Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 20, No. 2-3, 2005
Issue release date: August 2005
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;20:99–104

Acquired Sociopathy and Frontotemporal Dementia

Mendez M.F. · Chen A.K. · Shapira J.S. · Miller B.L.
aDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, bV.A. Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, and cDepartment of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: It is not understood why some patients withfrontotemporal dementia (FTD) manifest sociopathic behavior. Objective: To examine the prevalence and characteristics of sociopathic behavior in FTD patients as compared to those with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Methods and Participants: We surveyed a group of FTD patients and a group of AD patients for sociopathic behavior, evaluated the characteristics surrounding their acts, and compared the groups on neuropsychological tests and functional neuroimaging. Twenty-eight outpatients with FTD (15 men, 13 women; 61.9 ± 7.1 years; Mini-Mental State Examination score 23.6 ± 8.1) were compared with 28 patients with clinically probable AD (13 men, 15 women; 66.1 ± 9.2 years; Mini-Mental State Examination score 21.3 ± 5.3). Main outcome measures included: (a) the prevalence of sociopathic acts; (b) a structured interview; (c) neuropsychological tests including the Frontal Assessment Battery, and (d) clinically obtained positron emission tomography or single photon emission tomography scans. Results: Sixteen (57%) of the FTD patients had sociopathic behavior compared to two (7%) of the AD patients (χ2 = 13.84, p < 0.001). Sociopathic acts among FTD patients included unsolicited sexual acts, traffic violations, physical assaults, and other unacceptable behaviors. On interview, the FTD patients with sociopathic acts were aware of their behavior and knew that it was wrong but could not prevent themselves from acting impulsively. They claimed subsequent remorse, but they did not act on it or show concern for the consequences. Among FTD patients with sociopathy, neuropsychological assessment showed impaired motor inhibition, and functional neuroimaging showed right frontotemporal involvement. Conclusion: The results suggest that sociopathy in FTD results from a combination of diminished emotional concern for the consequences of their acts and disinhibition consequent to right frontotemporal dysfunction. In many jurisdictions, FTD patients with sociopathy would not pass legal criteria for ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, Boone K, Miller BL, Cummings J, Benson DF: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria.Neurology1998;51:1546–1554.
  2. Mendez MF, Perryman KM: Neuropsychiatric features of frontotemporal dementia. Evaluation of consensus criteria and review. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002;14:424–429.
  3. Miller BL, Darby A, Benson DF, Cummings JL, Miller MH: Aggressive, socially disruptive and antisocial behaviour associated with fronto-temporal dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1997;170:150–154.
  4. Mendez MF, Chow T, Ringman J, Twitchell G, Hinkin CH: Pedophilia and temporal lobe disturbances. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000;12:71–76.
  5. Gustafson L: Clinical picture of frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. Dementia 1993;4:143–148.
  6. Lynch T, Sano M, Marder KS, Bell KL, Foster NL, Defendini RF, Sima AA, Keohane C, Nygaard TG, Fahn S, et al: Clinical characteristics of a family with chromosome 17-linked disinhibition-dementia-parkinsonism-amyotrophy complex. Neurology 1994;44:1878–1884.
  7. Frisoni GB, Pizzolato G, Geroldi C, Rossato A, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M: Dementia of the frontal type: Neuropsychological and [99Tc]-HM-PAO SPET features. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1995;8:42–48.
  8. Gustafson L: Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. II. Clinical picture and differential diagnosis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1987;6:209–223.
  9. Miller BL, Chang L, Mena I, Boone K, Lesser IM: Progressive right frontotemporal degeneration: Clinical, neuropsychological and SPECT characteristics. Dementia 1993;4:204–213.
  10. Barrash J, Tranel D, Anderson SW: Acquired personality disturbances associated with bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal region. Dev Neuropsychol 2000;18:355–381.
  11. Blair RJR: The roles of orbital frontal cortex in the modulation of antisocial behavior. Brain Cogn 2004;55:198–208.
  12. Brower MC, Price BH: Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: A critical review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:720–726.
  13. Tranel D: ‘Acquired sociopathy’: The development of sociopathic behavior following focal brain damage. Prog Exp Pers Psychopathol Res 1994;285–311.

    External Resources

  14. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1984;34:939–944.
  15. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 1975;12:89–98.

