Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 72, No. 4, 2003
Issue release date: July–August 2003

A Systematic Review of Single-Session Psychological Interventions (‘Debriefing’) following Trauma

Rose S. · Bisson J. · Wessely S.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: Single-session psychological interventions such as psychological debriefing have become widely used following traumatic events. The evidence for their effectiveness has been widely debated. This review aimed to consider the evidence for the effectiveness of one-off early interventions within 1 month of a traumatic event. Methods: A systematic review using the standard Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Literature searches of various databases were performed to identify randomised controlled trials. The methodological quality of the studies identified was determined using standard measures, and the results were pooled to consider the overall evidence for effectiveness. Results: Eleven randomised controlled trials were found, all of individual or couple interventions. Three studies associated the intervention with a positive outcome, 6 demonstrated no difference in outcome between intervention and non-intervention groups and 2 showed some negative outcomes in the intervention group (these studies had the longest follow-up periods). The methodological quality of the studies varied widely, but was generally poor. This review suggests that early optimism for brief early psychological interventions including debriefing was misplaced and that it should not be advocated for routine use. There remains an urgent need for randomised controlled trials of group debriefing and other early interventions.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  2. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, et al: Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1048–1060.
  3. Mitchell JT: When disaster strikes... the critical incident stress debriefing process. J Emerg Med Serv JEMS 1983;8:36–39.
  4. Mitchell JT, Everly GS: Critical Incident Stress Debriefing: An Operation Manual for the Prevention of Traumatic Stress among Emergency Services and Disaster Workers. Ellicot City, Chevron, 1995.
  5. Bisson J, Deahl M: Psychological debriefing and prevention of post-traumatic stress. More research is needed. Br J Psychiatry 1994;165:717–720.
  6. Raphael B, Meldrum L: Does debriefing after psychological trauma work? BMJ 1995;310:1479–1480.
  7. Rick J, Perryman S, Young K, et al: Workplace Trauma and Its Management Review of the Literature. London, Institute of Employment Studies, 1998.
  8. Rose S, Bisson J: Brief early psychological interventions following trauma: A systematic review of the literature. J Trauma Stress 1998;11:697–710.
  9. Wessely S, Rose S, Bisson J: A systematic review of brief psychological interventions (‘debriefing’) for the treatment of immediate trauma-related symptoms and the prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder; in Oakley-Browne M et al (eds): Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Module of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ed 2. Oxford, Updated Software, 1998.
  10. Rose S, Bisson J, Wessely S: A systematic review of brief psychological interventions (‘debriefing’) for the treatment of immediate trauma-related symptoms and the prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford, Updated Software, 2001.
  11. Chalmers I, Altman DG: Systematic Reviews. London, British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 1995.
  12. Amir M, Weil G, Kapin Z, Tocker T, Witztum E: Debriefing with brief group psychotherapy in a homogenous group on non-injured victims of a terrorist attack: A prospective study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998;98:237–242.
  13. André C, Lelord F, Legeron P, Reignier A, Delattre A: Etude contrôlée sur l’efficacité à 6 mois d’une prise en charge précoce de 132 conducteurs d’autobus victimes d’agressions. Encéphale 1997;23:65–71.
  14. Brom D, Kleber R, Hofman M: Victims of traffic accidents: Incidence and prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychol 1993;49:131–140.
  15. Bryant R, Harvey A, Dang S, Sackville T, Basten C: Treatment of acute stress disorder: A comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counseling. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998;66:862–866.
  16. Carlier I, Lamberts R, Van Uchelen A, Gersons B: Disaster-related post-traumatic stress in police officers: A field study of the impact of debriefing. Stress Med 1998;14:143–148.
  17. Chemtob C, Tomas S, Law W, Cremniter D: Postdisaster psychosocial intervention: A field study of the impact of debriefing on psychological distress. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:415–417.
  18. Deahl M, Srinivasan M, Jones N, Thomas J, Neblett C, Jolly A: Preventing psychological trauma in soldiers: The role of operational stress training and psychological debriefing. Br J Med Psychol 2000;73:77–85.
  19. Deahl M, Gillham AB, Thomas J, Seale M, Srinivasan M: Psychological sequelae following the Gulf War. Factors associated with subsequent morbidity and the effectiveness of psychological debriefing. Br J Psychiatry 1994;165:60–65.
