Objective: It was our aim to evaluate the usefulness of napsin A and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) in the differential diagnosis of metastatic pulmonary and non-pulmonary adenocarcinomas (ACs) in pleural effusion. Study Design: A total of 84 pleural effusion fluid cell blocks were collected from metastatic ACs. There were 53 pulmonary ACs and 31 non-pulmonary ACs. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against napsin A and TTF-1. Results: Napsin A was positive in 44/53 (83%) cases of pulmonary ACs, and TTF-1 was positive in 30/53 (57%) cases of pulmonary ACs. All non-pulmonary ACs were negative for napsin A and TTF-1. Napsin A showed a reactivity in >75% of the tumor cells in 36 of the 44 positive cases (82%), whereas TTF-1 showed a reactivity in >75% of the tumor cells only in 6 of the 30 positive cases (20%; p < 0.01). Poorly differentiated pulmonary ACs expressed napsin A (73%) more frequently than TTF-1 (53%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.45). Conclusion: We conclude that napsin A is superior to TTF-1 with regard to distinguishing between metastatic pulmonary and non-pulmonary ACs in cell blocks prepared from malignant pleural effusions.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: 4/27/2011
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2
ISSN: 0001-5547 (Print)
eISSN: 1938-2650 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/ACY
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.