    External Resources

  16. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danzinger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL: A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1982;140:566–572.
  17. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  18. Welsh KA, Butters N, Mohs RC, Beekly D, Edland S, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A: The Consortium to Establish a Registry in Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology 1994;44:609–614.
  19. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B: The FAB: A Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 2000;55:1621–1626.
  20. Rosen HJ, Perry RJ, Murphy J, Kramer JH, Mychack P, Schuff N, Weiner M, Levenson RW, Miller BL: Emotion comprehension in the temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2002;125:2286–2295.
  21. Mendez MF, Lim GTH: Alterations in the sense of ‘humanness’ in right hemisphere predominant FTD patients. Cogn Behav Neurol 2004;17:133–138.
  22. Blake PY, Pincus JH, Buckner C: Neurologic abnormalities in murderers. Neurology 1995;45:1641–1647.
  23. Bigler ED: Frontal lobe pathology and antisocial personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:609–611.
  24. Raine A, Ishikawa SS, Arce E, Lencz T, Knuth KH, Bihrle S, LaCasse L, Colletti P: Hippocampal structural asymmetry in unsuccessful psychopaths. Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:185–191.
  25. Veit R, Flor H, Erb M, Hermann C, Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N: Brain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans. Neurosci Lett 2002;16:328:233–236.
  26. Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S, LaCasse L, Colletti P: Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:119–127.
  27. Damasio H, Grabowski T, Frank R, Galaburda AM, Damasio AR: The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science 1994;264:1102–1105.
  28. Damasio AR, Tranel D, Damasio H: Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behav Brain Res 1990;41:81–94.
  29. Eslinger PJ: Neurological and neuropsychological bases of empathy. Eur Neurol 1998;39:193–199.
  30. Benes FM: The relationship between structural brain imaging and histopathologic findings in schizophrenia research. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1993;1:100–109.
  31. Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW: Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 1994;50:7–15.
  32. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H: Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain 2000a;123:2189–2202.
  33. Damasio AR: Descartes’ error and the future of human life. Sci Am 1994;271:144.
  34. Saver JL, Damasio AR: Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia 1991;29:1241–1249.
  35. Adolphs R: Social cognition and the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 1999;3:469–479.
  36. Berthoz S, Armony JL, Blair RJR, Dolan RJ: An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms. Brain 2002;125:1696–1708.
  37. Anderson SW, Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR: Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:1031–1037.

    External Resources

  38. Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H: Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2000b;10:295–307.
  39. Rolls ET, Hornak J, Wade D, McGrath J: Emotion-related learning in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal lobe damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1518–1524.
  40. Baxter MG, Parker A, Lindner CC, Izquierdo AD, Murray EA: Control of response selection by reinforcer value requires interaction of amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 2000;20:4311–4319.
  41. Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Bramati IE, Grafman J: Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage 2002;16:696–703.
  42. Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Eslinger PJ: Morals and the human brain: A working model. Neuroreport 2003;14:299–305.
  43. Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD: An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001;293:2105–2108.
  44. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio AR: The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 1998;393:470–474.
  45. Gregory C, Lough S, Stone V, Erzinclioglu S, Martin L, Baron-Cohen S, Hodges JR: Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain 2002;125:752–764.
  46. Lough S, Hodges JR: Measuring and modifying abnormal social cognition in frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. J Psychosom Res 2002;53:639–646.
  47. Tranel D, Bechara A, Denburg NL: Asymmetric functional roles of right and left ventromedial prefrontal cortices in social conduct, decision-making, and emotional processing. Cortex 2002;38:589–612.
  48. Blair RJR, Cipolotti L: Impaired social response reversal. A case of ‘acquired sociopathy’. Brain 2000;123:1122–1141.
  49. Mychack P, Kramer JH, Boone KB, Miller BL: The influence of right frontotemporal dysfunction on social behavior in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2001;56(suppl 4):S11–S15.
  50. Perry RJ, Rosen HR, Kramer JH, Beer JS, Levenson RL, Miller BL: Hemispheric dominance for emotions, empathy and social behaviour: Evidence from right and left handers with frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase 2001;7:145–160.
  51. Edwards-Lee T, Miller BL, Benson DF, Cummings JL, Russell GL, Boone K, Mena I: The temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 1997;120:1027–1040.
  52. Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Goldman WP, Perry RJ, Schuff N, Weiner M, Feiwell R, Kramer JH, Miller BL: Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Neurology 2002;58:198–208.
  53. Borum R, Fulero SM: Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy. Law Hum Behav 1999;23:375–393.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50