  20. Doctor R, Curtis D, Isaacs G: Psychiatric morbidity in policemen and the effect of brief psychotherapeutic intervention: A pilot study. Stress Med 1994;10:151–157.
  21. Foa EB, Hearst-Ikeda D, Perry KJ: Evaluation of a brief cognitive-behavioral program for the prevention of chronic PTSD in recent assault victims. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:948–955.
  22. Hytten K, Hasle A: Fire fighters: A study of stress and coping. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989;355:50–55.
  23. Kenardy J, Webster R, Lewin T, et al: Stress debriefing and patterns of recovery following a natural disaster. J Trauma Stress 1996;9:37–49.
  24. Matthews L: Effect of staff debriefing on posttraumatic stress symptoms after assaults by community housing residents. Psychiatr Serv 1998;49:207–212.
  25. McFarlane AC: The aetiology of post-traumatic stress disorders following a natural disaster. Br J Psychiatry 1988;152:116–121.
  26. Polak P, Egan D, Vandebergh R, Williams W: Prevention in mental health: A control study. Am J Psychiatry 1975;132:146–149.
  27. Robinson R, Mitchell JT: Evaluation of psychological debriefings. J Trauma Stress 1993;6:367–382.
  28. Saari S, Lindeman M, Verkasalo M, Prtz T: The Estonia disaster: Description of crisis intervention in Finland. Eur Psychol 1996;2:135–139.
  29. Tadmor C, Brandes J, Hofman J: Preventive intervention for a Caesarian birth population. Br J Prev Psychol 1988;3:343–364.
  30. Viney L, Clarke A, Bunn T, Benjamin Y: An evaluation of three crisis intervention programmes for general hospital patients. Br J Med Psychol 1985;58:75–86.
  31. Churchill R: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for the treatment of depression in primary care; thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 1996.
  32. Kenardy J, Carr V: Imbalance in the debriefing debate: What we don’t know far outweighs what we do. Bull Aust Psychol Soc 1996;18:4–6.
  33. Bordow S, Porritt D: An experimental evaluation of crisis intervention. Soc Sci Med 1979;13:251–256.
  34. Bunn T, Clarke A: Crisis intervention: An experimental study of the effects of a brief period of counselling on the anxiety of relatives of seriously injured or ill hospital patients. Br J Med Psychol 1979;52:191–195.
  35. Mayou RA, Ehlers A, Hobbs M: Psychological debriefing for road traffic accident victims: A three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2000;176:589–593.
  36. Lee C, Slade P, Lygo V: The influence of psychological debriefing on emotional adaption in women following early miscarriage: A preliminary study. Br JMed Psychol 1996;69:47–58.
  37. Hobbs M, Adshead G: Preventive psychological intervention for road crash survivors; in Mitchell M (ed): The Aftermath of Road Accidents: Psychological, Social and Legal Perspectives. London, Routledge, 1996, pp 159–171.
  38. Bisson J, Jenkins P, Alexander J, Bannister C: A randomised controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of acute burn trauma. Br J Psychiatry 1997;171:78–81.
  39. Conlon L, Fahy TJ, Conroy R: PTSD in ambulant RTA victims: A randomized controlled trial of debriefing. J Psychosom Res 1999;46:37–44.
  40. Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA: Can midwives reduce postpartum psychological morbidity? A randomized trial. Birth 1998;25:215–219.
  41. Dolan L, Bowyer D, Freeman C, Little K: Critical incident stress debriefing after trauma: Is it effective? In press.
  42. Rose S, Brewin CR, Andrews B, Kirk M: A randomized controlled trial of individual psychological debriefing for victims of violent crime. Psychol Med 1999;29:793–799.
  43. Small R, Lumley J, Donohue L, Potter A, Walderstrom U: Midwife-led debriefing to reduce maternal depression following operative birth: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2000;321:1043–1047.
  44. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R: Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782–786.
  45. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W: Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209–218.
  46. Stein DM, Lambert MJ: Graduate training in psychotherapy: Are therapy outcomes enhanced? J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:182–196.
  47. Pitman RK, Altman B, Greenwald E, et al: Psychiatric complications during flooding therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1991;52:17–20.
  48. Brewin CR, Andrews A, Rose S, Kirk M: Acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of violent crime. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:360–365.
  49. Brewin CR, Rose S, Andrews A, et al: Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:158–162.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50