Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 38, No. 1, 2005
Issue release date: January–February 2005
Psychopathology 2005;38:32–37
(DOI:10.1159/000083968)

Diagnostic Stability in Depressive Disorder as according to ICD-10 in Clinical Practice

Kessing L.V.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic stability of the ICD-10 diagnosis of depressive disorder has not been investigated in clinical practice. Sampling and Methods: All patients who were diagnosed with depressive disorder at least once in a period from 1994 to 2002 in psychiatric out- or inpatient settings in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register. Results: A total of 39,741 patients were diagnosed with depressive disorder at least once; among these, 81% were diagnosed at the first contact. In approximately 56% of patients, the initial diagnosis of depressive disorder eventually changed during follow-up mainly to the schizophrenic spectrum (16%), but also to personality disorders (9%), neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (8%) and to bipolar disorder (8%). Among the 18% of patients who were later diagnosed with depressive disorder, 23% initially had a diagnosis of adjustment disorder. Conclusions: When the ICD-10 diagnoses are used in clinical practice, the diagnosis of depressive disorder has a low stability over time. These findings emphasize the need for a longitudinally based diagnostic process in the diagnostic systems.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Robins E, Guze SB: Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1970;126:983–987.
  2. Fennig S, Kovasznay B, Rich C, Ram R, Pato C, Miller A, Rubinstein J, Carlson G, Schwartz JE, Phelan J: Six-month stability of psychiatric diagnoses in first-admission patients with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:1200–1208.
  3. Amin S, Singh SP, Brewin J, Jones PB, Medley I, Harrison G: Diagnostic stability of first-episode psychosis. Comparison of ICD-10 and DSM-III-R systems. Br J Psychiatry 1999;175:537–543.
  4. Munk-Jorgensen P, Mortensen PB: The Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Dan Med Bull 1997;44:82–84.
  5. World Health Organization: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva, 1992.
  6. SPSS: SPSS for Windows, standard version 11.0. 2001.
  7. Clayton PJ, Guze SB, Cloninger CR, Martin RL: Unipolar depression: Diagnostic inconsistency and its implications. J Affect Disord 1992;26:111–116.
  8. Schwartz JE, Fennig S, Tanenberg-Karant M, Carlson G, Craig T, Galambos N, Lavelle J, Bromet EJ: Congruence of diagnoses 2 years after a first-admission diagnosis of psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:593–600.
  9. Tsuang MT, Woolson RF, Winokur G, Crowe RR: Stability of psychiatric diagnosis. Schizophrenia and affective disorders followed up over a 30- to 40-year period. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:535–539.
  10. Marneros A, Deister A, Rohde A: Stability of diagnoses in affective, schizoaffective and schizophrenic disorders. Cross-sectional versus longitudinal diagnosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991;241:187–192.
  11. Kessing LV: Diagnostic stability in bipolar disorder in clinical practice as according to ICD-10. J Affect Disord, in press.
  12. Lehmann HE, Fenton FR, Deutsch M, Feldman S, Engelsmann F: An 11-year follow-up study of 110 depressed patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1988;78:57–65.
  13. Rao AV, Nammalvar N: The course and outcome in depressive illness. A follow-up study of 122 cases in Madurai, India. Br J Psychiatry 1977;130:392–396.
  14. Coryell W, Winokur G: Course and outcome; in Paykel ES (ed): Handbook of Affective Disorders. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1992, pp 89–108.
  15. Coryell W, Endicott J, Maser JD, Keller MB, Leon AC, Akiskal HS: Long-term stability of polarity distinctions in the affective disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:385–390.
  16. Krishnan KR: Comorbidity and depression treatment. Biol Psychiatry 2003;53:701–706.
  17. Rapaport MH: Prevalence, recognition, and treatment of comorbid depression and anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(suppl 24):6–10.

    External Resources



Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50