Previous studies are consistent with the hypothesis that aberrant crypt foci (ACF) could be intermediate biomarkers in colorectal carcinogenesis. The present controlled experimental trial was performed to sequentially analyze ACF progression in rat colonic mucosa. F344 rats were administered 2-weekly doses of azoxymethane (15 mg/kg body weight, s.c.) and sacrificed 6, 12, 20, 30 and 36 weeks after the first carcinogen injection. Control groups of untreated rats were sacrificed at the same time points. The number of ACF per area, their multiplicity (number of crypts per focus), ACF frequency and multiplicity according to each colonic site, histology of ACF and macroscopic lesions were recorded. No ACF were found in control animals. In treated animals, the number of ACF per area and the multiplicity progressively and significantly increased throughout the study. ACF were prevalent in the mid colon. Lower frequencies were registered in the distal colon and rectum. ACF were rare in the proximal colon and cecum. By histology, ACF presented superficial and extensive hyperplasia. Tumors were found in the 30th and 36th week. Adenomas and well-differentiated adenocarcinomas were in the distal colon. All proximal neoplasms were signet ring cell carcinomas. In our study, ACF growing features and distribution are not correlated to adenoma and adenocarcinoma distribution. It is conceivable that signet ring cell carcinomas arising in the proximal colon, where ACF are rare, could present a different pathway of growth. The preneoplastic role of ACF and their function as intermediate biomarkers in colorectal carcinogenesis remain to be clarified.

Keywords:
Aberrant crypt foci, Colorectal tumors, F344 rats
This content is only available via PDF.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.