For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
Utility of Napsin A and Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 in Differentiating Metastatic Pulmonary from Non-Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma in Pleural EffusionKim J.-H.a · Kim Y.-S.a · Choi Y.-D.b · Lee J.-S.b · Park C.-S.b
aDepartment of Pathology, Jeju National University Medical School, Jeju, and bDepartment of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea Corresponding Author
Correspondence to: Chang-Soo Park
Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School
No. 5 Hak-dong, Dong-gu
Gwangju 501-749 (Korea)
Tel. +82 62 220 4302, E-Mail email@example.com
Objective: It was our aim to evaluate the usefulness of napsin A and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) in the differential diagnosis of metastatic pulmonary and non-pulmonary adenocarcinomas (ACs) in pleural effusion. Study Design: A total of 84 pleural effusion fluid cell blocks were collected from metastatic ACs. There were 53 pulmonary ACs and 31 non-pulmonary ACs. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against napsin A and TTF-1. Results: Napsin A was positive in 44/53 (83%) cases of pulmonary ACs, and TTF-1 was positive in 30/53 (57%) cases of pulmonary ACs. All non-pulmonary ACs were negative for napsin A and TTF-1. Napsin A showed a reactivity in >75% of the tumor cells in 36 of the 44 positive cases (82%), whereas TTF-1 showed a reactivity in >75% of the tumor cells only in 6 of the 30 positive cases (20%; p < 0.01). Poorly differentiated pulmonary ACs expressed napsin A (73%) more frequently than TTF-1 (53%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.45). Conclusion: We conclude that napsin A is superior to TTF-1 with regard to distinguishing between metastatic pulmonary and non-pulmonary ACs in cell blocks prepared from malignant pleural effusions.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel