Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 28, No. 1-2, 2006
Issue release date: February 2006
Dev Neurosci 2006;28:142–155
(DOI:10.1159/000090760)

Distinct Functions of Human Numb Isoforms Revealed by Misexpression in the Neural Stem Cell Lineage in the Drosophila Larval Brain

Toriya M. · Tokunaga A. · Sawamoto K. · Nakao K. · Okano H.
aDepartment of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, bDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, and cCore Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Saitama, Japan

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Mammalian Numb (mNumb) has multiple functions and plays important roles in the regulation of neural development, including maintenance of neural progenitor cells and promotion of neuronal differentiation in the central nervous system (CNS). However, the molecular bases underlying the distinct functions of Numb have not yet been elucidated. mNumb, which has four splicing isoforms, can be divided into two types based on the presence or absence of an amino acid insert in the proline-rich region (PRR) in the C-terminus. It has been proposed that the distinct functions of mNumb may be attributable to these two different types of isoforms. In this study, we used the outer optic anlage (OOA) of the Drosophila larval brain as an assay system to analyze the functions of these two types of isoforms in the neural stem cells, since the proliferation pattern of neuroepithelial (NE) stem cells in the OOA closely resembles that of the vertebrate neural stem/progenitor cells. They divide to expand the progenitor cell pool during early neurogenesis and to produce neural precursors/neurons during late neurogenesis. Clonal analysis in the OOA allows one to discriminate between the NE stem cells, which divide symmetrically to expand the progenitor pool, and the postembryonic neuroblasts (pNBs), which divide asymmetrically to produce neural precursors (ganglion mother cells), each of which divides once to produce two neurons. We found that in the OOA, the human Numb isoform with a long PRR domain (hNumb-PRRL), which is mainly expressed during early neurogenesis in the mouse CNS, promotes proliferation of both NE cells and pNBs without affecting neuronal differentiation, while the other type of hNumb isoform with a short PRR domain (hNumb-PRRS), which is expressed throughout neurogenesis in the mouse embryonic CNS, inhibits proliferation of the stem cells and promotes neuronal differentiation. We also found that hNumb-PRRS, a functional homologue of Drosophila Numb, more strongly decreases the amount of nuclear Notch than hNumb-PRRL, and could antagonize Notch functions probably through endocytic degradation, suggesting that the two distinct types of hNumb isoforms could contribute to different phases of neurogenesis in the mouse embryonic CNS.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Rhyu MS, Jan LY, Jan YN: Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells. Cell 1994;76:477–491.
  2. Uemura T, Shepherd S, Ackerman L, Jan LY, Jan YN: Numb, a gene required in determination of cell fate during sensory organ formation in Drosophila embryos. Cell 1989;58:349–360.
  3. Frise E, Knoblich JA, Younger-Shepherd S, Jan LY, Jan YN: The Drosophila Numb protein inhibits signaling of the Notch receptor during cell-cell interaction in sensory organ lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:11925–11932.
  4. Petersen PH, Zou K, Hwang JK, Jan YN, Zhong W: Progenitor cell maintenance requires numb and numblike during mouse neurogenesis. Nature 2002;419:929–934.
  5. Petersen PH, Zou K, Krauss S, Zhong W: Continuing role for mouse Numb and Numbl in maintaining progenitor cells during cortical neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:803–811.
  6. Li HS, Wang D, Shen Q, Schonemann MD, Gorski JA, Jones KR, Temple S, Jan LY, Jan YN: Inactivation of Numb and Numblike in embryonic dorsal forebrain impairs neurogenesis and disrupts cortical morphogenesis. Neuron 2003;40:1105–1118.
  7. Sestan N, Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rakic P: Contact-dependent inhibition of cortical neurite growth mediated by notch signaling. Science 1999;286:741–746.
  8. Verdi JM, Schmandt R, Bashirullah A, Jacob S, Salvino R, Craig CG, Program AE, Lipshitz HD, McGlade CJ: Mammalian NUMB is an evolutionarily conserved signaling adapter protein that specifies cell fate. Curr Biol 1996;6:1134–1145.
  9. Wakamatsu Y, Maynard TM, Jones SU, Weston JA: NUMB localizes in the basal cortex of mitotic avian neuroepithelial cells and modulates neuronal differentiation by binding to NOTCH-1. Neuron 1999;23:71–81.
  10. Berezovska O, McLean P, Knowles R, Frosh M, Lu FM, Lux SE, Hyman BT: Notch1 inhibits neurite outgrowth in postmitotic primary neurons. Neuroscience 1999;93:433–439.
  11. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ: Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 1999;284:770–776.
  12. Dho SE, French MB, Woods SA, McGlade CJ: Characterization of four mammalian numb protein isoforms. Identification of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated variants of the phosphotyrosine binding domain. J Biol Chem 1999;274:33097–33104.
  13. Verdi JM, Bashirullah A, Goldhawk DE, Kubu CJ, Jamali M, Meakin SO, Lipshitz HD: Distinct human NUMB isoforms regulate differentiation vs proliferation in the neuronal lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:10472–10476.
  14. Takahashi T, Goto T, Miyama S, Nowakowski RS, Caviness VS Jr: Sequence of neuron origin and neocortical laminar fate: relation to cell cycle of origin in the developing murine cerebral wall. J Neurosci 1999;19:10357–10371.
  15. Temple S: The development of neural stem cells. Nature 2001;414:112–117.
  16. Noctor SC, Martinez-Cerdeno V, Ivic L, Kriegstein AR: Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:136–144.
  17. Bayer SA, Altman J: Neocortical Development. New York, Raven Press, 1991.
  18. Hofbauer A, Campos-Ortega JA: Proliferation pattern and early differentiation of the optic lobes in Drosophila melanogaster. Rouxs Arch Dev Biol 1990;198:264–274.

