Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 5, No. 6, 2005
Issue release date: 2005
Pancreatology 2005;5:547–552

Duodenopancreatectomy versus Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Excision for Chronic Pancreatitis

Belina F. · Fronek J. · Ryska M.
Department of Surgery, Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: The aim of this study was to compare two surgical procedures in the treatment for chronic pancreatitis (CP): pancreatoduodenectomy resection (classical Whipple – PD procedure, or pylorus-preserving – PPPD) to duodenum-preserving pancreatic head excision with longitudinal pancreatojejunoanastomosis (DPPHE/PJA), to define the advantages of each procedure with regard to postoperative complications, pain relief, and the quality of life. Material and Method: 104 consecutive patients were included into this study. Duodenopancreatectomy was chosen when the head pancreatic mass was present or pancreatic cancer could not be ruled out (48 patients); otherwise DPPHE/PJA was performed (56 patients). Quality of life was measured prospectively on two occasions, before the procedure and during follow-up (median 39 months after surgery) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The test was re-evaluated for patients suffering from CP. Pain intensity was quantified using a specially designed pain score. Early postoperative morbidity and mortality were assessed and evaluated in both groups of patients. Results: Total pain score decreased significantly after surgery in both groups of patients. During the follow-up period, the global quality of life improved by 30.4% in the DPPHE/PJA group, and by 23.2% in the PD/PPPD group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were higher in the resection group, but the differences were not significant. Conclusions: Both surgical procedures led to significant improvement in the quality of life and pain relief after surgery for CP. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was found to be a valid and readily available test for quality-of-life assessment in patients with CP.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Traverso LW, Kozarek RA: The Whipple procedure for severe complications of chronic pancreatitis. Arch Surg 1993;128:1047–1053.
  2. Stapleton GN, Williamson RCN: Proximal pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1996;83:1433–1440.
  3. Bloechle C, Izbicki JR, Knoefel WT, et al: Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: results after duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas. Pancreas 1995;11:77–85.
  4. Frey CF, Amikura K: Local resection of the head of the pancreas combined with longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1994;220:492–507.
  5. Frey CF, Smith GJ: Description and rationale of a new operation for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 1987;2:701–707.
  6. Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, et al: Duodenum-preserving resections of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995;221:350–358.
  7. Stapleton GN, Williamson RCN: Proximal pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1996;83:1433–1440.
  8. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Berman B, et al for the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–376.
  9. Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Broering DC, et al: Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis: Prospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy; in Aaronson NK, Bullinger M, Ahmedzai S (eds): A Modular Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials. Recent Results Cancer Res 1988;111:231–249.
  10. Adams DB, Ford MC, Anderson MC: Outcome after lateral pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1994;219:481–489.
  11. Büchler MW, Friess H, Müller MW, et al: Randomized trial of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pylorus-preserving Whipple in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1995;169:65–70.
  12. Klempa I, Spatny M, Menzel J, et al: Pankreasfunktion und Lebensqualität nach Pankreaskopfresektion bei der chronischen Pankreatitis. Chirurg 1995;66:350–359.
  13. Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, et al: Drainage versus Resektion in der chirurgischen Therapie der chronischen Kopfpankreatitis: Eine randomisierte Studie. Chirurg 1997;68:369–377.
  14. Patel AG, Toyama MT, Kusske AM, et al: Pylorus-preserving Whipple resection for pancreatic cancer. Is it any better? Arch Surg 1995;130:838–842.
  15. Melvin WS, Buekers KS, Muscarella P, et al: Outcome analysis of long-term survivors following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointestinal 1998;S2:72–78.

    External Resources

  16. Huang JJ, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, et al: Quality of life and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:890–898.
  17. Fronek J, Ryska M, Belina F, et al: Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis – results after duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas (abstract). International 4th Congress of the European Chapter of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Amsterdam 2001, pp 27–30.
  18. Witzigmann H, Max D, Uhlmann D, et al: Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective trial comparing classical Whipple procedure and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. J Gastrointestinal 2002;S6:173–180.

    External Resources

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50