Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 50, No. 5, 2006
Issue release date: September 2006
Ann Nutr Metab 2006;50:450–460

Comparison of Women’s Diet Assessed by FFQs and 24-Hour Recalls with and without Underreporters: Associations with Biomarkers

Olafsdottir A.S. · Thorsdottir I. · Gunnarsdottir I. · Thorgeirsdottir H. · Steingrimsdottir L.
aUnit for Nutrition Research, Landspitali – University Hospital & Department of Food Science, University of Iceland, and bPublic Health Institute of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background/Aims: Women’s diet can be especially difficult to assess, as women tend to underreport their intakes more often than men and are more likely to do so if they think they are overweight or obese. The aim was to compare two methods to assess women’s diet and how well they associate with biomarkers. The influence and frequency of underreporting was also investigated. Methods: Diet of 53 women was assessed by two 24-hour recalls and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Blood was analyzed for retinol, β-carotene, vitamin C and serum ferritin, and 24-hour urine for nitrogen, potassium and sodium. Underreporting was evaluated with nitrogen excretion vs. intake, and energy intake vs. basal metabolic rate. Results: Energy percent (E%) from macronutrients was similar from FFQ and 24-hour recalls, but total intake was higher from 24-hour recalls (9,516 ± 2,080 vs. 8,183 ± 2,893 kJ, p < 0.01). Intakes of vitamin C and potassium from both methods correlated with their respective biomarkers (r = 0.316–0.393). Underreporters had higher body mass index (BMI) than others (27.7 ± 5.5 vs. 23.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2, p < 0.05). They reported lower E% total fat (32 ± 5 vs. 38 ± 6 E%, p < 0.01) and higher E% carbohydrate (49 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 7 E%, p < 0.05). Correlation between intake and biomarkers increased after exclusion of underreporters. Conclusion: For women, FFQ and 24-hour recalls give similar E% and most nutrients correlate, but FFQ gives lower intake. Underreporters have higher BMI and diminish the correlation between calculated intake and biomarkers. This has to be considered when intake data are associated with weight management, disease and lifestyle factors.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. World Health Organization (WHO): Obesity. Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of the WHO Consultation on Obesity, Geneva, June 3–5 1997. Geneva, WHO, 1998.
  2. Thorgeirsdottir H, Steingrimsdottir L, Olafsson Ö, Gudnason V: Trends in overweight and obesity in 45- to 64-year-old men and women in Reykjavik 1975–1994. Læknabladid 2001;87:699–704.
  3. Gudmundsdottir SL, Oskarsdottir D, Franzson L, Indridason OS, Sigurdsson G: The relationship between physical activity, body mass index, body composition and grip strength in an Icelandic population. Læknabladid 2004;90:479–486.
  4. Briefel RR, McDowell MA, Alaimo K, Caughman CR, Bischof AL, Carroll MD, Johnson CL: Total energy intake of the US population: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:1072s–1080s.
  5. Macdiarmid J, Blundell J: Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of underreporting. Nutr Res Rev 1998;11:231–253.

    External Resources

  6. Kaaks RJ: Biochemical markers as additional measurements in studies of the accuracy of dietary questionnaire measurements: conceptual issues. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:1232S–1239S.
  7. Willett W: Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998.
  8. Isaksson B: Urinary nitrogen as a validity test in dietary surveys. Am J Clin Nutr 1980;33:4–12.
  9. Plummer M, Kaaks R: Commentary: an OPEN assessment of dietary measurement errors. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1062–1063.
  10. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carrol RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, Bingham S, Schoeller DA, Troiano RP, Freedman LS: A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1054–1062.
  11. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Prentice AM: Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology. 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991;45:569–581.
  12. Johansson L, Solvoll K, Bjorneboe GE, Drevon CA: Under- and overreporting of energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:266–274.
  13. Bingham SA: Urine nitrogen as a biomarker for the validation of dietary protein intake. J Nutr 2003;133:3:921s.
  14. Thorsdottir I, Gunnarsdottir I, Palsson GI: Association of birth weight and breast-feeding with coronary heart disease risk factors at the age of 6 years. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2003;13:267–272.
  15. Gunnarsdottir I, Thorsdottir I: Relationship between growth and feeding in infancy and body mass index at the age of 6 years. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:1523–1527.
  16. Steingrimsdottir L, Thorgeirsdottir H, Olafsdottir AS: Icelandic National Nutrition Survey 2002. Reykjavik, Public Health Institute of Iceland, 2003.
  17. Sigurdsson G, Franzson L, Steingrimsdottir L, Sigvaldason H: The association between parathyroid hormone, vitamin D and bone mineral density in 70-year-old Icelandic women. Osteoporosis Int 2000;11:1031–1035.
  18. Black AE: Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1119–1130.
  19. Black AE, Bingham SA, Johansson G, Coward WA: Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24-hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997;51:405–413.
  20. World Health Organization (WHO): Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO Tech Rep Ser 724. Geneva, WHO, 1985.
  21. Bingham SA, Williams DRR, Cole TJ, Price CP, Cummings JH: Reference values for analyses of 24-hour urine samples known to be complete. Ann Clin Biochem 1988;25:610–619.
  22. Johansson G, Bingham S, Vahter M: A method to compensate for incomplete 24-hour urine collections in nutritional epidemiology studies. Public Health Nutr 1999;2:587–591.
  23. Bingham S, Cummings JH: The use of 4-aminobenzoic acid as a marker to validate the completeness of 24-hour urine collections in man. Clin Sci 1983;64:629–633.
  24. Johnston-Miller S: The nitrogen balance revisited. Hosp Pharm 1990;25:247–249.
  25. Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ: Operator’s manual IL 943 Flame Photometer. Instrumentation Laboratory. Clinical Chemistry. Theory, analysis and correlation, 1989.
  26. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307–310.
  27. Thompson FE, Byers T: Dietary assessment resource manual. J Nutr 1994;124:2245s–2317s.
  28. Masson LF, McNeill G, Tomany JO, Simpson JA, Peace HS, Wei L, Grubb DA, Bolton-Smith C: Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the κ statistic. Public Health Nutr 2003;6:313–321.
  29. Michels KB, Welch AA, Luben R, Bingham SA, Day NE: Measurement of fruit and vegetable consumption with diet questionnaires and implications for analyses and interpretation. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:987–994.
  30. Johansson I, Hallmans G, Wikman A, Biessy C, Riboli E, Kaaks R: Validation and calibration of food-frequency questionnaire measurements in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease cohort. Public Health Nutr 2002;5:487–496.
  31. Nordic Council of Ministers. The NORBAGREEN 2002 study: Consumption of vegetables, potatoes, fruit, bread and fish in the Nordic and Baltic countries. ThemaNord, 2003, vol 556.
  32. Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P, McGurire V, Cousins M, Stewart E, de Ramos M, Hewitt D, Grambsch PV, Kassim N, Little JA: Sources of variance in 24-hour recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am J Clin Nutr 1979;32:2546–2549.
  33. Le Marchand L, Hankin JH, Carter FS, Essling C, Luffey D, Franke AA, Wilkens LR, Cooney RV, Kolonel LN: A pilot study on the use of plasma carotenoids and ascorbic acid as markers of compliance to a high fruit and vegetable dietary intervention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:245–251.
  34. Knutsen SF, Fraser GE, Linsted KD, Beeson WL, Shavlik DJ: Comparing biological measurements of vitamin C, folate, α-tocopherol and carotene with 24-hour dietary recall information in non-Hispanic blacks and whites. Ann Epidemiol 2001;11:406–416.
  35. Willet WC, Stampfer MJ, Underwood BA, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH: Vitamins A, E and carotene: effects of supplementation of their plasma levels. Am J Clin Nutr 1983;38:559–566.

