Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 12, No. 3, 2006
Issue release date: June 2006
Eur Addict Res 2006;12:113–120

Relative Contribution of Smoker Prototypes in Predicting Smoking among Adolescents: A Comparison with Factors from the Theory of Planned Behavior

van den Eijnden R.J.J.M. · Spijkerman R. · Engels R.C.M.E.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background:It has frequently been suggested that adolescents are more likely to start smoking when they hold favorable social images or prototypes of smoking peers. Although empirical evidence supports the role of smoker prototypes in predicting smoking, little is known about the relative contribution of smoker prototypes, in comparison to more well-established social cognitive factors. Therefore, the present study investigated the relative impact of smoker prototypes, in comparison to factors of the theory of planned behavior, in predicting smoking among adolescents. Methods: A three-wave prospective study was conducted among 612 Dutch 8th grade students (aged 12–13 years). Questionnaires were administered and adolescents were followed during one year. Results: The results indicate that smoker prototypes are predictive of adolescent smoking behavior. Adolescents who believe that smoking peers are sociable more frequently engage in smoking behavior. Moreover, adolescents who hold the image that smoking peers are rebellious are less inclined to engage in smoking. These prototype factors predict a significant proportion of variance in smoking status, over and above the components of the theory of planned behavior. Conclusion: The findings of the present study are interesting because they suggest that intervening on the level of smoker prototypes may contribute to the effectiveness of current programs aiming at the prevention of adolescents’ smoking behavior.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Willemsen MC, Hoogenveen RT, Van Der Lucht F: New smokers and quitters: transitions in smoking status in a national population. Eur J Publ Health 2002;12:136–138.
  2. Zwart de WM, Stam H, Kuipers SBM: Kerngegevens [Basic figures]. 1997.
  3. NIPO. Roken jeugd 2002 [Smoking among the Adolescent Population 2002]. Amsterdam, TNS NIPO, 2002.
  4. Cuijpers P: Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs: a systematic review. Addict Behav 2002;27:1009–1023.
  5. Cuijpers P, Jonkers R, de Weerdt I, de Jong A: The effects of drug abuse prevention at school: the ‘Healthy School and Drugs’ project. Addiction 2002;97:67–73.
  6. Maingay R, Willemsen MC: Effecten van een 3-jarig multicomponenten schoolinterventie op beginnen met roken bij adolescenten: analyse van de data ESFA Nederland 1998–2001 [Effects of a 3-year multicomponent school intervention targeting smoking onset among adolescents: analysis of the ESFA data the Netherlands 1998–2001]. Den Haag, Stivoro, 2002.
  7. White D, Pitts M: Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. Addiction 1998;93:1475–1487.
  8. Tobler NS, Roona MR, Ochshorn P, Marshall DG, Streke AV, Stackpole KM: School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. J Primary Prevent 2000;20:275–336.

    External Resources

  9. Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organiz Behav Hum Decision Processes 1991;50:179–211.

    External Resources

  10. Armitage CJ, Conner M: Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001;40:471–499.
  11. Godin G, Kok G: The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot 1996;11:87–98.
  12. Collins LM, Sussman S, Rauch JM, Dent CW, Johnson CA, Hansen WB, et al: Psychosocial predictors of young adolescent cigarette smoking: a sixteen-month, three-wave longitudinal study. J Appl Soc Psychol 1987;17:554–573.

    External Resources

  13. Engels RC, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ: Predictability of smoking in adolescence: between optimism and pessimism. Addiction 1999;94:115–124.
  14. Kremers SPJ: On your marks. Revising, testing and integrating stage models of smoking initiation [Unigraph Maastricht]. Maastricht, Maastricht University, 2002.
  15. Kremers SP, Mudde AN, de Vries H: Subtypes within the precontemplation stage of adolescent smoking acquisition. Addict Behav 2001;26:237–251.
  16. Evans RI, Henderson A, Hill P, Raines B: Smoking in children and adolescents: Psychological determinants and prevention strategies; in Krasnegor NA (ed): The Behavioral Aspects of Smoking, ed 26. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1979.
  17. Younnis J, Haynie DL: Friendship in adolescence. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1992;13:59–66.

