Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) in the diagnosis of different stages of prostatic cancer (CaP) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of serum TPS in respect to total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free/total (f/t) PSA ratio. Patients and Methods: Patients with BPH (n = 58), localized CaP (n = 37) and metastatic CaP (n = 16) were compared by measuring serum TPS, tPSA and f/t PSA ratio. Results: Serum TPS was significantly increased only in patients with metastatic CaP (p < 0.05) and TPS levels was not significantly different between patients with BPH and localized CaP. Both f/tPSA and tPSA showed better sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating curve analysis in the differential diagnosis of BPH and localized CaP. Conclusion: In conclusion, serum TPS measurement was found to be significantly increased in metastatic prostatic carcinoma cases but was not useful in the early detection of prostatic carcinoma. Although there are several studies demonstrating the usefulness of TPS in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer, there is increasing evidence for the use of this molecule in the late period of the disease or as an adjunct to other molecules in the detection of recurrences.

Keywords:
Tissue polypeptide specific antigen, Prostate cancer, Metastatic, Prostate-specific antigen
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.