Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 71, No. 6, 2002
Issue release date: November–December 2002

Preliminary Validation of PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) – A Brief Method to Assess Suffering

Büchi S. · Buddeberg C. · Klaghofer R. · Russi E.W. · Brändli O. · Schlösser C. · Stoll T. · Villiger P.M. · Sensky T.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: Alleviation of suffering is widely acknowledged as one of the main goals of medicine. However, no measure to assess this crucial aspect of illness has been developed to date. Aims: To validate PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self-Measure) as a simple quantitative method of assessing the perceived burden of suffering due to illness. Methods: Validity and reliability studies to date have involved over 700 patients with a variety of chronic physical illnesses. Results: Reliability of PRISM is good (test-retest reliability r = 0.95; p ≤ 0.001, interrater reliability r = 0.79; p ≤ 0.001). Qualitative data indicate that the interpretation of the PRISM task is not only consistent among patients, but also consistent with that expected from existing literature on suffering. As expected, PRISM shows strong correlations with psychological variables (notably depression and coping resilience) and also correlates with SF-36 subscale scores. Prospective longitudinal data demonstrate that PRISM is sensitive to therapeutic change. It is very acceptable to patients and takes less than 5 min to administer. Conclusion: In the absence of a ‘gold standard’ measure of suffering, our validation data must be interpreted with caution. However, the performance of PRISM is entirely consistent with what would be expected of a measure of suffering, based on current published work.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Cassell EJ: The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. N Engl J Med 1982;306:639–645.
  2. Chapman RC, Gavrin J: Suffering and its relation to pain. J Palliat Care 1993;9:5–13.
  3. Drew FL: Suffering and autonomy; in DeBellis R, Marcus E, Kutschner AH, Smith Torres C, Barrett V, Siegel ME (eds): Suffering – Psychological and Social Aspects of Loss, Grief, and Care. New York, Haworth Press, 1986, pp 19–24.
  4. Büchi S, Sensky T, Sharpe L, Timberlake N: Graphic representation of illness: A novel method of measuring patients’ perceptions of the impact of illness. Psychother Psychosom 1998;67:222–225.
  5. Büchi S, Brändli O, Klingler K, Klaghofer R, Buddeberg C: Stationäre Rehabilitation bei Patienten mit chronisch obstruktiver Lungenkrankheit (COLK) – Effekte auf körperliche Leistungsfähigkeit, psychisches Wohlbefinden und Lebensqualität. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 2000;130:135–142.
  6. Büchi S, Villiger P, Kauer Y, Klaghofer R, Sensky T, Stoll T: PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) – a novel visual method to assess the global burden of illness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2000;9:368–373.
  7. Hamacher J, Büchi S, Georgescu CL, Stammberger U, Thurnheer R, Bloch KE , Weder W, Russi EW: Improved quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery. Eur Respir J 2002;19:54–60.
  8. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–483.
  9. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A: Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: Summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33(suppl):AS264–AS279.
  10. Bullinger M: German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: Preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1359–1366.

    External Resources

  11. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.
  12. Herrmann CH: International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res 1997;42:17–41.
  13. Aylard PR, Gooding JH, McKenna PJ, Snaith RP: A validation study of three anxiety and depression self-assessment scales. J Psychosom Res 1987;31:261–268.
  14. Antonovsky A: The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:725–733.

    External Resources

  15. Noack H, Bachmann N, Oliveri M, Kopp HG, Udris I: Fragebogen zum Kohärenzgefühl. Autorisierte Uebersetzung des ‘Sense of Coherence Questionnaire’ von Antonovsky (1987). Universität Bern, Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, 1991.
  16. Quanjer PH: Standardized lung function testing. Report of working party for ‘Standardization of Lung Function Tests’. European Community for Coal and Steel, Luxembourg. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1983;19(suppl 5):1–95.
  17. Liang MH, Socher SA, Larson MG, Schur PH: Reliability and clinical validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:1107–1118.
  18. Büchi S, Sensky T: PRISM – (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) – a brief non-verbal measure of illness impact and therapeutic aid in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics 1999;40:314–320.
  19. Gregory D, English JC: The Myth of Control: Suffering in palliative care. J Palliat Care 1994;10:18–22.
  20. Frankl VE: Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York, Simon/Touchstone, 1984.
  21. Morse JM, Penrod J: Linking concepts of enduring, uncertainity, suffering, and hope. Image J Nurs Sch 1999;31:145–150.
  22. Schnyder U, Büchi S, Mörgeli H, Sensky T, Klaghofer R: Sense of coherence – a mediator between disability and handicap? Psychother Psychosom 1999;68:102–110.
  23. Schnyder U, Büchi S, Sensky T, Klaghofer R: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence: Trait or state? Psychother Psychosom 2000;69:296–302.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50