekiç O. · Hepşen İ.F.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

To determine whether convergence rather than accommodation has a primary effect on the changes in axial length and other biometric components during near fixation, we measured the anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous length and axial length in the right eyes of 124 young male subjects while their left eyes focused at distance (6 m) and near (20 cm). The measurements were performed before and after cycloplegia in the right eye, so we aimed to study biometric components of the eye in the states of accommodation and nonaccommodation, but converging at near. While the left eye focused at near, the axial length increased significantly with and without cycloplegia (p < 0.0005 and p < 0.0005). The vitreous length was the main increasing ocular biometric component at near both with and without cycloplegia (p < 0.044 and p = 0.001, respectively). At near, there was no difference between two mean axial length and two vitreous length measurements both with and without cycloplegia (p = 0.672 and p = 0.595, respectively). Under cycloplegia, anterior chamber depth also increased significantly at near fixation (p = 0.012). Axial elongation at near fixation, mainly due to an increase in vitreous length, may result from the effect of accommodative convergence rather than accommodation itself. Much use of convergence, not accommodation, may be one of the contributing factors in adult onset and adult progression of myopia.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Richler A, Bear JC: Refraction, nearwork and education. A population study in Newfoundland. Acta Ophthalmol 1980;58:468–470.

    External Resources

  2. Parssinen TO: Relation between refraction, education, occupation and age among 26- and 46-year-old Finns. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:136–143.

    External Resources

  3. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Sommer A: Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:334–340.
  4. Parssinen O, Hemminki E, Klemetti A: Effect of spectacle use and accommodation on myopic progression: Final results of a three-year randomized clinical trial among schoolchildren. Br J Ophthalmol 1989;73:547–551.

    External Resources

  5. Sato T: The criticism of various accommodogenous theories on school myopia. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1981;28:97–102.
  6. Greene PR: Myopia and extraocular muscles. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1981;28:163–169.
  7. Hendrickson P, Rosenblum W: Accommodation demand and deprivation in kitten ocular development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:343–345.

    External Resources

  8. Storey JK, Rabie EP: Ultrasound: A research tool in the study of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1983;3:315–318.

    External Resources

  9. Coleman DJ, Weininger R: Ultrasonic M-mode technique in ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:475–477.

    External Resources

  10. Lepper RD, Trier HG: Measurement of accommodative changes in human eyes by means of a high-resolution ultrasonic system. Ophthalmic echography. Proceedings of the 10th SIDUO Congress. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987;48:157–162.
  11. Soriano HM: Echographic findings in accommodation. Ophthalmic echography. Proceedings of the 10th SIDUO Congress. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987;48:163–170.
  12. Shum PJT, Ko LS, Ng CL, Lin SL: A biometric study of ocular changes during accommodation. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:76–81.
  13. Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Bird JE: The effect of monocular versus binocular fixation on accommodative hysteresis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988;8:438–441.

    External Resources

  14. McBrien NA, Millodot M: A biometric investigation of late onset myopic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1987;65:461–468.

    External Resources

  15. Grosvenor T, Scott R: Comparison of refractive components in youth-onset and early adult-onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:204–209.
  16. Grosvenor T, Scott R: Three-year changes in refraction and its components in youth-onset and early adult-onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:677–683.
  17. McBrien NA, Adams DW: A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Refractive and biometric findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:321–333.

    External Resources

  18. Young FA: The nature and control of myopia. J Am Optom Assoc 1977;48:451–457.

    External Resources

  19. Parssinen O, Lyyra AL: Myopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: A three-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:2794–2802.
  20. Miles FA, Wallman J: Local ocular compensation for imposed local refractive error. Vision Res 1990;30:339–349.
  21. Young FA: Primate myopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58:560–566.

    External Resources

  22. Rose L, Yinon U, Belkin M: Myopia induced in cats deprived of distance vision during development. Vision Res 1974;14:1029–1032.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50