Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 19, No. 6, 2006
Issue release date: November 2006
Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2006;19:296–302

The pH of the Skin Surface and Its Impact on the Barrier Function

Schmid-Wendtner M.-H. · Korting H.C.
Departments of Dermatology and Allergology,aRheinische Friedrich Wilhelm University, Bonn, and bLudwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


The ‘acid mantle’ of the stratum corneum seems to be important for both permeability barrier formation and cutaneous antimicrobial defense. However, the origin of the acidic pH, measurable on the skin surface, remains conjectural. Passive and active influencing factors have been proposed, e.g. eccrine and sebaceous secretions as well as proton pumps. In recent years, numerous investigations have been published focusing on the changes in the pH of the deeper layers of the stratum corneum, as well as on the influence of physiological and pathological factors. The pH of the skin follows a sharp gradient across the stratum corneum, which is suspected to be important in controlling enzymatic activities and skin renewal. The skin pH is affected by a great number of endogenous factors, e.g. skin moisture, sweat, sebum, anatomic site, genetic predisposition and age. In addition, exogenous factors like detergents, application of cosmetic products, occlusive dressings as well as topical antibiotics may influence the skin pH. Changes in the pH are reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of skin diseases like irritant contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, ichthyosis, acne vulgaris and Candida albicans infections. Therefore, the use of skin cleansing agents, especially synthetic detergents with a pH of about 5.5, may be of relevance in the prevention and treatment of those skin diseases.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Heuss E: Die Reaktion des Schweisses beim gesunden Menschen. Monatschr Prakt Dermatol 1892;14:341–343.
  2. Schade H, Marchionini A: Der Säuremantel der Haut (nach Gaskettenmessung). Klin Wochenschr 1928;7:12–14.
  3. Blank HI: Measurement of pH of the skin surface. J Invest Dermatol 1939;2:67–79.
  4. Schirren CG: Does the glass-electrode determine the same pH values on the skin surface as a quinhydrone electrode? J Invest Dermatol 1955;24:485–488.
  5. Tronnier A: Seifen und Syndets in der Hautpflege und Therapie. Ärztl Kosmetol 1985;15:19–30.
  6. Zlotogorski A: Distribution of skin surface pH on the forehead and cheek of adults. Arch Dermatol Res 1987;398–401.
  7. Braun-Falco O, Korting HC: Der normale pH-Wert der Haut. Hautarzt 1986;37:126–129.
  8. Dikstein S, Zlotogorski A: Measurements of skin pH. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994;(suppl 185):18–20.
  9. Redoules D, Tarroux R, Perie J: Epidermal enzymes: their role in homeostasis and their relationship with dermatoses. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 1998;11:183–192.
  10. Mauro T, Holleran WM, Grayson S, et al: Barrier recovery is impeded at neutral pH, independent of ionic effects: implications for extracellular lipid processing. Arch Dermatol Res 1998;290:215–222.
  11. Bouwstra JA, Gooris GS, Dubhelaar FER, et al: pH, cholesterol sulfate, and fatty acids affect the stratum corneum lipid organization. J Invest Dermatol 1998;3:69–74.
  12. Leyvraz C, Charles RP, Rubera I, et al: The epidermal barrier function is dependent on the serine protease CAP 1/Prss8. J Cell Biol 2005;170:487–496.
  13. Vahlquist A: Variations in skin pH during normal and pathological keratinisation. Retinoids 1999;139:855–857.
  14. Fluhr JW, Kao J, Jain M, et al: Generation of free fatty acids from phospholipids regulates stratum corneum acidification and integrity. J Invest Dermatol 2001;117:44–51.
  15. Elias P: Stratum corneum architecture, metabolic activity and interactivity with subjacent barrier function. Br J Dermatol 1996;5:191–201.
  16. Rippke F, Schreiner V, Schwanitz HJ: The acidic milieu of the horny layer. New findings on the physiology and pathophysiology of skin pH. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;3:261–272.

    External Resources

  17. Parra JL, Paye M: EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin surface pH. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2003;16:188–202.
  18. Yosipovitch G, Maibach HI: Skin surface pH: a protective acid mantle. Cosmet Toiletries 1996;111:101–102.
  19. Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Munson KA, et al: Changes in diapered and non-diapered infant skin over the first month of life. Pediatr Dermatol 2000;17:45–51.
  20. Yosipovitch G, Maayan-Metzger A, Merlob P, et al: Skin barrier properties in different body areas in neonates. Pediatrics 2000;106:105–108.
  21. Hoeger PH, Enzmann CC: Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy. Pediatr Dermatol 2002;19:256–262.
  22. Zlotogorski A: Distribution of skin surface pH on the forehead and cheek of adults. Arch Dermatol Res 1987;279:398–401.
  23. Dikstein S, Zlotogorski A: Skin surface hydrogen ion concentration (pH); in Leveque JL (ed): Cutaneous Investigation in Health and Disease. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1989, pp 59–77.
  24. Naissan O, Maibach W, Maibach HI: Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:843–860.
  25. Jacobi U, Gautier J, Sterry W, et al: Gender-related differences in the physiology of the stratum corneum. Dermatology 2005;211:312–317.
  26. Talbert GA: Effect of work and heat on the hydrogen-ion concentration of the sweat. Am J Physiol 1919;50:433.
  27. Korting HC, Braun-Falco O: The effects of detergents on skin pH and its consequences. Clin Dermatol 1995;14:23–27.

