Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 87, No. 4, 2005
Issue release date: May 2005
Biol Neonate 2005;87:345–353

Ethical Considerations in Neonatal Respiratory Care

Orzalesi M. · Cuttini M.
‘Bambino Gesù’ Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Recent advances in neonatal care have greatly improved the chances for survival of very sick and/or very preterm neonates and have in fact changed the concept and the limits of viability. However, in some situations, when the infant’s demise can only be postponed at the price of great suffering or when survival is associated with severe disabilities and an intolerable life for the patient and the parents, it may be unwise to employ the full armamentarium of modern neonatal intensive care. In those circumstances withholding or withdrawing mechanical ventilation and other life-saving, though invasive and painful, procedures might be a better option. This review examines the ethical principles underlying those difficult decisions, the most frequent circumstances where they should be considered, the role of parents and other parties in the decision-making process and the reported behavior of neonatologists in many American and European neonatal intensive care units.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH: Introduction to assisted ventilation; in Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EK (eds): Assisted Ventilation of the Neonate, ed 4. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2003, pp 1–14.
  2. Donald I, Lord J: Augmented respiration: Studies in atelectasis neonatorum. Lancet 1953;i:9–13.
  3. Bancalari E, Sinclair JC: Mechanical ventilation; in Sinclair JC, Bracken MB (eds): Effective Care of the Newborn Infants. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 200–220.
  4. Soll RF, McQueen MC: Respiratory distress syndrome; in Sinclair JC, Bracken MB (eds): Effective Care of the Newborn Infants. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 325–358.
  5. Silverman WA: Overtreatment of neonates? A personal retrospective. Pediatrics 1992:90; 971–975.
  6. Beauchamp TL, Childress J: Principles of Biomedical Ethics, ed 1. New York, Oxford University Press, 1979; ed 5, 2001.
  7. Gillon R: Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester, Wiley & Sons, 1995.
  8. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Book 5; Politics, Book 3, chap 9.
  9. Macklin R: Applying the four principles. J Med Ethics 2003;29:275–280.
  10. Campbell DE, Fleischman AR: Limits of viability: Dilemmas, decisions, and decision-makers. Am J Perinatol 2001;18:117–128.
  11. Goldsmith JP, Ginsberg HG, McGettigan MC: Ethical decisions in the delivery room. Clin Perinatol 1996;23:529–550.
  12. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, ed 10. Springfield, 1988.
  13. Dunn PM, Stirrat GM: Capable of being born alive? Lancet 1984;i:553–555.
  14. Rennie JM: Perinatal management at the lower margin of viability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;74:F214–F218.
  15. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Chir B, Gibson AT, Wilkinson A: Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2000;343:378–384.
  16. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M: Neurological and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005;352:9–19.
  17. Larroque B, Bréart G, Kaminski M, Dehan M, André M, Burguet A, Granjean H, Ledésert B, Lévêque C, Maillard F, Matis J, Rozé JC, Truffert P: Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000;89:F139–F144.

    External Resources

  18. Vanhaesebrouck P, Allegaert K, Bottu J, Debauche C, Devlieger H, Docx M, François A, Haumont D, Lombet J, Rigo J, Smets K, Vanherreweghe I, Van Overmeire B, Van Reempts P: The EPIBEL study: Outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in Belgium. Pediatrics 2004;114:663–675.
  19. Haumont D: Management of the neonate at the limits of viability. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;112(suppl 1):1–3.
  20. Peerzada JM, Richardson DK, Burns JP: Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viability. J Pediatr 2004;145:492–498.
  21. de Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, Berbik I, Hansen G, Kucinskas A, Lenoir S, Levin A, Persson J, Rebagliato M, Reid M, Schroell M, de Vonderweid U and the EURONIC Group: Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective. J Pediatr 2000;137:608–612.
  22. Sheldon T: Dutch doctors change policy on treating preterm babies. Br Med J 2001;322:1383.

    External Resources

  23. Oei J, Askie LM, Tobianski R, Lui K: Attitudes of neonatal clinicians towards resuscitation of the extremely premature infant: An exploratory survey. J Paediatr Child Health 2000;36:357–362.
  24. Streiner DL, Saigal S, Burrows E, Stoskopf B, Rosenbaum P: Attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward active treatment of extremely premature infant. Pediatrics 2001;108:152–157.
  25. Ballard DW, Li Y, Evans J, Ballard R, Ubel PA: Fear of litigation may increase resuscitation of infants born near the limits of viability. J Pediatr 2002;140:713–718.
  26. Paris JJ, Shreiber MD, Reardon FE: Ethical and legal issues; in Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH (eds): Assisted Ventilation of the Neonate, ed 4. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2003, pp 81–90.
  27. Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M, Hansen G, de Leeuw R, Lenoir S, Persson J, Rebagliato M, Reid M, de Vonderweid U, Lenard MG, Orzalesi M, Saracci R, for the EURONIC Study Group: End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: Physician’s self-reported practices in seven European countries. Lancet 2000;355:2112–2118.
  28. Rebagliato M, Cuttini M, Broggin L, Berbik I, de Vonderweid U, Hansen G, Kaminsky M, Kollee LA, Kucinskas A, Lenoir S, Levin A, Persson J, Reid M, Saracci R, for the EURONIC Study Group: Neonatal end-of-life decision making: Physician’s attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries JAMA 2000;284;2451–2459.
  29. Tyson JE, Younes N, Verter J, Wright LL: Viability, morbidity and resource use among newborns of 501–800 g birth weight. JAMA 1996:276;1645–1651.
  30. Silverman WA: ‘Acceptable and unacceptable’ risks. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:2–3.
  31. Silverman WA: Compassion or opportunism? Pediatrics 2004;113:402–403.
  32. Cuttini M, Casotto V, Saracci R, Orzalesi M: In search of a good death: Health professionals’ beliefs may undermine effective pain relief for dying patients. Br Med J 2003;327:222.

