In the setting of intensive care, patients with acute renal failure often present a clinical picture of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). SIRS can be caused by bacterial stimuli or by non-microbiological stimuli that induce a significant inflammatory response. When this response is exaggerated, the patient experiences multiple organ system failure and a condition of sepsis also defined as a systemic malignant inflammation. This is mostly characterized by an invasion of cytokines and other pro-inflammatory mediators into the systemic circulation where major biological effects take place, including vasopermeabilization, hypotension and shock. At the same time, the monocyte of the septic patient seems to be hyporesponsive to inflammatory stimuli to a certain extent. In this condition, the patient faces a situation of hyperinflammation but at the same time of immunodepression expressing a clinical entity defined as counter anti-inflammatory response syndrome. The general picture of the clinical disorder is therefore better characterized by an immunodysregulation than by a simple pro- or anti-inflammatory disorder. Due to the short half-life of cytokines and other mediators spilled over into the circulation, it is extremely difficult to approach the problem at the right moment with the right pharmacological agent. For these reasons, the peak concentration hypothesis suggests that continuous renal replacement therapies, due to their continuity and unspecific capacity of removal, might be beneficial in cutting the peaks of the concentrations of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, restoring a situation of immunohomeostasis. Thus the patient may benefit from a lesser degree of immunodysregulation and he/she may restore a close-to-normal capacity of response to exogenous stimuli.

Keywords:
Continuous renal replacement therapy, Counter anti-inflammatory response, Immunodysregulation, Peack concentration hypothesis, Sepsis, Systemic inflammatory syndrome
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.