    External Resources

  28. Barel AO, Lambrecht R, Clarys P, et al: A comparative study of the effects on the skin of a classical bar soap and a syndet cleansing bar in normal use conditions and in the soap chamber test. Skin Res Technol 2001;7:98–104.
  29. Korting HC, Kober M, Müller M, et al: Influence of repeated washings with soap and synthetic detergents on pH and resident flora of the skin of forehead and forearm. Results of a cross-over trial in health probationers. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1987;67:41–47.
  30. Korting HC, Greiner K, Hübner K, et al: Changes in the skin pH and resident flora by washing with synthetic detergent preparations at pH 5.5 and 8.5. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1991;42:147–158.
  31. Stenzaly-Achtert S, Schölermann A, Schreiber J, et al: Axillary pH and influence of deodorants. Skin Res Technol 2000;6:87–91.
  32. Wickett RR, Trobaugh CM: Personal care products: effect on skin surface pH. Cosmet Toilet 1990;105:41–46.
  33. Hartmann AA: Effect of occlusion on resident flora, skin-moisture and skin-pH. Arch Dermatol Res 1983;275:251–254.
  34. Elsner P, Maibach HI: The effect of prolonged drying on transepidermal water loss, capacitance and pH of human vulvar and forearm skin. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1990;70:105–109.
  35. Schreiner V, Maerker U, Hoppe U: Dependence of barrier repair in human skin on intra- and extracellular pH. J Invest Dermatol 1996;106:917.
  36. Farwanah H, Raith K, Neubert RH, et al: Ceramide profiles of the uninvolved skin in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis are comparable to those of healthy skin. Arch Dermatol Res 2005;296:514–512.
  37. Chao SC, Richard G, Lee JY: Netherton syndrome: report of two Taiwanese siblings with staphylococcal scaled skin syndrome and mutation of SPINK5. Br J Dermatol 2005;152:159–165.
  38. Epprecht R: Elektrometrische Messungen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Säureneutralisation. Dermatologica 1955;111:204–223.
  39. Schnyder UW, Gloor M, Taugner M: İber die sozialmedizinische Bedeutung von Alkaliresistenz, Alkalineutralisation und Hautoberflächenlipidmenge bei Neurodermitis atopica und Ichthyosis vulgaris. Berufsdermatosen 1977;25:101–140.
  40. Eberlein-König B, Schäfer T, Huss-Marp J, et al: Skin surface pH, stratum corneum hydration, trans-epidermal water loss and skin roughness related to atopic eczema and skin dryness in a population of primary school children. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 2000;80:188–191.
  41. Seidenari S, Giusti G: Objective assessment of the skin of children affected by atopic dermatitis and in healthy children: a multicenter study. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1995;75:429–433.
  42. Sparavigna A, Setaro M, Gualandri V: Cutaneous pH in children affected by atopic dermatitis and in healthy children: a multicenter study. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:221–227.

    External Resources

  43. Hara J, Higuchi K, Okamoto R, et al: High-expression of sphingomyelin deacylase is an important determinant of ceramide deficiency leading to barrier disruption in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2000;115:406–413.
  44. Krien PM, Kermici M: Evidence for the existence of a self-regulation enzyme process within the human stratum corneum: an unexpected role for urocanic acid. J Invest Dermatol 2000;115:414–420.
  45. Abeck D, Lauer W, Schmidt T, et al: Age-dependent differences of histidine urocanic acid and urocanic isomers concentration in atopic eczema (abstract). J Invest Dermatol 1996;107:468.
  46. Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI: Susceptibility to irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulphate. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:122–124.
  47. Francomano MA, Mantovani L, Pepe P, et al: Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin (abstract). Skin Res Technol 1996;2:225.
  48. Gfatter R, Hackl P, Braun F: Effects of soap and detergents on skin surface pH, stratum corneum hydration and fat content in infants. Dermatology 1997;195:258–262.
  49. Öhmann H, Vahlquist A: The pH gradient over the stratum corneum differs in X-linked recessive and autosomal dominant ichthyosis: a clue to the molecular origin of the acid skin mantle? J Invest Dermatol 1998;111:674–677.
  50. Menon GK, Ghadially R, Williams ML, et al: Lamellar bodies as delivery systems of hydrolytic enzymes: implications for normal and abnormal desquamation. Br J Dermatol 1992;126:337–345.
  51. Yosipovitch G, Tur E, Cohen O, et al: Skin surface pH in intertriginous areas in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. Diabetes Care 1993;16:560–563.
  52. Yosipovitch G, Tur E, Morduchowitz G, et al: Skin surface pH, moisture, and pruritus in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993;8:1129–1132.
  53. Runeman B, Faergemann J, Larkö O: Experimental Candida albicans lesions in healthy humans: dependence on skin pH. Acta Derm Venereol 2000;80:421–424.
  54. Gfatter R, Hackl P, Braun F: Effects of soap and detergents on skin surface pH, stratum corneum hydration and fat content in infants. Dermatology 1997;195:258–262.
  55. Mücke H, Mohr KT, Rümmler A, et al: Untersuchungen über den Haut-pH-Wert der Hand nach Anwendung von Seife, Reinigungs- und Händedesinfektionsmitteln. Pharmazie 1993;48:468–469.
  56. Keining E: Zur Frage der Reinigung gesunder und kranker Haut. Dermatol Wochenschr 1959;46:1245–1251.
  57. Korting HC, Ponce-Pöschl E, Klövekorn W, et al: The influence of the regular use of a soap or an acidic syndet bar on pre-acne. Infection 1995;23:89–93.
  58. Turner RB, Biedermann KA, Morgan JM, et al: Efficacy of organic acids in hand cleansers for prevention of rhinovirus infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;46:2595–2598.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50