Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Original Paper

Electromyographic Activity of the Uterus Above the Placental Implantation Site

Kavšek G. · Pajntar M. · Leskošek B.

Author affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Related Articles for ""

Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;48:81–84

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: August 13, 1999
Issue release date: August 1999

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0378-7346 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-002X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GOI

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the uterus concerning the placental implantation site. In a clinical trial, 55 pregnant women in the last trimester of pregnancy were enrolled. They were divided into two major groups: 25 women had placental implantation site on the anterior and 30 women on the posterior uterine wall. With regard to the presence/nonpresence of contractions, each group was further divided into two subgroups. Uterine EMG activity was recorded by electrodes placed on the abdominal wall. All signals were transferred through a series of amplifiers. Amplified and filtered EMG signals were digitized and written on a hard disk, simultaneously with the signals of external tocodynamometry. From the 30-min EMG recording, we calculated the average root mean square (RMS) and the average median frequency (MF) of the signal. A significant difference of the abdominal EMG activity concerning the placental implantation site was found only in pregnant women with contractions. The RMS was significantly lower in the placental implantation site on the anterior uterine wall, whereas the MF was significantly higher. It can be concluded that the placental implantation site influences the uterine EMG activity registered through the abdominal wall, especially when registered above the placental implantation site.




Related Articles:


References

  1. Pušenjak S: EMG uterusa v latentni in v aktivni fazi poroda (Uterine EMG activity in the latent and active phase of labour); Thesis, Ljubljana 1993.
  2. Wolfs G, van Leeuwen M: Electromyographic observation on the human uterus during labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979;90:5–61.
  3. Kumar D, Barnes C: Studies in human myometrium during pregnancy. II. Resting membrane potential and comparative electrolyte levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;82:736–741.
  4. Kuriyama H, Csapo AI: A study of the parturient uterus with the microelectrode technique. Endocrinology 1961;68:1010–1025.
  5. Osa T, Katase T: Physiological comparison of longitudinal and circular muscles of the pregnant rat uterus. Jpn J Physiol 1975;25:153–164.
    External Resources
  6. Osa T: An interaction between the electrical activities of longitudinal and circular smooth muscles of pregnant rat uterus. Jpn J Physiol 1974;24:189–203.
    External Resources
  7. Pajntar M, Roškar E, Rudel D: Electromyographic observations on the human cervix during labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:691–697.
    External Resources
  8. Sakaguchi M, Nakajima A: Electromyogram of the human uterus in labour. J Appl Physiol 1973;35:423–426.
    External Resources
  9. Devedeux D, Marque C, Mansour S, Germain G, Duchene J: Uterine electromyography: A critical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1636–1653.
  10. Hon EHG, Davis CD: Cutaneous and uterine electrical potentials in labour – An experiment. Obstet Gynecol 1958;12:47–53.
  11. Marque C, Duchene J, Lecrercq S, Panczer G, Chaumont J: Uterine EHG processing for obstetrical monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986;33:1182–1187.
    External Resources
  12. Marque C, Duchene J: Human abdominal EHG processing for uterine contraction monitoring; in Wise DL (ed): Applied Biosensors. Stoneham, Butterworth, 1989, pp 187–226.
  13. Mansour S, Duchene J, Germain G, Marque C: Uterine EMG: Experimental and mathematical determination of the relationship between internal and external recordings. IEEE EMBS 1991;13:485–486.
  14. Mansour S, Devedeux D, Duchene J, Germain G, Marque C: Relevance of external uterine electromyography to contractile process characterization; in Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Engineering and Medicine, Stuttgart, Germany, April 1993. Stuttgart, European Conference on Engineering and Medicine, 1993, pp 370–371.
  15. Jung H: Uterusmotilität unter dem Einfluss der Placenta und ihrer Hormone. Arch Gynäkol 1962;198:145–149.
  16. Gondry J, Marque C, Duchene J, Cabrol D: Electrohysterography during pregnancy: Preliminary report. Biomed Instrum Technol 1993;27:318–324.
    External Resources
  17. Ramondt J, van Kooten C, Verhoeff A, Wallenburg HCS: Computer analysis of mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Med Biol Eng Comput 1986;24:351–355.
    External Resources
  18. Pajntar M, Roškar E, Rudel D: Longitudinally and circulatry measured EMG activity in the human uterine cervix during labour. Acta Physiol Hung 1988;71:497–502.
    External Resources
  19. Demianczuk N, Towell ME, Garfield RE: Myometrial electrophysiologic activity and gap junctions in the pregnant rabbit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;149:485–491.
    External Resources
  20. Garfield RE, Sims S, Daniel EE: Gap junction: Their presence and necessity in myometrium during parturition. Science 1977;198:958–960.
    External Resources
  21. Germain G, Cabrol D, Visser A, Sureau C: Electrical activity of the pregnant uterus in the cynomolgus monkey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:513–519.
    External Resources
  22. Harding R, Poore ER, Bailey A, Thorburn GD, Jansen CAM, Nathanielsz PW: Electromyographic activity of the nonpregnant and pregnant sheep uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:448–457.
    External Resources
  23. Hsing Wen Hsu, Figueroa JP, Honnebier MBMO, Wentworth R, Nathanielsz P: Power spectrum analysis of myometrial electromyogram and intrauterine pressure changes in the pregnant rhesus monkey in late gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:467–473.
    External Resources
  24. Pajntar M, Rudel D: Changes in electromyographic activity of the cervix after stimulation of labour with oxytocin. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991;31:204–207.
  25. Kao CY: Electrophysiological properties of uterine smooth muscle; in Wynn RM, Jollie WP (eds): Biology of the Uterus, ed 2. New York, Plenum Medical, 1987, pp 403–454.
  26. Pajntar M, Valentincic B, Verdenik I: The effect of pethidine hydrochloride on the cervical muscles in the active phase of labour. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1993;20:145–150.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: August 13, 1999
Issue release date: August 1999

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0378-7346 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-002X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GOI


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP