Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 212, No. 4, 2006
Issue release date: May 2006
Dermatology 2006;212:354–360

Dermoscopic Features of Congenital Melanocytic Nevus and Becker Nevus in an Adult Male Population: An Analysis with a 10-Fold Magnification

Ingordo V. · Iannazzone S.S. · Cusano F. · Naldi L.
aDepartment of Dermatology, Italian Navy Main Hospital G. Venticinque, Taranto, bDepartment of Dermatology, G. Rummo Hospital, Benevento, and cCoordinating Center, Italian Group for Epidemiological Research in Dermatology (GISED), Department of Dermatology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: Dermoscopic features of congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) have been mostly assessed by high-resolution videodermoscopy. However, optical dermoscopy with the 10-fold magnification is largely available. In some instances, the differential diagnosis between large CMN and Becker nevus (BN) may be difficult. Objective: The aims of this work were: (1) to assess by dermoscopy with the 10-fold magnification the morphological features which have been previously suggested as useful for the identification of CMN in high-resolution videodermoscopy; (2) to search and point out the dermoscopic features of BN; (3) to explore dermoscopic differences between CMN and BN. Methods: The subjects were observed among about 23,000 consecutive young men assessed at the Draft Council’s Medical Unit of the Italian Navy in Taranto for compulsory recruitment and referred to the Department of Dermatology of the Italian Navy Hospital for dermatological examination. Lesions were examined by the same observer using a dermatoscope with a 10-fold magnification, and both the dermoscopic criteria stated by the international Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy and dermoscopic features previously suggested as useful for the identification of CMN by videodermoscopy were recorded in a predisposed patient’s card. Results: There were 127 male subjects, median age 19 years, with 127 CMN, measuring ≧1.5 to ≤19.9 cm in 78% and ≧20 cm in 22% of cases, and 64 male subjects, median age 19 years, with 64 BN. In the sample of medium-sized and large CMN, dermoscopic features previously identified as characteristic of congenital lesions (i.e. target network, focal thickening of network lines, target globules, skin furrow hypopigmentation, focal hypopigmentation, hair follicles, perifollicular hypopigmentation, vessels and target vessels) were observed in sufficiently high rates. In the BN group, network, focal hypopigmentation, skin furrow hypopigmentation, hair follicles, perifollicular hypopigmentation and vessels were the main dermoscopic features. Focal thickening of network lines, globules, target globules, homogeneous diffuse pigmentation, hyperpigmented areas, blotches and target vessels were more frequently observed in CMN than in BN. Conclusions: (1) The same dermoscopic features observed in small and medium-sized CMN by videodermoscopy with high magnifications are also detectable in medium-sized and large CMN, employing the dermoscopy with the 10-fold magnification. (2) Network, focal, skin furrow and perifollicular hypopigmentation, hair follicles and vessels could be considered as peculiar dermoscopic features of BN. (3) Major differences in the frequency of dermoscopic characteristics were detected between CMN and BN, and dermoscopy seems to provide some diagnostic aid in differentiating CMN from BN in equivocal cases.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Rhodes AR, Albert LS, Weinstock MA: Congenital nevomelanocytic nevi: proportionate area expansion during infancy and early childhood. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:51–62.
  2. Walton RG, Jacobs AH, Cox AJ: Pigmented lesions in newborn infants. Br J Dermatol 1976;95:389–396.
  3. Lorenz S, Maier C, Segerer H, Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U: Skin changes in newborn infants in the first five days of life. Hautarzt 2000;51:396–400.
  4. Castilla EE, da Graca-Dutra M, Orioli-Parreiras IM: Epidemiology of congenital pigmented nevi. I. Incidence rates and relative frequencies. Br J Dermatol 1981;104:307–315.
  5. Alper J, Holmes LB, Mihm MC Jr: Birthmarks with serious medical significance: nevocellular nevi, sebaceous nevi, and multiple café au lait spots. J Pediatr 1979;95:696–700.
  6. Kopf AW, Bart RS, Hennessey P: Congenital nevi and malignant melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979;1:123–130.
  7. Sober AJ, Burstein JM: Precursors to skin cancer. Cancer 1995;75:645–650.
  8. Marghoob AA, Schoenbach SP, Kopf AW, Orlow SJ, Nossa R, Bart RS: Large congenital melanocytic nevi and the risk for the development of malignant melanoma: a prospective study. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:170–175.
  9. DeDavid M, Orlow SJ, Provost N, Marghoob AA, Rao BK, Huangh CL, Wasti Q, Kopf AW, Bart SR: A study of large congenital melanocytic nevi and associated malignant melanomas: review of cases in the New York University Registry and the world literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;36:409–416.
  10. Bittencourt FV, Marghoob AA, Kopf AW, Koenig KL, Bart RS: Large congenital melanocytic nevi and the risk for development of malignant melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis. Pediatrics 2000;736–741.
  11. Rhodes AR, Sober AJ, Day CL, Melski JW, Harrist TJ, Mihm MC Jr, Fitzpatrick TB: The malignant potential of small congenital nevocellular naevi. An estimate of association based on a histologic study of 234 primary cutaneous melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982;6:230–241.
  12. Illig L, Weidner F, Hundeiker M, Gartmann H, Biess B, Leyh F, Eberhard P: Congenital nevi less than or equal to 10 cm as precursors to melanoma: 52 cases, a review, and a new conception. Arch Dermatol 1985;121:1274–1281.
  13. Sahin S, Levin L, Kopf AW, Rao BK, Triola M, Koenig K, Huang C, Bart R: Risk of melanoma in medium-sized congenital melanocytic nevi: a follow-up study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:428–433.
  14. Makkar HS, Frieden IJ: Congenital melanocytic nevi: an update for the paediatrician. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002;14:397–403.
  15. Tannous ZS, Mihm MC Jr, Sober AJ, Duncan LM: Congenital melanocytic nevi: clinical and histopathologic features, risk of melanoma, and clinical management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52:197–203.
  16. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, Binder M, Cerroni L, De Rosa G, Ferrara G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Landthaler M, Menzies SW, Pehamberger H, Piccolo D, Rabinovitz HS, Schiffner R, Staibano S, Stolz W, Bartenjev I, Blum A, Braun R, Cabo H, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Fleming MG, Katz B, Kenet RO, Kittler H, Kreusch J, Malvehy J, Mazzocchetti G, Oliviero M, Ozdemir F, Peris K, Perotti R, Perusquia A, Pizzichetta MA, Puig S, Rao B, Rubegni P, Saida T, Scalvenzi M, Seidenari S, Stanganelli I, Tanaka M, Westerhoff K, Wolf IH, Braun-Falco O, Kerl H, Nishikawa T, Wolff K, Kopf AW: Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:679–693.
  17. Braun RP, Calza AM, Krischer J, Saurat JH: The use of digital dermoscopy for the follow-up of congenital nevi: a pilot study. Pediatr Dermatol 2001;18:277–281.
  18. Seidenari S, Pellacani G: Surface microscopy features of congenital nevi. Clin Dermatol 2002;20:263–267.
  19. Seidenari S, Martella A, Pellacani G: Polarized light-surface microscopy for description and classification of small and medium-sized congenital melanocytic naevi. Acta Derm Venereol 2003;83:1–6.
  20. Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Martella A, Giusti F, Argenziano G, Buccini P, Carli P, Catricalà C, De Giorgi V, Ferrari A, Ingordo V, Manganoni AM, Peris K, Piccolo D, Pizzichetta MG: Instrument-, age-, and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic nevi: a multicenter study. Br J Dermatol, in press.
  21. Tulli A, Laraia P, Capizzi R, Massi G: Nuovi aspetti del nevo congenito melanocitico mediante videodermatoscopia amplificata a 250 ingrandimenti. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 1999;134:289–293.
  22. Ciampo L, Mazzotta F, Scanni G, Milano A, Bonifazi E: Aspetti dermoscopici dei nevi melanocitari congeniti: componente pilare e ipopigmentazione focale. Eur J Pediatr Dermatol 2004;14:77–84.
  23. Becker W: Concurrent melanosis and hypertrichosis in distribution of nevus unius lateris. Arch Dermatol 1949;60:155–160.
  24. Copeman PWM, Wilson Jones E: Pigmented hairy epidermal nevus (Becker). Arch Dermatol 1965;92:249–251.
  25. Haneke E: The dermal component in melanosis naeviformis Becker. J Cutan Pathol 1979;6:53–58.
  26. Hurbanek RW, Johnson WC: Smooth muscle hamartoma associated with Becker’s nevus. Arch Dermatol 1978;114:104–106.
  27. Tymen R, Forestier JF, Boutet B, Colomb D: Naevus tardif de Becker: à propos d’une série de 100 observations. Ann Dermatol Vénéréol (Paris) 1981;108:41–46.
  28. de Almeida HL Jr, Happle R: Two cases of cephalic Becker nevus with asymmetrical growth of beard or scalp hair. Dermatology 2003;207:337–338.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50