    External Resources

  36. Forman MR, Lanza E, Yong LC, Holden JM, Graubard BI, Beecher GR, Meltiz M, Brown ED, Smith JC: The correlation between two dietary assessments of carotenoid intake and plasma carotenoid concentrations: application of a carotenoid food-composition database. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;58:519–524.
  37. McKeown NM, Day NE, Welch AA, Runswick SA, Luben RN, Mulligan AA, McTaggart A, Bingham SA: Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:188–196.
  38. Qvist I, Norden A, Olofsson T: Serum ferritin in the elderly. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1980;40:609–613.
  39. Milman N, Mathiassen B, Bohm J, Hansen JC: Serum ferritin in a Greenlandic Inuit hunter population from the Thule district. Arctic Med Res 1992;51:10–15.
  40. Joosten E, Vanderelst B, Kerkhofs P, De Boeck S: Does dietary iron intake influence the iron status in hospitalised elderly patients? J Nutr Health Aging 1999;3:8–10.
  41. Samuelsson G, Bratteby LE, Berggren K, Elverby JE, Kempe B: Dietary iron intake and iron status in adolescents. Acta Paediatr 1996;85:1033–1038.
  42. Cook JD, Skikne BS: Serum ferritin: a possible model for the assessment of nutrient stores. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;35:1180–1185.
  43. Ballard-Barbash R, Graubard I, Krebs-Smith SM, Schatzkin A, Thompson FE: Contribution of dieting to the inverse association between energy intake and body mass index. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996;50:98–106.
  44. Horner NK, Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Lampe JW, Beresford SA, Prentice RL: Participant characteristics associated with errors in self-reported energy intake from the Women’s Health Initiative food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:766–773.
  45. Høidrup S, Andreassen AH, Osler M, Pedersen AN, Jørgensen LM, Jørgensen T, Schroll M, Heitmann BL: Assessment of habitual energy and macronutrient intake in adults: comparison of a seven day food record with a dietary history interview. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002;56:105–113.
  46. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, Midthune D, Schoeller DA, Bingham S, Sharbaugh CO, Trabulsi J, Runswick S, Ballard-Barbash R, Sunshine J, Schatzkin A: Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:1–13.
  47. Lichtman SW, Pisarska K, Berman ER, Pestone M, Dowling H, Offenbacher E, Weisel H, Heshka S, Matthews DE, Heymsfield SB: Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1893–1898.
  48. Scagliusi FB, Polacow VO, Artioli GG, Benatti FB, Lancha AH: Selective underreporting of energy intake in women: magnitude, determinants, and effect of training. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;103:1306–1313.
  49. Braam AJLM, Ocké MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, Seidell JC: Determinants of obesity-related underreporting of energy intake. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:1081–1086.
  50. Krebs-Smith SM, Graubard B, Kahle LL, Subar AF, Cleveland LE, Ballard-Barbash R: Low energy reporters vs. others: a comparison of reported food intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54:281–287.
  51. Heerstrass DW, Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PHM, Seidell JC: Underreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake in relation to body mass index. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:186.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50