Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 74, No. 2, 2006
Issue release date: February 2007
Digestion 2006;74:118–125
(DOI:10.1159/000098177)

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Müller-Nordhorn J. · Roll S. · Böhmig M. · Nocon M. · Reich A. · Braun C. · Noesselt L. · Wiedenmann B. · Willich S.N. · Brüggenjürgen B.
aInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics and bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive cancer with low survival time, with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) being of major importance. The aim of our study was to assess both generic and disease-specific HRQoL in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer were consecutively included at admission to hospital. HRQoL was determined with the disease-specific European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and generic EuroQoL (EQ-5D) health status instruments. Scores of patients were compared to those of norm populations. The association of symptoms with overall HRQoL was analysed using linear regression. Results: A total of 45 patients with pancreatic cancer were included. The mean age was 64 years, 53% were females. Of all patients, 44% had metastases at the time of admission. HRQoL was significantly impaired for most EORTC and EQ-5D scales in comparison to norm populations. Symptoms of fatigue (–0.34 regression coefficient; 95% CI –0.63, –0.11) and pain (–0.21; 95% CI –0.39, –0.02) were significantly associated with impaired overall HRQoL. Conclusions: HRQoL was severely impaired in patients with pancreatic cancer. Symptom control and palliative care appear to be of particular importance.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Faivre J, Forman D, Esteve J, Obradovic M, Sant M: Survival of patients with primary liver cancer, pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer in Europe. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:2184–2190.
  2. Du W, Touchette D, Vaitkevicius VK, Peters WP, Shields AF. Cost analysis of pancreatic carcinoma treatment. Cancer 2000;89:1917–1924.
  3. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2004;363:1049–1057.
  4. Schmier J, Elixhauser A, Halpern MT: Health-related quality of life evaluations of gastric and pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:1998–2004.
  5. Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ: Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 2001;88:643–652.
  6. Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD: Quality of life after treatment of pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:145–151.
  7. Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Oates J, Cunningham D: Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies? Eur J Cancer 1998;34:503–509.
  8. Kelsen DP, Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Niedzwiecki D, Passik SD, Tao Y, et al: Pain and depression in patients with newly diagnosed pancreas cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:748–755.
  9. Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjoden PO, Jacobsson G, Sellstrom H, Enander LK, et al: Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol 1996;7:593–600.
  10. McLeod RS, Taylor BR, O’Connor BI, Greenberg GR, Jeejeebhoy KN, Royall D, et al: Quality of life, nutritional status, and gastrointestinal hormone profile following the Whipple procedure. Am J Surg 1995;169:179–185.
  11. Luman W, Cull A, Palmer KR: Quality of life in patients stented for malignant biliary obstructions. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997;9:481–484.
  12. Labori KJ, Hjermstad MJ, Wester T, Buanes T, Loge JH: Symptom profiles and palliative care in advanced pancreatic cancer – a prospective study. Support Care Cancer 2006;Epub ahead of print April 7.
  13. Billings BJ, Christein JD, Harmsen WS, Harrington JR, Chari ST, Que FG, et al: Quality-of-life after total pancreatectomy: is it really that bad on long-term follow-up? J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1059–1066.
  14. Warnick SJ Jr, Velanovich V: Correlation of patient-derived utility values and quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:906–911.
  15. Roberts J, Dolan P: To what extent do people prefer health states with higher values? A note on evidence from the EQ-5D valuation set. Health Econ 2004;13:733–737.
  16. Müller-Nordhorn J, Brüggenjürgen B, Böhmig M, Selim D, Reich A, Noesselt L, et al: Direct and indirect costs in a prospective cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;22:405–415.
  17. Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337–343.
  18. Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJ, Graf von der Schulenburg JM: Validating the EQ-5D with time trade-off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ 2005;6:124–130.
  19. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–376.
  20. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, ed 5. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1997.
  21. Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095–1108.
  22. König HH, Bernert S, Angermeyer MC: Health Status of the German population: results of a representative survey using the EuroQol questionnaire (in German). Gesundheitswesen 2005;67:173–182.
  23. Schwarz R, Hinz A: Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1345–1351.
  24. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J: Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:139–144.
  25. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 1995;57:289–300.
  26. Homs MY, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ, Steyerberg EW, Siersema PD: Quality of life after palliative treatment for oesophageal carcinoma – a prospective comparison between stent placement and single dose brachytherapy. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:1862–1871.
  27. Conner-Spady BL, Cumming C, Nabholtz JM, Jacobs P, Stewart D: A longitudinal prospective study of health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;36:251–259.
  28. Wildi SM, Cox MH, Clark LL, Turner R, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, et al: Assessment of health state utilities and quality of life in patients with malignant esophageal Dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1044–1049.
  29. Van den Hout WB, van der Linden YM, Steenland E, Wiggenraad RG, Kievit J, de Haes H, Leer JW: Single- versus multiple-fraction radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases: cost-utility analysis based on a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:222–229.
  30. Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ, Madalinska JB, Kirkels WJ, Habbema JD, et al: Five-year follow-up of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2005;116:291–296.
  31. Trippoli S, Vaiani M, Lucioni C, Messori A: Quality of life and utility in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Quality-of-life Study Group of the Master 2 Project in Pharmacoeconomics. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19:855–863.
  32. Conroy T, Paillot B, Francois E, Bugat R, Jacob JH, Stein U, et al: Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer – a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1228–1236.
  33. Francois E, Hebbar M, Bennouna J, Mayeur D, Perrier H, Dorval E, et al: A phase II trial of raltitrexed (Tomudex) in advanced pancreatic and biliary carcinoma. Oncology 2005;68:299–305.
  34. Ekstrom K, Hoffman K, Linne T, Eriksson B, Glimelius B: Single-dose etoposide in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer, a phase II study. Oncol Rep 1998;5:931–934.
  35. Halford S, Yip D, Karapetis CS, Strickland AH, Steger A, Khawaja HT, et al: A phase II study evaluating the tolerability and efficacy of CAELYX (liposomal doxorubicin, Doxil) in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1399–1402.
  36. Wenger FA, Jacobi CA, Haubold K, Zieren HU, Muller JM: Gastrointestinal quality of life after duodenopancreatectomy in pancreatic carcinoma. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study: pancreatoduodenectomy or pylorus[-]preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (in German). Chirurg 1999;70:1454–1459.
  37. http://www.eortc.be/home/qol/manuals.htm. European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer, 2006. Ref Type: Internet Communication.
  38. Saltzburg D, Foley KM: Management of pain in pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1989;69:629–649.
  39. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S: The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 2001;10:19–28.
  40. Kiss A, Meryn S: Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer. BMJ 2001;323:1055–1058.
  41. Volkers N: In coping with cancer, gender matters. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1712–1714.
  42. Kaasa S, Loge JH: Quality-of-life assessment in palliative care. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:175–182.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50