Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 40, No. 2, 2006
Issue release date: February 2006
Caries Res 2006;40:124–129
(DOI:10.1159/000091058)

Progression of Sealed Initial Bovine Enamel Lesions under Demineralizing Conditions in vitro

Paris S. · Meyer-Lueckel H. · Mueller J. · Hummel M. · Kielbassa A.M.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

The use of sealants for the infiltration of proximal enamel lesions could be a promising alternative to the common strategies of remineralization and operative treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare the progression of sealed initial enamel lesions after exposure to a demineralizing solution in vitro. In each of 54 bovine enamel specimens three subsurface lesions were created. Two of the lesions were etched with phosphoric acid and sealed with either a fissure sealant or with various adhesives (1–5) for 15 s or 30 s, respectively, whereas one lesion remained as the untreated control. Subsequently, half of each specimen was covered with nail varnish (baseline) and the other half was reexposed to a demineralizing solution for 14 days (experimental). The specimens were cut perpendicularly to the surface, infiltrated with a low-viscosity fluorescent resin and observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). For lesions sealed with the fissure sealant and adhesives 1–3, the progression of lesion depth (0–31 µm) was significantly decreased (p < 0.01; paired t test) compared with the untreated control (57 µm). For the fissure sealant and adhesives 1 and 3 extended penetration times (30 s) resulted in significantly reduced lesion progression compared to 15 s. It can be concluded that filling of the pores in initial enamel lesions with the fissure sealant and adhesives 1–3 can inhibit further demineralization in vitro.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Bjarnason S: Temporary tooth separation in the treatment of approximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int 1996;27:249–251.
  2. Buskes JA, Christoffersen J, Arends J: Lesion formation and lesion remineralization in enamel under constant composition conditions. A new technique with applications. Caries Res 1985;19:490–496.
  3. Davila JM, Buonocore MG, Greeley CB, Provenza DV: Adhesive penetration in human artificial and natural white spots. J Dent Res 1975;54:999–1008.
  4. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S: Managing approximal carious lesions: a new non-operative approach. Caries Res 2004;38:361.
  5. Frank RM: Structural events in the caries process in enamel, cementum, and dentin. J Dent Res 1990;69 (spec No):559–566.

    External Resources

  6. Garçía-Godoy F, Summitt JB, Donly KJ: Caries progression of white spot lesions sealed with an unfilled resin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997;21:141–143.
  7. Goepferd SJ, Olberding P: The effect of sealing white spot lesions on lesion progression in vitro. Pediatr Dent 1989;11:14–16.
  8. Gray GB, Shellis P: Infiltration of resin into white spot caries-like lesions of enamel: an in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10:27–32.

    External Resources

  9. Kidd EAM, van Amerongen JP: The role of operative treatment; in Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Ames, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003, vol 1, pp 245–250.
  10. Kogon SL, Stephens RG, Reid JA, Donner A: Can radiographic criteria be used to distinguish between cavitated and noncavitated approximal enamel caries? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1987;16:33–36.

    External Resources

  11. Marthaler TM, Germann M: Radiographic and visual appearance of small smooth surface caries lesions studied on extracted teeth. Caries Res 1970;4:224–242.
  12. Mejàre I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H, Johansson H: Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: A prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries Res 1998;32:10–16.
  13. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Mueller J, Coelfen H, Kielbassa AM: Influence of the application time on the penetration of different adhesives and a fissure sealant into artificial subsurface lesions in bovine enamel. Dent Mater (in press).
  14. Nyvad B: The role of oral hygiene; in Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds): Dental caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Ames, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003, vol 1, pp 171–177.
  15. Pearce EI, Nelson DG: Microstructural features of carious human enamel imaged with back-scattered electrons. J Dent Res 1989;68:113–118.
  16. Rimmer PA, Pitts NB: Temporary elective tooth separation as a diagnostic aid in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1990;169:87–92.
  17. Robinson C, Brookes SJ, Kirkham J, Wood SR, Shore RC: In vitro studies of the penetration of adhesive resins into artificial caries-like lesions. Caries Res 2001;35:136–141.
  18. Robinson C, Hallsworth AS, Weatherell JA, Kunzel W: Arrest and control of carious lesions: A study based on preliminary experiments with resorcinol-formaldehyde resin. J Dent Res 1976;55:812–818.
  19. Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Pasqualetti T, Imfeld T, Besek MJ: Penetration of a bonding agent into de- and remineralized enamel in vitro. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:111–115.
  20. Spurr AR: A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 1969;26:31–43.
  21. ten Cate JM, Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF, Fejerskov O: Chemical interactions between the tooth and oral fluids; in Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Ames, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003, vol 1, pp 49–68.
  22. Waggoner WF, Crall JJ: A study of the carious lesion utilizing radiography, polarized light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Quintessence Int 1984;15:1163–1174.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50