Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003
Issue release date: July 2003

The Cyclin in the RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme Is a Target for the Transcriptional Repressor Tup1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Schüller J. · Lehming N.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


The general transcriptional repressor Tup1p requires the cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase pair Srb11p/Srb10p in the holoenzyme of transcription. We used the split-ubiquitin system to demonstrate that Tup1p interacts with Srb11p in vivo. We confirmed our observation in vitro with the help of purified proteins, and we compared the de-repression effect of deleting TUP1, SRB10, and SRB11 on different promoters. We propose that Tup1p targets the cyclin Srb11p to affect the cyclin-dependent kinase Srb10p.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Ansari, A.Z., Koh, S.S., Zaman, Z., Bongards, C., Lehming, N., Young, R.A., and Ptashne, M. 2002. Transcriptional activating regions target a cyclin-dependent kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:14706–14709.
  2. Ausubel, F., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., and Struhl, K. 1998. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York, John Wiley.
  3. Balasubramanian, B., Lowry, C.V., and Zitomer, R.S. 1993. The Rox1 repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae hypoxic genes is a specific DNA-binding protein with a high-mobility-group motif. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:6071–6078.
  4. Becerra, M., Lombardia-Ferreira, L.J., Hauser, N.C., Hoheisel, J.D., Tizon, B., and Cerdan, M.E. 2002. The yeast transcriptome in aerobic and hypoxic conditions: Effects of hap1, rox1, rox3 and srb10 deletions. Mol. Microbiol. 43:545–555.
  5. Boeke, J.D., Lacroute, F., and Fink, G.R. 1984. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-Fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:345–346.
  6. Bongards, C., Chew, B.S., and Lehming, N. 2003. The TATA-binding protein is not an essential target of the transcriptional activators Gal4p and Gcn4p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 370:141–147.
  7. Carlson, M. 1999. Glucose repression in yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:202–207.
  8. Chi, Y., Huddleston, M.J., Zhang, X., Young, R.A., Annan, R.S., Carr, S.A., and Deshaies, R.J. 2001. Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. Genes Dev. 15:1078–1092.
  9. Dasgupta, A., Darst, R.P., Martin, K.J., Afshari, C.A., and Auble, D.T. 2002. Mot1 activates and represses transcription by direct, ATPase-dependent mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2666–2671.
  10. Davie, J.K., Trumbly, R.J., and Dent, S.Y. 2002. Histone-dependent association of Tup1-Ssn6 with repressed genes in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:693–703.
  11. Dohmen, R.J., Stappen, R., McGrath, J.P., Forrova, H., Kolarov, J., Goffeau, A., and Varshavsky, A. 1995. An essential yeast gene encoding a homolog of ubiquitin-activating enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 270:18099–18109.
  12. Ducker, C.E. and Simpson, R.T. 2000. The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome. EMBO J. 19:400–409.
  13. Dünnwald, M., Varshavsky, A., and Johnsson, N. 1999. Detection of transient in vivo interactions between substrate and transporter during protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:329–344.
  14. Edmondson, D.G., Smith, M.M., and Roth, S.Y. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10:1247–1259.
  15. Gromöller, A. and Lehming, N. 2000. Srb7p is a physical and physiological target of Tup1p. EMBO J. 19:6845–6852.
  16. Hengartner, C.J., Myer, V.E., Liao, S.M., Wilson, C.J., Koh, S.S., and Young, R.A. 1998. Temporal regulation of RNA polymerase II by Srb10 and Kin28 cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol. Cell 2:43–53.
  17. Hirst, M., Kobor, M.S., Kuriakose, N., Greenblatt, J., and Sadowski, I. 1999. GAL4 is regulated by the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme-associated cyclin-dependent protein kinase SRB10/CDK8. Mol. Cell 3:673–678.
  18. Huang, L., Zhang, W., and Roth, S.Y. 1997. Amino termini of histones H3 and H4 are required for α1-α2 repression in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6555–6562.
  19. Huang, M., Zhou, Z., and Elledge, S.J. 1998. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 94:595–605.
  20. Johnsson, N. and Varshavsky, A. 1994. Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10340–10344.
  21. Keleher, C.A., Goutte, C., and Johnson, A.D. 1988. The yeast cell-type-specific repressor α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell 53:927–936.
  22. Keleher, C.A., Redd, M.J., Schultz, J., Carlson, M., and Johnson, A.D. 1992. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68:709–719.
  23. Kerkmann, K. and Lehming, N. 2001. Genome-wide expression analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain deleted for the Tup1p-interacting protein Cdc73p. Curr. Genet. 39:284–290.
  24. Kuchin, S. and Carlson, M. 1998. Functional relationships of Srb10-Srb11 kinase, carboxy-terminal domain kinase CTDK-I, and transcriptional corepressor Ssn6-Tup1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1163–1171.
  25. Laser, H., Bongards, C., Schüller, J., Heck, S., Johnsson, N., and Lehming, N. 2000. A new screen for protein interactions reveals that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group proteins Nhp6A/B are involved in the regulation of the GAL1 promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13732–13737.
  26. Lee, M., Chatterjee, S., and Struhl, K. 2000. Genetic analysis of the role of pol II holoenzyme components in repression by the Cyc8-tup1 corepressor in yeast. Genetics 155:1535–1542.
  27. Lehming, N. 2002. Analysis of protein-protein proximities using the split-ubiquitin system. Briefings Funct. Genom. Proteom. 1:230–238.
  28. Marquez, J.A., Pascual-Ahuir, A., Proft, M., and Serrano, R. 1998. The Ssn6-Tup1 repressor complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in the osmotic induction of HOG-dependent and -independent genes. EMBO J. 17:2543–2553.
  29. Nehlin, J.O. and Ronne, H. 1990. Yeast MIG1 repressor is related to the mammalian early growth response and Wilms’ tumour finger proteins. EMBO J. 9:2891–2898.
  30. Pätzold, A.J. and Lehming, N. 2001. Why Ppr1p is a weak activator of transcription. FEBS Lett. 494:64–68.
  31. Smith, R.L. and Johnson, A.D. 2000. Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: A conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:325–330.
  32. Tzamarias, D. and Struhl, K. 1994. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature 369:758–761.
  33. Varshavsky, A. 1996. The N-end rule: Functions, mysteries, uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:12142–12149.
  34. Varshavsky, A. 1997. The ubiquitin system. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:383–387.
  35. Vincent, O., Kuchin, S., Hong, S.P., Townley, R., Vyas, V.K., and Carlson, M. 2001. Interaction of the Srb10 kinase with Sip4, a transcriptional activator of gluconeogenic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:5790–5796.
  36. Wahi, M. and Johnson, A.D. 1995. Identification of genes required for α2 repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 140:79–90.
  37. Watson, A.D., Edmondson, D.G., Bone, J.R., Mukai, Y., Yu, Y., Du, W., Stillman, D.J., and Roth, S.Y. 2000. Ssn6-tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 14:2737–2744.
  38. Wellhausen, A. and Lehming, N. 1999. Analysis of the in vivo interaction between a basic repressor and an acidic activator. FEBS Lett. 453:299–304.
  39. Zaman, Z., Ansari, A.Z., Koh, S.S., Young, R., and Ptashne, M. 2001. Interaction of a transcriptional repressor with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme plays a crucial role in repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:2550–2554.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50