Objective: To investigate the knowledge, professional involvement and confidence of Canadian nurses and physicians in providing genetic services for adult onset hereditary disease. Methods: 1,425 physicians and 1,425 nurses received a mailed questionnaire with reminders. The response rates were 50% (n = 543) and 79% (n = 975), respectively. Results: Forty-eight percent of physicians and 31% of nurses lacked formal education in genetics. Respondents reported being involved in caring for people at risk for adult onset hereditary disease. Their levels of confidence that they could perform tasks, such as counselling about predictive genetic tests, however, were lower than their levels of expectation that it would be important for them to provide these services. Conclusions: The expected roles and educational needs of Canadian nurses and physicians have broad areas of overlap suggesting the possibility of combined professional education programs and multiple ways of organizing teams to provide genetic services to people at risk for adult onset hereditary disease.

Keywords:
Genetic predisposition to disease, Professional education, Family physicians, Nursing, Primary health care
1.
Kenner C: National coalition for health professional education in genetics. AACN Clin Issues 1998;9:582–587.
2.
Knottnerus JA: Community genetics and community medicine. Fam Pract 2003;20:601–606.
3.
Lea DH: A new world view of genetics service models. Online J Issues Nurs 2000;5:5.
4.
Emery J, Watson E, Rose P, Andermann A: A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Fam Pract 1999;16:426–445.
5.
Welkenhuysen M, Evers-Kiebooms G: General practitioners and predictive genetic testing for late-onset diseases in Flanders: What are their opinions and do they want to be involved? Community Genet 2002;5:128–137.
6.
Hunter A, Wright P, Cappelli M, Kasaboski A, Surh L: Physician knowledge and attitudes towards molecular genetic (DNA) testing of their patients. Clin Genet 1998;53:447–455.
7.
Carroll JC, Brown JB, Blaine S, Glendon G, Pugh P, Medved W: Genetic susceptibility to cancer: Family physicians’ concerns and needs. Can Fam Physician 2003;49:45–52.
8.
Lapham EV, Kozma C, Weiss JO, Benkendorf JL, Wilson MA: The gap between practice and genetics education of health professionals: HuGEM survey results. Genet Med 2000;2:226–231.
9.
Peterson SK, Rieger PT, Marani SK, deMoor C, Gritz ER: Oncology nurses’ knowledge, practice, and educational needs regarding cancer genetics. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:3–12.
10.
Hayflick SJ, Eiff PM: Will the learners be learned? Genet Med 2002;4:43–44.
11.
Blaine S, Carroll JC: Genetic screening for hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancers. The Foundation for Medical Practice Education 2002;10:1–9.
12.
Warner E, Heisey RE, Goel V, Carroll JC, McCready DR: Hereditary breast cancer. Risk assessment of patients with a family history of breast cancer. Can Fam Physician 1999;45:104–112.
13.
Warner E, Carroll JC, Heisey RE, Goel V, Meschino WS, Lickley HL, et al: Educating women about breast cancer. An intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer. Can Fam Physician 2003;49:56–63.
14.
Jenkins JF, Prows C, Dimond E, Monsen R, Williams J: Recommendations for educating nurses in genetics. J Prof Nurs 200;17:283–290.
15.
Kirk M: Nursing through the genetics lens: Convergent thinking on education and professional development. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:1–3.
16.
Prows CA, Hetteberg C, Johnson N, Latta K, Lovell A, Saal HM, et al: Outcomes of a genetics education program for nursing faculty. Nurs Educ Perspect 2003;24:81–85.
17.
Lea DH, Lawson MT: A practice-based genetics curriculum for nurse educators: An innovative approach to integrating human genetics into nursing curricula. J Nurs Educ 2000;39:418–421.
18.
Lea DH, Williams JK, Jenkins J, Jones S, Calzone K: Genetic health care: Creating interdisciplinary partnerships with nursing in clinical practice. Nat Acad Pract Forum 2000;2:177–186.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.