    External Resources

  33. Carter BS, Bhatia J: Comfort/palliative care guidelines for neonatal practice: Development and implementation of an Academic Medical Center. J Perinatol 2001;21:279–283.
  34. Catlin A, Carter B: Creation of a neonatal end-of-life palliative care protocol. J Perinatol 2002;22:184–195.
  35. Anspach RR: Deciding Who Lives. Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993.
  36. Cuttini M, Rebagliato M, Bortoli P, Hansen G, de Leeuw R, Lenoir S, Persson J, Reid M, Schroell M, de Vonderweid U, Kaminski M, Lenard H, Orzalesi M, Saracci R: Parental visiting, communication, and participation in ethical decisions: A comparison of neonatal unit policies in Europe. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;81:F84–F91.
  37. Garel M, Gosme-Séguret S, Kaminski M, Cuttini M: Les prises de décisions éthiques en réanimation néonatale. Enquête auprés des soignants de deux centres français. Arch Pédiatr 1997;4:662–670.
  38. Leuthner SR: Decisions regarding resuscitation of the extremely premature infant and models of best interest. J Perinatol 2001;21:193–198.
  39. McHaffie H, Cuttini M, Brölz-Voit G, Randag L, Mousty R, Duguet AM, Wennergren B, Benciolini P: Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: Legislation and official guidelines across Europe. J Med Ethics 1999;25:440–446.
  40. Chiswick M: Parents and end of life decisions in neonatal practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F1–F3.

    External Resources

  41. Benfield DG, Leib SA, Vollman JH: Grief response of parents to neonatal death and parent participation in deciding care. Pediatrics 1978;62:171–177.
  42. Walwork E, Ellison PH: Follow-up of families of neonates in whom life support was withdrawn. Clin Pediatr 1985;24:14–19.
  43. McHaffie HE, Laing IA, Parker M, McMillan J: Deciding for imperiled newborns: Medical authority or parental autonomy? J Med Ethics 2001;27:104–109.
  44. Harrison H: The principles for family-centered neonatal care. Pediatrics 1993;92:643–649.
  45. Duff RS, Campbell AGM: Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. N Engl J Med 1973;289:890.
  46. Campbell AGM, Lloyd DJ, Duffty P: Treatment dilemmas in neonatal care: Who should survive and who should decide? Ann NY Acad Sci 1988;530:92–103.
  47. Whitelaw A: Death as an option in neonatal intensive care. Lancet 1986;ii:328–331.
  48. Eg-Andersen G: Prediction of outcome in 164 infants born after 24 to 28 weeks gestation. Acta Paediatr Scand 1989(suppl);360:50–61.
  49. de Kleine MJ, de Leew R, Kollée LA, Berger HM: Voortzetten of staken van levensverlengend in 4 centra voor neonatale intensieve zorg. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1993;137:496–500.
  50. Wall SN, Partridge JC: Death in the intensive care nursery: Physician practice of withdrawing and withholding life support. Pediatrics 1997;99:64–70.
  51. de Leeuw R, de Beaufort AJ, de Kleine MJK, van Harrewijn K, Kollée LA: Foregoing intensive care treatment in newborn infants with extremely poor prognoses. A study in four neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands. J Pediatr 1996;129:661–666.
  52. Cook LA, Watchko JF: Decision making for the critically ill neonate near the end of life. J Perinatol 1996;16:133–136.
  53. van der Heide A, van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, de Graaff LM, Kester JGC, Kollée LAA: Medical end-of-life decisions in neonates and infants in the Netherlands. Lancet 1997;350:251–255.
  54. Lorenz JM, Paneth N, Jetton JR, den Ouden L, Tyson JE: Comparison of management strategies for extreme prematurity in New Jersey and the Netherlands: Outcomes and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 2001;108:1269–1274.
  55. Silverman WA: The limits of medical intervention. Prospettive in Pediatria 1989;19:177–182.
  56. Pellegrino ED: The anatomy of clinical-ethical judgments in perinatology and neonatology: A substantive and procedural framework. Semin Perinatol 1987;11:202–209.
  57. Siva Subramanian KN, Mc Cullough LB, Queenan JT (eds): The ethics of perinatal and neonatal care. Semin Perinatol 1987;11:201–209.

    External Resources

  58. Mc Intyre N, Popper K: The critical attitude in medicine: The need for a new ethics. Br Med J 1983;287:1919–1923.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50