    External Resources

  18. Chassin L, Presson CC, Sherman SJ, Corty E, Olshavsky R: Self-images and cigarette smoking in adolescence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1981;7:670–676.

    External Resources

  19. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M: Predicting young adults’ health risk behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;69:505–517.
  20. Leventhal H, Cleary PD: The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification. Psychol Bull 1980;88:370–405.
  21. Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Zhao L, Russell DW, Reis-Bergan M: The effect of peers’ alcohol consumption on parental influence: a cognitive mediational model. J Stud Alcohol 1999;13:32–44.
  22. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Blanton H, Russell DW: Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74:1164–1180.
  23. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Boney-McCoy S: Prototype perception predicts (lack of) pregnancy prevention. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1995;21:84–92.

    External Resources

  24. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M: Health images and their effects on health behavior; in Buunk BP, Gibbons FX (eds): Health, Coping and Well-Being. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997, pp 63–94.
  25. Blanton H, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Conger KJ, Smith GE: The role of family and peers in the development of prototypes associated with substance use. J Fam Psychol 1997;11:271–288.
  26. Gibbons FX, Helweg-Larsen M, Gerrard M: Prevalence estimates and adolescent risk behavior: cross-cultural differences in social influence. J Appl Psychol 1995;80:107–121.
  27. Blanton H, Van den Eijnden RJJM, Buunk BP, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M: Accentuate the negative: social images in the prediction and promotion of condom use. J Appl Soc Psychol 2001;31:274–295.

    External Resources

  28. Chassin L, Tetzloff C, Hershey M: Self-image and social-image factors in adolescent alcohol use. J Stud Alcohol 1985;46:39–47.
  29. Ouellette JA, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Reis-Bergan M: Parents, peers, and prototypes: Antecedents of adolescent alcohol expectancies, alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related life problems in rural youth. Psychol Addict Behav 1999;13:183–197.
  30. Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Reis-Bergan M, Trudeau L, Vande Lune LS, Buunk B: Inhibitory effects of drinker and nondrinker prototypes on adolescent alcohol consumption. Health Psychol 2002;21:601–609.
  31. Gibbons FX, McGovern PG, Lando HA: Relapse and risk perception among members of a smoking cessation clinic. Health Psychol 1991;10:42–45.
  32. Aloise-Young PA, Hennigan KM, Graham JW: Role of the self-image and smoker stereotype in smoking onset during early adolescence: a longitudinal study. Health Psychol 1996;15:494–497.
  33. Spijkerman R, Van den Eijnden RJJM, Vitale S, Engels RC: Explaining adolescents’ smoking and drinking behavior: the concept of smoker and drinker prototypes in relation to variables of the theory of planned behavior. Addict Behav 2004;29:1615–1622.
  34. Aloise-Young PA, Hennigan KM: Self-image, the smoker stereotype and cigarette smoking: developmental patterns from fifth through eighth grade. J Adolesc 1996;19:163–177.
  35. Spijkerman R, van den Eijnden RJ, Vitale S, Engels RC: Explaining adolescents’ smoking and drinking behavior: the concept of smoker and drinker prototypes in relation to variables of the theory of planned behavior. Addict Behav 2004;29:1615–1622.
  36. Spijkerman R, van den Eijnden RJ, Engels RC: Self-comparison processes, prototypes, and smoking onset among early adolescents. Prev Med 2005;40:785–794.
  37. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL: Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  38. Engels RC, Knibbe RA, de Vries H, Drop MJ: Antecedents of smoking cessation among adolescents: Who is motivated to change? Prevent Med 1998;27:348–357.
  39. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S: The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Publ Health 1994;84:1086–1093.
  40. Dolcini MM, Adler NE, Ginsberg D: Factors influencing agreement between self-reports and biological measures of smoking among adolescents. J Res Adolesc 1996;6:515–542.
  41. Hunter SM, Webber LS, Berenson GS: Cigarette smoking and tobacco usage behavior in children with adolescents: Bogalusa Heart Study. Prevent Med 1980;9:701–712.
  42. Frissen D, Willemsen MC: Imago van niet-rokende jongeren verbeterd [Image of nonsmoking adolescents has improved]. Defactor 2002;April.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50