Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 56, No. 1, 2003
Issue release date: August 2003
Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;56:38–42

Accuracy of Clinical Diagnostic Methods of Threatened Abortion

Yip S.-K. · Sahota D. · Cheung L.-P. · Lam P. · Haines C.J. · Chung T.K.-H.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Objective: To examine the accuracy of clinical diagnostic methods in assessing vaginal bleeding in pregnant women before 28 weeks’ gestation. Methods: 772 consecutive women who presented with threatened abortion before 28 weeks’ gestation were studied. Structured history and physical examination were performed on each woman as initial clinical assessment. This was followed by transvaginal sonography to determine the status of pregnancy. The accuracy of diagnoses at different clinical stages (history, physical examination, and transvaginal sonography) relative to the final diagnosis was compared using the kappa coefficient (ĸ). Results: Clinicians were unable to accurately diagnose or predict the status of the pregnancy from history alone (ĸ = 0.33; 95% CI 0.28, 0.38) or after physical examination (ĸ = 0.57; 95% CI 0.52, 0.62). Transvaginal sonography led to an accurate diagnosis of pregnancy status (ĸ = 0.96; 95% CI 0.95, 0.98) in most cases, except where an ectopic pregnancy existed. Absence of abdominal tenderness (p = 0.04), cervical excitation (p = 0.02), and incorrect identification of retained products of conception on transvaginal sonography (p = 0.01) were features of missed ectopic pregnancy. Conclusions: The clinical assessment of threatened abortion by history and physical examination is unreliable in most cases. The diagnostic accuracy is improved by the addition of transvaginal sonography. Even with the help of transvaginal sonography, a small proportion of ectopic pregnancies will be missed.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Sanders RC: Legal problems related to obstetric ultrasound. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;847:220–227.
  2. Ankum WM, Hajenius PJ, Schrevel LS, Van der Veen F: Management of suspected ectopic pregnancy: Impact of new diagnostic tools in 686 consecutive cases. J Reprod Med 1996;41:724–728.
  3. Sandvei R: Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Diagn Gynecol Obstet 1981;3:15–18.
  4. Fleisis JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, Wiley, 1981, p 218.
  5. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.
  6. Morris N: Management of the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Aust Fam Physician 1982;11:78–85.
  7. Axelsen SM, Henriksen TB, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ: Characteristics of vaginal bleeding during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;63:131–134.
  8. Stabile I, Campbell S, Grudinskas JG: Ultrasonic assessment of complications during first trimester of pregnancy. Lancet 1987;2:1237–1240.
  9. Norman SG: An audit of the management of ectopic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:1267–1272.
  10. Chung TK, Cheung LP, Leung TY, Haines CJ, Chang AM: Misoprostol in the management of spontaneous abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:832–835.
  11. Chung TK, Lee DT, Cheung LP, Haines CJ, Chang AM: Spontaneous abortion: A randomized, controlled trial comparing surgical evacuation with conservative management using misoprostol. Fertil Steril 1998;71:1054–1059.

    External Resources

  12. Ballagh SA, Harris HA, Demasio K: Is curettage needed for uncomplicated incomplete spontaneous abortion? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1279–1282.
  13. Zalanyi S: Vaginal misoprostol alone is effective in the treatment of missed abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:1026–1028.
  14. Weinstein L, Morris MB, Dotters D, Christian D: Ectopic pregnancy – a new surgical epidemic. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:698–701.
  15. Barnhart KT, Simhan H, Kamelle SA: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound above and below the beta-hCG discriminatory zone. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:583–587.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50