    External Resources

  19. Nassif C, Noveen A, Hartenstein V: Early development of the Drosophila brain. 3. The pattern of neuropile founder tracts during the larval period. J Comp Neurol 2003;455:417–434.
  20. Zhong W, Jiang MM, Weinmaster G, Jan LY, Jan YN: Differential expression of mammalian Numb, Numblike and Notch1 suggests distinct roles during mouse cortical neurogenesis. Development 1997;124:1887–1897.
  21. Ito K, Awano W, Suzuki K, Hiromi Y, Yamamoto D: The Drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells. Development 1997;124:761–771.
  22. Lee T, Luo L: Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 1999;22:451–461.
  23. Newsome TP, Asling B, Dickson BJ: Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. Development 2000;127:851–860.
  24. Oda H, Uemura T, Harada Y, Iwai Y, Takeichi M: A Drosophila homolog of cadherin associated with armadillo and essential for embryonic cell-cell adhesion. Dev Biol 1994;165:716–726.
  25. Yoshida T, Tokunaga A, Nakao K, Okano H: Distinct expression patterns of splicing isoforms of mNumb in the endocrine lineage of developing pancreas. Differentiation 2003;71:486–495.
  26. Nie J, Li SS, McGlade CJ: A novel PTB-PDZ domain interaction mediates isoform-specific ubiquitylation of mammalian Numb. J Biol Chem 2004;279:20807–20815.
  27. Dumstrei K, Wang F, Hartenstein V: Role of DE-cadherin in neuroblast proliferation, neural morphogenesis, and axon tract formation in Drosophila larval brain development. J Neurosci 2003;23:3325–3335.
  28. Struhl G, Fitzgerald K, Greenwald I: Intrinsic activity of the Lin-12 and Notch intracellular domains in vivo. Cell 1993;74:331–345.
  29. Zhong W, Feder JN, Jiang MM, Jan LY, Jan YN: Asymmetric localization of a mammalian numb homolog during mouse cortical neurogenesis. Neuron 1996;17:43–53.
  30. Wai P, Truong B, Bhat KM: Cell division genes promote asymmetric interaction between Numb and Notch in the Drosophila CNS. Development 1999;126:2759–2770.
  31. Guo M, Jan LY, Jan YN: Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: interaction of Numb and Notch. Neuron 1996;17:27–41.
  32. Coffman CR, Skoglund P, Harris WA, Kintner CR: Expression of an extracellular deletion of Xotch diverts cell fate in Xenopus embryos. Cell 1993;73:659–671.
  33. Chitnis A, Henrique D, Lewis J, Ish-Horowicz D, Kintner C: Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta. Nature 1995;375:761–766.
  34. Lardelli M, Williams R, Mitsiadis T, Lendahl U: Expression of the Notch 3 intracellular domain in mouse central nervous system progenitor cells is lethal and leads to disturbed neural tube development. Mech Dev 1996;59:177–190.
  35. Nakamura Y, Sakakibara S, Miyata T, Ogawa M, Shimazaki T, Weiss S, Kageyama R, Okano H: The bHLH gene hes1 as a repressor of the neuronal commitment of CNS stem cells. J Neurosci 2000;20:283–293.
  36. Ohtsuka T, Sakamoto M, Guillemot F, Kageyama R: Roles of the basic helix-loop-helix genes Hes1 and Hes5 in expansion of neural stem cells of the developing brain. J Biol Chem 2001;276:30467–30474.
  37. Hatakeyama J, Bessho Y, Katoh K, Ookawara S, Fujioka M, Guillemot F, Kageyama R: Hes genes regulate size, shape and histogenesis of the nervous system by control of the timing of neural stem cell differentiation. Development 2004;131:5539–5550.
  38. Fortini ME, Rebay I, Caron LA, Artavanis-Tsakonas S: An activated Notch receptor blocks cell-fate commitment in the developing Drosophila eye. Nature 1993;365:555–557.
  39. Lieber T, Kidd S, Alcamo E, Corbin V, Young MW: Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. Genes Dev 1993;7:1949–1965.
  40. Rebay I, Fortini ME, Artavanis-Tsakonas S: Analysis of phenotypic abnormalities and cell fate changes caused by dominant activated and dominant negative forms of the Notch receptor in Drosophila development. C R Acad Sci III 1993;316:1097–1123.
  41. Schroeter EH, Kisslinger JA, Kopan R: Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature 1998;393:382–386.
  42. Struhl G, Adachi A: Nuclear access and action of notch in vivo. Cell 1998;93:649–660.
  43. Qi H, Rand MD, Wu X, Sestan N, Wang W, Rakic P, Xu T, Artavanis-Tsakonas S: Processing of the notch ligand delta by the metalloprotease Kuzbanian. Science 1999;283:91–94.
  44. Berdnik D, Torok T, Gonzalez-Gaitan M, Knoblich JA: The endocytic protein alpha-Adaptin is required for numb-mediated asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2002;3:221–231.
  45. Santolini E, Puri C, Salcini AE, Gagliani MC, Pelicci PG, Tacchetti C, Di Fiore PP: Numb is an endocytic protein. J Cell Biol 2000;151:1345–1352.
  46. Salcini AE, Confalonieri S, Doria M, Santolini E, Tassi E, Minenkova O, Cesareni G, Pelicci PG, Di Fiore PP: Binding specificity and in vivo targets of the EH domain, a novel protein-protein interaction module. Genes Dev 1997;11:2239–2249.
  47. Huang EJ, Li H, Tang AA, Wiggins AK, Neve RL, Zhong W, Jan LY, Jan YN: Targeted deletion of numb and numblike in sensory neurons reveals their essential functions in axon arborization. Genes Dev 2005;19:138–151.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 9.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 8.00